JUNIUS UNMASKED OB, THOMAS PAINE THE AUTHOR OF THE LETTERS OF JUlSriUS, DECLARATION OF mOEPENDENCE, Non stat diutius nominis umbra, I WASHINGTON, D.C.: JOHN GRAY & CO., PUBLISHERS. 1872. 11 1 ^>^■; :?3 M^- Entered according to Act ot Congress, in the year 1871, by JOHN GRAY & CO., In the OfRce of the Libi-arian of Congress, at Washington. ')' PREFACE, One hundred years ago to-day, Junius wrote as follows: "The man who fairly and completely answers this argu- ment, shall have my thanks and my applause. . . . Grateful as I am to the good Being whose bounty has imparted to me this reasoning intellect, whatever it is, I hold myself proportionably indebted to him from whose enlightened understanding another ray of knowledge com- municates to mine. But neither should I think the most exalted faculties of the human mind a gift worthy of the Divinity, nor any assistance in the improvement of them a subject of gratitude to my fellow-creatures, if I were not satisfied that really to inform the understanding corrects and enlarges the heart." , These were the concluding words of his last Letter. So say I now, and I make them the preface to an argument which now sets the great apostle of liberty right before the world. They serve, like a literary hyphen, to connect the two ages— his own with this ; and the two lives — the masked with the open one; in both of which ages and lives he did good to mankind, and that mightily. "Washington, D. C, January 21, 1872. PA^ET I. INTRODUCTION. The literary work which survives a century has un- common merit. Time has set the seal of approval upon it. It has passed its probation and entered the ages. A century has just closed upon the work of Junius. The causes which produced it, either in act or person, have long since passed away. The foolish king, the corrupt minister, and the prostituted legislature are for- gotten, or only recalled to be despised ; but the work of Junius, startling in thought, daring in design, bris- tling with satire, a consuming fire to those he attacked, remains to be admired for its principles, and to be studied for its beauty and strength. The times in which Junius wrote were big with events. The Seven Years' War had just closed with shining victories to Prussia and England. Frederic, with an unimpaired nation and a permanent peace, it left with a good heart and much personal glory ; but George III., with India and America in his hands, with the plunder of a great conquest to distribute to a greedy and licentious court, it left pious, but simple. Great wars disturb the masses. They awaken them (7) 8 JUNIUS UNMASKED. from the plodding, dull routine of physical labor, and, thrusting great questions of conquest and defense, of justice and honor, before them, agitate them into thought. Conditions change; new ideas take the place of old ones, and a revolution in thought and action fol- lows. But a war of ideas, starting from principles of peace, brings the enslaved again to the sword, and this crisis is termed a revolution. Junius wrote at the dawn of the age of revolutions. The war of ideas was waged against priestcraft, and skepticism was the result. Voltaire had struck fable from history with the pen of criticism, and a scientific method here dawned upon history. Rousseau's democ- racy had entered the hearts of the down-trodden in France, and, a wandering exile, he had spread the con- tagion in England. George Berkeley, the Irish idealist, had just died, and the Scotch Thomas Reid arose with the weapon of common sense to test the metaphysician's ideas. Common Sense was, in the strictest sense, revo- lutionary, and, under the tyranny of king, lords, and commons, meant war. It was not a phrase without meaning, but a principle proclaimed, and it passed more readily into the understanding of the common people because conveyed in common speech. When Reid said, " I despise philosophy, and renounce its guidance ; let my soul dwell in common sense,'' he illuminated all Britain and America. The philosophy of common sense entered the professor's chair, invaded the pulpit, and, having passed thence into the humblest cottage, soon took a higher range — it went immediately up and knocked at the king's gate. It would be false to say it found admittance there. It was only because there had JNTROD UOTION. % been a new world opened as an asylum for the oppressed of every land, that it did not sweep kings and monarchs from all the high places in Europe. At this time, too, Mr. Pitt, the great commoner, the friend of common sense and English liberty, in his old age, war-worn and sick, had compromised with his vanity for a title. In his great fall from Pitt to Chat- ham, from the people to a peerage, he gained nothing but lost his good name. He exchanged worth for a bauble, and a noble respect for the contempt of nobles and the sorrows of the people. Mr. Pitt had departed, Lord Chatham was passing away; and in any assault by a trafficking ministry and corrupt legislature upon the people's rights, there was no one left to bend the bow at the gates. To tax the colonies became the settled plan of king, ministers, and parliament. The tax was easily imposed, but c6uld not be enforced. Freedom had long before been driven to America, and, in a line of direct descent, her blood had been transmitted from mother to son. The true sons of freedom now stood shoulder to shoul- der, and, looking forward to independence, claimed to have rights as men, which king and lords would not concede to subjects. The Stamp Act was passed and repealed, and a Test Act substituted. England refused to compel the colonies to give up their money without their consent, but menaced them, and consoled herself with these words : ^^ The king in parliament hath full power to hind the colonies in all things whatsoever. ''^ Having surrendered the fact, she indulged in declama- tion, and the world laughed at her folly. Like a fretful and stupid mother demanding a favor of her son grown 10 JUNIUS UNMASKED. to manhood, and, being refused^ persists in scolding and shaking the fist at him, as if he still wore a baby's frock. At this juncture Junius wrote his Letters. The cir- cumstances called him forth. He was a child of fate. He spoke to the greatest personages, assaulted the strongest power, and advocated the rights of man before the highest tribunal then acknowledged on earth. This he could not do openly, and what he said came as with tlie power of a hidden god. There is no evidence that Junius ever revealed himself. ^'I am the sole deposi- tory of my own secret, and it shall perish with me.^'" This he said and religiously kept. But his was the age which demanded it. He also said: '^ Whenever Junius appears, he must encounter a host of enemies." One hundred years have passed since he said this, but this "host'' is less to be feared now than when he wrote. No one now can injure him, and there are few who would assault his grave. It is time to unmask Junius, and though still to be hated, I will reveal the enemy of kings and the friend of man. The reforms he advocated for England are partly accomplished, and the principles he taught, if not adopted there, have been established in America. He left no child to bear his name, but he was the father of a nation. The unimpaired inheritance was his thoughts and principles; these he transmitted, not alone to this nation, but to the world— /or the world was his country. METHOD. In the investigation of a subject so startling and novel, and especially when it leads to the criticism of a work which has found favor with the public^ and now to be attributed to an author who has been publicly condemned^ it becomes the critic to state clearly the plan of his argument, what he designs to do, and how he intends to do it. I therefore ask: Who was Junius? I answer: Thomas Paine. The object of this book is to prove this, and possibly to demonstrate it. To do this, I shall follow as closely as possible the order of events, giving parallels and coincidences in character, conduct, and composition of the masked and the open life. I do not fear as to the proof of my proposition, but I shall aim higher, I shall try to demonstrate by the overwhelming weight of facts. Proof produces belief, demonstration knowledge. The innocent have been hanged on the evidence of proof, but a fact is established by demonstration. Demonstration follows proof, and knowledge follows belief; and ascending from the indi- vidual to mankind, we find the age of reason to succeed the age of faith. Science dwells in demonstration, and establishes principles from observed facts. Why may there not be a scientific criticism? To arrive at this (11) 12 JUNIUS UNMASKED. the writer must ascend to that eminence in feeling where the opposing prejudices of mankind can not reach him; he must rise above praise or censure, he must dwell alone in the light of reason, he must be a child of Truth. Vain, however,' would it be to expect to find himself or a public devoid of prejudice. This is im- possible, for prejudice is produced by strong conviction. It is a feeling which, like a magnet, points as the elec- tric force directs. To counteract this force is to destroy the magnet. It is those who think deeply, and have investigated thoroughly, who have an enlightened pre- judice, and those who take upon authority what others tell them, who have a blind prejudice; but those who neither think nor investigate for themselves may truly be said to have no prejudice. My object is to convince the understanding and thereby build up a prejudice in favor of my proposition, which shall have a foundation of fact and argument, not to be removed, and to be but little disturbed. The world is my jury, they shall decide upon the facts. Lord Bacon gave the world a method, this method is also mine : Let FACTS RE\^EAL THE INWARD TEUTH OF KATTJEE. MYSTERY. There is a scarcity of facts, a painful obscurity connected with that part of Mr. Paine's life before he removed to America. In fact, history has given him to the world, as almost beginning life on his arrival at Philadelphia, near the close of the year 1774. At this time, in the full stature of manhood, a little less than forty years of age, we find him without a personal his- tory, without any events in life sufficient to predicate his after life upon. Can the great life to come rest on nothing? How came that mighty mind so fully stored with history, so deeply analytic, so skilled in literature and science, so perfect in the art of expressing ideas, so highly disciplined and finely equipped, ready to do battle against kings and ministers and in behalf of hu- man rights? Whence came that mighty pen, which has often been acknowledged to have done more for human freedom than the .sword of Washington ? Why this dumb silence of history? There comes to us no thought of Mr. Paine worth recording prior to this time. The proud and imposing superstructure stands on a basis fit and substantial, but it rises out of the depths of mystery. And what little we do know of him prior to this time, aside from the great fact of his birth, is only a series of minor facts, with great blanks not even capable of being filled up by the imagination. (13) 14 JUNIUS UNMASKED. When a lad he went to school, but how long he went, or with what proficiency he studied, nobody knows. At sixteen he went aboard a privateer, but how long he served, or what made him quit the service, nobody knows. At twenty-seven he enters the employ of the English government as an exciseman, but was dismissed in a little over a year, nobody knows why. He now teaches school in Loudon a year, but nobody knows with wdiat success, or what were his accomplishments. He now quits London and letters, and the society of the learned, to return to the same petty office from which he had been dismissed, and for the trifling salary of less than fifty pounds a year. This office he now holds eight years more. Only a solitary ray of light illuminates this long period, when in the full tide of life. The chronicler renders it insignificant by a sin- gle dash of the j3en. It is closed with. another dis- missal and dismal mystery. He now forever separates from his wife upon amicable terms, nobody knows why. During their after lives they neither of them marry, and never speak disrespectfully of each other. He leaves her all the property, and often sends her money during his after life. This obscure and twice dis- missed English exciseman^ it is said, now goes to talk with Benjamin Franklin, minister at the court of St. James, for several of the colonies ; and, by what means nobody knows, obtains letters of the highest com- mendation, as an introduction to America, from her greatest and most honored citizen. A few months afterward Benjamin Franklin places in the hands of Mr. Paine important documents, for him to write a history of the political troubles and a defense of the MYSTERY. 15 colonies. A mighty work, worthy of a greater than Franklin ! These facts stagger credulity. An ob- scure English exciseman, whose life is yet a blank, who has never been an author, save perhaps of some fugitive pamphlet to demand more pay for excise of- ficers, is introduced to America, and is solicited and in- trusted by America's greatest writer, thinker, patriot, and statesman, to do America's greatest work, and that work, too, which shall decide forever the fate of a world. Franklin ! by what mysterious gift of divina- tion hast thou found thy man ? Is there no child of America among all the sons of Freedom equal to the task ? Where art thou thyself? But the man Frank- lin found had no need of books or his documents. This obscure Englishman had the facts in his memory, the wrongs in his heart, the logic in his reason, and he thought for himself. His work was half written before Franklin had furnished him with the ^' neces- sary papers,'' and as a New Year's gift surprised the learned doctor with the first pamphlet of Common Sense. The appearance of this greatest of political works which has blessed a world, with all the attending cir- cumstances — the obscure life of Paine, the few wild events connected with it, the unprecedented action of Franklin, the introduction to the world of a profound thinker and almost perfect writer in the full ripeness of his intellect, and the beginning of an unceasing brilliant literary life at its meridian, are mysteries, save in this instance, unknown to history. Common Sense is a child of mystery. It is the best of this great author's productions. He himself so considered it, for he directs 16 JUNIUS UNMASKED, that his tombstone shall bear the simple inscription, Thomas Paine, author of Common Sense. That Thomas Paine should have lived an easy, idle life, without any great effort in thought, study, or com- position, for fifteen years immediately preceding the appearance of Common Sense, is what no writer, or thinker, or student, or statesman will believe. Great works of genius do not come in this way, much less profound political writings. Even inspiration would desert the connection. And that the proud, ambitious, literary adventurer, who shall dedicate his life to the good of mankind, who shall wrest the power from priests and the scepter from kings, should content him- self to fill a poor and petty office under a king he despised, without some nobler object in view, and at that age too when the mind of man is the most aspir- ing, and drives to the greatest activity, is what no one who knows the heart of man, and the secret springs of action, will believe. But if it can be proven that Thomas Paine was Junius, then will every blank be filled and every mystery dispelled. There is no external evidence, direct in its nature, as to the authorship of Junius ; the evidence is internal. That the secret did not perish with Junius, no one can gainsay. But that he told it to no one, we are not at liberty to conclude. Time has sufficiently removed us from the scene of conflict. We are not bewildered with a multitude of claimants, with an army of witnesses for and against ; nor are we disturbed by the clamors of the public, and the hearsay evidence of belligerents. In this universal calm I will bring Junius forth to speak for himself. STATEMENT. The time occupied in writing the Lettees of Jun- ius was just three years. The first one is dated Jan- uary 21, 1769, and the last one January 21, 1772. They were written for the Public Advertiser, a news- paper printed in London, and were afterward revised and corrected by Junius. The edition which he cor- rected "contains all the letters of Junius, Philo Junius, and of Sir William Draper, and Mr. Home to Junius, with their respective dates, and according to the order in which they appeared in the Public Advertiser. ''^ There are seventy-eight in alL Of these, Junius wrote sixty ; thirty the first year, five the second, and twenty- five the third year. In these Lettees Junius fre- quently defends himself over the signature of Philo Junius, which he deemed indispensably necessary in answer to plausible objections. On this point Junius observes: "The subordinate character is never guilty of the indecorum of praising his principal. The fraud was innocent, and I always intended to explain it." These letters were an attack upon the king and minis- try, and a defense of the people, whose original rights had been invaded. If Thomas Paine wrote them, he was then an exciseman stationed at Lewes, about forty (17) 18 JUNIUS UNMASKED. miles south of London, and was just thirty-live years old when he completed them. I will now introduce to the reader Junius himself through his first letter, which was one of his most fin- ished productions, and contains the germs of all the rest. I will give also the comments of Chauncey A. Goodrich, D. D., formerly professor of Ehetoric in Yale College. These comments are to be found in the doctor's work, entitled British Eloquence. I do this for two reasons: to let the reader see what high value is placed on Junius by the learned who teach eloquence by example, and also that he may see the object, method, and style of Junius. I shall afterward add my own comments on the doctor's notes, setting him right when in error in matters of fact. This will fully open the question and prepare the reader for my argument. LETTER TO THE PRINTER OF THE PUBLIC ADVERTISER.* Sir, — The submission of a free people to the execu- tive authority of government is no more than a com- pliance with laws which they themselves have enacted. While the national honor is firmly maintained abroad, and while justice is impartially administered at home, * 1. Dated January 21, 1769. There is a great regu- larity in the structure of this letter. The first two paragraphs contain the exordium. The transition fol- lows in the third paragraph, leading to the main jproposition, which is contained in the fourth, viz., '^that the existing discontent and disasters of the nation were justly chargeable on the king and ministry/^ The next eight paragraphs are intended to give the proof of the proposition, by reviewing the chief depart- ments of government, and endeavoring to show the incompetency or mal-administration of the men to whom they were intrusted. A recapitulation follows in the last paragraph but one, leading to a restatement of the proposition in still broader terms. This is strengthened in the conclusion by the remark, that if the nation should escape from its desperate condition through some signal interposition of Divine Provi- dence, posterity would not believe the history of the times, or consider it possible that England should have survived a crisis " so full of terror and despair." 2 (19) I 20 JUNIUS UNMASKED. the obedience of the subject will be voluntary, cheerful, and, I might say, almost unlimited. A generous nation is grateful even for the preservation of its rights, and willingly extends the respect due to the office of a good prince into an affection for his person. Loyalty, in the heart and understanding of an Englishman, is a rational attachment to the guardian of the laws. Prej- udices and passion have sometimes carried it to a criminal length, and, whatever foreigners may imagine, we know that Englishmen have erred as much in a mistaken zeal for particular persons and families, as they ever did in defense of what they thought most dear and interesting to themselves. It naturally fills us with resentment to see such a temper insulted and abused.* In reading the history * 2. We have here the starting point of the exordium, as it lay originally in the mind of Junius, viz., that the English nation was " insulted and abused ^^ by the king and ministers. But this was too strong a state- ment to be brought out abruptly. Junius therefore went back, and prepared the way by showing in suc- cessive sentences, (1.) Why a free people obey the laws — "because they have themselves enacted them.^^ (2.) That this obedience is ordinarily cheerful, and almost unlimited. (3.) That such obedience to the guardian of the laws naturally leads to a strong affection for his person. (4.) That this aifection (as shown in their history) had often been excessive among the English, who were, in fact, peculiarly liable to a " mistaken zeal for particular persons and families.^^ Hence they were equally liable (this is not said, but implied) to have their loyalty imposed upon; and therefore the feeling then so prevalent was well founded, that the king in his rash counsels and reckless choice of ministers, must LETTER. 21 of a free people, whose rights have been invaded, we are interested in their cause. Our own feelings tell us how long they ought to have submitted, and at what moment it would have been treachery to themselves not to have resisted. How much warmer will be our resentment, if experience should bring the fatal exam- ple home to ourselves ! The situation of this country is alarming enough to have been taking advantage of the generous confidence of his people, and playing on the easiness of their temper. If so, they were indeed insulted and abused. The exordium, then, is a complete chain of logical deduction, and the case is fully made out, provided the popular feeling referred to was correct. And here we see where the fallacy of Junius lies, whenever he is in the wrong. It is in taking for granted one of the steps of his reasoning. He does not, in this case, even mention the feeling alluded to, in direct terms. He knew it was beating in the hearts of the people; his whole preceding train of thought was calculated to justify and inflame it, and he therefore leaps at once to the conclusion it involves, and addresses them as actually filled with resentment '^Ho see such a temper insulted and abused." The feeling, in this instance, was to a great extent well founded, and so far his logic is com- plete. In other cases his assumption is a false one. He lays hold of some slander of the day, some dis- torted statement of facts, some maxim which is only half true, some prevailing passion or prejudice, and dexterously intermingling them with a train of thought which in every other respect is logical and just, he hurries the mind to a conclusion which seems neces- sarily involved in the premises. Hardly any writer has so much art and plausibility in thus misleading the mind. 22 JUNIUS UNMASKED. rouse the attention of every man who pretends to a concern for the public welfare. Appearances justify suspicion ; and, when the safety of a nation is at stake, suspicion is a just ground of inquiry. Let us enter into it with candor and decency. Respect is due to the station of ministers ; and if a resolution must at last be taken, there is none so likely to be supported with firmness as that which has been adopted with modera- tion. The ruin or prosperity of a state depends so much upon the administration of its government, that, to be acquainted with the merit of a ministry, we need only observe the condition of the people. If we see them obedient to the laws, prosperous in their industry, united at home, and respected abroad, we may reason- ably presume that their affairs are conducted by men of experience, abilities, and virtue. If, on the contrary, we see a universal spirit of distrust and dissatisfaction, a rapid decay of trade, dissensions in all parts of the empire, and a total loss of respect in the eyes of foreign powers, we may pronounce, without hesitation, that the government of that country is weak, distracted, and corrupt. The multitude, in all countries, are patient to a certain point. Ill usage. may rouse their indigna- tion and hurry them into excesses, hut the original fault is in government.* Perhaps there never was an instance * 3. Here is the central idea of the letter — the prop-, osition to be proved in respect to the king and his ministers. The former part of this paragraph contains the major premise, the remainder the minor down to the last sentence, which brings out the conclusion in emphatic terms. In order to strengthen the minor, LETTER. 23 of a change in the circumstances and temper of a whole nation, so sudden and extraordinary as that which the misconduct of ministers has, within these very few years, produced in Great Britain. When our gracious sovereign ascended the throne, we were a flourishing and a contented people. If the personal vir- tues of a king could have insured the happiness of his subjects, the scene could not have altered so entirely as it has done. The idea of uniting all parties, of trying all characters, and distributing the of&ces of state by rotation, was gracious and benevolent to an extreme, though it has not yet produced the many salutary eifects which were intended by it. To say nothing of the wisdom of such plan, it undoubtedly arose from an unbounded goodness of heart, in which folly had no share. It was not a capricious partiality to new faces ; it was not a natural turn for low intrigue, nor was it the treacherous amusement of double and triple negotia- tions. No, sir ; it arose from a continued anxiety in the purest of all possible hearts for the general welfare.* which was the most important premise, he rapidly contrasts the condition of England before and after the king ascended the throne. In doing this, he dilates on those errors of the king which led to, and which account for, so remarkable a change. Thus the conclu- sion is made doubly strong. This union of severe logic with the finest rhetorical skill in filling out the premi- ses and giving them their utmost effect, furnishes an excellent model for the student in oratory. *4. In this attack on the king, there is a refined artifice, rarely if ever equaled, in leading the mind gradually forward from the slightest possible insinua- tion to the bitterest irony. First we have the " uniting 24 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Unfortunately for us, the event has not been answerable to the design. After a rapid succession of changes, we are reduced to that change which hardly any change can mend. Yet there is no extremity of distress which of itself ought to reduce a great nation to despair. It of all parties/' which is proper and desirable; next "trying all characters/' which suggests decidedly a want of judgment; then "distributing the offices of state by rotation,''^ a charge rendered plausible, at least, by the frequent changes of ministers, and involving (if true) a weakness little short of absolute fatuity. The way being thus prepared, what was first insinuated is now openly expressed in the next sentence. The word "/o%'' is applied to the conduct of the king of Eng- land in the face of his subjects, and the application rendered doubly severe by the gravest irony. Still, there is one relief. Allusion is made to his " unbounded goodness of heart,'' from which, in the preceding chain of insinuations, these errors of judgment had been deduced. The next sentence takes this away. It directly ascribes to the king, with an increased severity of ironical denial, some of the meanest passions of royalty, " a capricious partiality for new faces," a "natu- ral love of low intrigue/' "the treacherous amusement of double and triple negotiations ! " It is unnecessary to remark on the admirable precision and force of the language in these expressions, and, indeed, throughout the whole passage. There had been just enough in the king's conduct, for the last seven years, to make the people suspect all this, and to weaken or destroy their affection for the crown. It was all connected with that system of favoritism introduced by Lord Bute, which the nation so much abhorred. Nothing but this would have made them endure for a moment such an attack on their monarch, and especially the absolute mockery with which Junius concludes the whole, by speaking of LETTER. 25 is not the disorder, but the physician ; it is not a casual concurrence of calamitous circumstances, it is the per- nicious hand of government, which alone can make a whole people desperate. Without much political sagacity, or any extraordi- nary depth of observation, Ave need only mark how the principal departments of the state are bestowed [distributed], and look no farther for the true cause of every mischief that Uefalls us. The finances of a nation, sinking under its debts and expenses, are committed to a young nobleman already ruined by play.* Introduced to act under the auspices " the anxiety of the purest of all possible hearts for the general welfare!" His entire Letter to the king, with all the rancor ascribed to it by Burke, dops not contain so much bitterness and insult as are concentrated in this single passage. While we can not but condemn its spirit, we are forced to acknowledge that there is in this and many other passages of Junius, a rhetorical skill in the evolution of thought which was never sur- passed by Demosthenes. * 5. The Duke of Grafton, first Lord of the Treasury. It is unnecessary to remark on the dexterity of connect- ing with this mention of a treasury, '^ sinking under its debts and expenses,''" the idea of its head being a gambler loaded with his own debts, and liable contin- ually to new distresses and temptations from his love of play. The thought is wisely left here. The argu- ment which it implies would be weakened by any attempt to expand it. Junius often reminds us of the great Athenian orator, in thus striking a single blow, and then passing on to some other subject, as he does here to the apostasy of the Duke of Grafton, his incon- sistency, caprice, and irresolution. 26 JUNIUS UNMASKED. of Lord Chatham, and left at the head of affairs by that nobleman's retreat, lie became a minister by acci- dent; but, deserting the principles and professions which gave him a moment's popularity, we see him, from every honorable engagement to the public, an apostate by design. As for business, the world yet knows nothing of his talents or resolution, unless a wavering, wayward inconsistency be a mark of genius, and caprice a demonstration of spirit. It may be said, perhaps, that it is his Grace's province, as surely as it is his passion, rather to distribute than to save the public money, and that while Lord North is Chancellor of the Exchequer, the first Lord of the Treasury may be as thoughtless and extravagant as he pleases. I hope, however, he will not rely too much on the fertility of Lord North's genius for finance. His Lordship is yet to give us the first proof of his abilities. It may be candid to suppose that he has hitherto voluntarily concealed his talents; intending, perhaps, to astonish the world, when we least expect it, with a knowledge of trade, a choice of expedients, and a depth of resources equal to the necessities, and far beyond the hopes of his country. He must now exert the whole power of his capacity, if he would wish us to forget that, since he has been in office, no plan has been formed, no system adhered to, nor any one impor- tant measure adopted for the relief of public credit. If his plan for the service of the current year be not irrevocably fixed on, let me warn him to think serious- ly of consequences before he ventures to increase the public debt. Outraged and oppressed as we are, this nation will not bear, after a six years' peace, to see new LETTER. 27 millions borrowed, without any eventual diminution of debt or reduction of interest. The attempt might rouse a spirit of resentment, which might reach beyond the sacrifice of a minister. As to the debt upon the civil list, the people of England expect that it will not be paid without a strict inquiry how it was incurred.* If it must be paid by Parliament, let me advise the Chancellor of the Exchequer to think of some better expedient than a lottery. To support an expensive war, or in circumstances of absolute necessity, a lottery may perhaps be allowable ; but, besides that it is at all times the very worst way of raising money upon the people, I think it ill becomes the royal dignity to have the debts of a prince provided for, like the repairs of a country bridge or a decayed hospital. The manage- ment of the king's afiliirs in the House of Commons can not be more disgraced than it has been. A leading minister repeatedly called down for absolute ignorance — ridiculous motions ridiculously withdrawn — deliber- ate plans disconcerted, and a week's preparation of * 6. Within about seven years, the king had run up a debt of £513,000 beyond the ample allowance made for his expenses on the civil list, and had just applied, at the opening of Parliament, for a grant to pay it off. The nation were indignant at such overreaching. The debt, however, was paid this session, and in a few years there was another contracted. Thus it went on, from time to time, until 1782, when £300,000 more were paid, in addition to a large sum during the interval. At this time a partial provision was made, in connec- tion with Mr. Burke's plan of economical reform, for preventing all future encroachments of this kind on the public revenues. 28 JUNIUS UNMA8KED. graceful oratory lost in a moment^ give us some, though not an adequate idea of Lord North^s parliamentary abilities and influence.* Yet, before he had the mis- fortune of being Chancellor of the Exchequer, he was neither an object of derision to his enemies, nor of melancholy pity to his friends. A series of inconsistent measures has alienated the colonies from their duty as subjects and from their natural affection to their common country. When Mr. Grenville was placed at the head of the treasury, he felt the impossibility of Great Britain^s supporting such an establishment as her former successes had made in- dispensable, and, at the same time, of giving any sensi- ble relief to foreign trade and to the weight of the public debt. He thought it equitable that those parts of the empire which had benefited most by the ex- penses of i\\Q, war, should contribute something to the expenses of the peace, and he had no doubt of the con- stitutional right vested in Parliament to raise the con- tribution. But, unfortunately for this country, Mr. Grenville was at any rate to be distressed because he was minister, and Mr. Pitt and Lord Camden were to be patrons of America, because they were in opposi- tion. Their declaration gave spirit and argument to the colonies; and while, perhaps, they meant no more than the ruin of a minister, they in effect divided one- half of the empire from the other.f * 7. Notwithstanding these early difficulties, Lord North became at last a very dexterous and effective debater. fS. This attack on Lord Chatham and his friend shows the political affinities of Junius. He believed LETTER. 29 Under one administration the Stamp Act is made, under the second it is repealed, under the third, in spite of all experience, a new mode of taxing the colonies is invented, and a question revived, which ought to have been buried in oblivion. In these circumstances, a new office is established for the business of the Plantations, with Mr. Grenville and Lord Rockingham in the right of Great Britain to tax America ; and in referring to Mr. Grenville's attempt to enforce that right by the Stamp Act, he adopts his usual course of interweaving an argument in its favor into the language used.^ He thus prepares the way for his censures on Lord Chat- ham and Lord Camden, affirming that they acted on the principle that ^^ Mr. Grenville was at any rate to be distressed because he was minister and they were in opposition," thus implying that they were actuated by factious and selfish views in their defense of America. About a year after this letter was written, Lord Rock- ingham was reconciled to Lord Chatham and Lord Camden, and all united to break dowu the Grafton ministry. Junius now turned round and wrote his cel- ebrated eulogium on Lord Chatliam, contained in his fifty-fourth letter, in which he says, '^ Recorded honors shall gather round his monument, and thicken over him. It is a solid fabric, and will support the laurels that adorn it. I am not conversant in the language of panegyric. These praises are extorted from me; but they will wear well, for they have been dearly earned." The last of his letters was addressed to Lord Camden, in which he says, " I turn with pleasure from that barren waste, in which no salutary plant takes root, no verdure quickens, to a character fertile, as I wil- lingly believe, in every great and good qualification." Political men have certainly a peculiar faculty of view- ing the characters of others under very different lights, as they happen to affect their own interests and feelings.^ BO JUNIUS UNMASKED. and the Earl of Hillsborough called forth^ at a most critical season, to govern America. The choice at least announced to us a man of superior capacity and knowl- edge. Whether he be so or not, let his dispatches as far as they have appeared^ let his measures as far as they have operated, determine for him. In the former we have seen strong assertions without proof, declama- tion without argument, and violent censures without dignity or moderation, but neither correctness in the composition, nor judgment in the design. As for his measures, let it be remembered that he was called upon to conciliate and unite, and that, when he entered into office, the most refractory of the colonies were still dis- posed to proceed by the constitutional methods of peti- tion and remonstrance. Since that period they have been driven into excesses little short of rebellion. Pe- titions have been hindered from reaching the throne, and the continuance of one of the principal assemblies put upon an arbitrary condition, which, considering the temper they were in, it was impossible they should com- ply with, and which would have availed nothing as to the general question if it had been complied with.* So violent, and I believe I may call it so unconstitu- tional an exertion of the prerogative, to say nothing of the weak, injudicious terms in which it was conveyed, gives us as humble an opinion of his Lordship's capaci- * 9. The ^^ arbitrary condition '^ was that the General Court of Massachusetts should rescind one of their own resolutions and expunge it from their records. The whole of this passage in relation to Hillsborough is as correct in point of fact, as it is well reasoned and finely expressed. LETTER. 31 ty as it does of his temper and moderation. While we are at peace with other nations^ our military force may perhaps be spared to support the Earl of Hillsborough's measures in America. Whenever that force shall be necessarily withdrawn or diminished, the dismission of such a minister will neither console us for his impru- dence, nor remove the settled resentment of a people, who, complaining of an act of the legislature, are out- raged by an unwarrantable stretch of prerogative, and, supporting their claims by argument, are insulted with declamation. Drawing lots would be a prudent and reasonable method of appointing the officers of state, compared to a late disposition of the secretary's office. Lord Koch- ford was acquainted with the affairs and temper of the Southern courts; Lord Weymouth was equally quali- fied for either department. By what unaccountable caprice has it happened, that the latter, who pretends to no experience whatsoever, is removed to the most important of the two departments, and the former, by preference, plackl in an office where his experience can be of no use to him?* Lord Weymouth had distin- guished himself in his first employment by a spirited, * 10. The changes here censured had taken place about three months before. The office of Foreign Secretary for the Southern Department was made vaqant by the resignation of Lord Shelburne.^ Lord Rochford, who had been minister to France, and thus made "acquainted with the temper of the Southern courts," ought natu- rally to have been appointed (if at all) to this depart- ment. Instead of this he was made Secretary of the Northern Department, for which he had been prepar^ by no previous knowledge ; while Lord Weymouth was 32 JUNIUS UNMASKED. if not judicious conduct. He had animated the civil magistrate beyond the tone of civil authority, and had directed the operations of the army to more than mil- itary execution. Recovered from the errors of bis youth, from the distraction of play, and the bewitching smiles of Burgundy, behold him exerting the whole strength of his clear, unclouded faculties in the service of the crown. It was not the heat of midnight ex- cesses, nor ignorance of the laws, nor the furious spirit of the house of Bedford ; no, sir ; when this respecta- ble minister interposed his authority between the magistrate and the people, and signed the mandate on wliich, for aught he knew, the lives of thousands de- pended, he did it from the deliberate motion of his heart, supported by the best of his judgment.* taken from the Home Department, and placed in the Southern, being *' equally qualified ^^ [that is, wholly unqualified by any "experience whatsoever'^] for either department in the Foreign office, whether Southern or Northern. ^ *11. As Secretary of the Home Department, Lord Weymouth had addressed a letter to the magistrates of London, early in 1768, advising them to call in the military, provided certain disturbances in the streets should continue. The idea of setting the soldiery to fire on masses of unarmed men has always been abhor- rent to the English nation. It was, therefore, a case admirably suited to the purposes of this Letter. In using it to inflame the people against Lord Weymouth, Junius charitably supposes that he was not repeating the errors of his youth — that he was neither drunk, nor ignorant of what he did, nor impelled by "the furious spirit '^ of one of the proudest families of the realm — LETTER. 33 It has lately been a fashion to pay a compliment to the bravery and generosity of the Commander-in-chief [the Marquess of Granby] at the expense of his under- standing. They who love him least make no question of his courage, while his friends dwell chiefly on the facility of his disposition. Admitting him to be as brave as a total absence of all feeling and reflection can make him, let us see what sort of merit he derives from the remainder of his character. If it be generosity to accumulate in his own person and family a number of lucrative employments; to provide, at the public ex- pense, for every creature that bears the name of Man- ners; and, neglecting the merit and services of the rest of the army, to heap promotions upon his favorites and dependents, the present Commander-in-chief is the most generous man alive. Nature has been sparing of her gifts to this noble lord; but where birth and fortune all of which Lord Weymouth would certainly say — and therefore (which his Lordship must also admit) that he did, from " the deliberate motion of his heart, supported by the best of his judgment,^^ sign a paper which the great body of the people considered as author- izing promiscuous murder, and which actually resulted in the death of fourteen persons three weeks after. The whole is so wrought up as to create the feeling, that Lord Weymouth was in both of these states of mind — that he acted with deliberation in carrying out the dictates of headlong or drunken passion. All this, of course, is greatly exaggerated. Severe measures did seem indispensable to suppress the mobs of that day, and, whoever stood forth to direct them, must of necessity incur the popular indignation. Still, it was a question among the most candid men, whether milder means might not have been effectual. 34 JUNIUS UNMASKED. ' are united, we expect the noble pride and independence of a man of spirit, not the servile, humiliating com- plaisance of a courtier. As to the goodness of his heart, if a proof of it be taken from the facility of never refus- ing, Avhat conclusion shall we draw from the indecency of never performing? And if the discipline of the army be in any degree preserved, what thanks are due to a man whose cares, notoriously confined to filling up va- cancies, have degraded the office of Commander-in-chief into [that of] a broker of commissions.^ With respect to the navy, I shall only say that this country is so highly indebted to Sir Edward HawdvC, *12. The Marquess of Granby, personally considered, was perhaps the most popular member of the cabinet, with the exception of Sir Edward Hawke. He was a warm-hearted man, of highly social qualities and gener- ous feelings. As it was the object of Junius to break down the ministry, it was peculiarly necessary for him to blast and destroy his popularity. This he attempts to do by discrediting the character of the marquess, as a man of firmness, strength of mind, and disinterested- ness in managing i\\Q concerns of the army. This at- tack is distinguished for its plausibility and bitterness. It is clear that Junius was in. some way connected with the army or with the War Department, and that in this situation he had not only the means of very exact in- formation, but some private grudge against the Com- mander-in-chief."^ His charges and insinuations are greatly overstrained; but it is certain that the army was moldering away at this time in a manner which left the country in a very defenseless condition. Lord Chat- ham showed this by incontestible evidence, in his speech on the Falkland Islands, delivered about a year after this Letter was written. LETTER. 35 that no expense shoold be spared to secure him an hon- orable and affluent retreat. The pure and impartial administration of justice is perhaps the firmest bond to secure a cheerful submission of the people, and to engage their affections to govern- ment. It is not sufficient that questions of private right or wrong are justly decided, nor that judges are superior to the vileness of pecuniary corruption. Jef- fries himself, when the court had no interest, w^as an upright judge. A court of justice may be subject to an- other sort of bias, more important and pernicious, as it reaches beyond the interest of individuals and affects the whole community. A judge, under the influence of government, may be honest enough in the decision of private causes, yet a traitor to the public. When a victim is marked out by the ministry, this judge will offer himself to perform the sacrifice. He will not scruple to prostitute his dignity, and betray the sanctity of his office, whenever an arbitrary point is to be car- ried for government, or the resentment of a court to be gratified. These principles and proceedings, odious and con- temptible as they are, in effect are no less injudicious. A wise and generous people are roused by every appear- ance of oppressive, unconstitutional measures, whether those measures are supported openly by the power of government, or masked under the forms of a court of justice. Prudence and self-preservation will oblige the most moderate dispositions to make common cause, even with a man whose conduct they censure, if they see him persecuted in a way which the real spirit of the laws 3 36 JUNIUS UNMASKED. will not justify. The facts on which these remarks are founded are too notorious to require an application.* This, sir, is the detail. In one view, behold a nation overwhelmed with debt; her revenues wasted ; her trade declining; the affections of her colonies alienated; the duty of the magistrate transferred to the soldiery; a gallant army, which never fought unwillingly but against their fellow-subjects, moldering away for want of the direction of a man of common abilities and spirit; and, in the last instance, the administration of justice become odious and suspected to the whole body of the people. This deplorable scene admits of but one addi- tion — that we are governed by counsels, from wdiich a *13. It is unnecessary to say that Lord Mansfield is here pointed at. No one now believes that this great jurist ever did the things here ascribed to him by Jun- ius.^ All that is true is, that he was a very high Tory, and was, therefore, naturally led to exalt the pre- rogatives of the crown ; and that he was a very politic man (and this was the great failing in his character), and therefore unwilling to oppose the king or his min- isters, when he knew in heart they were wrong. This was undoubtedly the case in respect to the issuing of a general warrant for apprehending Wilkes, which he ought publicly to have condemned ; but, as he remained silent, men naturally considered him, in his character of Chief Justice, as having approved of the course di- rected by the king. Hence Mansfield was held respon- sible for the treatment of Wilkes, of whom Junius here speaks in very nearly the terms used by Lord Chatham, as a man whose " conduct" he censured, but with whom every moderate man must " make common cause," when he was "persecuted in a way which the real spirit of the laws will not justify." LETTER, 37 reasonable man can expect no remedy but poison, no relief but death. If, by tlie immediate interposition of Providence, it were [be] possible for us to escape a crisis so full of terror and despair, posterity will not believe the history of the present times. They will either con- clude that our distresses were imaginary, or that we had the good fortune to be governed by men of acknowl- edged integrity and wisdom. They will not believe it possible that their ancestors could have survived or re- covered from so desperate a condition, while a Duke of Grafton was Prime Minister, a Lord North Chancellor of the Exchequer, a Weymouth and a Hillsborough Secretaries of State, a Granby Commander-in-chief, and a Mansfield chief criminal judge of the kingdom. Junius. COMMENTS ON THE DOCTOR'S NOTES. Note S, p. 28. (1.) The doctor is here in error. In no place does Junius use language which can even be distorted into an argument in favor of enforcing the right to tax America. He here attacks the opposition or minority because they had from selfish motives di- vided one-half of the empire from the other. He states the views of Mr. Grenville on the subject of taxing the colonies^ but not his oivn. Elsewhere, however, he does, and this is his language: "Junius considers the right of taxing the colonies by an act of the British Legisla- ture as a speculative right merely, never to be exerted, nor ever to be renounced. ^^ — Let. 63. But Camden and Pitt denied the right — Bancroft, vol. v., pp. 395, 403. Junius stood between the two parties in regard to taxing the colonies, hence could not be a partisan. (2.) Here again is an error. Rockingham and Chat- ham led the two wings of the minority. The former was in favor of septennial, the latter of triennial parliaments. — Let. 52. Herein Junius agreed with Chatham, and hence could not be a partisan of Rocking- ham. — Let. 53. But because Junius eulogized Chat- ham, he was said to be a partisan of Chatham, which he afterwards contradicts when he compiled his letters, in a note to the name of Mr. Pitt in his first letter, and (38) COMMENTS. 39 is as follows : ^' And yet Junius has been called the partisan of Lord Chatham." In Letter 53, Junius denies partisanship to both. Neither did he agree with Lord Camden, and mildly censures him for his action. — Let. 59. Junius was never a partisan, as will be fully proven hereafter. This shows how limited a knowledge the doctor had of Junius, and also how unfit to comment on these matters of fact. He had not even caught the design or spirit of Junius. He was advocating the cause of the people and not the cause of any party or faction. Note 10, p. 31. (3.) Shelburne was dismissed; he did not resign. This is a grave error in the doctor, when the conduct of king and ministers is the theme, and when we are studying the motives and character of the writer. As I wish to excite inquiry, in the mind of the reader, to lead him to a just method of criticism and investigation, I will briefly state how I detected even so apparently trifling a mistake as the above. The first sentence of the paragraph is as follows: "Drawing lots would be a prudent and reasonable method of appointing the ofiicers of state compared to a late disposition of the secretary's oflice." After reading this, and then the note, it occurred to me that the king should not be so severely censured for any mistake in judgment in filling an office sud- denly left vacant by a resignation. If the writer did so he was malignant, and ought to be condemned by all liberal-minded and good people. And after having studied thoroughly the character of Mr. Paine, for I now supposed him to be the author, I said : al- though the language is his, the spirit is not. I confess 40 JUNIUS UNMASKED. this staggered me not a little^ but in a few moments I regained myself^ after reading these lines from Ban- croft's History, vol. vi., pp. 214, 215, 216: "Yield- ing to the daily importunities of the king, Grafton prepared to dismiss Shelburne. . . . Shelburne was removed. The resignation of Chatham instantly fol- lowed The removal of Shelburne opened the cabinet to the ignorant and incapable Earl of Roch- ford, who owed his selection to the mediocrity of his talents and the impossibility of finding a secretary of state more thoroughly submissive." This was satis- factory to me. What was evidence against my hy- pothesis by the note of Doctor Goodrich, was evidence in favor of it when the facts Avere known. This shows how careless men become who do not have in view a scientific method, and who do not search after the soul of things, but content themselves with a super- ficial reading. I would here warn the reader to ques- tion the statement of any writer which does not come with more than a plausible degree of truth. The day of historic fable is past. History is a science. The man of science takes but little on authority not capable of proof, and it is through this scientific method that the humblest mind, capable of rational judgment, becomes supreme over itself. Note 12, p. 34. (4.) That Junius had a private grudge against Lord Granby, is an affirmation not suj^ported by the facts. Junius himself says, in a note to Let- ter 7 : '^The death of Lord Granby was lamented by Junius. He undoubtedly owed some compensations to the public, and seemed determined to acquit himself of' them. In private life he was unquestionably that good COMMENTS. 41 man, who, for the interest of his country, ought to have been a great one. I speak of him now without partiality. I never spoke of him tvith resentment. His mistakes in public conduct did not arise either from want of sentiment, or want of judgment, but in general from the difficulty of saying 7io to the bad people who surrounded him.'^ Note 13, p. 36. (5.) To which I reply: every student of history does believe just the things ascribed to Lord Mansfield by Junius, and as the doctor has given us no authority in support of his rash affirmation, I will dismiss him to the tender mercies of those who will search for themselves. ESTIMATE OF JUNIUS, BY MR. BURKE.* How comes this JuKius to have broke through the cobwebs of the ]aw, and to range uncontrolled, un- punished, through the land ? The myrmidons of the court have been long, and are still, pursuing him in vain. They will not spend their time upon me, or you, or you. No; they disdain such vermin, when the mighty boar of the forest that has broken through all their toils, is before them. But what will all their efforts avail? No sooner has he wounded one than he lays another dead at his feet. For my part, when I saw his attack upon the king, I own my blood ran cold. I thought that he had ventured too far,- and there was an end of his triumphs. Not that he had not asserted many truths. Yes, sir, there are in that composition many bold truths, by which a wise prince might profit. It was the rancor and venom with which I was struck. In these respects the North Briton is as much inferior to him as in strencrth, wit, and judgment. But while I expected in this daring flight his final ruin and fall, behold him rising still higher, and coming down souse upon both houses of Parliament. Yes, he did make you his quarry, and *rrom a speech delivered in the House of Commons. (42) ESTIMATE BY MR. BUBKE. 43 you still bleed /rom the wounds of his talons. You crouched, and still crouch, beneath his rage. Nor has he dreaded the terrors of your brow, sir ;* he has at- tacked even you — he has — and I believe you have no reason to triumph in the encounter. In short, after carrying away our Royal Eagle in his pounces, and dashing him against a rock, he has laid you pros- trate. Kings, Lords, and Commons are but the sport of his fury. Were he a member of this House, what might not be expected from his knowledge, his firm-' ness, and integrity ? He would be easily known by his contempt of all danger, by his penetration, by his vigor. Nothing would escape his vigilance and activity. Bad ministers could conceal nothing from his sagacity ; nor could promises or threats induce him to conceal any thing from the public. * Sir Fletcher Norton, Speaker of the House, was distinguished for the largeness of his overhanging eye- brows. SOCIAL POSITION. What was the position of Joniiis in society? Was he a man of fortune or of hnmble means? Was he a peer, or the leader of a party or faction, or was he one of the common people? Let Junius tell. In his reply to Sir William Draper, he says: '"^I will not contend with you in point of composition — you are a scholar, Sir William, and, if I am truly informed, you write Latin with almost as much purity as English. Suffer me then (for I am a plain, unlettered man) to continue that style of interrogation which suits my capacity.^^ — Let. 7. In the following the italics are Junius\ He had been upbraided by Sir William, for his assumed sig- nature, and replied: "I should have hoped that even my name might carry some authority with it, if I had not seen how very little weight or consideration a printed paper receives, even from the respectable signa- ture of Sir William Draper.'^— Let. 3. Again, he says: " Mine, I confess, are humble labors. I do not presume to instruct the learned, but simply to inform the body of the people, and I prefer that channel of conveyance which is likely to spread farthest among theni.^^ — Let. 22. Again: ^^Welbore Ellis, what say you? Is this the law of Parliament, or is it not? I am a plain man, sir, and can not follow you through the phlegmatic forms of an oration. Speak out, Gildrig! Say yes or no." — (44) SOCIAL POSITION. 45 Let. 47. Again: '^I speak to the people as one of the people." — Let. 58. In Let. 57 he says he is a ^^ stranger " to the Livery of London. He says, also, in Let. 25, to Sir William Draper: ''I believe, sir, you will never know me. A considerable time must certainly elapse before we are personally acquainted." This language is not equivocal. They neither of them personally knew the other. In Let. 18 he says he is not personally known to Mr. Grenville, a member of the House of Commons. Nor was he a collegian or lawyer. In Let. 53 he says: ''I speak to facts with which all of us are conversant. I speak to men and to their experience, and will not descend to answer the little sneering soph- istries of a collegian." And again: "This may be logic at Cambridge, or at the treasury, but among men of sense and honor it is folly or villainy in the ex- treme." In Let. 7 he says to Sir William Draper: '^An academical education has given you an unlimited command over the most beautiful figures of speech. Masks, hatchets, racks, and vipers dance through your letters in all the mazes of metaphorical confusion." This is one of Junius' most withering sarcasms. In his Pre- face he says : " I am no lawyer by profession, nor do I pretend to be more deeply read than every English gen- tleman should be in the laws of his country." "I speak to the plain understanding of the people, and appeal to their honest, liberal construction of me." And of the Letters he says in the Dedication: "To me, orig- inally, they owe nothing but a healthy, sanguine con- stitution." Now, from the above facts, and the method of elimi- nation, it may be affirmed, Junius was not prominent be- 4g JUNIUS UNMASKED. fore the Euglisli nation. He was not a peer, nor mem- ber of the House of Commons. He could not have been an army officer. He was not a collegian, nor a lawyer. What, then, was he? Just what he says him- self to be : " one of the common people, with a healthy, sanguine constitution," but by no means without genius, education, and practical knowledge. JUNIUS NOT A PAETISAN. But let ns continue tlie method of elimination till we find his true position. Because we can not safely affirm what he was, till we know in some particulars, what he was not; and it is thus the spirit and object of Junius may be made visible. I affirm, therefore, Ju- nius was not a partisan. In proof of which I submit the following, from Let. 58, to the study of the reader : "'No man laments more sincerely than I do the un- happy differences which have arisen among the friends of the people, and divided them from each other. The cause, undoubtedly, suffers as well by the diminution of that strength which union carries along with it, as by the separate loss of personal reputation, which every man sustains when his character and CQuduct are fre- quently held forth in odious or contemptible colors. The differences are only advantageous to the common enemy* of the country. The hearty friends of the cause are provoked and disgusted. The lukewarm advocate avails himself of any pretense, to relapse into that indo- lent indifference about every thing that ought to inter- est an Englishman, so unjustly dignified with the title of moderation. The false, insidious partisan, who cre- ates or foments the disorder, sees the fruit of his dis- *King, ministers, and parliament. (47) 48 JUNIUS UNMASKED. honest industry ripen beyond his hopes, and rejoices in the promise of a banquet, only delicious to such an ap- petite as his own. * It is time for those who really mean the Cause and the People, who have no view to private advantage, and who have virtue enough to prefer the general good of the community to the gratification of personal animosities — it is time for such men to inter- pose. Let us try whether these fatal dissensions may not yet be reconciled; or, if that be impracticable, let us guard, at least, against the worst effects of division, and endeavor to persuade these furious partisans, if they will not consent to draw together, to be separately use- ful to that cause which thej all pretend to be attached to. Honor and honesty must not be renounced, although a thousand modes of right and wrong were to occupy the degrees of morality between Zeno and Epicurus. The fundamental principles of Christianity may still be preserved, though every zealous sectary adheres to his own exclusive doctrine, and pious ecclesiastics make it a part of their religion to persecute one another. The civil constitution, too — that legal liberty, that general creed which every Englishman professes — may still be supported, though Wilkes and Home, and Townsend and Sawbridge, should obstinately refuse to communi- cate; and even if the fathers of the Church — if Saville, Richmond, Camden, Rockingham, and Chatham should disagree in the ceremonies of their political worship, and even in the interpretation of twenty texts of Magna Charta. I speak to the people as one of the people. Let us employ these men in whatever departments their various abilities are best suited to, and as much to the advantage of the common cause as their different incli- NOT A PARTISAN. 49 nations ^Yill permit. They can not serve us without essentially serving themselves.'^ In the above Junius places himself on the side of the people, and clearly above all party or faction. But he continues : -' I have too much respect for the abilities of Mr. Home, to flatter myself that these gentlemen will ever be cordially re-united. It is not, however, unreason- able to expect, that each of them should act his separ- ate part with honor and integrity to the public. As for differences of opinion upon speculative questions, if we wait until they are reconciled, the action of human affairs must be suspended forever. But neither are we to look for perfection in any one man, nor for agree- ment among many. When Lord Chatham affirms that the authority of the British legislature is not su- preme over the colonies in the same sense in which it is supreme over Great Britain; when Lord Camden supposes a necessity (which the king is to judge of), and, founded upon that necessity, attributes to the crown a legal power (not given by the act itself) to suspend the operation of an act of the legislature, I listen to them both, with diffidence and respect, but without the smallest degree of conviction or assent. Yet I doubt not they delivered their real sentiments, nor ought they to be hastily condemned. ... I mean only to illustrate one useful proposition, which it is the intention of this paper to inculcate, ' That we should not generally reject the friendship or services of any man because he differs from us in a particular opinion.' This will not appear a superfluous caution, if we ob- serve the ordinary conduct of mankind. In public 50 JUNIUS UNMASKED. aifairs, there is the least chance of a perfect concur- rence of sentiment or inclination ; yet every man is able to contribute something to the common stock, and no man's contribution should be rejected. If individuals have no virtues, their vices may be of use to us. I care not with what principle the new-born patriot is animated, if the measures he supports are beneficial to the community. The nation is interested in his conduct. His motives are his own. The proper- ties of a patriot are perishable in the individual ; but there is a quick succession of subjects, and the breed is worth preserving. The spirit of the Americans may be an useful example to us. Our dogs and horses are only English upon English ground ; but patriotism, it seems, may be improved by transplanting. I will not reject a bill which tends to confine parliamentary privilege within reasonable bounds, though it should be stolen from the house of Cavendish, and introduced by Mr. Onslow. The features of the infant are a proof of the descent, and vindicate the ^ noble birth from the baseness of the adoption.* I will will- * That the reader may see the value Junius placed on such men as Onslow, I will place before him a short address of Junius to the king : " As you are a young man, sir, who ought to have a life of happi- ness in prospect ; as you are a husband, as you are a father (your filial duties I own have been religiously performed), is it bona fide for your interest or your honor, to sacrifice your domestic tranquillity, and to live in perpetual disagreement with your people, merely to preserve such a chain of beings as North, Barring- ton, Weymouth, Gower, Ellis, Onslow, Rigby, Jerry Dyson, and Sandwich? Their very names are a satire NOT A PABTISAN. 51 ingly accept a sarcasm from Colonel Barrd,* or a simile from Mr. Biirke.f Even the silent vote of Mr. Calcraft is worth reckoning in a division. What though he riots in the plunder of the army, and has only determined to be a patriot when he could not be a peer ? Let us profit by the assistance of such men while they are with us, and place them, if it be possi- ble, in the post of danger to prevent desertion. The wary Wedderburne, the pompous Suffolk^ never threw away the scabbard, nor ever went upon a forlorn hope. They always treated the king's servants as men with whom, some time or other, they might probably be in friendship. When a man who stands forth for the upon all government, and I defy the gravest of your chaplains to read the catalogue without laughing.^' * Isaac Barr^ defended the colonies and opposed tlie Stamp Act in the House of Commons with ^'a display of eloquence, which astonished all who heard him.'' When the ministry in 1771 tried to suppress the prac- tice of reporting the parliamentary debates, he de- nounced them and the House of Commons in the strongest and most sarcastic terms ; and after closing his speech he " left the house, calling upon every honest man to follow him." The letters of Junius were afterwards attributed to him. t "J. simile from Jfr. Burked One is here forcibly reminded how prophetic this sarcasm is of what Mr. Paine will say in liis Rights of Man, of Mr. Burke's imagery : ^^ I have now to follow Mr. Burke through a pathless wilderness of rhapsodies.'' . . . '^ His inten- tion was to make an attack on the French revolution ; but instead of proceeding with an orderly arrangement he has stormed it with a mob of ideas, tumbling over and destroying one another." 4 52 JUNIUS UNMASKED. public, has gone that length from which there is no practicable retreat, when he has given that kind of personal offense, which a pious monarch never par- dons, 1 then begin to think him in earnest, and that he will never have occasion to solicit the forgiveness of his country. But instances of a determination so en- tire and unreserved are rarely to be met with. Let us take mankind as they are ; let us distribute the vir- tues and abilities of individuals, according to the of- fices they affect; and when they quit the service, let us endeavor to supply their places with better men than we have lost. In this country there are always candidates enough for popular favor. The temple of fame is the shortest passage to riches and prefer- ment. Above all things, let me guard my countrymen against the meanness and folly of accepting of a trifling or moderate compensation for extraordinary and essen- tial injuries. Our enemy treats us as the cunning trader does the unskillful Indian ; they magnify their generosity, when they give us baubles of little propor- tionate value for ivory and gold. The same House of Commons who robbed the constituent body of their right of free election; who presume to make a law, un- der pretense of declaring it; who paid our good king's debts, without once inquiring how they were incurred; who gave thanks for repeated murders committed at home, and for national infamy incurred abroad; who screened Lord Mansfield; who imprisoned the magis- trates of the metropolis for asserting the subjects' right to the protection of the laws ; who erased a judicial rec- ord, and ordered all proceedings in criminal suit to be NOT A PARTISAN. 53 suspended ; this very House of Commons have gracious- ly consented that their own members may be compelled to pay their debts, and that contested elections shall, for the future, be determined with some decent regard to the merits of the case. The event of the suit is of no consequence to the crown. While parliaments are septennial, the purchase of the sitting member or of the petitioner, makes but the difference of a day. Conces- sions such as these, are of little moment to the sum of things; unless it be to prove that the worst of men are sensible of the injuries they have done us, and perhaps to demonstrate to us the imminent danger of our situa- tion. In the shipwreck of the state, trifles float, and are preserved; while every thing solid and valuable sinks to the bottom, and is lost forever." Nor did Junius ever receive pay for his writings. The charges made against him are thus briefly disposed of: ^^ To write for profit, without taxing the press ; to write for fame, and to be unknown ; to support the in- trigues of faction, and to be disowned as a dangerous auxiliary by every party in the kingdom, are contra- dictions which the minister must reconcile before I for- feit my credit with the public. I may quit the service, but it would be absurd to charge me with desertion. The reputation of these papers is an honorable pledge for my attachment to the people But, in truth, sir, I have left no room for an accommodation with the piety of St. James'. My offenses are not to be redeemed by recantation or repentance. On one side, our warmest patriots would disclaim me as a bur- then to their honest ambition. On the other, the vilest 54 JUNIUS UNMASKED. prostitution, if Junius could descend to it, would lose its natural merit and influence in the cabinet, and treachery be no longer a recommendation to the royal favor/' — Let. 44. " He is not paid for his labor, and certainly has a right to choose his employment.^' — Let. 63. " As for myself, it is no longer a question whether I shall mix with the throng and take a single share in the danger. Whenever Junius appears he must en- counter a host of enemies. But is there no honorable way to serve the public without engaging in personal quarrels with insignificant individuals, or submitting to the drudgery of canvassing votes for an election ? Is there no merit in dedicating my life to the information of my fellow-subjects? What public question have I declined? What villain have I spared? Is there no labor in the composition of these letters ?'' — Let. 53. In compiling the Letters, he says in his Preface: "The printer will readily acquit me of any view to my own profit. I undertake this troublesome task merely to serve a man who has deserved well 'of me and the public, and who, on my account, has been exposed to an expensive, tyrannical prosecution." This was Mr. Woodfall, publisher of the Public Advertiser. I am now prepared to ask: What, then, was the object of Junius? What does he mean by "The Cause and the People ".^ To what Cause has he " dedicated his life^^f and which, if he should desert, would be the ^^ vilest prostitution f Why this great zeal and disin- terested benevolence ? Aloof from party, unknown to the public, writing for neither fame nor favor, what is the meaning of this literary adventurer? A REVOLUTIONIST. The object of Junius was to produce a revolution in England, to dethrone the king, depose the ministry, dissolve Parliament, and bring the constitution back to its original principles. He defends, at the same time, the action of the American colonies, and encourages them to move on with the work. It is, perhaps, noticeable to the historian, and espe- cially if he studies the causes of human action, that great movements in behalf of human weal are at no given time confined to a particular locality, but that they, in a measure, span the world. They at least ra- diate till they affect the whole of a particular type of mankind. ISTor is this attributable altogether to com- merce and a social interchange of thought, for these take time; but it seems as though, at times, convulsions of thought instantaneously afiect great classes of people widely separated by ocean or country. The study of mobs and riots in America, England, and France would lead to this conclusion. It is, however, not a mooted point, that the same cause which moved the colonies to action just prior to the revolution, at the same time con- vulsed the English nation. The tyranny of king, min- (55) 56 JUNIUjS UNMA8KED. isters, and Parliament put its heel on the neck of Eng- lishmen as well as Americans. The people rose in rebellion there as well as here. Patriots arose in Eng- land as well as in America, and foremost among them all was Junius, for he fought the battle of freedom for the whole world. But that Junius meant war in England, is evident from almost every letter. I will give a few extracts in proof In his Dedication he says: '^i^lthough the king should continue to support his present system of government, the period is not very distant at which you will have the means of redress in your own power: it may be nearer, perhaps, than any of us expect; and I would warn you to be prepared for it.^^ If Thomas Paine wrote i\\Q Letters of Junius, he said this just be- fore departing for America. In his address to the Livery of London, he says, in regard to the candidates for election : ^"^ Will they grant you common halls when it shall be necessary ? Will they go up with remonstrances to the king? Have they firmness enough to meet the fury of a venal House of Commons? Have they fortitude enough not to shrink at imprisonment? Have they spirit enough to hazard their lives and fortunes in a contest, if it should be necessary, with a prostituted legislature? If these questions can fairly be answered in the affirma- tive, your choice Is made. Forgive this passionate lan- guage. I am unable to correct it. The subject comes home to us all. It is the language of my heart." — Let. 57. Upon the appointment of Luttrell as adjutant- general, and who, thereupon, takes command of the army in Ireland, Junius says: '^My Lord, though it A BEV0LUTI0NI8T. 57 may not be possible to trace this measure to its source, we can follow the stream, and warn the country of its approaching destruction. The English nation must be roused and put upon its guard. Mr. Luttrell has already shown us how far he may be trusted, when- ever an open attack is to be made upon the liberties of this country. I do not doubt that there is a deliberate plan formed. Your lordship best knows by Avhora. The cprruption of the legislative body on this side, a military force on the other, and then, Jareioell to Eng- lancV — Let. 40. Addressed to Lord North. The italics are his own. Speaking of the king, he says: ^^If he loves his people, he will dissolve the parliament which they can never confide in or respect. If he has any regard for his own honor, he will disdain to be any longer con- nected with such abandoned prostitution. But if it wTre conceivable [and it was with Junius] that a king of this country had lost all sense of personal hon- or, and all concern for the welfare of his subjects, I confess, sir, I should be contented to renounce tlie forms of the constitution once more, if there were no other way to obtain substantial justice for the people." — Let. 44. Any one who is acquainted with the English con- stitution knows that ^' its forms'^ can not be renounced without a revolution. And as to his opinion of the king, he says, " his virtues had ceased to be a question." . . . ^' The man. I speak of [the king] has not a heart to feel for the frailties of his fellow creatures. It is their virtues that afflict, it is their vices that console him." — Let. 53. But this will be brought out more strongly 58 JUNIUS UNMASKED. in ray Parallels, and I will leave it here and pass on to speak of his sympathy with the colonies. It has perhaps been already noticed by the reader, that Junius, in the extracts given, spoke in the most respectful terms of the colonies. But when he says: "The spirit of the Americans may be an useful exam- ple to us ;" and, " patriotism may be improved by trans- planting,'' he meant more than praise of the colonies. He meant to stir up the English nation to action and rebellion. He speaks of the affections of the colonies as having been " alienated from their common country '^ by a series of inconsistent measures. — Let. 1 and Let. 3. But in no instance does he blame them. In his address to the king, he says : " The distance of the colonies would make it impossible for them to take an active concern in your affairs, if they were as well affected to your government as they once pretended to be to your person. They are ready enough to distin- guish between you and your ministers. They com- plained of an act of the legislature, but traced the origin of it no higher than to the servants of the crown ; they pleased themselves with the hope that their sov- ereign, if not favorable to their cause, at least was im- partial. They consider you as united with your servants against America; and know how to distin- guish the sovereign and a venal parliament on one side, from the real sentiments of the English people on the other. Looking forward to independence, they might possibly receive you for their king ; but if ever you re- tire to America [this would be after Junius had effected a revolution in England], be assured they will A REVOLUTIONIST. 59 give you such a covenant to digest as the presbytery of Scotland would have been ashamed to oiFer to Charles the Second. They left their native land in search of freedom, and found it in a desert. Divided, as they are, into a thousand forms of policy and religion, there is one point in which they all agree : they equally de- test the pageantry of a king, and the supercilious hy- pocrisy of a bishop." — Let. 35. Oliver Cromw^ell he calls an ^' accomplished president," and extols his genius. — Let. 14. Much more could be given of the same nature, but this is sufficient. KEVIEW OF JUNIUS. I WISH the reader to catch the spirit of Junius, and to this end I will briefly review the book. Junius, before beginning, has an orderly plan for his literary campaign. He opens it with the new year, and closes it with the same. He begins with a full and sweeping broadside at king, ministers, and anient, at the same time defending- the Enjilish rii pa people and the American colonies. He knew this would call forth a return fire, for which he held him- self in readiness. He expected a defense of the Duke of Grafton, but was disappointed in this, for it came from Sir William Draper, in behalf of Lord Granby. After he had temporarily silenced this gun, the last shot from Sir William being, '^ Cease, viper!" he pours charge after charge into Grafton, the prime minister. He does not attack the king at this time, for the reason that " it had been a maxim of the Eng- lish government, not unwillingly admitted by the peo- ple, that every ungracious or severe exertion of the pre- rogative should be placed to the account of the minis- ter; but that whenever an act of grace or benevolence was to be performed, the whole merit of it should be attributable to the sovereign himself'^ That is, the maxim that "The king can do no wrong," was yet (60) BE VIEW OF JUNIUS, 61 admitted by the people, and for Junius to attack the kmg instead of the prime minister, would have thwarted his design, which was, as before stated, Revo- lution. Nor does Junius dare to assault the throne till he has brought forth a response in defense of Grafton, knowing that when it came it must reflect on the king. The last of May of the first year he had brought all his charges against Grafton, and to them there had been no response but " the flat general charge of scur- rility and falsehood." This Junius did not deign to answer. He now appears over the signature of Philo Junius, compiling the facts and giving them in their order. The principle charges were : an invasion upon " the first rights of the people and the first principles of the constitution'^ by the arbitrary appointment of Mr. Luttrell as a member of the House of Commons in the place of Mr. Wilkes, who, at the king's so- licitation, had been expelled : the disgraceful conduct of Grafton in associating with a prostitute in public : the charge of bastardy upon the duke: the desertion of Lord Chatham : the betrayal of Rockingham and Wilkes : his vascillating and weak action in regard to the colonies : and marrying the near relative of a man who had debauched his wife. But nothing could pro- voke any reply worthy of an answer by Junius till he, near the close of the year, brought forward the charge against Grafton of " selling a patent place in the col- lection of customs at Exeter to one Mr. Hine.'^ Junius says of this : " No sale by the candle was ever con- ducted with greater formality. I thank God ! there is not in human nature a degree of impudence daring enough to deny the charge I have fixed upon you.'' To 62 JUNIUS UNMASKED. aggravate this charge, Junius works up another, which is as follows: ^^A little before the publication of this and the preceding letter, the Duke of Grafton had commenced a prosecution against Mr. Samuel Vaughan for endeavoring to corrupt his integrity by an offer of five thousand pounds for a patent place in Jamaica/' But now the duke is charged by Junius with the ac- ceptance of a bribe from Mr. Hine, and to save the duke from impeachment, and Lord Mansfield from embarrassment, the prosecution is immediately drop- ped. See Let. 34. In a note to the above Letter Junius says : " From the publication of the preceding to this date, not one word was said in defense of the Duke of Grafton. But vice and impudence soon regained themselves, and the sale of the royal favor w^as openly avowed and defended. We acknowledge the piety of St. James', but what has become of its morality ? '' It is now the 12th of December, and on the 19th Junius assaults the throne. Till now there was no opportunity offered, for up to this time the king stood within the impregnable fortress, ^^ The king can do no wrong.'' Junius, while he acknowledges this maxim, does so merely to get the ear of the king, for he after- ward in his Preface takes occasion to place himself right before the public. But having once entered the king's castle, he makes George the Third the most insignificant and detestable object on earth. It is the most powerful piece of satire against kingcraft in the English language, and while it remains to be read by the people, kings may look on and tremble. Junius also in this not only hints war, but threatens revolution. In closing he says : " But this is not a time to trifle REVIEW OF JUNIUS. 63 with your fortune. They deceive you^ sir, who tell you that you have many friends whose ajffections are founded upon a principle of personal attachment. The fortune which made you a king forbade you to have a friend. It is a law of nature which can not be violated with impunity. The mistaken prince who looks for friend- ship, will find a favorite, and in that favorite the ruin of his affairs.'^ And the closing sentence is : " While he plumes himself upon the security of his title to the crown, should remember, that, as it was acquired by one revolution, it may be lost by another." — Let. 35. But Junius failed to produce the desired effect. The spirit of revolution was now at its height. The ocean must ebb. A reaction follows, and during two years more Junius strives to put new life into the flagging energies of his countrymen, and to kindle anew the fire of liberty. But the flame goes out. The commons have been corrupted by the king, and now the lords give way : " The three branches of the legislature (king, lords, and commons) seem to treat their separate rights and interests as the Roman trium- virs did their friends ; they reciprocally sacrifice them to the animosities of each other, and establish a detestable union among themselves upon the ruin of the laws and liberty of the commonwealth.^' — Let. 39. Of the House of Lords he says : " By resolving that they had no right to impeach a judgment of the House of Commons in any case whatsoever, where that house has a competent jurisdiction, they in effect gave up that constitutional check and reciprocal control of one branch of the legislature over the other, which is, per- haps, the greatest and most important object provided 64 JUNIUS UNMASKED. for by the division of the whole legislative power into three estates ; and now let the judicial decisions of the House of Commons be ever so extravagant, let their declarations of law be ever so flagrantly false, arbitrary, and oppressive to the subject, the House of Lords have imposed a slavish silence upon themselves ; they can not interpose; they can not protect the subject ; they can not defend the laws of their country. A concession so extraordinary in itself, so contradictory to the principles of their own institution, can not but alarm the most unsuspecting mind/' — Let. 39. Junius, in a note to this Letter, calls for a leader upon this state of facts : ^' The man who resists and overcomes this iniquitous power assumed by the lords, must be supported by the whole people. We have the laws on our side, and want nothing but an interpid leader. When such a man stands forth, let the nation look to it. It is not his cause, but our own.'' But the leader did not come, and Junius is no more known to England. After such declarations it would outrage all degrees of probability to suppose that Junius revealed himself to the king and ministry, and that they conferred on him a fat office for what he had written. I will not insult the common sense of my readers by offering an argument against it, founded upon the laws of human nature. And yet. Lord Macaulay has surrendered his reason to just such an assumption. Had Junius ever revealed himself to the king and his "detestable junto," that w^ould have been the last of him. Before I take my leave of Junius, I will give two extracts in which he sounds, TO AKMS ! REVIEW OF JUNIUS. 65 He is addressing the Duke of Grafton : ^' You have now brought the merits of your administration to an issue, on which every Englishman^ of the narrowest ca- pacity, may determine for himself; it is not an alarm to the passions, but a calm appeal to the judgment of the people upon their own most essential interests. A more experienced minister would not have hazarded a direct invasion of the first principles of the constitution before he had made some progress in subduing the spirit of the people. With such a cause as yours, my lord, it is not sufficient that you have the court at your devo- tion, unless you find means to corrupt or intimidate the jury. The collective body of the people form that jury, and from their decision there is but one appeal. Whether you have talents to support you at a crisis of such difficulty and danger, should long ago have been considered.^' — Let. 15. " My lord, you should not encourage these appeals to Heaven, The pious prince from whom you are supposed to descend made such frequent use of them in his public declarations, that, at last, the people also found it neces- sary to appeal to Heaven in their turn. Your admin- istration has driven us into circumstances of equal dis- tress — beware, at least, how you remind us of the reme- dy /^—Let. 9. Junius breathed the spirit of revolution. This is the purpose, and only purpose, of the Letters, namely : to produce a revolution in England. And, if Thomas Paine was Junius, the idea never left him. As this is a fact which extends through the life of Mr. Paine, I shall offer some proof here, on this point, as amidst the multiplicity of facts and arguments it may hereafter es- 66 JUNIUS UNMASKED. cape me. It will serve, also, to introduce Mr. Paine to the reader. An obscure English exciseman has now been a little more than two years in America, and just five years since Junius wrote his last Letter; he has written "Com- mon Sense ^' and one '^ Crisis f he has revolutionized pub- lic sentiment in America, the Declaration of Indepen- dence has been sent abroad to the world, and the war well begun, when in his second " Crisis ^^ he indites the following to Lord Howe: '^ 1, who know England and the disposition of the people well, am confident that it is easier for us to effect a revolution there than you a conquest here. A few thousand men landed in England with the declared design of deposing the present king, bringing his ministers to trial, and setting up the Duke of Gloucester in his stead, would assuredly carry their point while you were groveling here ignorant of the matter. As I send all my papers to England, this, like Common Sense, will find its way there; and, though it may put one party on their guard, it will inform the otlier and the nation in general of our design to help them.'' Here Mr. Paine has announced the name of the leader whom Junius called for. But Paine proposes to do Junius over again. Hear him! In the year 1792 he writes: "During the war, in the latter end of the year 1780, I formed to myself i\\Q design of coming over to England. ... I was strongly impressed with the idea that if I could get over to England without being known, and only remain in safety till I could g^i out a publication, I could open the eyes of the country with respect to the madness and stupidity of its government. HE VIE TV OF JUNIUS. 67 I saw that the parlies in parliament had pitted them- selves as far as they could go, and could make no new impression on each other. General Greene entered fully into my views, but the affair of Arnold and Andre hap- pening just after, he changed his mind, and, under strong apprehensions for my safety, wrote to me very pressingly to give up the design, which, with some re- luctance, I did." He afterward renews the same design. In accompanying Colonel Laurens to France, certain dispatches from the English government fell into his hands through the capture of an English frigate. These dispatches Paine read at Paris, and brought them to America on his return. He says: '^By these dis- patches I saw further into the stupidity of the Eng- lish cabinet than I otherwise could have done, and I renewed my former design. But Colonel Laurens was so unwilling to return alone, more especially as, among other matters, he had a charge of upward of two hun- dred thousand pounds sterling money, that I gave in to his wishes, and finally gave up my plan. But I am now certain that, if I could have executed it, it would not have been altogether unsuccessful." — Note, Rights of Man, part ii. JSior is this all. " When Na- poleon meditated a descent upon England by means of gunboats, he secured the services of Thomas Paine to establish, after the conquest, a more popular govern- ment."— -New Am. Cyc, Art. Thomas Paine. From all that I can gather, Mr. Paine was himself the author of this " plan of Napoleon's." . 5 COMMON SENSE. Junius is heard no more in England. The fame of this unknown author has gone round the world. A score of volumes have been w^ritten to prove his identity with a score of names. But all that has been said is wild with conjecture, and arguments have only been built upon ^^ rumor, ^^ and " facts ^^ drawn from the im- agination. A scientific criticism has never been at- tempted. Truth has been insulted by the imagination in its wild ramblings, and writers have contented them- selves with theory and fancy, "to pile up reluctant quarto upon solid folio, as if their labors, because they are gigantic, could contend with truth and Heaven." But while the king and his cabinet are setting traps, and hunting up and down the whole realm for this *^ mighty boar of the forest," in fear that he will again plunge at the king, or tear the ermine of Lord Mansfield, Thomas Paine, just landed upon the shores of America, hurls back a shaft at royalty which transfixes it to the wall of its castle. This was Common Sense. A reaction had taken place in England, and the people of America were also affected thereby. Reconciliation was the cry, independence scarcely lisped, and, wdien lisped, people " startled at the novelty of it." " In this state of po- litical suspense," says Mr. Paine, "the pamphlet of m COMMON SENSE. 69 Common Sense made its appearance, and the success it met with does not become me to mention. Dr. Frank- lin, Mr. Samuel, and John Adams were severally spoken of as the supposed author. I had not, at that time, the pleasure either of personally knowing or being known to the two last gentlemen. The favor of Dr. Franklin's friendship I- possessed in England, and my introduction to this part of the world was through his patronage. ... In October, 1775, Dr. Franklin proposed giving me such materials as were in his hands toward completing a history of the present transactions, aud seemed desirous of having the first volume out the next spring. I had then formed the outlines of Com- mon Sense and finished nearly the first part ; and, as I supposed the doctor's design in getting out a history was to open the new year with a new system, I expected to surprise him with a production on that subject much earlier than he thought of, and, without informing him what I was doing, got it ready for the press as fast as I conveniently could, and sent him the first pamphlet that was printed off." — Note, Crisis, iii. Opening the new year with a new system is emphat- ically what Junius also did, and it is most remarkable that the appearance of Junius' first Letter had, at first, the same effect in England that Common Sense had in America. Both came like thunderbolts. "On January 10, 1776, when ' a reconciliation with the mother country was the wish of almost every American,' a pamphlet called Common Sense, advocating the establishment of a republic of free and independent states, ^ burst upon the world' — in the language of Dr. Rush — Svith an effect which has rarely been produced by types and pa- 70 JUNIUS UNMASKED. per in any age or country.' It was immediately de- nounced as ^ one of the most artful, insidious, and per- nicious of pamphlets ! ' John Dickinson, a staunch sup- porter of the American cause, and author of the ^ Far- mers' Letters,' opposed the idea of independence in a speech as a member of the Continental Congress. The author of ^ Plain Truth,' one of the many replies to Common Sense, thought that ' volumes were insufficient to describe the horror, misery, and desolation awaiting the people at large in the siren form of American inde- pendence.' Dr. William Smith, provost of the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania, said, in his ^ Cato's Letters/ published in March, 1776 : ^ Nor have many weeks yet elapsed since the first open proposition for independence was published to the world ; it certainly has no counte- nance from congress, and is only the idol of those who wish to subvert all order among us, and rise on the ruins of their country.'" — Art. Thomas Paine, New Am. Cyc. This was the first effort in America toward revolu- tion. It was a bold hand, moved by a daring heart, that wrote Common Sense. In style and language, in argument and sentiment, in spirit and character, it is the finest political production ever produced in the Eng- lish language. The object for which Junius and Com- mon Sense were written I have shown to be the same, namely: revolution, and that the base of operation has only been changed. It is still an attack upon king, lords, and commons, and a defense of the people. I now go to show that Common Sense is a concise repro- duction of Junius, in sentiment, style, and method of argumentation. But I will first call to the reader's COMMON SENSE. 71 mind a sentence from Junius in answer to the assertion of Dr. Smith just quoted^ that Common Sense was ^^the first open proposition for independence/' On the con- trary, the first open statement of Junius in regard to the colonies, addressed to the king six years before this, is as follows : ^^ Looking forward to independence, they might possibly receive you for their king ; but, if you ever retire to America, be assured they will give you such a covenant to digest as the presbytery of Scotland would have been ashamed to offer to Charles the Second. They left their native land in search of freedom, and found it in a desert. Divided as they are into a thou- sand forms of policy and religion, there is one point in which they all agree — they equally detest the pageantry of a king, and the supercilious hypocrisy of a bishop.'' I have now only to remark : when Thomas Paine came to America, at least when he wrote Common Sense, he understood the American people and what they wanted better than they did themselves ; and so did Junius. I now bring Common Sense and Junius together to show parallels of idea, method, and style. Common Sense was ad- Junius was dedicated to dressed to the inhabitants the English nation ; por- of America, the Introduc- tions of the Dedication are tion of which is as follows : as follows : " Perhaps the sentiments '^ I dedicate to you a col- contained in the following lection of letters written by pages are not yet sufficient- one of yourselves, for the ly fashionable to procure common benefit of us all. them general favor; a long They would never have habit of not thinking a grown to this size without thing wrong, gives it a su- your continued encourage- 72 JUNIUS UNMASKED. perficial appearance of be- ment and applause. To ing right, and raises, at me they originally owe first, a formidable outcry nothing but a healthy, san- in defense of custom. But guine constitution. Under the tumult soon subsides, your care they have thriven; Time makes more converts to you they are indebted for than Reason. whatever strength or beau- ■ "A long and violent ty they possess. abuse of power is general- " When kings and min- ly tlie means of calling the isters are forgotten, when right of it in question (and the force and direction of in matters, too, which personal satire is no longer might never have been understood, and when meas- thought of had not the suf- ures are only felt in their ferers been aggravated into remotest consequences, this the inquiry), and as the book will, I believe, be king of England hath un- found to contain principles dertaken, in his own right, worthy to be transmitted to support the parliament to posterity. When you in what he calls theirs, and leave the unimpaired, he- as the good people of this reditary freehold to your country are grievously op- children, you do but half pressed by the combination, your duty. Both liberty they have an undoubted and property are precarious, privilege to inquire into the unless the possessors have pretensions of both, and sense and spirit enough to equally to reject the usurpa- defend them, tions of either. '^ Be assured that the laws " In the following sheets which protect us in our the author hath studiously civil rights, grow out of avoided every thing which the constitution, and they is personal among ourselves, must fall or flourish with Compliments as well as it. This is not the cause censure to individuals make of faction or of party, or of no part thereof. The wise any individual, but the and the worthy need not common interest of every the triumph of a pamphlet; man in Britain. Although and those whose sentiments the king should continue COMMON iSENSE. 73 are injudicious or unfriend- ly will cease of themselves, unless too much pains is bestowed upon their con- version. ^'The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country deso- late with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of mankind, and extirpating the defend- ers thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling ; of which class, re- gardless of party censure, is The Author.'^ to support his present sys- tem of government, the pe- riod is not very distant at which you will have the means of redress in your own power; it may be nearer, perhaps, than any of us expect ; and I would warn you to be prepared for it ^'You can not but con- clude, without the possibil- ity of a doubt, that long parliaments are the founda- tion of the undue influence of the crown. This influ- ence answers every pur- pose of arbitrary power to the crown. . . It promises every gratification to ava- rice and ambition, and se- cures impunity. . . You are roused at last to a sense of your danger; the remedy will soon be in your })0w- er. If Junius lives you shall often be reminded of it. If, when the opportu- nity presents itself, you neglect to do your duty to yourselves and to posterity, to God and to your coun- try, I shall have one con- solation left in common with the meanest and basest of mankind : civil liberty may still last the life of Junius.'^ 74 JUNIU>S UNMASKED. I would call the attention of the reader to the man- ner in which they close : to the cause of which they speak : to the object of their labors : to the fact that they stand above party or faction : to the expression of Junius^ " written by one of yourselves ; " to the declar- ation that if he lives he will often remind the English people of the danger they are in and of the remedy : to tlie fact that Mr. Paine here does it, and continues to do it ever after while he lives : in short, I would call the attention of the reader to the perfect similarity in style, object, and sentiment, save in this — the. one was the requiem of Freedom in England, the other, her natal song in America. As I have called attention to the style, I would caution the reader not to be betrayed by the word " hath " of Mr. Paine. It by no means affects the style. It was doubtless used or not used at first as a blind by Mr. Paine; for he sometimes used it and sometimes did not. A few years later in life it is aban- doned altogether, and Junius occasionally lets it slip. See Let. 37. And also the word " doth.''— Note, Let. 41. The following gives a distinction between society and government, the failure of human conscience, and the necessary surrender of human liberty : Commoi'i Sense. Junius. Society in every state is "It is not in the nature of a blessing, but government human society that any even in its best state is but form of government in a ■ necessary evil. In its such circumstances can long worst state, an intolerable be preserved. — Let. 35. one; for when we suffer or "The multitude in all are exposed to the same countries are patient to a miseries by a government certain point. Ill usage COMMOX SEXSE. 75 which we might expect in may rouse their indignation a country withoi^t gov- and hurry them into exces- ernment^ our calamity is ses, but the original fault heightened by reflecting, is in government, that we furnish the means " The ruin or prosperity by which we suffer. Gov- of a state depends so much ernment, like dress, is the upon the administration of badge of lost innocence, its government, that to The palaces of kings are be acquainted with the built upon the ruins of the merit of a ministry, we bowers of paradise, for were need only observe the the impulses of conscience condition of the people.^' clear, uniform, and irresist- Let. 1. iblyobeyed, man would need " If co?iscie7ice plays the no other law-giver; but tyrant it would be greatly that not being the case, he for the benefit of the finds it necessary to surren- world that she were more der up a part of his prop- arbitrary and far less pla- erty to furnish means for cable than some men find the protection of the rest ; her."— Let. 27. and this he is induced to " I lament the unhappy do by the same prudence necessity whenever it arises which in every other case of providing for the safety advises him out of two of the state by a temporary evils to choose the least.' invasion of the personal liberty of the subject."-Let. 58. Junius feels and ac- knowledges the evil in the most express terms, and will show himself ready to concur in any rational plan that may provide for the liberty of the individual without hazarding the safety of the community.'^ Let. 63. 76 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Mr. Paine now proceeds to form a government upon an ideal plan, and show the origin of those first princi- ples which would operate in the first peopling of a coun- try. " But as nothing but heaven is impregnable to vice/^ the natural restraints of society will not be suffi- cient to check it ; this will necessitate the establishment of a government. At first, the whole colony may delib- erate, and in the first parliament every man will have a seat. But as the colony increases this can not be done, because inconvenience prohibits it. He now observes: '^ This will point out the Junius, convenience of their con- senting to leave the legis- /'The House of Commons lative .part to be managed are only interpreters whose bv a select number chosen duty it is to convey the from the whole body, who sense of tlie people faithful- are supposed to have the ly to the crown ; if the in- same interests at stake terpretation be false or ini- which those have who ap- perfect, the constituent pointed them, and who will powers are called to deliv- act in the same manner as er their own sentiments, the whole body would were Their speech is rude but they present. If the colo- intelligible; their gestures ny continue increasing, it fierce but full of expla- will become necessary to nation. Perplexed with augment the number of sophistries, their honeat representatives ; and that eloquence rises into ac- the interest of every part tion.^^ — Let. 38. of the colony may be at- '^ I an^i convinced that if tended to, it will be found shortening the duration of best to divide the whole parliaments (which, in ef- into convenient parts, each feet, is keeping the repre- purt sending its proper sentative under the rod of number; and that the the constituent) be not elected mio;ht never form made the basis of our COMMON SENSE, 77 to themselves an interest separate from the electors, prudence will point out the propriety of having elec- tions often ; because, as the elected might by that means return and mix again with the general body of the electors, in a few months their fidelity to the public will be secured by the pru- dent reflection of making a rod for themselves. And as this frequent interchange will establish a common interest with every part of the community, they will mutually and naturally support each other, and on this (not on the unmeaning name of king) depends the strength of government and the happiness of the gov- erned. ^' Here, then, is the ori- gin and rise of govern- ment ; viz, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world ; here, too, is the design and 'end of govern- ment, viz : freedom and se- curity. And however our eyes may be dazzled with show, or our ears deceived by sound; however preju- dice may warp our wills, or interest darken our un- new parliamentary juris- prudence, other checks or improvements signify noth- ing. On the contrary, if this be made the founda- tion, other measures may come in aid, and, as auxil- iaries, be of considerable advantage. If we are sin- cere in the political creed we profess, there are many things can not be done by king, lords and commons.^' Let. 68. " The free election of our representatives in parlia- ment comprehends, because it is the source and securi- ty of every right and priv- ilege of the Englisli nation. The ministry have realized the compendious ideas of Caligula. They know that the liberty, the laws, and property of an English- man, have in truth but one neck, and that to violate the freedom of election strikes deeply at them all.^' Let. 39. " Does the law of parlia- ment, which we are often told is the law of the land ; does the right of every subject of the realm, depend upon an arbitrary, capri- * cious vote of one branch of the legislature? The voice 78 JUNIUS UNMASKED. derstanding^ the simple of truth and reason must voice of nature and reason be silent.'^ — Let. 20. will say^ it is right.'^ In the above the sentiment is not only the same, but the same metaphors are used. As a "rod'^ for the representative, and the '^ voice of reason. ^^ In the following the same metaphor also is used, but with a change in the application. Common Sense. Junius. '' But the constitution of " After a rapid succession England is so exceedingly of changes, we are reduced complex, that the nation to that state which hardly may suffer for years to- any change can mend. It gether without being able is not -the disorder, but the to discover in which part physieian : it is not a casual the fault lies ; some will concurrence of calamitous say in one, some in another, circumstances; it is the and every political physi- pernicious hand of govern- cian will advise a different ment which alone can make medicine.'' a whole people desperate.'^ Let. 1. In the above, Junius is speaking, in his first Letter, with all the prejudices of an Englishman in favor of the constitution. But this soon wears off, and in his closing Letter he speaks as boldly as Common Sejs"se. Common Sense. Junius. " I know it is difficult to '' I confess, sir, that I felt get over local or long the prejudices of my educa- standing prejudices, yet if tion in favor of a House we will suffer ourselves of Commons still hanging to examine the component about me. . . . The parts of the English con- state of things is much stitution, we will find them altered in this country since COMMON SENSE. 79 to be the base remains of it was necessary to protect two ancient tyrannies^ com- our representatives against pounded with some new the direct powerof the crown, republican materials. We have nothing to appre- First : The remains of hend from prerogative, but monarchical tyranny in the every thing from undue in- person of the king. fluence.'' — Let. 44. Secondly: The remains See how Junius now of aristocratical tyranny in bows to monarchy in order the persons of the peers. to strike it : '^ I can more Thirdly : The new repub- readily admire the liberal lican materials in the per- spirit and integrity, than sons of the commons, on the sound judgment of any whose virtue depends the man who prefers a republi- freedom of England. can form of government in this or any other empire ^' The nearer any govern- of equal extent, to a mon- ment approaches to a repub- archy so qualified and lie, the less business there is limited as ours. I am for a king. It is somewhat convinced that neither is it difficult to find a proper in theory the wisest system name for the government of government, nor practi- of England. Sir William cable in this country. Yet, Meredith calls it a repub- though I hope the English lie, but in its present state constitution will forever it is unworthy of the name^ preserve its original mon- because the corrupt influ- archical form, I would have ence of the crown by having the manners of the people all the places at its disposal, purely and strictly repub- hath so effectually swal- lican. I do not mean the lowed up the power, and licentious spirit of anarchy eaten out the virtue of the and riot ; I mean a general House of Commons (the attachment to the common republican part in the con- weal, distinct from any stitution), that the govern- partial attachment to per- raent of England is nearly sons or families ; an im- as monarchical as that of plicit submission to the France or Spain. Men fall laws only ; and an affection 80 JUNIUS UNMASKED. out with names without un- to the magistrate propor- derstanding them. For it is tioiied to the integrity and the republican and not the wisdom with which he monarchical part of the distributes justice to the constitution of England, people, and administers which Englishmen glory their affairs. The present in, viz: the liberty of choos- habit of our political body ing a House of Commons appears to me the very from out their own body; reverse of what it ought to and it is easy to see, that be. The form of the con- when republican virtue stitution leans rather more fails, slavery ensues. Why than enough to the popular is the constitution of Eng- branch ; while in effect the land sickly, but because manners of the people (of monarchy hath poisoned the those at least who are republic, the crown hath likely to take the lead in eugrossed the commons." the country) incline too generally to a dependence upon the crown. The real friends of arbitrary power combine the facts, and are not inconsistent with their principles, when they stren- uously support the unwarrantable privileges assumed by the House of Commons. In these circumstances it were much to be desired that we had many such men as Mr. Sawbridge to represent us in parliament. I speak from common. report and opinion ouly, when T impute to him a speculative predilection in favor of a republic. In the personal conduct and manners of the man I can not be mistaken. He has shown himself possessed of that republican firmness which the times require, and by which an English gentleman may be as usefully and as honorably distinguished as any citi- zen of ancient Eome, of Athens, or Lacedemon." Let. 58. I would remark on the above passage from Junius, that this is one of his finest rhetorical efforts, and it is COMMON SENSE. 81 well worthy of a moment's pause, to study its plan and probable effect on the English mind. This was written near the close of his literary campaign. The reaction had set in, and he was stemming the tide of public opinion. He wishes to bring the people up to his re- publican notions, and to rouse them to action. He be- gins by admiring the liberal spirit and integrity of the man, but reflects on his judgment who prefers a repub- lic to a monarchy so qualified and limited in a country of that size. He limits monarchy to a small country. The reader will mark how guarded he is here. He is fully aware of the prejudices of the people in favor of monarchy, and doubtless he spoke his own sentiments at the time, qualified as they were. Mr. Paine after- ward spoke offsetting up the Duke of Gloucester, de- posing the king, and bringing the ministers to trial.'' Junius has now prepared the public ear for an attentive and respectful hearing ; he has bowed to monarchy, and touched the heart of his audience. He now introduces the principles of a republic, which produce a spirit de- void of anarchy and riot, but one attached to the com- mon weal and submissive to the laws only. He now tenderly chides the people for their dependence upon the crown, especially the leaders. He then advances to a charge of inconsistency, and shows the advantage the friends of arbitrary power take of it. He now supports himself by authority in a eulogy on Mr. Sawbridge, of whom he says: ^'He has shown himself possessed of that republican firmness which the times require." He at last caps the climax with an array of republics, and a hint that an English gentleman would be "• honorably distinguished'' if he would come forward and play 82 '■ JUNIUS UNMASKED. the part of Brutus. The whole paragraph is deeply planned and finely wrought out, and would fall with stunning weight upon the mind of the English nation. But let us proceed. Mr. Paine asked, in the last sentence quoted above in the parallel column : " Why is the constitution of England sickly ?'' etc. He also further says: ^^An inquiry into the constitutional errors in the English form of government is at this time highly necessary, for, as we are never in a proper con- dition of doing justice to others while we continue un- der the influence of some leading partiality, so neither are we capable of doing it to ourselves while we remain fettered by an obstinate prejudice. And as a man who is attached to a prostitute is unfit to choose or judge of a wife, so any prepossession in favor of a rotten consti- tution of government will disable us from discerning a good one.'' — Common Sense, Part I. Englishmen considered rotten boroughs the only rot- ten part of the constitution, but Common Sense and Junius both considered that the disease had extended from the extremities to the heart. Junius says: '^As to cutting away the rotten boroughs, I am as much offended as any man at seeing so many of them under the direct influence of the crown, or at the dis- posal of private persons. Yet, I own I have both doubts and apprehensions in regard to the remedy you propose. . . '. When all your instruments of am- putation are prepared, when the unhappy patient lies bound at your feet, without the possibility of resistance, by what infallible rule will you direct the operation? When you propose to cut away the rotten parts, can you tell us what parts are perfectly sound? Are there COMMON SENSE. 83 any certain limits, in fact or theory, to inform you at what point yoa must stop — at what point the mortifica- tion ends? To a man [Mr. Wilkes] so capable of ob- servation and reflection as you are, it is unnecessary to say all that might be said upon the subject. Besides that, I approve higlily of Lord Chatham's idea of in- fusing a portion of new health into the constitution, to enable it to bear its infirmities — a brilliant expression, and full of intrinsic wisdom.^' — Last Letter of Junius. Common Sense. Junius. "Tosaythattheconstitu- ^'^The three branches of tion of England is a union the legislature seem to treat of three powers, recipro- their separate rights and in- cally checking each other, terests as the Roman trium- is farcical; either the words virs did their friends — they have no meaning, or they reciprocally sacrifice them are flat contradictions. To to the animosities of each say that the commons is a other, and establish a de- check upon the king pre- testable union among them- supposes two things: selves upon the ruin of the Fii'st. — That the king is laws and the liberty of the not to be trusted without commonwealth.^' — Let. 39. being looked after; or, in Li speaking of and to the other words, that a thirst king, he says: for absolute power is the ^' It has been the misfor- natural disease of mon- tune of your life, and orig- archy. inally the cause of every Secondly. — That the com- reproach and distress which mons, by being appointed has attended your govern - for that purpose, are either ment, that you should never wiser, or more worthy of have been acquainted with confidence than the crown, the language of truth until There is something ex- you heard it in the com- ceedingly ridiculous in the plaints of your people." — composition of monarchy — Let. 35. 6 84 JUNIUS UNMASKED. it first excludes a man from ^' A faultless, insipid the means of information, equality in his character is yet empowers him to act in neither capable of virtue or cases where the highest vice in the extreme, but it judgment is required. The secures his submission to state of a king shuts him those persons whom he has from the world, yet the been accustomed to respect, business of a king requires and makes him a dangerous him to know it thorough- instrument of their ambi- ly; wherefore, the different tion. Secluded from the parts, by unnaturally op- world, attached from his in- posing and destroying each fancy to one set of persons other, prove the whole char- and one set of ideas, he can acter to be absurd and use- neither open his heart to less. new connections, nor his That the crown is this mind to better informa- overbearing part in the tion.^^ — Let. 39. English constitution, needs Of the king\s influence not to be mentioned ; and on parliament, he says : that it derives its whole ^' It is arbitrary and no- consequence merely from toriously under the influ- being the giver of places ence of the crown." — Let. and pensions, is self-evident. 44. Wherefore, though w^e have ^^ I beg you will convey been wise enough to shut to your gracious master my and lock a door against ab- humble congratulations up- solute monarchy, we at the on the glorious success of same time have been foolish peerages and pensions, so enough to put the crown lavishly distributed as the in possession of the key. rewards of Irish virtue." — The prejudice of Eng- Let. (^^. lishmen in favor of their " That the sovereign of own government by king, this country is not amen- lords, and commons, arises able to any form of trial as much or more from na- known to the laws, is un- tional pride than reason, questionable; but exemp- Individuals are undoubt- tion from punishment is a edly safer in England than singular privilege annexed COMMON SENSE. 85 in some other countries, but to the royal character, and the ^yill of the king Is as no way excludes the possi- much the law of the land bility of deserving it. How in Britain as in France, long and to what extent a with this difference: that, king of England may be instead of proceeding di- protected by the forms, rectly from his mouth, it is when he violates the spirit handed to the people under of the constitution, deserves the formidable shape of an to be considered. A mis- act of parliament. For the take in this matter proved fate of Charles the 'First fatal to Charles and his hath only made kings more son." — Preface to Junius, subtle — not more just. " The consequences of this Wherefore^ laying aside attack upon the constitution all national pride and preju- are too plain and palpable dice in favor of modes and not to alarm the dullest ap- forms, the plain truth is prehension. I trust you that it is wholly owing to the will find that the people of Gonstitution of the people, and England are neither defi- notthe constitution of the gov- cient in spirit or under- ernment, that the crown is standing, though you have not as oppressive in Eng- treated them as if they had land as in Turkey." neither sense to feel, nor spirit to resent. We have reason to thank God and our ancestors that there never yet was a minister in this country who could stand the issue of such a conflict, and, with every prejudice in favor of your intentions, I see no such abilities in your grace as should enable you to succeed in an enterprise in which the ablest and basest of your predecessors have found their destruc- tion. . . . Never hope that the freeholders will make a tame surrender of their rights, or that an Eng:- lish army will join with you in overturning the liber- ties of their country." — Let. 11. I will now present their doctrine of equal rights: 86 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Common Sense. "Mankind being original- ly equals in the order of creation, the equality could not be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance. "As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest, can not be justified on the equal rights of nature. . . " For all men being orig- inally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honors of his cotemporarles, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strong- est natural^ proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings, is, that nature dis- proves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giv- ing mankind an ass for a lion.^^ Junius. " In the rights of freedom w^e are all equal The least considerable man among us has an interest equal to the proudest noble- man.''— Let. 37. " When the first original right of the people, from which all laws derive their authority," etc. — Let. 30. j " Those sacred original | rights which belonged to them before they were sol- diers."— Let. IL " Those original rights of your subjects, on which all their civil and political lib- erties depend. ..... " If the English people should no longer confine their resentment to a sub- missive representation of their wrongs ; if, following the glorious example of their ancestors, they should no longer appeal to the creature of the constitution, but to that high Being who gave them the rights of humanity, whose gifts it were sacrilege to surrender; let me ask you, sir, upon what part of your subjects would you rely for assist- ance?" — Address to the king. Let. 35. COMMON SENSE. 87 While I am upon the subject of king, I will present their views in this place. And I would call attention to the severity of the language : Common Sense. Junius. " In England, a king hath " For my own part, far little more to do than to from thinking that the make war and give away king can do no wrong ; far places, which, in . plain from suffering myself to terms, is to impoverish the be deterred or imposed up- nation and set it together on by the language of by the ears. A pretty forms ; if it were my mis- business, indeed, for a man fortune to live under the to be allowed eight hun- inauspicious reign of a dred thousand sterling a prince, whose whole life year for, and worshiped was employed in one base, into the bargain ! Of more contemptible struggle with worth is one honest man to the free spirit of his peo- society and in the sight of pie, or in the detestable God than all the crowned endeavor to corrupt their ruffians that ever lived. moral principles, I would "But where, say some, is not scruple to declare to the king of America? VU him: ^Sir, you alone are tell you, friend, he reigns the author of the greatest above, and doth not make wrong to your subjects and havoc of mankind, like the to yourself. . . Has not royal brute of Britain." the strength of the crown, In commenting on the whether influence or pre- sentence spoken of the rogative, been uniformly king, "63/ ?i;Aose Is OD ALOKE exerted for eleven years they were permitted to do together, to support a nar- any tiling/^ he says : " Here row, pitiful system of gov- is idolatry even without a ernment, which defeats mask; and he who can itself and answers no one calmly hear and digest such purpose of real power, doctrine, hath forfeited his profit, or personal satisfac- claim to rationality ; is an tion to you ?^ " — Pref. 88 JUNIUS UNMASKED. apostate froDi the order of ^^The minister who, by manhood, and ought to be secret corruption, invades considered as one who hath the freedom of elections, not only given up the pro- and the ruffian [meaning per dignity of man, but the king] who, by open vio- sunk himself beneath the lence, destroys that free- rank of animals, and con- dom, are embarked in the temptibly crawls through same bottom." — Let. 8. the world like a worm. " When Junius observes However, it matters very that kings are ready enough little now what the king to follow such advice, he of England either says or does not mean to insinuate does; he hath wickedly that, if the advice of Par- broken through every moral liament were good, the and human obligation, king would be so ready to trampled nature and con- follow it." — Let. 45. science under his feet ; and, '^ There is surely some- by a steady and unconstitu- thing singularly benevo- tional spirit of insolence lent in the character of and cruelty, procured for our sovereign. From the himself an universal ha- moment he ascended the tred." throne, there is no crime I shall now give two of which human nature is passages from another por- capable (and I call upon tion of Mr.*Paine's work the recorder to witness it) to parallel with the last that has not appeared two of Junius on the king: venial in his sight." — Let. ''Good heavens! what 48. volumes of thanks does '' I know that man [the America owe to Britain ! king] much better than What infinite obligation to any of you. Nature in- the tool that fills with tended him only for a good paradoxical vacancy the humored fool. A system- throne!" — Crisis, iii. atical education, with long "The connection between practice, has made him a vice and meanness is a fit consummate hypocrite. . . subject for satire, but when What would have been the the satire is a fact it cuts triumph of that odious hyp- COMMON SENSE. 89 with the irresistible power ocrite and his minions if of a diamond. If a Qua- Wilkes had been defeated? ker, in defense of his just It was not your fault, rev- rights, his property, and the erend sir, that he did not chastity of his house, takes enjoy it completely/^ — Let. up a musket he is expelled 51, to Rev. Mr. Home, the meeting; but the pres- '^Though the Kennedies ent king of England, who were convicted of a most seduced and took into keep- deliberate and atrocious ing a sister of their society, murder, they still had a is reverenced and supported claim to the royal mercy, by repeated testimonies, They were saved by the while the friendly noodle chastity of their connec- from whom she was taken, tions. They had a sister ; and who is now in this city, yet it was not her beauty, continues a drudge in the but the pliancy of her vir-^ service of his rival, as if tue, that recommended her proud of being cuckolded to the king, by a creature called a '' The holy author of king.'^ — Crisis, iii. our religion was seen in The above will explain the company of sinners ; a passage in Junius — Let. but it was his gracious pur- 56 — which is as follows: pose to convert them from " You must confess that their sins. Another man even Charles the Second who, in the ceremonies of would have blushed at that our faith, might give les- open encouragement, at sons to the great enemy of those eager, meretricious it, upon diiferent princi- caresses, with which every pies, keeps much the same species of private vice and company. He advertises public prostitution is re- for patients, collects all the ceived at St. James'." diseases of the heart, and turns a royal palace into an hospital for incurables. A man of honor has no ticket of admission at St. James'. They receive him like a virgin at the 90 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Magdalen's — ^ Go tliou and do likewise/'' — Let. 67, to Lord Mansfield. I will now make a few remarks upon Common Sense. I have introduced a few extracts to show its spirit, scope, and object ; and ih^ opinions, principles, language, and style of Mr. Paine. I have also thrown by the side of them the similar characteristics of Junius, but this is not all. Common Sense was to America what Junius would have been to England if the same success had attended it. There is a plan in Common Sense similar to that of Junius. It opens the new year with a new policy ; it begins by a contrast between society and government ; it attacks the government and defends the original rights of the people ; it assaults the king and his minions; it defends republicanism against royalty; it calls on the people to rebel against tlie tyrant, to take up arms in their defense, and to establish government upon the natural and original rights of the people. If one will study the two works he will find not only the general plan the same, but even in detail they strikingly correspond ; showing the same head to plan, and the same hand to execute. There is the same language, the same figures of speech, the same wit, the same method of argumentation, the same withering satire, the same appeals to Heaven, and the same bold, proud, unconquerable spirit, in the one as in the other. If Mr. Paine was Junius, these things would natu- rally be expected. And it would be expected, also, that having failed to produce the desired effect in COMMON SENSE. 91 England^ and all farther effort there being at an end, that if Junius lived he would change his base of operations if a favorable opportunity offered, and strike once more for the liberties of the people. Thus the natural order of things leads us to an irresistible con- clusion. But in order not to be too hasty we ought to ask : Is there not one fact in the whole life and character of Mr. Paine incompatible wuth Junius? When it is found I will surrender the argument. But let us proceed. Nature is prodigal of varieties. No two individuals are alike, either in physical form or mental features. Great differences may be found even among those most resembling each other, but when we find a man prominent among his fellow-kind, it is because of marked characteristics in which he greatly differs from the rest. These characteristics are expressed in action. A record of these actions is the history of men. Faust gives us movable type, and Watt the steam-engine. Newton asks nature to reveal her mode of operation in the movement of matter. Bacon asks her for her method. Buckle inquires after the science of history. Napoleon was a magazine of war. And thus great minds reveal themselves in their own way; and the more striking and peculiar the characteristic, the more easily can we distinguish and describe the person. Mr. Paine was a literary adventurer. And unlike adven- turers in conquest or discovery, he left the record of his course as he went along. His was not a path in the sea, nor foot-prints in the sand, but a work like that of Euclid or Laplace, carved out of thought ; he called 92 JUNIUS UNMASKED. out of chaos a new world of politics; he fought great battles and won victories with the pen. To ivnow the man, then, we must examine his writings. To this end, therefore, I call the reader's attention to his style. STYLE. I WILL first make some concise remarks upon this subject, to aid us in comparing Junius with Mr. Paine; because I propose to show that the style of the one is the style of the other. Style, by most authors, is treated under the following heads : Perspicuity, Vivacity, and Beauty. Perspicuity, I define, the clear and true expression of our thoughts in the fewest words. Vivacity is the energy or life of expression ; it attracts the attention, and excites the ^imagination. It takes the will by storm and produces conviction. Combined with perspicuity it becomes eloquence. Beauty is the harmony and smoothness of of expression, and is often made synonymous with elegance. The first requisite in style is perspicuity. It is a prevalent notion among the vulgar that clearness of expression leads to dryness and dullness in speaking or writing, owing to the plain garb in which ideas are clothed. But the fact is, the very reverse of this is true, and as the legitimate result. Words are said to be the signs of ideas, or symbols of thought. But words spoken is thought passing in the air ; they are ideas in invisible vibrations, and a sound can neither be a sign nor a symbol. But words written are sym- (93) 94 JUNIUS UNMASKED. bols of thought. Language addresses both the ear and the eye. The true end and aim of language is to make others feel the full force of an idea as it is felt by the speaker. Language must therefore be forever imperfect, and this from the nature of things, or at least till ideas can be silently conveyed upon the waves of some subtle nerve force. Ideas flit from the mind with the rapidity of lightning. To the inward beholder truth becomes visible at times instantaneously. He sees it, he feels it; it fills him with emotions; it struggles for utterance. Truth writhes to get free and become universally, instead of particularly, known and felt. It may be and is felt instantaneously, yet it can not be expressed in words for hours, and perhaps never; cer- tainly never as it should be. Truth rests in the mind, or flutters there in ideal beauty. It requires an artist transcending earthly perfection to breathe it to the ear or throw it out to the eye on canvas. The tongue and hand both fail, the sounds are discordant, and the lines are broken. In the one instance we have a jumble of sounds, and in the other a daub for a picture. It becomes apparent at once, the more words we use to express thought, the more it is cumbered with technicalities and idiomatic phrases, just so much more gross, and feeble, and uninviting it becomes, because robbed of its ideal beauty. But, on the con- trary, if a word or a look or a touch could express it, its beauty, and its power, and its worth would not be thus blemished. Byron would have spoken that word were it lightning. Hence arises the interest and charm in beholding the picture of an artist, wliere so much is revealed at a glance ; for it is thought which is STYLE. 95 expressed there. Hence^ also, it becomes evident that far more can be expressed in a figure of speech, quickly and boldly put, than could be otherwise presented in hours or days. '' A single hieroglyphic character/' says Champoleon le June, ^Svould probably convey more to the mind of an ancient Egyptian than a quarto page would to a European." Perspicuity, therefore, is not necessarily devoid of energy or elegance, in. fact the only means to secure a clear and concise style is- to use the trope — especially in the two forms of metaphor and comparison : observ- ing always that long and labored figures of speech are generally ambiguous, and always have a bad effect. Their beauty, and worth, and power consist in the brevity and clearness with which they are expressed. ^' The thought expressed in a single line by Chaucer," says Lord Kames, " gives more luster to a young beauty, than the whole of his much labored poem, " Up rose the sun, and up rose Emilie." Perspicuity, then, we would consider the very soul of vivacity, and vivacity the soul of eloquence. The elegance or beauty of expression is of far less consequence, and must often be sacrificed to the very nature of ideas. It can not be said that all ideas are beautiful. There are uncomely and hideous things on earth ; there are disagreeable and hateful subjects to be spoken of, and there are painful feelings to be expressed. Language would fail to subserve the end for which it exists, did it not correspond to the sources of thought and the objects to be described; otherwise it would not be language. To be elegant, therefore, at all times, in 96 JUNIUS UNMASKED. speaking or writing, involves an absnrdity, inasmuch as only a part of our ideas could be expressed were this the case. The simple narration of facts enlightens ; elegance soothes and pleases ; but vivacity moves to action. It is the duty of the writer to make liis style and language correspond with his subject. Keeping the foregoing principles in view, the reader may apply such terms to the piece he reads, or the discourse he hears, as may be most fitting. It is thus we speak of concise, diffuse, bold, feeble, nervous, plain, neat, dry, or flowery styles. A full sentence or period, as it is called, must therefore have: 1. Precision; that is, it must be clear and not ambiguous : 2. Unity ; that is, it must not have crowded into it different subjects : 3. Strength; that is, all unnecessary words must be thrown away, and it must be built with such mechan- ical skill as will render it the most forcible to the mind: and, 4. Harmony; that is, it must sound with the sense. For the purpose of an argument, it is immaterial to me whether I have cause to praise or censure the style of Mr. Paine. It is a comparison of the known with the unknown, in which I am about to engage, and it is the likeness, not the merits, which I wish to bring out. A good or a bad style would not affect the similarity were either produced by the same hand. But it is a fact worthy of remark, as I am passing, that a bad style in writing or speaking, has never produced any marked effect upon the world. It is th'e nature of great minds to be possessed of clear ideas, and to such minds nature never withholds the gift of purity of diction. , STYLE. 97 The style of Mr. Paine is as peculiar as the great mind that produced it, and I will describe it to be : strong, hold, clear, and harmonious. The construction of any of his pieces, is like the building of a fine edifice. He never begins witliout plan and specifications. He builds it in the ideal before he puts it on paper. The reader finds a foundation fit and substantial in the first paragraph, often in the first sentence. Upon this he finds a superstructure to correspond, which in size and proportions, is neat and artistic, constructed with each separate material of the best kind, and in its proper place, never left without cornice and entablature, so that when taken all together it is most pleasing and useful. He never leaves a period like a broken column, yet a careless vine sometimes winds around it, to attract the mind from its stately proportions, and we have lost the argument in the beauty of the figure. But the effect is momentary. He soon brings us back to the practical and the real. And it is his peculiar beauty, that he does not impose ideas upon us which his lan- guage can not convey to the commonest understanding. Mr. Jefferson says of his style: "^o writer has exceeded Paine in familiarity of style, in perspicuity of expression, happiness of elucidation, and in simple and unassuming language.'^ Style presents the law, as well as the image, of the writers' mind; in other words, style gives us the true portrait and habits of the mind, for the mind can by no means counterfeit itself. I will therefore proceed to an analysis and comparison of Mr. Paine's style with that of Junius; and, first, of the sentence, or period. The different members are of the same length, hence the 98 juniUjS unmasked. rythm or harmony. Take tlie following examples, and I will place bars between the cliiFerent members to aid the eye : ^' The style and langnaga you have adopted are, I confess, | not ill suited to the elegance of your own man- ners, I or to the dignity of the cause you have under- taken. I Every common dauber writes rascal and villain under his pictures, | because the pictures themselves have neither character nor resemblance. | But the works of a master require no index ; | his features and coloring are taken from nature; | the impression is immediate and uniform ; | nor is it possible to mistake the charac- ters, I whether they represent the treachery of a minis- ter, "I or the abused simplicity of a king.^^ | ^' Were I disposed to paint a contrast, | I could easily set off what you have done in the present case | against what you would have done in that case, | and by justly opposing them, | conclude a picture that would make you blush. | But as, when any of the prouder passions are hurt, | it is much better philosophy | to let a man slip into a good temper | than to attack him in a bad one — I for that reason, therefore, I only state the case, I and leave you to reflect upon it.^' | ^^Ye that tell us of harmony and reconciliation, | can ye restore to us the time that is past? | Can ye give to prostitution its former innocence? | Neither can ye re- concile Britain and America. | The last cord now is broken — | the people of England are presenting ad- dresses against us. | There are injuries which nature can not forgive — | she would cease to be nature if she did. I As well can the lover forgive the ravisher of his STYLE. 99 mistress^ | as the continent forgive the murders of Britain/' | " The question is not of what metal your instruments are made, | but whether they are adapted to the work you have in hand. | Will they grant you common halls when it shall be necessary ? | Will they go up with re- monstrances to the king? | Have they firmness enough to meet the fury of a venal House of Commons? | Have they fortitude enough not to shrink at imprisonment? | Have they spirit enough to hazard their lives and for- tunes in a contest, | if it should be necessary, with a prostituted legislature? j If these questions can fairly be answered in the affirmative, your choice is made. | Forgive this passionate language. | I am unable to cor- rect it. I The subject comes home to us all. [ It is the language of my heart." | The above is sufficient. The first and last paragraphs are from Junius, the other two from Paine. The last two paragraphs are passionate, the first two calm but energetic. Throughout the whole, nature is at work — there is nothing artificial. But it was the melody or rythm that I wished to indicate to the reader. This is peculiar and common to both, and itself can not be imi- tated. If a writer ever succeeds in reproducing this style, it will be from the nature of his own mind, and not from imitation. If the reader will now return to page 71, and com- pare the Dedication to Junius with the Introduction to Common Sense, he will find in rythm a striking par- allel, because the subject is the same, and the mind of the writer is performing the same work. 7 100 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Grammatical accuracy is often sacrificed to concise- ness, as in the following: Paine. Junius. " Many circumstances ^' If this be your meaning have and will arise which and opinion, you will act are not local/^^ — Introduc. consistently with ^7 in choos- ing Mr. Nash/^~Let. 57. Mr. Paine was bold enough to transcend the minor rules of grammar whenever he found them cumbersome to his style. In this he is consistent witli Junius. There is a majesty of manner, and a grandeur of style, which strike the mind of the reader with great force. Take, for example, the following : Paine. Junius. " It w^as not Newton's " You have still an hon- honor, neither could it be orable part to act. The af- his pride, that he was an fections of your subjects Englishman, but that he may still be recovered; but, was a philosopher; the before you subdue their heavens had liberated him hearts, you must gain a no- from the prejudices of an ble victory over your own. island, and science had ex- Discard those little personal panded his soul as bound- resentments which have too less as his studies." — Cri- long directed your public sis, viii. conduct. Pardon this man ^' The heart that feels not the remainder of his punish- now is dead ; the blood of ment ; and, if resentment his children will curse his still prevails, make it what cowardice who shrinks back it should have been long at a time when a little since — an act, not of mercy, might have saved the but of contempt. He will STYLE. 101 whole, and made them hap- soon fall back into his nat- py. I love the man that ural station, a silent sena- can smile in trouble, that tor, and hardly supporting can gather strength from the weekly eloquence of distress, and grow brave by a newspaper. The gentle reflection." . . . Speak- breath of peace would leave ing of the principles of war, him on the surface neglect- he continues : ^^ What sig- ed and unremoved ; it is nifies it to me whether he only the tempest that lifts who does it is a king or a him from his place, common man ; my country- " Without consulting man or not my country- your ministers, call together man ; whether it be done your whole council. Let it by an individual villain or appear to the public that an army of them ? . . . you can determine and act Let them call me rebel and for yourself. Come forward welcome ; I feel no concern to your people. Lay aside from it, but I should suffer the wretched formalities of the misery of devils were I a king, and speak to your to make a whore of my subjects with the spirit of soul by swearing allegiance a man, and in the language to one whose character is of a gentleman, that of a sottish, stupid, These sentiments, sir, and stubborn, worthless, brutish the style they are conveyed man ! . . . There are in, may be ofPensive, per- cases which can not be over- haps, because they are new done by language, and this to you." — Let. 35. is one."— Crisis, i. In the following, diminutives are handled with tell- ing effect : Paine, Junius. "Indolence and inability "About this time the have too large a share in courtiers talked of nothing your composition ever to but a bill of pains and pen- suffer you to be any thing alties against the lord more than the hero of lit- mayor and sheriffs, or im- 102 JUNIUiS UNMASKED. tie villainies and unfinished peachment at the least, adventures/^ — To Lord Little Mannikin Ellis told Howe, Crisis, v. the king that if the busi- ^' That a man whose soul ness were left to his man- is absorbed in the low traf- agement he would engage fie of vulgar vice, is inca- to do wonders. It was pable of moving in any su- thought very odd that a perior region, is clearly business of so much im- shown in you by the event portance should be intrust- of every campaign. ^^ — To ed to the most contempti- Lord Howe, Crisis, v. ble little piece of machin- ^^ You may plan and ex- ery in the whole kingdom, ecute little mischiefs, but His honest zeal, however, are they worth the expense was disappointed. The they cost you, or will such minister took fright, and at partial evils have any efiect the very instant that little on the general cause ? Ellis was going to open, Your expedition to Egg sent him an order to sit Harbor will be felt at a down. All their magnan- distance like an attack up- imous threats ended in a on a hen-roost, and expose ridiculous vote of censure, you in Europe with a sort and a still more ridiculous of childish frenzy.'^ — Crisis, address to the king." — vi. Note, Let. 38. The reader will observe that the method also of rid- icule is the same. A hundred examples of this might be selected from both ; and he has, doubtless, already noticed the biting satire of both. The Letters of Jun- ius are among the finest specimens of satire in the Eng- lish language, and are only equaled by Mr. Paine^s Letters to Lord Howe, and passages in his Rights of Man to Mr. Burke. I will give a few extracts. It will be remembered how Junius called the king not only a '^ruffian," but said "nature only intended him for a good humored fool," and that if he ever retired to STYLE. 103 America he would get a severe covenant to digest from a people who united in detesting the pageantry of a king and the supercilious hypocrisy of a bishop. With this remembrance I will submit the following piece of satire from Crisis, No. vi : " Your rightful sovereign, as you call him, may do well enough for you, who dare not inquire into the humble capacities of the man ; but we, who estimate persons and things by their real worth, can not suffer our judgment to be so imposed upon; and unless it is your wish to see him exposed, it ought to be your en- deavor to keep him out of sight. The less you have to say about him the better. We have done with him, and that ought to be answer enough. You have been often told so. Strange! that the answer must be so often repeated. You go a begging with your king as with a brat, or with some unsalable commodity you are tired of; and though every body tells you no, no, still you keep hawking him about. But there is one that will have him in a little time, and as we have no inclination to disappoint you of a customer, we bid nothing for him." Many passages of similar severity could be collected. In fact, the two Letters addressed to Lord Howe are not equaled in force or severity by the most savage of Junius^ productions. I now call attention to other parallel peculiarities. The manner of threatening, commanding, and warn- ing, is the same : Paine, Junius. " I hold up a warning to " The English nation 104 JUNIUS UNMASKED. your senses, if you have must be roused and put any left. . . I call, not upon its guard. . . The with the rancor of an ene- corruption of the legisla- my, but the earnestness of tive body on this side, a a friend, on the deluded military force on the other, people of England. . . . and then farewell to Eng- There is not a nobleman's land." — Let. 40. country seat but may be ^' Sullen and severe with- laid in ashes by a single out religion, profligate person.^' — Crisis, vi. without gayety, you live "A change of the minis- like Charles the Second, try in England may proba- without being an amiable bly bring your measures companion, and, for aught into question and your head I know, may die as his to the block.'' — To Lord father did, without the Howe, Crisis, v. reputation of a martyr." — ^'Go home, sir, and en- Let. 12. deavor to save the remains " Return, my lord, be- of your rained country by fore it be too late, to that a just representation of the easy, insipid system which madness of her measures, you first set out with. A few moments well ap- Take back your mistress, plied may yet preserve her Indulge the people. At- from political destruction." tend New Market. To be — Crisis, V. weak and inactive is safer \^^ The farce of monarchy than to be daring and "jand aristocracy in all coun- criminal ; and wide is the tries is following that of distance between a riot of chivalry, and Mr. Burke the populace and a convul- is dressing for the funeral, sion of the whole king- The time is not very distant dom." — Let. 11. when England will laugh " The period is not very at itself for sending to Hoi- distant at Avhich you will land, Hanover, Zell, or have the means of redress Brunswick, for men, at the in your own power ; it may expense of a million a year, be nearer, perhaps, than who understand neither her any of us expect, and I laws, her language, nor her would warn you to be pre- STYLE. 105 interest, and whose capaci- pared for it.^^ — Dedica- ties would scarcely have tion. fitted them for the office of parish constable." — Rights of Man. But examples of this kind are not wanting in any chapter or Letter. The threat, the command, the warn- ing, is a peculiarity so prominent that no one would fail to observe it. And this peculiarity often passes into the style of prophecy. As above, Junius says : " The period is not very distant/' and Mr. Paine re- peats the expression in the same style : " The time is not very distant.'^ This reveals, not a literary theft, but a mind whose mode of thinking and expression was ever the same. The reader will furthermore notice the peculiarity in the use of " sir," and the expressions, '^ You, Sir William," '^ You, sir," so common to both. This arises from the proud and commanding character of Mr. Paine. He always talks as one having authority, when addressing those he wishes to satirize, but with an avowed modesty when addressing those he wishes to influence. This last is seen in Junius, with regard to Lords Rockingham and Chatham, when speaking of parliamentary reform, and in Common Sense, when speaking of a constitution and methods of taxation. Junius says, after giving his own views: "Other measures may, undoubtedly, be supported in argu- ment, as better adapted to the disorder, or more likely to be obtained." And Common Sense says: "In a former page I threw out a few thoughts on the pro- 106 JUNIUS UNMASKED. priety of a continental charter^ for I only presume to offer hints, not plans." These things point to the same mental source, and this characteristic influences the style to a marked degree. I call attention now to what is termed alliteration: the bringing words together commencing with the same letter, as follows : Paine, Jvmius. Best and brightest. Conduct and character. Character and conduct. Mark the movements and Concurrence of calami- meaning, tons circumstances. For law as for land. Catchpenny contrivance. Fears and falsities. Dignity of the design. Prejudice and preposses- Enormous excesses. sion. Faith and folly. Patron and punisher. Fashionable formality. Wise and worthy. Pernicious principles, etc. Stay and starve. Good faith and folly Reconciliation and ruin have long been received as are nearly related. synonymous terms. s The above are only a few examples. Almost every page exhibits this feature of the writer. It is a mania with Mr. Paine, and it is almost the first observable feature of Junius. No other author that I have read so abounds in alliteration. But herein Junius and Mr. Paine, not content with two words, frequently unite three, as in some of the examples above. They also bring two words thus together, and ascending from the sound to the sense, give them relationship in mean- ing; as in the last examples above. STYLE. 107 As alliteration exhibits a law of the mind, it can easily be determined, by the rule of averages, whether Mr. Paine and Junius agree. I have estimated the ratio by counting twenty thousand words in each, and have found them to average the same. Were all the words in Junius counted and compared with the same number in Mr. Paine's political writings, it would give the true law of averages, but twenty thousand words will give an approximation not far from the truth. There is another peculiarity in the style of Mr. Paine and Junius, arising out of this law of the mind, or this mania for alliteration, which is to continue the alliteration throughout the paragraph. For example, if a prominent word begins with an f, t, or p, or any other letter, he continues to select words beginning with the same letter, or in which the sound is promi- nent, while expressing the same thought or idea. In the following he ])lays upon like letters in a wonder- ful manner. I will put the words in italics : Paine. Junius. " Perhaps the sentiments *' Prejudices and passions contained in the following have, sometimes, carried it 'pages, are not yet sufficient- to a criminal length, and ly fashionable to procure whatever foreigners may them general favor; a long imagine, we know that habit of not thinhing a thing Englishmen have erred as wrong gives it a superficial much in a mistaken zeal for appearance of being 7'ight, pai^ticular persons and fam- and raises, at first, a for- Hies as they ever did in de- midable outcry in defense of fense of what they thought custom. But the tumult most dear and interesting soon subsides. Time makes to themselves.'^ — Let. 1. more converts than reason.'^ C. S., Introd. 108 JUNIUS UNMASKED. I have not gone out of my way for the above ex- amples. Thousands of just such examples may be taken from both. This, together with the even length of the members of the period, is what produces the rythm and harmony of Mr. Paine^s style, and which I have never seen paralleled, except in Junius. I have con^pared it with a hundred authors, and never have I found any thing like it. But Junius is in no respect unlike Mr. Paine. Had a perfect portrait been painted of Mr. Paine, at the time he wrote his Com- mon Sense, and another at the time Junius wrote his Letters, the two portraits could not have more resem- bled each other than does the style of Junius resemble that of Mr. Paine. And this is what can not be imi- tated, for it arises out of the constitution of the mind, just like poetry or music; and the poet and musician are born, not made. Mr. Paine and Junius never use poetry, unless it be a line at the head of a piece. And they both ridicule the use of it in prose composition. Paine. Jmiiiis. '^ I can consider Mr. " These letters, my lord, Burke's book in scarcely are read in other countries any other light than a and in other languages, dramatic performance, and and I think I may affirm he must, I think, have without vanity, that the considered it in the same gracious character of the light himself by the j9oej^ica^ best of princes is by this liberties he has taken of time not only perfectly omitting some facts, dis- known to his subjects, but torting others, and making tolerably well understood the machinery bend to pro- by the rest of Europe. In duce a stage effect. . . . this respect alone I have STYLE. 109 I have now to follow Mr. the advantage of Mr, Burke through a pathless AVhitehead. His plan, I wilderness of rhapsodies.^^ think, is too narrow. He -Rights of Man, part i. seems to manufacture his verses for the sole use of the hero who is supposed to be the subject of them, and, that his meaning may not be exported in foreign bot- toms, sets all translation at defiance.^'— Let. 49. They sometimes wander from the point, and then bring the reader back by mentioning the fact : Paine. Junius. '^ But to return to the " But, sir, I am sensible case in question." — Crisis, I have followed your ex- vii and xiii. ^^ Passing on ample too long, and wan- from this digression, I shall dered from the point." — now endeavor to bring into Let. 18. one view the several parts." — Crisis, viii. " But to re- turn to my account." — Rights of Man, part i. Another peculiarity is the method of bringing the subject " into one view :" Paine. Junius. See last quotation above. " This, sir, is the detail. " Having now finished this In one view, behold," etc. subject, I shall bring the — Let. 1. several parts into one See also Letter 13. view." — Rights of Man, part ii. 110 JUNIUS UNMASKED. I have before called attention to the manner in which Mr. Paine signed his Introduction to Common Sense, and Junius his Dedication; but there is a similarity in the manner in which they frequently close their pieces. The expressions, "To conclude," "I shall conclude," " I shall therefore conclude," are used by both. There is a marked peculiarity in taking illustrations from the Bible, and I now speak of and compare the political writings of Mr. Paine with Junius. Junius is filled with such references, and they are no less plenti- ful in Common Sense. This leads me on to speak of figures of speech. In the use of the trope I find the one a reproduction of the other. The metaphor comes before us in every conceivable beauty, and herein they paint with an art- ist's skill, and the many delicate touches, as well as bold strokes, show the same hand at the brush. There is never, for example, a long and labored metaphor ; never a company of them together; never one that does not apply with admirable effect. At the close of ai:^ article, a figure of speech is often used with a master's skill, and leaves an impression on the mind of the reader not easily effaced. In this they are alike. Junius, for example, closes thirty-six of his Letters in this manner; and in Mr. Paine's three works — Common Sense, The Crisis, and Eights of Man — he closes twenty-three parts in this manner, which gives us about the same ratio. They both abound in meta- phor and comparison. Seldom do they use allegory or hyperbole, but personification and exclamation are fre- STYLE. Ill quento I will now give a few parallels which I have selected from the many examples^ and I will begin the list with exclamations so common to both : Paine, Junius, Alas! But^ alas! I thank God! I thank God! For God's sake ! Would to God ! In the name of Heaven ! In God's name ! Good God! May God protect me! Good Heavens! I appeal to God for my I pray God ! sincerity ! The expression, " I thank God !" is the most frequent with both. As this is not common with writers, the parallel is a strong one. But to continue : Paine, Junius, " Every political physi- " It is not the disorder, cian will advise a differ- but the physician — it is the ent medicine.'' — Common pernicious hand of govern- Sense. ment." — Let. 1. ^* Why is the nation sick- " Infuse a portion of new ly?" health into the constitu- tion."— Let. 68. "Like a prodigal lin- "No man regards an gering in habitual con- eruption on the surface sumption, you feel the relics when the noble parts are of life, and mistake them invaded and he feels a mor- for recovery." — Address to tification approaching the English people. heart." — Let. 39. " These are the times that " These are not the times try men's souls." — Crisis, i. to admit of any relaxation in the little discipline we have left." 112 JUNIUS UNMASKED. The constituents "mak- ing a rod for themselves/^ Speaking of Abbe Ray- naPs work, he calls it a ^^ performanGeJ^ — Letter to. "At stake/' This ex- pression is very frequent. ^' In one view.'' Quite frequent. " The time is not very distant." " The simple voice of nature and reason will say it is right." " Where nature hath given the one she hath withheld the other." "For as the greater weight will always carry up the less, and all the wheels of .a machine are put in motion by one, it only remains to know which power in the constitution has most weight." " One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings is that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion." "Under the rod of the constituent." Speaking of M. de Lolme's Essay on Govern- ment, he calls it a ^^perform- ance: -Preface. "At stake." This ex- pression is very frequent. "In one view." Quite frequent. " The period is not very distant." " The voice of truth and reason must be silent." " Nature has been spar- ing of her gifts to this noble lord." " We incline the balance as effectually by lessening the weight in the one scale as by increasing it in the other." "You would fain be thought to take no share in government, while in reality you are the main- spring of the machine." " It is you. Sir William, who make your friend ap- pear awkward and ridicu- lous, by giving him a laced suit of tawdry qualifications which nature never intended him to wear." < STYLE. 113 In the last metaphor nature personified is brought forward as the actor, by turning to ridicule the vanity of man in assuming more than he is, Junius, without expressing it in words, has put forward the fable of the ass in a lion's skin, when speaking of Lord Gran- by's courage. But Mr. Paine has applied the same fable to the king. The figures are differently ex- pressed but exactly the same. Paine. Junius. " Like wasting an estate " Like broken tenants on a suit at law to regulate who have had warning to the trespasses of a tenant, quit the premises, they whose lease is just expir- curse their landlord, de- iug." stroy the fixtures, throw every thing into confusion, and care not what mischief they do the estate," The above is the same figure, but differently applied. This figure is quite often used by Mr. Paine and Junius. Paine. Junius. " Quitting this class of " I turn with pleasure men, I turn with the warm from that barren waste in ardor of a friend, to those which no salutary plant who have nobly stood and takes root, no verdure are yet determined to stand quickens, to a character fer- the matter out. I call not tile as I willingly believe upon a few, but upon all, in every great and good up and help us; lay your qualification. I call upon shoulders to the wheel." — you, in the name of the Crisis, i. English nation, to stand forth in defense of the laws of your country and to ex- ert in the cause of truth 114 JUNIUS UNMASKED. and justice those great abilities with which you were intrusted for the benefit of mankind." — Let. 68. There are two facts in the above parallel showing that the same mind indited both. First : Turning away from those who have deserved and who have been receiving his censure to the friends of the cause ; and, Secondly: The call which immediately follows: ^^I call upon you." That it was not stolen from Junius by Mr. Paine, is proven by two facts. First : The language and figure are different; and, Secondly: That which makes it a parallel it is impossible to steal. It is a parallel of conditions, the one in England and the other in America. But if Junius were not Mr. Paine, then would the conditions be destroyed. But there is a parallel of conditions, which can not be plagiarized ; therefore Thomas Paine was Junius. If it be argued in answer to this reasoning : There might be just such conditions existing with the char- acter Junius in England as with Paine in America, which might produce a parallel as above, I admit the possibility ; but the chances are infinity to one against such a hypothesis. But to reduce the chances still more, let us bring a parallel of fact to illustrate a principle of national honor. Paine. Junius. " There is such an idea " If we recollect in what in the world as that of na- manner the king^s friends tional honor, and this false- have been constantly em- ly understood is oftentimes ployed, we shall have no the cause of war. In a reason to be surprised at STYLE. 115 Christian and philosophical any condition of disgrace sense mankind seem to have to which the once respected stood still at individual name of Englishman may civilizations, and to retain be degraded as nations all the original The expedition against rudeness of nature. Peace Port Egmont does not ap- by treaty is only a cessa- pear to have been a sudden tion of violence for a refor- ill-concerted enterprise : it mation of sentiment. It is seems to have been con- a substitute for a principle ducted, not only with the that is wanting and ever usual military precautions, will be wanting till the idea but in all the forms and of national honor is rightly ceremonies of war. A understood. I remember frigate was first employed the late Admiral Saunders to examine the strength of declaring in the House of the place. A message was Commons, and that in the then sent demanding im- time of peace, ^ That the mediate possession in the city of Madrid laid in ashes Catholic king's name, and was not a sufficient atone- ordering our people to de- ment for the Spaniards tak- part. At last a military ing off the rudder of an force appears and compels English sloop of war.' I the garrison to surrender. do not ask whether this is A formal capitulation en- Christianity or morality, I sues, and his majesty's ship, ask whether it is decency ? which might at least have whether it is proper Ian- been permitted to bring guage for a nation to use? home his troops immedi- In private life we call it ately, is detained in port by the plain name of bully- twenty days and her rud- ing, and the elevation of der forcibly taken away. rank can not alter its char- This train of facts carries acter. It is, I think, ex- no appearance of the rash- ceedingly easy to define ness or violence of a Span- what ought to be under- ish governor. Mr. Bucca- stood by national honor ; relli is not a pirate, nor has for that which is the best he been treated as such by character for an individual those who employed him. 8 116 JUNIUS UNMASKED. is the best character for a I ^eel for the honor of a nation ; and wherever the gentleman when I affirm latter exceeds or falls be- that our king owes him a neath the former, there is a signal reparation. When departure from the line of will the humility of this true greatness." — Crisis, country end? A king vii. of Great Britain, not con- tented with placing himself upon a level with a Span- ish governor, descends so low as to do a notorious injustice to that gover- nor. Thus it happens in private life with a man who has no spirit nor sense of honor. One of his equals orders a servant to strike him : instead of returning the blow to the master, his courage is contented with throw- ing an aspertion equally false and public upon the character of the servant." — Let. 42. The above parallel, like the preceding one, arises primarily in the mind from the association of ideas. The definition of national honor is the same, and arose out of the same transaction. Taking away the rudder from an English frigate was a national insult, but instead of demanding reparation of the king of Spain, the king of England would satisfy his honor by attack- ing a king's servant, which furnishes the materials for the censure of Junius, and Admiral Saunders would be satisfied to see the city of Madrid laid in ashes, which furnishes the just ground for the aspersions of Mr. Paine; and from thence they define national honor to be that deportment which is best suited to an individual. They both state the case, and then define ; the method and figures are the same. But there is another parallel in these two pieces, and in the same connection. Mr. Paine and Junius both use very harsh language in STYLE. 117 commenting on the facts in the case, and when they close their censure they say : Paine. Junius. " This, perhaps, may " These are strong terms, sound harsh and uncourtly, sir, but they are supported but it is too true, and the by fact and argument." more is the pity." This apology taken in the same connection, shows the same mind, for it is a law of nature, whether ex- hibited in mind or matter, that when given the same conditions the same results follow. Now if Thomas Paine be not Junius, then would no such parallels be found ; for, as before remarked, literary theft is impossi- ble, inasmuch as conditions can not be stolen, and more especially the most important condition in the above case, mental constitution. In other words the case is stated by the same person, in the same style, but not in the same language Paine. Junius. ^^This plain language "These sentiments, sir, may, perhaps, sound un- and the style they are con- courtly to an ear vitiated veyed in, may be offensive by courtly refinements, but perhaps, because they are words were made for use, new to you. Accustomed and the fault lies in deserv- to the language of courtiers, ing them, or the abuse in you measure their affections applying them unfairj^^ " by the vehemence of their — Crisis, ii. expressions ; and when they only praise you indifferently you admire their sincerity." —Let. 35. 118 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Paine, " Like a stream of water.'' "Slave in buff/' " My creed in politics." " Expressed myself over- warmly." '^By following the pas- sion and stupidity of the pilot you wrecked the ves- sel within sight of the shore." Applied to Eng- land. *^ It needs no painting of mine to set it off, for na- ture can only do it justice." " She [England] set out with the title of parent or mother country. The as- sociation of ideas which naturally accompany this expression are filled with every thing that is fond, tender, and forbearing. They have an energy pe- culiar to themselves, and overlooking the accidental attachment of natural af- fection apply with infinite softness to the first feelings of the heart." " That men never turn rogues without turning Junius. "Like a rapid torrent." " Cream-colored para- site." " Political creed we pro- fess." " Passionate language." " In the shipwreck of the state, trifles float and are preserved, while every thing solid and valuable sinks to the bottom and is lost forever." " The works of a master require no index ; his fea- tures and coloring are taken from nature." " With all his mother's softness.'^ [Mr. Paine argued against this title of " mother country " being applied to England. And what is remarkable, Junius was never betrayed into it, even with all his prejudice in favor of the English na- tion hanging about him. In Letter 1, he speaks of England as having " alien- ated the colonies from their natural affection to their common country," and in no place says parent or mother country. This fact is a striking parallel.] " There is a proverb con- cerning persons in the pre- STYLE. 119 fools, is a maxim sooner or dicament of this gentleman, later universally true/' — ^ They commence dupes, and Crisis, iii. finish knaves/ '^ — Let. 49. " The corrupt and aban- ^* Corruption glitters in doned court of Britain.^' the van, collects and main- tains a standing army of mercenaries." " Trembling duplicity of ^' In that state of aban- a spaniel.^' doned servility and prosti- tution." ..." The min- istry, abandoned as they are." . " i^gony of a wounded " When the mind is tor- mind." tured." " Compound of reasons." " Compound his ideas." " Nothing but the sharp- " He was forced to go est essence of villainy com- through every division, re- pounded with the strongest solution, composition, and distillation of folly, could refinement of political have produced a menstruum chemistry before he hap- that would have effected a pily arrived at the caput separation." — Crisis, iii. mortuum of vitriol in your grace. Flat and insipid in your retired state ; but brought into action you be- come vitriol again." — Let. 15. In the above Mr. Paine applies this figure of polit- ical chemistry to the causes which led to the separation of the colonies from England. Junius is speaking to the Duke of Grafton. ^^ Menstruum ^^ and ^^ Caput mor- titum/' are old chemical terms. The former means that which will dissolve, and the latter the worthless matter which is left. They are both figures of analysis, and show the writer to have given his attention, to chemis- try. Mr. Paine, it is well known, in 1775, shortly after 120 JUNIUS UNMASKED. arriving in America, '^set his talents to work^^ to mahe saltpeter by some cheap and expeditious method, and formed an association to supply gratuitously the na- tional magazines with powder. This fact also shows that Mr. Paine came to America to fight England ; for it was before he had written his Common Sense. His object was, to be prepared; his method was, first the powder and then the Declaration of Independence, which last was produced by the pamphlet Common Sense. Paine. Junius. "It renders man dimin- "Women, and men like utive in things that are women, are timid, vindic- great, and the counterfeit of tive, and irresolute.^^ — Let. woman in things that are 41. small/^ — Rights of Man, part i. •' Fact is superior to rea- " The plain evidence of soning.^^ — Rights of Man, facts is superior to all dec- part ii., chap. i. larations.^^ — Let. 5. " You sunk yourself be- " You are degraded be- low the character of a pri- low the condition of a man." vate gentleman." — Crisis, — Let. 34. ii. " Now if I have any con- " I thought, however, he ception of the human heart, had been better read in the they will fail in this more history of the human heartJ^ than in any thing they have — Let. 27. yet tried." — Crisis, iii. Mr. Paine and Junius both reasoned, and this very often, from the nature of man, and especially his pas- sions. The following are parallels : STYLE. 121 Paine. Junius. "■ Spirit of prophecy." " Spirit of prophecy." '' Man of spirit." " Man of spirit." " Air of." '' Air of." '' Strokes of." " Strokes of." '' Give color to." *' Give color to." '^ Tranquillity of." '' Tranquillity of." ^^ Narrow views." ^' Narrow views." '^ But the great hinge on " This is not the hinge on which the whole machine which the debate turns." — turned^ is the union of the Let. 16. States.^' — Crisis, xv., note. " Each individual feels " I consider nothing but his share of the wound the wound which has been given to the whole." — given to the law." — Let. 30. Crisis, xii. ^^ Thorn in the flesh." '^ Thorn in the king's side." ^' As the future ability of " The features of the in- a giant over a dwarf is de- fant are a proof of the de- lineated in his features while scent." — Let. 58. an infant." — Crisis, xi. ^ " But from such opposi- " Hardly serious at first, tion, the French revolu- he is now an enthusiast, tion, instead of suffering, The coldest bodies warm receives homage. The more with opposition, the hardest it is struck, the more sparks sparkle in collision." — Let. it will emit."— Rights of 35. Man, part i. " He pities the plumage, ^^ The feather which adorns but forgets the dying bird." the royal bird supports his — Do. flight. Strip him of his plumage, and you fix him to earth."— Let. 42. " The ripeness of the con- ^' When you are ripe, you tinent for independence." shall be plucked." — Let. 66. 122 JUNIUS UNMASKED. " Had you studied true ^' But neither should I greatness of hearty the first think tlie most exalted fac- and fairest ornament of ulties of the human mind mankind.''' — Crisis, vii. a gift worthy of the Divin- ity, nor any assistance in [This shows a parallel the improvement of them a also in the estimation they subject of gratitude to my place upon the human fac- fellow-creatures, if I were ulties, which is worth more not satisfied that really to in argument than any par- inform the understanding, allel of figure or expres- corrects and enlarges the sion.] heart/' — Last sentence of Junius. Wounded herself to the " Stab you to the heart.'^ i) heart.'' " Unite in despising you." ^' United detestation.' '' We are not moved by " How far you are au- thegloomy sm^eof a worth- thorized to rely upon the less king." — Crisis, iv. sincerity of those smiles which a pious court lav- ishes without reluctance upon a libertine by pro- fession," etc. — Let. 15. "That which, to some " We owe it to the boun- persons, appeared modera- ty of Providence that the tion in you at first, was not completest depravity of the produced by any real virtue heart is sometimes strangely of your own, but by a con- united with a confusion of trast of passions, dividing the mind, which counter- and holding you in perpet- acts the most favorite prin- ual irresolution. One vice ciples, and makes the same w^ill frequently expel an- man treacherous w^ithout other, without the least art, and a hypocrite with- merit in the man, as powers out deceiving." — Let. 15. in contrary directions re- duce each other to rest." — ■ Crisis, V. STYLE. 123 The last parallel above will bear a moment^s thought and study. Paine says: '^Without the least merit in the man.^' Junius says : ^' We owe it to the bounty of Providence." They were both deeply read in the history of the human heart. The following is of the same nature, showing the same mental philosophy : Paine. Junius. " Men whose political " In public affairs there principles are founded on is the least chance of a avarice are beyond the perfect concurrence of sen- reach of reason, and the timent or inclination. If only cure of toryism of individuals have no vir- this cast is to tax it. A tues, their vices may be of substantial good drawn use to us. I care not with from a real evil, is of the what principle the new- same benefit to society as born patriot is animated if drawn from a virtue; if the measures he sup- and when men have not ports are beneficial to the public spirit to render community. The nation themselves serviceable, it is interested in his con- ought to be the study of duct, the motives are his government to draw the own.'^ — Let. 58. best possible use from " I am not so unjust as their vices. When the to reason from one crime governing passion of any to another ; though I man or set of men is once think that, of all vices, known, the method of avarice is most apt to managing them is easy; taint and corrupt the for even raisers, whom no heart." — Let. 27. public virtue can impress, would become generous could a heavy tax be laid upon covetousness." " Charity with them be- ^^ His charity has im- gins and ends at home." — proved upon the proverb^ 124 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Exam, of Prophecies^ Ap- and ended where it be- pendix. gan/^ — Let. 27. ^^ Gut a verse." ^' Gut a resolution.^^ The above are a few of the similar figures which have come under my eye. The careful reader will, doubtless^ find many more, as I have given my attention to a multiplicity of subjects in this investi- gation, and many parallels would thus escape me. But I have given more than sixty, which ought to arrest the attention of any thinking man. Together with the above may be taken parallel phrases fre- quently used by both ; for example : '^ I affirm,'^ '' Excess of folly/' '' In point of," " Give the lie to," ^' For several reasons," " Branded with," ^' It signi- fies not," " Circumstanced," ^^ For my own part," "In short," "Forever," "Common cause." I now pass on to those figures of speech which come in the form of argumentation, as antithesis and interrogation. ^ Antithesis is a species of word painting. It is to an argument what light and shade are to a painting. There can, therefore, be no argument without an- tithesis in some form. It may be defined, contrast- ing or placing in opposition opinions, sentiments, and ideas. The following are examples : Paine. Junius. "At home and abroad." "At home and abroad." " A government of ' our " If we see them obedi- own is our natural right ; ent to the laws, prosper- STYLE. 125 and when a man seriously ous in their industry, reflects on the precarious- united at home and re- ness of human affairs, he spected abroad, we may will become convinced that reasonably presume that it is infinitely wiser and their affairs are conducted safer to form a constitu- by men of experience, tion of our own in a cool, abilities, and virtue. If, deliberate manner, while on the contrary, we see an we have it in our power, universal spirit of distrust than to trust such an in- and dissatisfaction, a rapid teresting event to time and decay of trade, dissensions chance. If loe omit it noiu, in all parts of the empire, some Massanello may here- a total loss of respect in after arise, who, laying the eyes of foreign powers, hold of popular disquie- we" may pronounce, with- tudes, may collect together out hesitation, that the the desperate and discon- government of that coun- tented, and, by assuming try is weak, distracted, to themselves the powers and corrupt/^ — Let. 1. of government, finally sweep away the liberties of the continent like a del- As would naturally be expected from what has al- ready been brought forward, in regard to the mental constitution of Mr. Paine, he abounds in this figure and style of argumentation; and it is the same witli Junius. Sentence after sentence, and period after period, are in antithesis. The expressions, " On the one hand, and on the other, ^.^ ^^ At home and abroad," ^^On this side, and on that," are the constant companions of both. Hence the method, also, in both, of bringing forward contra- dictions in the conduct and character of individuals, or in any proposition they are attacking. This is the lan- guage, also, of ridicule; the contradiction makes it ab- 126 JUNIUS UNMASKED. surd, the incongruity ridiculous. Antithesis is, there- fore, an argumentative figure of speech, in which con- trast or comparison is made to present an image of things or principles to the mind. It is to rhetoric what light and shade are to painting. In no other way can a writer paint a picture. Hence, when Mr. Paine says, '^ Were I disposed to paint a contrast," and when Jun- ius says, " Imagine what you might be, and then reflect upon what you are,'' they reveal the gift of that tre- mendous power they exhibit in their productions. It is from this constitutional arrangement of the mind which makes a man a good mathematician. For, if one will trace a mathematical process of reasoning, he will find it to be a system of comparisons or antitheses — and nothing else — having foundation primarily in equality. The idea of equality is the origin of mathematics. It was, therefore, a mathematician who wrote Junius. We can not go wrong in this conclusion, for we reason from first principles, and we would expect to find his style and language assuming mathematical preciseness, and only equaled by Mr. Paine in argumentation. From what has already been said, we would expect to find the frequent use of the dilemma, and the redudio ad absurdum — or, that the contrary of what is true leads to the absurd, Paine, Junius. " There is something ex- " The right of election b ceedingly ridiculous in the the very essence of the con- composition of monarchy; stitution. To violate that it first excludes a man from right, and, much more, to STYLE. 127 the means of information, yet empowers him to act in cases where the highest judgment is required. The state of a king shuts him from the Avorld, yet the business of a king requires him to know it thoroughly ; wherefore, the different parts, by unnaturally op- posing and destroying each other, prove the whole character to be absurd and ridiculous/' transfer it to any other set of men, is a step leading immediately to the dissolu- tion of all government. So far forth as it operates, it constitutes a House of Commons which does not represent the people. A House of Commons so formed would involve a contradiction, and the greatest confusion of ideas; but there are some minis- ters, my lord, whose views can only be answered by reconciling absurdities, and making the same proposi- tion which is false and ab- surd in argument true in fact."— Let. 11. I give the following dilemmas Paine, •^^ If you make the neces- sary demand at home, your party sinks ; if you make it not, you sink yourself; to ask it now is too late, and to ask it before was too soon ; and, unless it ar- rive quickly, will be of no use. In short, the part you have to act can not be act- ed." — Crisis, ii. Junius. " This confession reduces you to an unfortunate di- lemma. By renewing your solicitations, you must ei- ther mean to force your country into a war at a most unseasonable juncture, or, having no view or ex- pectation of that kind, that you look for nothing but a private compensation to yourself "—Let. 25. 128 JUNIUS UNMASKED. But these methods of arguQientation are only a species of antithesis^ and may all be reduced to the one funda- mental form of comparison. This may remind us of the fact that all improvement arises from comparison, whether in language, government, or personal exper- ience. I have one marked feature of argumentative figure to point out, and this is, interrogation. This is insinu- ation without direct attack, a sort of flank movement, when charges are made that can not be jjroven, or when too evident to need proof. This style is also not only common to both Mr. Paine and Junius, but so promi- nent that it attracts attention at once. It is frequently the case with Mr. Paine and Junius that '^ language fails,'' that is, it is poured forth in such torrents of abuse that the reader is made painfully aware of it, and to recapture the mind of the reader, they art- fully charge it to the impossibility of doing justice to so bad a subject. For example : Paine. Junius. "There are cases that "But this language is too can not be overdone by mild for the occasion. The language, and this is one. king is determined that our — Crisis, i. abilities shall not be lost to society." — Let. 48. "There is not in the "Our language has no compass of language a suf- terms of reproach, the mind ficiency of words to express has no idea of detestation, the baseness of your king, which has not already been his ministry, and his army, happily applied to you and They have refined upon exhausted. Ample justice STYLE. 129 villainy till it wants a has been done, by abler name. To the fiercer vices pens than mine, to the sep- of former ages they have arate merits of your life added the dregs and scum- and character. Let it be mings of the most finished my humble office to collect rascality, and are so com- the scattered sweets till pletely sunk in serpentine their united virtue tortures deceit that there is not left the sense.^' — Let. 4L among them one generous " In what language shall enemy.'^ — Crisis, v. I address so black, so cow- " We sometimes experi- ardly a tyrant. Thou ence sensations to which worse than one of the language is not equal. The Brunswicks and all the conception is too bulky to Stuarts.^^ — Let. 56. be born alive, and in the "The king has been ad- torture of thinking we vised to make a public sur- stand dumb. Our feel- render, a solemn sacrifice in ings imprisoned by their the face of all Europe, not magnitude, find no way only of the interest of his out, and in the struggle of subjects, but of his own per- expression every finger tries sonal reputation, and of the to be a tongue. The ma- dignity of that crown which chinery of the body seems his predecessors have worn too little for the mind, and with honor. These are we look about us for help strong terms, sir, but they to show our thoughts by. are supported by fact and Such must be the sensation argument/^ — Let. 42. of America whenever Bri- tain teeming with corrup- tion shall propose to her to sacrifice her faith. '^ — Crisis, xii. In the last parallel above, it will be noticed, the strong terms were called forth by a sacrifice of national honor with Great Britain, and a prospect of it in the United States. I call attention to this in this place to 130 JUNIU8 UNMASKED. save repetition of proofs, showing that proud spirit of personal honor so prominent in Paine and Junius, and from which they both say : national honor is governed by the same rules as personal honor. I now pass to notice the most prominent mental characteristics. MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. If the reader will carry forward in his mind what I have already said on style and the object for which Mr. Paine and Junius wrote, it will greatly aid me in re- ducing the size of this book, I shall act on the prin- ciple of this suggestion, and while I give new matter upon new subjects, the reader will find the parallels greatly strengthened by what has already been said. The reader will also apply the facts already brought for- ward to the passages I shall hereafter present, so that, like a two-edged sword, it may be made to cut both ways. And first of avarice and the miser .- Paine. Junius. " Could I find a miser ^' Of all the vices avarice whose heart never felt the is most apt to taint and cor- emotion of a spark of prin- rupt the heart.'' — Let. 27. ciple, even that man, unin- ^^ As for the common sor- fluenced by every love but did vieios of avarice," etc. — the love of money, and ca- Let. 53. pable of no attaohment but " The miser himself sel- to his interest, would and dom lives to enjoy the fruits must, from the frugality of his extortion.^' — Let. 20, which governs him, con- note. tribute to the defense of the " I could never have a country, or he ceases to be doubt in law or reason that a miser and becomes an a man convicted of a high idiot. breach of trust and of a no- 9 (131) 132 JUNIUS UNMASKED. " Every passion that acts torious corruption in the upon mankind has a pe- execution of a public office, culiar mode of operation, was and ought to be inca- Many of them are tempo- pable of sitting in the same rary and fluctuating; they parliament.'^ — Let. 20. admit of cessation and va- riety. But avarice is a fixed, uniform passion. It neither abates of its vigor nor changes its object.^^ — Crisis, X. I call attention to that pride of character and per- sonal honor, so conspicuous in both Paine and Junius : Paine. Junius. " A man who has no sense " Honor and honesty of honor, has no sense of must not be renounced, al- shame." — LettoCheetham. though a thousand modes,'' ^^ Knowing my own heart, etc. — Let. 58. and feeling myself, as I now " Junius will never de- do, superior to all the skir- scend to dispute with such mish of party, the inveter- a writer as Modestus.'' — acy of interested, or mis- Let. 29. taken opponents, I answer " For my own part, my not to falsehood or abuse." lord, I am proud to affirm, — R. M., part ii. that if I had been weak '^ Fortified with that enough to form such a proud integrity, that dis- friendship, I would never dain to triumph or to yield, have been base enough to I will advocate the rights betray it.'' — Let. 9. of man." — Do. A thousand passages might be selected from both to show this ruling trait of character. The proud, im- posing spirit that would dare to undertake the business of a world for the good of mankind, and to tread on the pride of courtiers, and to tell the king, who ruled MENTAL GHABACTEBISTICS. 133 over the greatest nation on earth, that nature had only intended him for a good-humored fool, is pre-eminently the leading trait in Junius and Paine. No one can mistake it; no one can fail in finding it; no one can help feeling the force of it. It has never been pro- duced in any other man. The world^s history has given us but the one example of it. We search in vain for another parallel. And if Mr. Paine did not write Junius, nature produced twins of the same men- tal type to do the same work for mankind, and then defeated all her arts and gave the lie to all her laws, by exhibiting the one and forever concealing the other. But surely nature can conceal nothing. Her method is to reveal, not to conceal. She writes the character of man on all he touches, and reveals it in the very language he would employ to conceal it. It was this proud spirit which gave Paine that con- tempt for monarchy which he so often expressed. ^^I have an aversion -to monarchy," he says, ^^ as being too debasing to the dignity of man." This is a language which courtiers could not understand, and they would consider it the vain babbling of a mad-man ; but it is the very basis of that government which he labored to establish in America and France. This is also the spirit of Junius when he says with such withering sarcasm : " It may be matter of curious speculation to consider, if an honest man were permitted to approach a king, in what terms he would address him- self to his sovereign." And after having gained the ear of the king, when he says: "Let it be imagined, no matter how improbable, that he has spirit enough t<;> bid him speak freely and understanding enough to 134 JUNIUS UNMASKED. listen to him with attention. Unacquainted with the vain impertinence of forms, he would deliver his senti- ments with dignity and firmness." ^ Here Junius, also, fortified with that proud integrity of character which he held in common with all who would not be enslaved, and which he possessed as the birthright of man, was free to place the dignity of an honest man in antithesis to a weak understanding in a king only supported by the vain impertinence of forms. Paine was too proud to be vain ; his pride came up from nature ; it was the pride of human worth, and opposed to that vanity of art which always makep pretentions to more worth than nature has conferred. Nature gives us pride, art makes us vain. It was this pride, in opposition to vanity, which Junius expressed in his great battle against the usurpations of government, when he says : " Both liberty and property are precarious unless the possessors have sense and spirit enough to defend them. This is not the language of vanity. If I am a vain man my gratification lies within a narrow circle." That is, ^' to write for fame and be unknown." From this pride of character, so strong and peculiar, we may draw no weak conclusion in regard to the authorship of Junius, for the parallel is perfect, and the age in which he wrote gave us nothing like it in any one but Paine. This characteristic gives tone to the whole mind, and a shade of coloring to every faculty. It reflects itself upon the people, and draws therefrom the conclusion that they have more " sense and spirit " than they really possess. It gives a double coloring to hope, paints two bows instead of one, and reduces the time for the establishment of right. It thus produces MENTAL CHABACTEBISTICS. • 135 more faith in the people than facts will sustain. For exaraple : j Paine] Junius. " The fraud, hypocrisy, ^^ I believe there is yet a and imposition of govern- spirit of resistance in this ments are now beginning country, which will not to be too well understood submit to be oppressed ; to promise them any longer but I am sure there is a career. The farce of mon- fund of good sense in this archy and aristocracy in country which can not be all countries, is following deceived.'^ — Let. 16. that of chivalry, and Mr. " Although the king Burke is dressing for the should continue to support funeral. ^^ his present system of gov- ^^ The time is not very ernment, the period is not distant when England will very distant, at whicl)|^'0u laugh at itself for sending will have the means of abroad for a king." &c. redress in your own power ; " Within the space of a it may be nearer, perhaps, few years we have seen two than any of us expect, revolutions, those of Amer- " You are roused at last ica and France. . . . to a sense of your danger : From both these instances the remedy will soon be in it is evident that the great- your power." — Ded. est forces that can be brought into the field of revolutions, are reason and common interest. . We may hereafter hope to see revolutions or changes in government, produced by the same quiet operation, by which any measure determinable by reason and discussion, is accomplished." — R. of M. Part ii. "I do not believe that monarchy and aristocracy will continue seven years longer in any of the enlight- ened countries of Europe." — R. of M. Part ii. Pref. 136 JUNIUS UNMASKED. But Paine and Junius were botli mistaken. Reason will, perhaps, forever fail to produce a revolution with- out bloodshed. Reason only prepares for war, and when time has slowly accomjjlished the work of reason in any reform, it terminates that work in convulsions of war. The political corruptions, also, which Junius was so hopeful would soon be resisted by the English people, still exist, and the reforms he advocated, al- though partly accomplished, fail to produce any better result. The reason is, the people never resist tyranny till scourged into it, from self-interest; and, besides, they must worship a tyrant of some political form, bending the knee to king or party, and baring the back to the lash. A leader the people must have, under wh^c banner they can rally, and which they consider it treason to desert, and whether they vote for a president or bow to a king, is all the same. The political prayer of royalty or republicanism, if not in the same words, expresses the same fact. The one is, ^' Oh, Lord ! to the king I bow, thou knowest he can do no wrong.'^ The other is, ^' Oh, Lor(i ! to the party I bow, thou knowest I never scratched a ticket.^' Although Paine and Junius were thoroughly read in the history of the human heart, they failed to place a proper estimate on the character of mankind. They failed because they reasoned from their own pride of character, their own feelings, hopes, and desires, and these far exceeded the mass of mankind. They were both too proud to flatter. Paine, Junius. " As it is not ray cus- " I am not conversant in MENTAL CIIABACTEBISTIG8. 137 torn to flatter but to serve the language of panegyric, mankind, I will speak free- These praises are extorted ly." — Crisis, xi. from me; but they will ^^ The world knows I am wear well, for they have not a flatterer.'' — R. M., been dearly earned." — Let. part ii. Preface. 53. The above characteristic is quite peculiar. I do not remember of ever seeing the like of it in any other writer, and as there is a perfect parallel here, the fact that it stands almost alone gives it great weight. They were both enthusiasts, as the following paral- lel on moderation will show : Paine. Junius. "Though I would care- '^The lukewarm advo- fully avoid giving unneces- cate avails himself of any sary offense, yet I am in- pretense to relapse into that dined to believe that all indolent indifference about those who espouse the doc- every tiling that ought to trine of reconciliation may interest an Englishman, so be included within the fol- unjustly dignilied with the lowing descriptions : Inter- title of moderations^ — Let. ested men, who are not to 58. be trusted ; weak men who "I have been silent can not see; prejudiced men hitherto, though not from who will not see ; and a cer- that shameful indifference tain sort of moderate men, about the interests of so- who think better of the ciety which too many of us European world than it de- possess and call modera- serves; and this last class, tion.^^ — Let. 44. by an ill-judged delibera- tion, will be the cause of more calamities to this con- tinent than all the other three." — Common Sense. 138 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Paine and Junius both had the same opinion of mod- erate men. They both^ also, had secretiveness large. That Jun- ius never revealed himself to the world, and that he baffled all the king's spies, is evidence enough on his side. I will now present a few evidences in regard to Mr. Paine. First, in regard to his wife. No one knows why they parted, and, when interrogated, he would make the evasive answer, " I had a cause.'' But, if pressed, he would bluntly respond, '^ It was a private affair, and nobody's business." He also sent her money without letting her know the source of it. Secondly : His Common Sense was kept a secret from Dr. Franklin till published, and this when the doctor had placed the materials in his hands toward completing a history of colonial affairs. He says: "I expected to surprise him with a production on that subject much earlier than he thought of, and, without informing him what I was doing, got it ready for the press as fast as I conveni- ently could, and sent him the first pamphlet that was printed off'." Thirdly: He projected a plan of going to England in disguise, and getting out a pamphlet in se- cret, to rouse the English people. See what he says about it on page 66 of this book. Fourthly: "The Ad- dress and Declaration " of the gentlemen who met at the Thatched House tavern in 1791, in England, was written by Mr. Paine, although he was not known, and took no part in the meeting. He only revealed himself as the author of it after Home Tooke, the supposed au- thor, had stated that Mr. Paine was the author. But this is what he says about it : " The gentleman who MENTAL CHARACTERmTICS. 139 signed the address and declaration as chairman of the meeting, Mr. Home Tooke, being generally supposed to be the person who drew it up, and having spoken much in commendation of it, has been jocularly accused of praising his own work. To free him from this embar- rassment, and to save him the repeated trouble of men- tioning the author, as he has not failed to do, I make no hesitation in saying, I drew up the publication in question,^' etc. — Rights of Man, note. This is sufficient to show a trait of character which made Junius, as a secret, a success. Without this strong ruling passion there could have been no Junius to spring- like a tiger upon king and court. But, if it can be shown in any mental characteristic that Mr. Paine is incompatible with that character which is stamped upon Junius and made him a success, I will surrender the ar- gument. Mr. Paine says, as Home Tooke had not failed to de- clare him the author, he then acknowledged it as his own. Had Mr. Tooke been silent, you may well be as- sured Mr. Paine would never have divulged it to friend or foe of either. Since Mr. Paine above has used the expression, "Jocularly accused of praising his own work," the reader will not fail to remember the same characteristic in Junius, when he says of Philo Junius, and who was also the real Junius himself, that "the subordinate character was never guilty of the indecorum of praising his principal." This again reminds us of Mr. Paine, when speaking of that passage in Numbers : "Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were on the face of the earth." Paine bluntly responds : " If Moses said this of himself, in- 140 JUNIUS UNMASKED. stead of being the meekest of men, he was one of the most vain and arrogant of coxcombs." I now call attention to the fact that Mr. Paine and Junius, when attacking the private character of men, both seem to delight, when the fact would fit, in charging bastardy: Paine. Junius. ^' A French bastard, land- Speaking of the Duke of ing with an armed banditti, Grafton's ancestors : and establishing himself ^^ Those of your grace, king of England against for instance, left no distress- the consent of the natives, ingexamplesof virtue, even is, in plain terms, a very to their %^7^ma^!e posterity ; paltry rascally original. It and you may look back certainly hath no divinity with pleasure to an illus- in it," — Common Sense. trious pedigree, in which heraldry has not left a sin- gle good quality upon re- cord to insult or upbraid you. You have better proofs of your descent, my lord, than the register of a marriage," etc. — Let. 12. In their appeals to posterity they were both equal and frequent. Mr. Paine says, in closing his first Crisis: ^' By perseverance and fortitude we have the prospect of a glorious issue ; by cowardice and sub- mission the sad choice of a variety of evils, a ravaged country, a depopulated city, habitations without safety, and slavery without hope; our homes turned into bar- racks and bawdy-houses for Hessians and a future race MENTAL CI-IARACTERISTIO.S. 141 to provide for, whose fathers we shall doubt of. Ijook on this picture and weep over it ! and if there yet re- mains one thoughtless wretch who believes it not, let him suffer it unlamented." Junius also says in strains as pathetic and patriotic : '^ We owe it to posterity not to suffer their dearest inheritance to be destroyed. But if it were possible for us to be insensible of these sa- cred claims, there is yet an obligation binding on our- selves, from which nothing can acquit us, a personal interest which we can not surrender. To alienate even our own rights would be a crime as much more enor- mous than suicide as a life of civil security and freedom is superior to a bare existence ; and if life be the bounty of Heaven, we scornfully reject the noblest part of the gift, if we consent to surrender that certain rule of liv- ing, without which the condition of human nature is not only miserable, but contemptible.^^ — Let. 20. In the study of the human heart, and in a knowl- edge of the secret workings of the mind they were both masters. And, had it not been that they over- applied the nobler virtues in the common people, they would never have gone wrong in their conclusions. They failed not in the knowledge, but in the applica- tion of the thing. They thought it existed where it did not. But this is the law, which they laid down as follows : Paine, Junius. " It is the faculty of the ^' By persuading others human mind to become we convince ourselves. The what it contemplates, and passions are engaged, and to act in unison with its create a maternal affection objects."— R. M., part i. in the mind which forces f 142 JUNIUS UNMASKED. US to love the cause for which we suffer/' . . ^^ When once a man is determined to believe, the very absurdity of the doctrine confirms him in his faith." — Let. 35. The mental constitution of Mr. Paine made him practical. What he knew he considered of no use to himself unless he could apply it in some way. He finds the people oppressed by the usurpations of govern- ment, and he urges to rebellion. He finds in America, Britain had prohibited the importation of powder, and his knowledge of chemistry immediately supplies the national magazines. His mechanical thought was not satisfied until it had taken the form of an iron bridge. It was the same disposition in Junius which kept him forever talking of " experience," and the " evidence of facts." I give a single parallel out of hundreds : Paine. Junius. " In the progress of poli- ^* As you yourself are a tics, as in the common oc- singular instance of youth currences of life, we are not without spirit, the man only apt to forget the who defends you is a no ground we have traveled less remarkable example over, but frequently neg- of age without the benefit iect to gather up experience of experience.^^ — Let. 9. as we go." — Crisis, iii. I merely call attention to the above fact as a practi- cal feature of the mind common to both. In the same manner both make frequent mention of ^^reason^' and ^^ common sense." Examples of this kind it is useless to give, for they look out from every page. I now pass to consider their doctrines and private opinions ; and first of politics : MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 143 I have heretofore proven that they were not parti- sans in the strict sense of the term, yet they both had party proclivities: Paine. Junius. " There is a dignity in To the king : ^^ You are tne warm passions of a not, however, destitute of whig which is never to be support. You have all the found in the cold malice of a Jacobites, Non-jurors, Eo- tory; in the one nature is man Catholics, and Tories only heated, in the other of this country, and all poisoned. The instant the Scotland without excep- former has it in his power tion. . . . And truly, to punish, he feels a dispo- sir, if you had not lost the sition to forgive, but the Wkig interest of England, canine venom of the latter I should admire your dex- knows no relief but re- terity in turning the hearts venge. This general dis- of your enemies.'^ — Let. tinction will, I believe, 35. apply in all cases, and suits " When I hear the Un- as well the meridian of defined privileges of the England as America." — popular branch of the leg- Crisis, vi. islature exalted by tories and Jacobites, at the ex- pense of those strict rights which are known to the subject and limited by the laws, I can not but suspect that some mischievous scheme is in agitation to destroy both law and privi- lege, by opposing them to each other." — Let. 44. They both declare Law to be king: Paine. Junius. " But where, say some. To the king : ^' Nor can is the king of America? you ever succeed [against . ... So far as we Wilkes] unless he should 144 JUNIUS UNMASKED. approve of monarchy, in be imprudent enough to America the law is kingJ^ forfeit the protection of C. S. those laws to which you owe your crown^ — Let. 35. game laws of They both express themselves on the England as follows : Paine, " Had there been a house of farmers, there had been no game laws. . . . The French constitution says there shall be no game laws; that the farmer on v/hose lands wild game shall be found (for it is by the produce of those lands they are fed) shall have a right to what he can take. In England, game is made the property of those at whose expense it is fed." — E. of M. Jujiius. "As to the game laws, he [Junius] never scrupled to declare his opinion that they are a species of the forest laws: that they are oppressive to the subject; and that the spirit of them is incompatible with legal liberty: that the penalties imposed by these laws bear no proportion to the nature of the ofPense : that in par- ticular, the late acts to pre- vent dog-stealing or killing game between sun and sun, are distinguished by their absurdity, extravagance, and pernicious tendency.'^ —Let. 63. Both express themselves the same on laivs in general : Paine, Junius, " The government of a free " The submission of a free country, properly speaking, people to the executive au- v.is not in the persons, hut thority of government is no in the laivs.'^ — R. of M. more than a compliance with the laws which they them- selves have enacted.'' — L. 1. iENTAL CIIABACTEHISTICS. 145 I would have the reader mark the fact that the above sentiment of Junius is the first he proclaims in his book. This, it will readily be seen, contains in itself the whole system of politics which Junius and Paine labored to establish. From this sentiment arose the frequent expressions of Junius^ *' Original rights;^' ^^ First rights ; ^^ '' Sacred original rights of the people ; ^' ^' The meanest mechanic is equal to the noblest peer;^' and which Paine embodied in the expression, '^ Man- kind are originally equal in the order of creation. '^ Herein also we find the foundation for that method of both in tracing the rights of man back to their origin, and the easy manner in distinguishing original right from usurpation. A parallel here will make this plain : Paine. Junius. " The example shows to " To establish a claim of the artificial world that man privilege in either house, must go back to nature for and to distinguish original information." — R. M., part right from usurpation, it ii. " Can we possibly sup- must appear that it is indis- pose that if government pensably necessary for the had originated in a right performance of the duty, principle and had not an in- and also that it has been terest in pursuing a wrong uniformly allowed. From one, that the world could the first part of this de- have been in the wretched scription it follows, clearly, and quarrelsome condition that whatever privilege does we have seen it? of right belong to the pres- A\^hat was at first plunder, ent House of Commons, did assumed the softer name of equally belong to the first revenue, and the power assembly of their prede- originally usurped they af- cessors, was so completely fected to inherit." — R. M., vested in them, and might part ii., chap. ii. See, also, have been exercised in the 146 JUNIUS UNMASKED. a fine specimen of this kind same extent. From the of argumentation in the second we must infer that first chapter of Common privileges which, for sev- Sense. eral centuries, were not only never allowed, but never even claimed by the House of Commons, must be founded upon usurpa- tion/'— Let. 44. In regard to America, I have shown their views to run parallel. Mr. Paine says in Crisis vii : " The ministry and minority have both been wrong." And Junius says in his first Letter : " But unfortunately for his country, Mr. Grenville was at any rate to be dis- tressed because he was minister, and Mr. Pitt and Lord Camden were to be the patrons of America because they were in opposition." The minority here meant no more than the ruin of a minister and split the nation, with- out doing the colonies alny good. Mr. Paine also says of Lord Chatham on this same point in Crisis viii : '^ An opinion hangs about the gentlemen of the minor- ity, that America would relish measures under their administration which she would not from the present cabinet. On this rock Lord Chatham would have split had he gained the helm." I bring forward this parallel to show three things, the same political opinions, the same views of the par- ties in England, and the same figures of speech, all thrown into the same subject-matter. This, together with the same resemblance in style, surely point to the same author. MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. I47 This leads me on to speak of other private opinions. And first of lawyers, and especially Lord Mansfield : Paine. Junius. " It is difficult to know ^^ As a practical profes- when a lawyer is to be be- sion, the study of the law lieved.'^ — Let. to Erskine, requires but 'a moderate Int. portion of abilities. The Of those who preside at learning of a pleader is St. James^ ^^ They know usually upon a level with no other influence than cor- his integrity. The indis- ruption, and reckon all their criminate defense of right probabilities from prece- and wrong contracts the dent. A new^ case is to understanding, while it cor- them a new world, and rupts the heart. Subtlety while they are seeking for is soon mistaken for wis- a parallel they get lost, dom, and impunity for vir- The talents of Lord Mans- tue. If there be any in- field can be estimated at stances upon record (as best no higher than those some there are undoubtedly of a sophist. He under- of genius and morality stands the subtleties but united in a lawyer), they not the elegance of nature, are distinguished by their and by continually viewing singularity, and operate as mankind througk the cold exceptions.'^ — Let. 67. medium of the law, never '^ Considering the situa- thinks of penetrating into tion and abilities of Lord the warmer regions of the Mansfield, I do not scruple mind." — Crisis, vii. to affirm, with the most solemn appeal to God for my sincerity, that in my judgment he is the very worst and most dangerous ~ man in the kingdom.'^ — Let. Q>^. The above parallel in regard to Lord Mansfield is most remarkable. Let us consider it. Whether the 10 148 JUNIUS UNMASKED. statements be true or not, is immaterial. Mr. Paine said he knew no other influence than corruption ; that his talents were those of a sophist^ and that he under- stood the subtleties of nature, not its elegance. Refer- ence is here had to the Athenian sophists, whose art it was "to make the worse appear the better reason." This art made them talented in a certain direction, and in the employment of it they became renowned and rich. Paine affirms that the law had corrupted him. Junius says the practice of the law makes a bad man, and that Mansfield was, considering the conditions, the worst man in the kingdom. This is an opinion so sin- gular and prominent, so rare among men, and expressed so boldly and unqualifiedly, by both Paine and Junius, that it furnishes a parallel which comes with positive and telling force. Perhaps Paine and Junius were the only two writers at the time who held this opinion. And that they should express it in the same manner, with all the fine shades and attending peculiarities the same, and be at the same time two persons, is a phe- nomenon which nature never exhibited but once, and never will again among mankind. To remove the weight of this evidence, something positive must be brought forward to rebut it. It will be noticed above that Mr. Paine spoke of "precedent" being the basis of reckoning all their probabilities, and that a new case was a new world. Here we find anotlier parallel in opinion : Paine. Junius, " Government by prece- " Precedents, in opposi- dent, without any regard to tion to principle, have lit- MENTAL CHABAOTERISTICS. 149 the principle of the prece- tie weight with Junius^ but dent, is one of the vilest he thought it necessary to systems that can be set up. meet the ministry on their In nrumerous instances, the own ground." — Let. 16, precedent ought to operate note. as a warning, and not as *^ I am no friend to the an example, and requires to doctrine of precedents, ex- be shunned instead of imi- elusive of right, though tated ; but, instead of this, lawyers often tell us that precedents are taken in the whatever has been done lump, and put at once for once may lawfully be done constitution and for law.^^ again." — Preface. R. of M., part ii., chap. iv. Many examples could be given of the above like- ness, but these are sufficient. I submit the following in regard to Lord North : Paine. Junius. "As for Lord North, it "The management of the is his happiness to have in king's affairs in the House him more philosophy than of Commons can not be sentiment, for he bears flog- more disgraced than it has ging like a top, and sleeps been. A leading minister the better for it. His pun- repeatedly called down for ishment becomes his sup- absolute ignorance, ridic- port, for while he suffers ulous motions ridiculously the lash for his sins, he withdrawn, deliberate plans keeps himself up by twirl- disconcerted, a week's prep- ing about. In politics, he aration of graceful oratory is a good arithmetician, and lost in a moment, give us in every thing else nothing some though not adequate at alV^ — Crisis, vii. ideas of Lord North's par- liamentary abilities and in- fluence. Yet, before he had the misfortune of be- ing Chancellor of the Ex- 150 JUNIUS UNMASKED. chequer, he was neither an object of derision to his enemies, nor of melancholy pity to his friends. I hope he [Grafton] will not rely on the fertility of Lord North^s genius for finance ; his lordship is yet to give us the first proof of his ahilities.^' — Let. 1. Mr. Paine, no doubt, had in his mind this passage of Junius when he described him as a twirling top, a good arithmetician in politics, but in every thing else nothing at all. In speaking of the misconduct of England, they both make it commence at the termination of the Seven Years' War, and speak of the time reckoned from the beginning of the year 1763. I will notice Junius first, so as to present this parallel in chronological order. He says in his first Letter, written Jan. 21, 1769 : " Outraged and oppressed as we are, this nation will not bear, after a six years^ peace, to see new millions," etc. On Feb- ruary 14, 1770, he says : "At the end of seven years we are loaded with a debt," etc. This is the method, in regard to time Junius always employs when speaking of the distress and calamities of England. Let us now pass over to America, and we find, near the close of 1778, Mr. Paine uses the same method and language, when addressing the people of England in Crisis, vii : '^ A period of sixteen years of misconduct and misfortune is certainly long enough for any one nation to suffer under." He elsewhere uses the same language in the same way, which shows a mental habit peculiar to both. The same opinion of court and courtier has elsewhere MENTAL CHARACTERIiSTIGS. 151 been shown, but a definite parallel or two may not be out of place : Paine. Junius. *^ For the caterpillar prin- " Where birth and fortune ciples of all courts and cour- are united, we expect the tiers are alike/^ — Rights of noble pride and indepen- Man, part i. dence of a man of spirit, not the servile, humiliating complaisance of a courtier/' Let. 1. They held the same opinion of oaths : Paine. Junius. "If a government re- "He [the minister] is quires the support of oaths, the tenant of the day, and it is a sign that it is has no interest in the in- not worth supporting, and heritance. The sovereign ought not to be supported/' himself is bound by other R. of M., part ii, chap. iv. obligations, and ought to look forward to a superior, a permanent interest. His paternal tenderness should remind him how many hos- tages he has given to society. The ties of nature come powerfully in aid of oaths and protestations.'' — Let. 38. They place personal interest above strict moral rig Jit ^ as a means of improvement: Paine. Junius. " As to mere theoretical " It will be said, that I reformation, I have never deny at one moment what preached it up. The most I would allow at another, effectual process is that of To this I answer, gen- improving the condition of erally, that human affairs man by means of his inter- are in no instance governed 152 JUNIUS UNMASKED. est^ and it is on this by strict, positive right, ground that I take my . . . My premises, I stand." — R. of M., part ii, know, will be denied in ar- chap. V. gument, but every man's conscience tells him they are true. It remains then to be considered whether it be for the interest of the people/^ etc. — Let. 44. The reader will here see a mental characteristic the same, and a philosophy growing therefrom which is boldly affirmed by both. That we gather strength by antagonism, and in this way the vicious are often brought into notice and be- come successful, is a prominent fact noticed by both . Paine. Junius. " Those whose sentiments " Mr. Wilkes, if not are injudicious or unfriend- persecuted, will soon be ly, v/ill cease of themselves, forgotten. — Let. 11. See unless too much pains is also Let. 1 and 35. bestowed upon their con- version." — C. S., Int. I have heretofore given examples of the above to prove another fact. I now call attention to the passion of suspicion : Paine. Junius. " I am not of a disposi- " The situation of this tion inclined to suspicion, country is alarming enough It is, in its nature, a mean to rouse the attention of and cowardly passion, and, every man who pretends to upon the whole, even ad- a concern for the public mitting error into the case, welfare. Appearances jus- it is better ; I am sure it is tify suspicion ; and when MENTAL CHARACTEBISTIOS. 153 more generous to be wrong the safety of a nation is at on the side of confidence, stake, suspicion is a just than on the side of sus- ground of inquiry/^ — Let. picion. But, I know as a 1. fact, that the English gov- ernment. . . . Their anti- revolutionary doctrines invite suspicion even against one's will, and in spite of one's charity to be- lieve well of them." — Let. to Samuel Adams. The above is strong language in regard to suspicion. Paine thinks it mean and cowardly if not well founded, and Junius thinks it is justifiable when the safety of a nation is at stake. This is an uncommon sentiment, and, if Mr. Paine was Junius, he is found repeating himself after an interval of thirty-four years. In regard to thinking for one's self, Junius says of Benson, in withering rebuke to Lord Mansfield, who had committed him for contempt: "He had the im])u- dence to pi-etend to think for himself J' Paine exclaims : " Why is man afraid to think ? '^ There is a fact now in regard to the English army which is of great weight in my argument relative to a change of opinion. Junius always spoke highly of the army, while he sometimes censured individual officers. Speaking of the regiments of the guards, he says: " Far be it from me to insinuate the most distant reflection upon the army. On the contrary, I honor and esteem the profession, and if these gentlemen were better sol- diers I am sure they would be better subjects." Mr. 154 JUNIUS UNMASKED. Paine^ just nine years afterward, when in America, and fighting against the English army, says of the English people: "They are made to believe that their generals and armies differ from those of other nations, and have nothing of rudeness or barbarity in them. They sup- pose them what they wish them to be ; they feel a dis- grace in thinking otherwise. There was a tiuie when I felt the same prejudices, and reasoned from the same errors; but experience — sad and painful experience — has taus^ht me better. What the conduct of former ar- mies was I know not, but what the conduct of the pres- ent is I well know — it is low, cruel, indolent, and prof- ligate.'^ — Crisis, vii. This is a species of dovetailing the life and opinions of Junius into those of Mr. Paine. But the reader will see there is no effort on my part. All I ask is for truth to take its course. It would be beneath the dignity of a scientific criticism to stoop to artifice. I wish now to bring forward a complex parallel, to show that pride of character which would not stoop to the meanness of party politics, and to show, also, their opinion of bribery at elections, and the origin of "mili- tary governments '^ in England. . '^It is difficult,^' says Mr. Paine, "to account for the origin of charter and corporation towns, unless we sup- pose them to have arisen out of, or having been con- nected with, some species of garrison service. The times in which they began justify this idea. The gen- erality of these towns have been garrisons, and the cor- porations were charged with the care of the gates of the town when no military garrison was present. Th^ir MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 155 refusing or granting admission to strangers, which has produced the custom of giving, selling, and buying free- dom, has more of the nature of garrison authority than civil government/^ — Rights of Man, part ii, chap. 5, note. I am now prepared to give the parallels : Paine. Junius, "As one of the houses of " But it seems the sale the English Parliament is of a civil employment was in a great measure made up not sufficient, and military by elections from these cor- governments, which were porations, and as it is un- intended for the support of natural that a pure stream worn-out veterans, must be would flow from a foul thrown into the scale to de- fountain, its vices are but fray the extensive bribery a continuation of the vices of a contested election. ^^ — of its origin. A man of Let. 34. moral honor and good po- " But is there no honor-' litical principles can not able way to serve the pub- submit to the mean drudg- lie without engaging in eri/ and disgraceful arts by personal quarrels with in- which such elections are significant individuals, or carried." submitting to the drudgery of canvassing votes for an election." — Let. 53. Says Mr. Paine : "7 love method^ This, every action proved. His business transactions, his political plans, the productions of his pen, were all in design and exe- cution methodical. In dedicating his life to the good of mankind, he studied method in the use of his great mental j)Owers. He never set about doing any thing without a plan and specifications. He carried in the brain the ideal of the work he was to give material 156 JUNIUS UNMASKED. shape and substance. His plans were always well- digested and often long in maturing. He, for exam- ple, anticipated the revolution, and proceeded to fill the public arsenals with powder. He then brought out Common Sense, when public opinion was decidedly against a declaration of independence, to educate that public sentiment in favor of it. This produced the desired effect, and when war was fairly begun upon a proper basis and plan, he struck the enemy at the proper time and place with an occasional Crisis. The first Crisis he wrote, for example, won a battle for the Union. After the war was over, he went to England and brought out his Eights of Man, laboring in the same lines and advocating the very principles of Junius. There is not a political principle expressed in Junius which was not again reproduced in Eights of Man. But method is stamped upon every production of his pen. Take, for example. Common Sense. The design was to bring public sentiment up to a declaration of independence. Now if we examine the method of the work, we will find the steps like a geometrical demon- stration, from first principles to conclusion. In Com- mon Sense he first convinces the reason, then inflames the passions, and lastly destroys dissension by a stirring, manly, patriotic appeal. The work proper is divided into four parts. I. Of the origin and design of government. Here the first principles are laid down, and are such as to convince the mind of every man capable of thinking. He then shows that the English constitution is not founded upon such principles; and that a people seek- ing political happiness while clinging to such a rotten MENTAL CHAMACTEBISTICS. 157 government;, is like a man seeking connubial happiness while he is attached to a prostitute. II. Of monarchy and hereditary succession. Here he brings out his great political axiom, the equality of man in the order of creation, and then ridicules the pre- tentions of kings, and demolishes the whole fabric of " sacred titles ^^ by an appeal to sacred and profane his- tory, to the rights of man, to his reason, to his affec- tions, and to posterity. He has now prepared the mind of the American reader for the reception of truth, and he brings forward — III. Thoughts on the present state of the American affairs. He begins by saying : " In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense.'' It is now he warms with the subject, and having before prepared the mind with exalted views of government and with the axioms upon which all just governments are founded; having before shown that all legislative powers are derived from the people, and founded in the consent of the governed; having, iu short, announced his bill of rights, he now comes for- ward with an indictment against England. This is full and complete, and by the time the reader has done with it he is then prepared for his final argument, which is — IV. The ability of America to acquire and maintain her independence. He afterward added an appendix, in which he re- counts the principal causes which impel the colonies to a separation. The reader will remark the method of the whole piece. He takes hold of the mind by strategy at first, and then 158 JUNIUS UNMASKED. places before it principles, facts, causes, and consequences, till he has made it entirely his own. If now the reader will return to the first Letter of Junius, he will find an admirable example of the same method. As to method, the two pieces are every way identical. Did a person not study this Letter of Ju- nius, he would perhaps fail to get, at first, the exact likeness which Mr. Paine has so completely reproduced in Common Sense, as an artistic performance. Junius' Letter to the king is also an example of the same method. There is, first, the bill of rights, and then the indictment. We find here the same strategy, which takes possession of the mind of the people, the same method to place the w^riter above and beyond selfish motives, the same foundation of principles, the same superstructure of argument, and the same method of bringing the reader to the conclusions. Herein we find policy. The policy of Mr. Paine made him extremely cau- tious, and he w^eighed well the consequences of speak- ing to the public, studying especially the proper time. This w^as the habit of Junius also. I will now give a few examples: When the civil laW'S of England had been trampled on by the military, in the case of General Gansel, Junius delayed speaking about it. He says: *'Had I taken it up at an earlier period, I should have been accused of an uncandid, malignant precipitation, as if I watched for an unfair advantage against the ministry, and w^ould not allow them a reasonable time to do their duty. They now stand without excuse." — Let. 30. He then proceeds to strike the ministry "hip MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 159 and tliigli/^ In Letter 44 he also mentions the fact of having been silent^ not from a ^'shameful indifference/' bat because he had determined to " not deliver a hasty- opinion on a matter of so much delicacy and impor- tance." The same constitutional caution is exhibited in Mr. Paine. Upon national honor^ in Crisis xii, dated May, 1782, he says: "In March, 1780, I published part of the Crisis, JSFo. viii, in the newspapers, but did not conclude it in the following papers, and the remainder has lain by me till the present day. There appeared about that time some disposition in the British cabinet to cease the further prosecntion of the war, and as I had formed my opinion that whenever such a design should take place, it w^ould be accompanied by a dishonorable proposition to America respecting France, I had sup- pressed the remainder of that number, not to expose the baseness of any such proposition. '^ He now incorpo- rates it in this number, and then follows with one of the noblest productions on national honor which it has been the fortune of man to write. I now give an opinion on the principles of the Eng- lish constitution : Paine. Junius. " A government on the " There can not be a doc- principles on which consti- trine more fatal to the lib- tiitional governments aris- erty and property we are ing out of society are es- contending for, than that tablished, can not have the which confounds the idea right of altering itself. If of a supreme and an arbi- it had, it would be arbi- trary legislature If 160 JUNIUS UNMASKED. trary. It might make it- the majority can disfran- self what it pleased; and chise ten boroughs, why not whenever such a right is twenty — why not the whole set up, it shows that there kingdom ? Why should not is no constitution. The act they make their own seats by which i\iQ English par- in parliament for life? liament empowered itself to When the septennial act sit for seven years, shows passed^ the legislature did there is no constitution in what, apparently and pal- England. It might, by the pably, they had no power same self-authority, have to do.'^ — Let. QS. sat any greater number of years, or for life.^' — K. of M., part i. Although the above doctrine that the people, not the legislature, are supreme, is not new, yet it was rarely asserted in the time of Paine, and renders the above parallel strong and peculiar. Even the same language is used in making the same application to the septen- nial act, which might as well have empowered the members of parliament to sit /or life. Here is a parallel on the opinion of the Jobbing spirit of courtiers : Paine. Junius. " Every nation that does To Draper : " It would not govern itself, is gov- have been more decent in erned as a Job. England you to have called this dis- has been the prey of Jobs honorable transaction by its ever since the revolution." true name, ajob^ to accom- R. of M., part ii, chap, v., modate two persons by par- note, ticular interest and manage- ment at the castle.^' — Let. 7. MJSNTAL OHABA OTERISTIC^. 161 Both Paine and Junius frequently give vent to their detestation of gambling and gamblers. A single case in point is sufficient : Paine. Junius. "Those who knew the To Bedford: "His own savage obstinacy of the honor would have forbid- Idng, and the jobbing, ^am- den him from mixing his bling spirit of the court, private pleasures or conver- predicted the fate of the sation with jockeys, game- petition."— Crisis, iii. sters, blasphemers, gladia- tors, and buffoons.'^ — Let, 23. See, also, Let. 14. They both have the same opinion of the theater; but as the proof of this is only circumstantial, I will not cumber these pages with it. We know that Paine was a Quaker upon this point; and Junius contempt- uously addresses Garrick, the actor, " Now mark me, vagabond! keep to your pantomimes,''^ etc. I now pass to consider their religious opinions. And, first, their views of God: Paine. Junius. "The Almighty hath im- " Grateful as I am to the planted in us these unex- good Being whose bounty tinguishable feelings for has imparted to me this good and wise purposes," reasoning intellect," etc — — C. S. Let. m. "The country was the " They acknowledged the gift of Heaven, and God hand of Providence in the alone is their Lord and descent of the crown upon sovereign."— Crisis, v. the head of a true Stuart." "From such men and [Spoken in. irony .1— Let. such masters may the gra- 49. 162 JUNIUS UNMASKED. ' cious hand of Heaven pre- ^' If they should no serve America." longer appeal to the crea- ^^The will of God hath ture of the constitution, but parted us, and the deed is to that high Being, who registered for eternity." — gave them the rights of Crisis, V. humanity, whose gifts it " Even the distance at were sacrilege to surrender, which tlie Almighty hath let me ask you sir," etc. — placed America and Eng- Let. 35. land, is a strong and natu- '^ I do not scruple to ral proof that the authority affirm, with the most sol- of the one over the other emn appeal to God for my was never the design of sincerity." — Let. 6S. Heaven. " The people also found "The reformation was it necessary to appeal to preceded by the discovery Heaven in their turn." — of America, as if the Al- Let. 9. mighty graciously meant to " And if life be the open a sanctuary to the bounty of Heaven, we persecuted in future years, scornfully reject the noblest when home should afford part of the gift," etc. — neither friendship nor safe- Let. 20. ty. " If when the opportu- '^ I am as confident, as I nity offers itself you neg- am that God governs the lect to do your duty to world, that America will yourselves and to posterity, never be happy till she gets to God and your country," clear of foreign dominion." etc. — Dedication. — Crisis, i. Of Providence they further say : Paine. Junius. " But Providence, who " If it should be the will best knows how to time her of Providence to afflict him misfortunes as well as her with a domestic misfor- immediate favors, chose this tune," etc. — Let. 23. to be the time, and who " The next is a most re- MENTAL QHARACTEBI8TIC8. 163 flare dis2)iite it?'^ — Cri- markable instance of the sis, iii. goodness of Providence/' "To the interposition of — Let. 66. Providence and her bless- " If by the inamediate ings on our endeavors, and interposition of Providence not to British benevolence it were possible for us to are we indebted for the escape a crisis so full of ter- short chain that limits your ror and despair, posterity ravages." — Crisis, vi. will not believe the history '^To deny such a right of the present times.'' — would be a kind of athe- Let. 1. ism against nature, and the best answer to such an ob- jection will be: ^ The fool hath said in his heart there is no God!''' — Crisis, iii. Mr. Paine wrote the Age of Reason as an argument against atheism on the one hand and fanaticism on the other. This he says himself. I will now give the language of Mr. Paine on relig- ion, infidelity, atheism, fanaticism, and morality, and then subscribe the language of Junius. In his discourse to the Theophilanthropists of Paris, Mr. Paine says : " Religion has two principal enemies — fanaticism and infidelity, or that which is called atheism. The first requires to be combatted by reason or morality, the other by natural philosophy." In opposing atheism he makes intelligent force the God of the universe. This is his language : " God is the power, or first cause, nature is the law, and matter is the subject acted upon.'^ That is, there is a duality in the universe — -force and matter; and the action of force on matter produces the laws of nature, or, every phenomenon is produced by 11 164 JUNIUS UNMASKED. the motion of matter. He founds lils argument against atheism on the motion of matter, and elaborates it in his clear and forcible style, and then says : " Where will in- fidelity — where will atheism find cause for this aston- ishing velocity of motion, never ceasing, never varying, and which is the preservation of the earth in its orbit? It is not by reasoning from an acorn to an oak, or from a;iy change in the state of matter on the surface of the earth, that this can be accounted for. Its cause is not to be found in matter, nor in any thing we call nature. The atheist who affects to reason, and the fanatic who rejects reason, plunge themselves alike into inextricable diffi- culties. The one perverts the sublime and enlightening study of natural philosophy into a deformity of absurdi- ties by not reasoning to the end, the other loses himself in the obscurity of metaphysical theories, and dishonors the Creator by treating the study of his works with contempt. The one is a half-rational of whom there is some hope, the other is a visionary to whom we must be charitable." I wish the reader to compare with the last sentence above the following extracts from Junius, to be found in Letters 44 and 35 : " The opinions of these men are too absurd to be easily renounced. Liberal minds are open to conviction, liberal doctrines are capable of im- provement. There are proselytes from atheism, hut none from superstition.''^ "When once a man is determined to believe, the very absurdity of the doctrine confirms him in his faith." But Junius, like Paine, was a religious man. In Letter 56, he says: "I know such a man; my lord, I MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 165 know you both, and, with the blessing of God {for I, too, am religious), the people of England shall know you as well as I do/' As Mr. Paine has been misunderstood by the relig- ious world, and as so much has been said against his re- ligion that a prejudice deep and bitter now rests on the world against him, I will give a couple of extracts from his Rights of Man on this point. I confess that my own prejudices were so great against him (and I thought myself quite liberal), that they would not suffer me to read his works till quite recently. Such is the tyranny of religious instruction. The first extract is from the first part. In a note, he says: '^ There is a single idea, which, if it strikes rightly upon the mind, either in a legal or a religious sense, will prevent any man, or any body of men, or any government, from go- in o- wrong on the subject of religion ; which is, that be- fore any human institutions of government were known in the world, there existed, if I may so express it, a compact between God and man from the beginning of time; and that, as the relation and condition which man in his individual person stands in toward his Maker can not be changed by any human laws or hu- man authority, that religious devotion, which is a part of this compact, can not so much as be made a subject of human laws; and that all laws must conform them- selves, to the prior-existing compact, and not assume to make the compact conform to the laws, which, besides being human, are subsequent thereto. The first act of man, when he looked around and saw himself a crea- ture which he did not make, and a world furnished for his reception, must have been devotion; and devotion 166 JUNIUS UNMASKED. must ever continue sacred to every individual man, as it appears right to him, and governments do mischief by interfering/^ The next extract is from part second, near its close, and I would call the attention of the reader to the beauty of the allegory : '^ But as religion is very improperly made a political machine, and the reality of it is thereby destroyed, I will conclude this work with stating in what light re- ligion appears to me. " If we suppose a large family of children on any par- ticular day, or particular occasion, made it a custom to present to their parents some token of their affection and gratitude, each of them would make a different offering, and most probably in a different manner. Some would pay their congratulations in themes of verse and prose, others by some little devices, as their genius dictated or according to what they thought would please ; and, perhaps, the least of all, not able to do any of those things, would ramble into the garden or the field and gather what it thought the prettiest flower it could find, though perhaps it might be but a sim- ple weed. The parents would be more gratified by such a variety than if the whole of them had acted on a concerted plan, and each had made exactly the same offering. This would have the cold appearance of con- trivance, or the harsh one of control. But of all un- welcome things nothing would more afflict the parent than to know that the whole of them had afterwards gotten together by the ears, boys and girls, fighting, and reviling, and abusing each other about which was the best or the worst present. MENTAL QHABACTERISTICS, 167 '^ Why may we not suppose that the great Father of all is pleased with a variety of devotion ; and that the greatest offense we can act is that by which we seek to torment and render each other miserable? For my own part I am fully satisfied that what I am now doing with an endeavor to conciliate mankind, to render their condition happy, to unite nations that have hitherto been enemies, and to extirpate the horrid practice of war, and break the chains of slavery and oppression, is estimable in his sight, and being the best service I can perform, I act it cheerfully. ^^ I do not believe that any two men, on what are called doctrinal points, think alike who think at all.'^ [And this, my reader, is Thomas Paine who hath spoken. I would like to have Henry Ward Beecher, after he has read this book, take the above passage as a text and preach a sermon from it.] I now call attention to a few parallels : Paine. Junius, "A narrow system of " Superstition is certainly politics like a narrow sys- not the characteristic of tern of religion, is calcu- this age; yet some men are lated only to sour the tem- bigoted in politics who are per, and be at variance with infidels in religion.^^ — Let. mankind.^^ — Crisis, iii. 67. ^' Secluded from the world, attached from his infancy to one set of per- sons and one set of ideas, he can neither open his heart to new connections nor his mind to better information. A character of this sort is the soil fittest to produce that obstinate bigotry in politics and religion which begins with a meritorious 168 JUNIUS UNMASKED. sacrifice of the understanding and finally conducts the monarch and the martyr to the block/^ — Let. 39. Junius is here speaking of the king, who with a nar- row understanding would naturally have a narrow sys- tem of politics and religion. But again : Paine. Junius. " We persecute no man, " The fundamental prin- neither will we abet in the ciples of Christianity may persecution of any man for still be preserved though religion's sake.'^ — Crisis, iii. every zealous sectary ad- '^ The writer of this is heres to his own exclusive one of those few who never doctrine, and pious ecclesi- dishonors religion, either astics make it part of their by ridiculing or caviling at religion to persecute one any denominations whatso- another.^' — Let. 68. ever. To God and not to " If I thought Junius man are all men accounta- capable of uttering a dis- ble on the score of relig- respectful word of the re- ion. '^ — Enistle to the Qua- ligion of his country I kers. should be the first to re- nounce and give him up to the public contempt and indignation." — Let. 54. Above it is Philo Junius who is speaking ; but the reader will remember he is the real Junius. He had been attacked for his impiety, and he puts Philo Junius forward to defend himself. The reader can not fail to notice the same hand in the last parallel. Paine says : " The ivriter of this is one of those few who never dishonors religion" by abusing the professors of it. And he never did. Junius ridiculed the ceremonial in tlie Catholic Church which denies the cup to the MENTAL CHABACTERmTICS. 169 laiety ; and of this he says : " It is, in this country, as fair an object of ridicule as transuhstantiation, or any other part of Lord Peter's History in the Tale of the Tub." This reminds me of what Paine says of popery and Peter : ^^A man hath as good reason to believe that there is as much of kingcraft as priestcraft in with- holding the scripture from the public in popish coun- ti^es. For monarchy in every instance is the popery of government/' — Common Sense. In regard to Peter, we see the same temptation to touch his pen with satire and ridicule, and the passage may be found in Rights of Man, part first. It is as follows : ^' I will quote Mr. Burke's catalogue of barriers that he has set up be- tween man and his maker. Putting himself in the character of a herald, he says : ^ We fear God ; we look with awe to kings ; with affection to parliaments ; with duty to magistrates; with reverence to priests; and Tvith respect to fiobility.' Mr. Burke has forgot to put in chivalry. He has also forgot to put in Peter." They both considered it true that there is a wide difference between piety and morality. Paine himself says (and it is the noblest sentiment ever uttered by man) : " My country is the woeld, and my relig- ion IS TO DO GOOD." Junius frequently puts piety and morality in antithesis, as the following examples will show: '^They care not what injustice is practiced upon a man whose moral character they piously think themselves obliged to condemn." — Let. 39. '^ The un- feigned p>iety, the sanctified religion of George the Third have taught him to new-model the civil forces of the State. Corruption glitters in the van^" etc. Then, speak- 170 JUNIUS UNMASKED. ing of some of his predecessors^ he says : " They were kings or gentlemen, not hypocrites or priests. They were at the head of the Church, but did not know the vahie of their office. They said their prayers with- out ceremony, and had too little of priestcraft in their understanding to reconcile the sanctimonious forms of religion with the utter destruction of the morality of the people.^^ — Let. 55. But Mr. Paine was the inveterate enemy to priest- craft as well as kingcraft. His whole life was spent in waging war against the two. Let us now see what Junius thought of the former. I have shown him to run parallel with Mr. Paine in the latter. Junius says : " The resentment of a priest is impla- cable : no sufferings can soften ; no penitence can ap- pease." — Let. 53. In speaking of the Pev. Mr. Home, he says : " No, my lord ; it was the solitary, vindic- tive malice of a monk, brooding over the infirmities of his friends, until he thought they quickened into public life, and feasting with a rancorous rapture upon the sordid catalogue of his distresses. Now let him go back to his cloister. The Church is a proper retreat for him ; in his principles he is already a bishop. The mention of this man has moved me from my nat- ural moderation." — Let. 49. Again : " The priesthood are accused of misinterpreting the scriptures. Mr. Home has improved on his profession. He alters the text, and creates a refutable doctrine of his own." — Let. 53. The above passages can not be mistaken for Mr. Paine's spirit, style, and language. These tell us thpy MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 171 are his with much more truth than a name attached to any writing tells us its author. It seems they both had the same opinion of a Meth- Paine. Junius. '' But when he [man] " You meanly evaded multiplies his creed with the question, and, instead imaginary things, he forces of the explicit firmness and his mind, and pretends to decision of a king, gave us believe what he does not nothing but the misery of believe. This is, in gen- a ruined grazier, and the eral, the case with the whining piety of a Method- Methodists — their religion istJ' — Let. 36. is all creed and no mor- als.''— Let. to Mr. Dean. Now the reader will recall the parallel I gave in re- gard to never dishonoring religion by saying any thing against particular forms or denominations. With the exception of the Catholic Church, this is the only in- stance which has fallen under my eye ; and it seems they had such a disliking to Methodism, a sarcasm must be let loose upon it. Trifling as this instance may seem, there is great force in its being solitary, and ap- parently contradictory to what they both before affirmed in general. Such an instance has, in fact, more weight than a score of parallels on common characteristics, for it shows a peculiar and strong bias in a particular di- rection. Of the term Christian there is no positive ground for a parallel, because it is one of no definite meaning. We call ourselves, as a nation, Christians; yet we are di- 172 JUNIUS UNMASKED. vided into a hundred forms of religion^ and many of them in the articles of faith contradictoiy and antago- nistic. Yet, in the fundamental principles of morality, we are, in common with all civilized races, agreed. The Christian religion happens to belong to the highest civi- lization, and we frequently use the term as synonymous with the morality of this civilization. But when we come to define strictly according to the theological im- port of the word, there are many of us who are not Christians. In the former sense, Mr. Paine and Junius were Christians ; in the latter sense, they were not. And now for the proof. Junius says, in Letter 15, to the Duke of Grafton : " It is not, indeed, the least of the thousand contradictions which attend you, that a man marked to the world by the grossest violation of ceremony and decorum, should be the first servant of a court in which prayer's are morality, and kneeling is relig- ion.^^ For this, and his attacks on the priesthood, and his frequently putting piety in antithesis to morality, he was at last accused of being an impious and irreligious man. He now puts Philo Junius forward to explain his religious views, who says, in Letter 54: "These candid critics never remember any thing he says in honor of our holy religion, though it is true that one of his leading arguments is made to rest ^upon the internal evidence which the purest of all religions carries with it.^ I quote his words, and conclude from them that he is a true and hearty Christian — in substance, not in ceremony — though possibly he may not agree with my reverend lords the bishops, or with the head of the Church, ^ that prayers are morality, or that kneeling is religion.' " MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS, 173 That is, Junius was a Christian Avho, upon moral principles, did not say his prayers, and who thought that forms were no part of religion. In other words, if the highest morality was Christianity, he claimed to be a Christian, and would not stoop '^to reconcile the sanctimonious forms of religion with the utter destruc- tion of morality." This, too, was Mr. Paine^s Christianity. In a na- tional and moral sense he uses the term with approba- tion, but when in a theological sense he disowns it. He says, in Crisis, ii: "This ingratitude may suit a tory, or the unchristian peevishness of a fallen Quaker, but none else." In Crisis, i, he says : " I wish, with all the devotion of a Christian, that the names of whig and tory may never more be mentioned." To the Quakers he says : " Call not coldness of soul religion, nor put the higot in the place of the Clwistian.'^ In Common Sense he says: " For myself, I fully and conscientiously believe that it is the will of the Almighty that there should be a diversity of religious opinions among us. It affords a larger field for our Christian kindness." And again : '^ This new world hath been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe. ... In this extensive quar- ter of the globe, we forget the narrow limits of three hundred and sixty miles (the extent of England), and carry our friendship on a larger scale ; we claim broth- erhood with every European Christian, and triumph in the generosity of the sentiment.^' The above are a few of the many passages in which he indorses Christianity. But Christian here means only its moral phase or principles, and these principles 174 juniUjS- unmasked. exalted by the feeling of universal brotherhood. But in a theological sense he uses the' term very differently, and by keeping this fact in view, he is readily under- stood, and there is only the contradiction which the use of the word by common consent carries with it. In the Age of Reason, Conclusion, he says: "Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented there is none more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedify- ing to man, more repugnant to reason, and more con- tradictory in itself, than this thing called Christianity." They both had the same views of Jesus. Mr. Paine says in the Age of Reason, part i : " Nothing that is here said can apply, even with the most distant disre- spect, to the real character of Jesus Christ. He was a virtuous and amiable man. The morality that he preached and practiced was of the most benevolent kind; and though similar systems of morality had been preached by Confucius and by some of the Greek phi- losophers many years before, and by the Quakers since, and by many good men in all ages, it has not been ex- ceeded by any He preached most excellent morality, and the equality of man ; but he preached also against the corruptions and avarice of the Jewish priests, and this brought upon him the hatred and vengeance of the whole order of the priesthood." And between the Romans and the Jews 'Hhis virtuous re- former and revolutionist lost his life." Junius, near the close of his last letter but one, boldly affirms Jesus a man. He says : " The holy author of our religion was seen in the company of sinners, but it was his gracious purpose to convert them from' their MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 175 sins. Another man [the king], who, in the ceremonies of our faith, might give lessons to the great enemy of it [the devil] upon different principles, keeps much the same company/^ Neither Mr. Paine nor Junius were superstitious. And first of Paine. In Crisis, i, he says: '^ I have as \\tt\Q superstition in me as any man living, but my secret opinion has ever been, and still is, that God Al- mighty will not give up, to military destruction, a peo- ple," etc. Junius says, in Letter 36, note : '^ Every coward pre- tends to be planet-struck." And in Letter 49, satir- izing Lord Bute, he says : " When that noxious planet approaches England, he never fails to bring plague and pestilence along with him." In Letter 67 he says: " Superstition is certainly not the characteristic of this age; yet some men are bigoted in politics who are infidels in religion. I do not despair of making them ashamed of their credulity." Above, Junius also casts an aspersion upon the term infidel. Mr. Paine was very tender upon this point, and could not bear to be taunted with infidelity. He says : '^ Infidelity is believing falsely. If what Chris- tians believe is not true, it is the Christians that are the infidels." — Remarks on R. HalFs sermon. In the Examination of the Prophecies, he concludes with this sentence, emphasized as follows: ^^He that be- lieves IN THE STORY OF ChRIST, IS AN INFIDEL TO God." He also defines infidelity as being unfaithful to one's own convictions. In the Age of Reason, part i, 176 JUNIUS UNMASKED, he says : " Infidelity consists in professing to believe what he does not believe/^ He also uses the word as synonymous with atheist, in his Discourse to the Theo- philanthropists, as will be seen by reference to page 163 of this book. I have heretofore given the views of Junius on Frayer. See page 172. It now remains to give Mr. Paine's views. In his Letter to Samuel Adams he says : "A man does not serve God when he prays, for it is himself he is try- ing to serve; and as to hiring or paying men to pray, as if the Deity needed instruction, it is, in my opinion, an abomination.^^ They both believe in the divine justice of retribu- tion and future punishn;ient. Junius says : " The di- vine justice of retribution seems now to have begun its progress. Deliberate treachery entails punishment upon the traitor. There is no possibility of escaping it." — Let. 66. ^^A death -bed repentance seldom reaches to restitution." — Dedication. Mr. Paine says, in Crisis, ii, to Lord Howe : " How many you have thus privately sacrificed we know not, and the account can only be settled in another world." And in Crisis, v, to the same man, he says : ''You may, perhaps, be unwilling to be serious, but this destruction of the goods of Providence, this havoc of the human race, and this sowing the world with mischief, must be accounted for to him who made and governs it." But I will give a positive affirmation of the fact. In the Age of Reason, near the close of the Second Part, he says : " The existence of an Almighty power is suf- MENTAL CHABACTEBISTICS. I77 ficiently demonstrated to us AYe must know, also, that the power that called us into being can, if be pleases, and wben be pleases, call us to account for tbe manner in wbicb we have lived here; and therefore, without seeking any other motive for the belief, it is rational to believe that he will, for we know before- hand that he can The probability that we may be called to account hereafter, will, to a reflecting mind, have the influence of belief; for it is not our belief or unbelief that can make or unmake the fact. As this is the state we are in, and which it is proper we should be in, as free agents, it is the fool only, and not the phi- losopher or even the prudent man, that would live as if there were no God.^^ Religiously, he can quite properly be classed with Theodore Parker. He stands close at his side, and, having preceded him, a shoulder higher. Yet, in this regard, Mr. Parker treats him with contempt. The reader will be pleased to read the following letters ; the one from Horace Seaver to Mr. Parker, and the reply : Boston, January 11, 1843. Rev. ai^d Dear Sir: — As chairman of the com- mittee of arrangement for the celebration of Thomas Paine's birth-day in this city, on the 30th instant, I am instructed to perform the highly pleasing duty of so- liciting the honor of your company at the dinner; and to say to you in addition, that it would give the com- mittee great pleasure, as well as many others of your personal friends, if your health and time will allow you to comply with this invitation. I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Horace Seaver. 178 JUNIUS UNMASKED. West Roxhury, January 14, 1843. Dear Sir : — Your favor of the 11th instant came in my absence from home, and I now hasten to reply to the invitation you offer me. With the views I en- tertain of Mr. Paine's character in his later years, I could not, consistently with my own sense of duty, join with you in celebrating his birth-day. I feel grateful, truly so, for the services rendered by his po- litical writings, and his practical efforts in the cause of freedom ; though with what I understand to be the spirit of his writings on theology and religion, I have not the smallest sympathy. I am, respectfully, Your obedient servant, Theodore Parker. This is one arch-heretic trampling on his brother in the holy name of religion. Yet the great work which Thomas Paine performed before Mr. Parker was con- ceived in the womb of Time, made a Theodore Parker possible. Parker stood on the shoulders of Thomas Paine, and he uttered scarcely a thought on religion and theology which Mr. Paine had not written before him. Mr. Parker translated DeAYette, but Mr. Paine's second part of the Age of Reason, as an original investigation and critical examination of the Bible, will be read when Parker's translation of DeWette is forgotten. The latter is a scholar's effort, dry, voluminous, costly, and soon to be laid away forever; the former, a friend^s offering to mankind, brought within the reach of their understanding and their means. As an argument it has never been equaled ; as a theological work it is fair and candid; as a religious work it breathes the spirit of forbearance, kindness, MENTAL CHABACTERISTICS. 179 morality, and brotherly love. I have searched in vain to find the authority for Mr. Parker's religious hatred to Thomas Paine. They taught the same morality and religion, the same theology, the same retributive jus- tice, and denounced boldly the same errors in politics and religion; and differed only in this that Mr. Par- ker said his prayers in j^ublic, and Mr. Paine in private. The hatred to Mr. Paine is perhaps inherited, and we stand in awe of him as of the devil, without a reason and without knowing why. The Egyptian children still startle at the name of " Bonaparte;'' the American children at the name of Thomas Paine ; and Mr. Par- ker never outgrew this superstition of his youth. But the historian may safely record : Without Thomas Faine, .there would have been no Theodore Parher, The reader can not fail to see the substantial elements of the Quaker character in Junius, if we let Mr. Paine define it. In the Age of Reason, second part, he says : ^^ The only sect that has not persecuted are the Qua- kers, and the only reason that can be given for it is, that they are rather Deists than Christians. They do not believe much about Jesus Christ, and they call the Scriptures a dead letter." The Quakers have no priesthood. With them the power to teach is the immediate gift of God, and they speak as they are moved by the Spirit, and what they say is by the inspiration of the inner light. They have neither pulpit nor church, and in their meeting there is neither ceremony nor song, nor the dull routine of stated prayers. They oppose war, slavery, intemper- ance, litigation, extravagance, profanity, and priest- 12 180 JUNIUS UNMASKED. "t craft. Dancing and dressing in the fashion of the day they forbid. Their religion consists in morality ; not in ceremony and show. They hate a bishop as they hate a tyrant, and they hold an honest man the noblest Avork of God. What could be more like Junius than this? But if this does not satisfy the reader the evi- dence of Junius himself would have little weight. But he positively affirms the principles of the Quakers as the true religion, and this ought to satisfy the most doubtful. At the close of Letter 41, he says: "An honest man, like the true religion, appeals to the under- standing, or modestly confides in the internal evidences of his conscience. The impostor employs /orce instead of argument, imposes silence when he can not convince, and propagates his character by the swordJ^ This proves Junius to be a Quaker, in principle. No one can mistake the expression : " The internal evidences of the conscience," which often comes so forcibly from Junius. And says Paine also : "As for morality, the knowledge of it exists in every man's conscience.^' Were an artist called upon to produce a picture of Junius' moral, political, and religious character, he could give no shade or stroke which he could not find full and distinct in the living character of Mr. Paine. Although Thomas Paine was not a professed Quaker, yet the rigid Quaker principles of moral conduct spoke out in every action ; and while he did not spare their errors, he spoke highly of them as a sect. He chas- tised, them with an unsparing hand, but it was in friendship, not in revenge. He loved their austere worship, he sought their society, he walked in their ways, and often paid them a tribute of praise. In MENTAL C:iARACTERISTIOS. 181 short, by birth he was a Quaker, but by profession not. He was himself, an original man thrown out upon earth, born for a purpose, which he fulfilled. But the moral character of Junius was the same; he proves it so in a hundred different ways ; in his pride of character, in his love of justice, in his sympa- thies for the people, in his declaration of human rights, in the austerity of his morals, in his faith in the inte- rior evidence of the conscience, in his hatred to bad men and bad measures, in his moral courage to attack the strongholds of political corruption. No one but a man having a double portion of Quaker principles and Quaker spirit could talk as did Junius to the king, unmasking him before the public, and exposing his weakness, wickedness, folly, and stupidity. And herein nature comes powerfully in to my aid in my argument. In fact, it is my only object to trace the lines of argument which nature has drawn, and never to descend to art. Says Mr. Paine : " It sometimes happens, as well in writing as in conversation, that a person lets slip an expression that serves to unravel what he intends to conceal." I will take him at his word and quote two short passages of his own, giving a few strokes of his personal history : " If I have anywhere expressed my- self over- warmly, 'tis from a fixed, immovable hatred I have, and ever had, to cruel men and cruel meas- ures. I have likewise an aversion to monarchy, as being too debasing to the dignity of man, but I never troubled others with my notions till very lately, nor ever published a syllable in England in my life. What I 182 JUNIU8 UNMASKED. write is pure nature, and my pen and my soul have ever gone together. My writings I have always given away, reserving only the expense of printing and paper, and sometimes not even that. I never courted either fame or interest, and my manner of life, to those who know it, will justify what I say. My study is to be useful.'^ The above was thrown into the body of Crisis, ii, and addressed to Lord Howe. Let us examine its sep- arate counts: I. '^ Hatred to cruel men and cruel measures.'^ See on this head the hatred of Junius to the tyrant in any form, to the ^' hoary lecher/^ Lord Irnham, to the *^ monsters^' of the house of Bedford, and the "worst man in the kingdom," Lord Mansfield. II. "An aversion to monarchy, as being too debas- ing to the dignity of man." This is the key-note to Jmiius. III. " Never troubled others with my notions till very lately." This was dated January 13, 1777, just one year after Common Sense, and just five years after the last Letter of Junius. Very lately is an indefi- nite expression, and is meant to pave the way for the next, which was designed to mislead the unwary, and here we see unmistakable evidence of Junius. IV. " I never published a syllable in England in my life." When Woodfall was prosecuted for publishing Junius' Letter to the king, the jury found him '' guilty of publishing onlyJ^ Then Junius, whoever he was, never published a syllable of the Letters. But Mr. Paine wrote a pamphlet, "The Case of the Excise Officers," while in England, and it was published by a MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 183 Mr. Lee. To the untblnking, the sentence: "I never published a syllable in England in my life/' would be proof at first that he never wrote for the press, but a moment's thought will show it to be an innocent sub- terfuge. But why this subterfuge, if Mr. Paine was not Junius, and he had not yet a work to perform in England? If not Junius, what is the meaning of it? Why did he say it ? The reader must answer. V. " My writings I have always given away.'' Ju- nius gave to Mr. Woodfall the whole of his Letters. See his Preface. YI. ^' I never courted either fame or interest." Says Junius : " To write for profit, without taxing the press ; to write for fame and be unknown; to support the in- trigues of faction, and be disowned by every party in the kingdom, are contradictions," etc. That is, he was charged with writing for fame and interest, and he thus contradicts it. VII. " What I write is pure nature." Thus, Junius says : " The works of a master require no index, his features and coloring are taken from nature;" and a hundred other examples could be given. A^III. *^ My study is to be useful." Thus also Ju- nius : ^^Is there no merit in dedicating my life to the information of my fellow-subjects? He is not paid for his labor, and certainly has a right to choose his employment." It is thus I could take every statement of Thomas Paine, either of previous life, private purpose, or pub- lic principle, and find its counterpart in Junius. This could not be done were not the two characters the same person. Take again, for example, the statement 1§4 JUNIUS UNMASKED. in Crisis, xv. Speaking of the part he took in the revohition, he says : I. " So far as my endeavors could go, they have all been directed to conciliate the affections, unite the interests, and draw and keep the mind of the country together ; (II) and the better to assist in this foundation work of the revolution, I have avoided all places of profit or office, either in the State I live in or in the United States, kept myself at a distance from all parties and party connections, and even disregarded all private and inferior concerns ; and when we take into view the great work which we have gone through, and feel, as we ought to feel, the first importance of it, we shall then see that the little wranglings and indecent contentions of personal parley are as dishonorable to our characters as they are injurious to our purpose. (Ill) It was the cause of America that made me an author. The force with which it struck my mind, and the dangerous con- dition the country appeared to me in, by courting an impossible and unnatural reconciliation with those who were determined to reduce her, instead of striking out into the only line that could cement and save her — A Declaration of In^dependence — made it impossible for me, feeling as I did, to be silent : (IV) and if in the course of more than seven years I have rendered her any service, I have likewise added something to the reputa- tion of literature, by freely and disinterestedly employ- ing it in the great cause of mankind, and showing that there may be genius without prostitution.^^ Compare now the above with Junius, as follows: I. " It is time for those who really mean the Cause and the People, who have no view to private advantage, and MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS. 185 who have virtue enough to prefer the general good of the community to the gratification of personal animos- ities: it is time for such men to interpose. Let us try whether these fatal dissensions may not yet be reconciled, or if that be impracticable, let us guard at least against the worst effects of division, and endeavor to persuade these furious partisans, if they will not consent to draw together, to be separately useful to that cause which they all pretend to be attached to." II. " To write for profit without taxing the press, to write for fame and to be unknown, to support the intrigues of factions and to be disowned as a dapgerous auxiliary by every party in the kingdom are contradictions which the minister must reconcile before I forfeit my credit with the public.'^ III. "It was the cause of America that made me an author," says Paine. This is true of Junius ; for the troubles which called him forth are well known to be those of America. But he would never have been known, perhaps, had he not written Common Sense, which was published anonymously, and was at first at- tributed to Benjamin Franklin. IV. "The reputation of these papers is an honorable pledge for my attach- ment to the people .... These letters, my lord, are read in other countries and in other languages. For my own part, I claim no merit from endeavoring to do a service to my fellow-subjects. I have done it to the best of my understanding, and without looking for the approbation of other men, my conscience is satisfied." 186 JUNIUS UNMASKED. EEVIEW. Let us now retrace our steps^ and see how strong a case is made out. 1. Twelve facts in the life of Mr. Paine shown to be the same as those in Junius. 2. An apparent contradiction proven to be a parallel fact. 3. They both represent Quaker principles. 4. They have the same views of conscience. 6. Both believe in the divine justice of retribution. 6. Both believe in future punishment. 7. Both have the same views of prayer. 8. Both have the same dislike to the word infidel. 9. Both have the same opinion of Jesus of Nazareth. 10. Both have the same views of Christianity. 11. Both use the term Christian the same. 12. Both had a special dislike to Methodism. 13. Both were inveterate enemies to priestcraft. 14. Both made a wide difference between piety and morality. 15. Both had the same views of the Catholic faith. 16. Both ridiculed "Peter." 17. Both affirmed that they did not persecute for re- ligious opinion. 18. Both hated a narrow system in politics or re- ligion. 19. Both had the same views of "religion." 20. Both had the same views of superstition. 21. Both had the same views of atheism. 22. Both had the same views of providence. BE VIEW. 187 23. Both had the same views of the theater. 24. Both detested gamblers and gambling. 25. Both had the same opinion of the English Con- stitution. 26. Both were extremely cautious. 27. Both were extremely politic. 28. Both loved method. 29. Both evinced the same kind of method in writing. 30. Both had the same views of the origin of mil- itary governments. 31. Both had the same views of party politics.. 32. Neither would take part in party politics. 33. Both had the same pride of character. 34. Both had the same views of the English army. 35. Both loved free thought. 36. Both thought alike of suspicion. 37. Both expressed the same views of antagonism. 38. Both placed personal interest above strict moral right. 39. Both thought alike of oaths. 40. They had the same opinion of courts and courtiers. 41. They considered the termination of the Seven Years' War a distinguished period, and dated the mis- fortunes and establishment of tyranny in England from that period. 42. They both had the same opinion of Lord North. 43. Both had the same opinion of Lord Mansfield. 44. Both had the same views of precedent. 45. Both had the same opinion of lawyers. 46. Both had the same views of the cause of America. 47. Both had the same views of the minority in England. 188 JUNIUS UNMASKED. 48. And herein the same views of Lord Chatham. ■ 49. Both traced the rights of man back to their origin. 50. Both express themselves alike in regard to laws in general. 51. Both express themselves alike in regard to the game laiv. ■ 52. Both declare law to be king. 53. They had the same predilections in regard to politics. 54. They were neither of them partisans. 55. They were both practical. 56. Both often appealed to experience and the evi- dence of facts. 57. Both assert the mind becomes what it contem- plates. 58. Both were deeply read in the " history of the hu- man heart.' ^ 59. Both delight in charging bastardy. 60. Secretiveness was a ruling characteristic. 61. Both had the same opinion of moderate men. 62. They were botli enthusiasts. 63. Both were too proud to be vain or to flatter. 64. Both placed too high an estimate on the judg- ment of the masses. 65. Both were excessively hopeful. 6Q. Personal honor unparalleled in history. 67. Both express themselves alike in regard to av- arice and the miser. 68. Both often assert that " language fails." 69. Both have the same method of argumentation, and hereunder many parallels are given. BEVIEW. 189 70. Both have the same style, and hereunder many parallels are given. 71. More than sixty parallel expressions and figures of speech are given. 72. They both use the same kind of figures the most frequently. 73. They use the figure in the same manner, and usually one at the close of an article. 74. Both use the same facts and figure to illustrate national honor. 75. The same rythm in style is common to both. 76. The same alliteration. 77. The same method of bringing the subject into one view. 78. The wandering from the point and mentioning the fact. 79. The same threat, command, and warning. 80. The same method of ridicule and satire. 81. The same use of diminutives. 82. The same sacrifice of grammar to conciseness. 83. The same majesty and grandeur of style. 84. Common Sense parallels tvith Junius, in many ways, and hereunder more than forty examples, which to repeat would be to rewrite them. 85. They were both revolutionists. 86. They both dedicated their life to the same ob- ject: to remove some wrong, to do mankind some good. 87. They both attacked the King of England and his ministry in the same spirit and language. 88. Both had the same opinion of bribery at elec- tions. 190 JUNIUS UNMASKED. 89. They were both political reformers, following the same principle without pay and above party. In the above argument I have given nearly three hundred parallel facts and characteristics, many of them of such a nature that it would be at variance with na- ture itself to suppose them to belong to different men. But I have also searched for a solitary fact which would in the least render Mr. Paine and Junius in- compatible, and have found it not. This is a task I hope some reader, who has some means and ample time, will devote a year or two to investigate. My case is much stronger than I hoped even to make it. I have by no means given all the facts and parallels, but where one would answer, I put it in the place of several on the same subject. I have labored to condense — not to expand; I have, therefore, commented but little, and reasoned scarcely any. There is no reasoning which is superior to the simple declaration of facts. It should be the office of the writer to present facts to A REASONING WORLD. The literary world has had enough of the whirlwind of words ; it wants a deluge of facts. Then each mind will take care of itself, if worth preserving. To this end I subjoin Lord Macau- lay's five reasons why Sir Philip Francis was Junius: " Was he the author of the Letters of Junius ? Our own firm belief is that he was. The external evidence is, we think, such as would support a verdict in a civil — nay, in a criminal proceeding. The handwriting of Junius is the very peculiar handwriting of Francis, slightly disguised. As to the position, pursuits, and connections of Junius, the following are the most im- BEVIEW. 191 portant facts, which can be considered as clearly proved : First, that he was acquainted with the technical forms of the Secretary of State's office ; secondly, that he was intimately acquainted with the business of the War Of- fice; thirdly, that he, during the year 1770, attended debates in the House of Lords, and took notes of speeches — particularly of the speeches of Lord Chat- ham ; fourthly, that he bitterly resented the appoint- ment of Mr. Chamier to the place of Deputy Secretary at War ; fifthly, that he was bound by some strong tie to the first Lord Holland. . . . JS^ow here are five marks, all of which ought to be found in Junius. They are all five found in Francis. We do not believe that more than two of them can be found in any other person whatever. If this argument does not settle the question, there is an end of all reasoning on circumstan- tial evidence.^' If that kind and amount of evidence would hang a man in the time of Macaulay, the times have so changed that it takes far stronger evidence to hang men now than then. That kind of evidence is absolutely worthless for two reasons : first, the facts alleged in the separate counts are neither of them necessary to the pro- duction of Junius; and, secondly, they would prove nothing if they were, for they might be common to a hundred men, and that they were not would be matter of fact to prove. Even Macaulay makes this rest on his own belief, " We do not believe,'' he says, " that more than two of them can be found in any other per- son whatever. '' But the fact is, they are absolutely ^^ imaginary/' and not at all necessary. "The internal evidence,'' he says, ''seems to point in 192 JUNIUS UN3IASKEB. the same way/^ First, he acknowledges that Francis, as a writer, is inferior to Junius, but not ^' decidedly,'^ and then he goes on to say : "One of the strongest rea- sons for believing that Francis was Junius, is the moral resemblance between the two men/^ Macaulay now sets up a character for Junius, the most of which is not to be found in Junius, and says it is like Francis. It is thus he imj^oses on the credulity of the ignorant. But I give his words, that the reader may investigate f3r himself: . "It is not difficult, from the letters which, under va- rious signatures y are known to have been written by Junius, and from his dealings with Woodfall and oth- ers, to form a tolerable correct notion of his character.^' I call the attention of the reader to the above sentence, and have emphasized the word ^'notion" and the phrase ^^ various signatures. '^^ Of the former, I would remark that a notio7i of one's character falls far short of a judg- ment, and in a criticism is not only trifling, but con- temptible. In regard to " various signatures," I will let Junius himself answer : " The encouragement given to a multitude of spurious, mangled publications of the 'Letters of Junius,' persuades me that a complete edi- tion, corrected and improved by the author, will be fa- vorably received." — Preface. In this volume his sig- nature is Junius, and occasionally, when he wishes to explain the meaning, or defend the principle, he puts forward Philo Junius, but never without this cause. I now proceed to give the character which Macaulay has picked up — I know not ivhere : "He was clearly a man not destitute of real patriotism and magnanimity — a man whose vices were not of a BE VIEW. 193 sordid kind. But he must also have been a man in the highest degree arrogant and insolent — a man prone to malevolence, and prone to the error of mistaking his malevolence for public virtue. ^Doest thou well to be angry?' was the question asked in olden time of the Hebrew prophet, and he answered : ^ I do well.' This was evidently the temper of Junius, and to this cause we attribute the savage crueltv which disg:races several of his Letters. No man is so merciless as he who, un- der a strong self-delusion, confounds his antipathies with his duties. It may be added that Junius, though allied with the democratic party by common enmities, was the very opposite of a democratic politician. While attacking individuals with a ferocity which perpetually violated all the laws of literary warfare, he regarded the most defective parts of the old constitution with a re- spect amountiug to pedantry ; pleaded the cause of Old Saurum with fervor, and contemptuously told the capi- talists of Manchester and Leeds that, if they wanted votes, they might buy land and become freeholders of Lancashire and Yorkshire. All this, we believe, might stand, with scarcely any change, for a character of Philip Francis.'' Thus much Macaulay. Where he got the above character I am unable to tell, unless out of his own im- agination. Before I answer it, I will give another per- version of the truth. Dr. Goodrich concludes his ar- ticle on Junius as follows: "Junius continued his la- bors, with various ability, but with little success, nearly two years longer; until, in the month of January, 1772, the king remarked to a friend in confidence: ^Junius is known, and will write no more.' Such proved to be 194 JUNIUS UNMASKED. the fact. His last performance was dated January 21, 1772, three years to a day from his first letter to the printer of the Public Advertiser. Within a/e?y months^ Sir Philip Francis was appointed to one of the high- est stations o^ jprofit and trust in India, at a distance of fifteen thousand miles from the seat of English politics ! '^ The ''few months^' in the above sentence is just a year and a half after the king "remarked in confi- dence,'^ etc. But Francis did not go to India for more than two and a half years after. In March, 1772, he resigned his clerkship in the war department, in conse- quence of a quarrel with Lord Barrington, the new Minister at War. He then left England, and traveled on the continent the remainder of the year ; in the June following he was appointed one of the Council of Ben- gal, with a salary of £10,000, and in the summer of 1774 went to India. That fall Thomas Paine came to America. It is thus the phrase " a few months/^ art- fully put into a sentence in connection with the supposed fact that the king had found out Junius, and had bribed him to stop writing, would mislead the mind, and per- vert a reasonable conclusion. This is a trick of the pen, and to which no honorable mind will descend. The fact is, Francis would never have been thought of as Junius, had he not been an intimate friend and schoolmate of Mr. WoodfalPs. But the above argument, summed up by Lord Ma- caulay, is the strongest on record for any man till now. I was not aware of its weakness till wow. I supposed there was a plausible argument at least. To be an- swered, it needs only to be appended to this. I speak without vanity, for the argument is nature's own, not BE VIEW. 195 mine. I will honor it, therefore, with a rebuttal from Junius himself. In Letter 44 he says : ^' I may quit the service, but it would be absurd to suspect me of de- sertion. The reputation of these papers is an honorable pledge for my attachment to the people. To sacrifice a respected character, and to renounce the esteem of sockty, requires more than Mr. Wedderburn's resolu- tion ; and though in him it was rather a profession than a desertion of his principles (I speak tenderly of this gentleman, for, when treachery is in question, I think we should make allowances for a Scotchman), yet we have seen him in the House of Commons, overwhelmed with confusion, and almost bereft of his faculties. But in truth, sir, I have left no room for an accommodation with the piety of St. James'. My offenses are not to be redeemed by recantation or repentance : on one side, our warmest patriots would disclaim me as a burthen to their honest ambition ; on the other, the vilest pros- titution, if Junius could descend to it, would lose its natural merit and influence in the cabinet, and treachery be no longer a recommendation to the royal favor.'' There is not, among the dregs or scummings of hu- man nature, a character so false and vile as to WTite that, and then do as Francis did, or do as the king of England did, if he believed him to be Junius. Nature rebels at such an argument, founded on the facts of the case. It is by a species of subterfuge, or literary leger- demain, exhibiting some facts and hiding others, call- ing the attention to some trifling thing, and then con- cealing the truth of the matter, is all that has ever rendered the argument in favor of Francis of any con- sequence with the public. There is more, for example, 13 196 jujStiujS unmasked, in the one word Lord, placed just in front of Macaulay, than in any argument he may give on the subject. In fact, that word imposes on the mind an authority not easily resisted. It obscures the reason, quiets investi- gation, destroys the desire to search, beguiles thought, puts the mind to sleep, and the reader, like a young bird with eyes closed and mouth open, takes the food from out the old one's mouth, gulps it down, and goes to sleep. It is thus the student and the professor take, on authority, what they have no business to, and do what they never would do, did their own souls not bow basely at the shrine of some literary Baal. It is thus in politics, religion, history, law, philosophy, criticism, belles-lettres, science — whichever way we turn we find the false god and his worshipers. When the student and the professor come to find Mr. Macaulay to be a man of much talent in a certain direction, but by no means a literary god to be worshiped as infallible, they will lose faith in his assertions which come without proof. It had been my intention to throw a few hints into the Introduction upon external and internal evidence, as it is called, but I concluded to defer it till now, because the remarks and the illustrations would then be thrown together. In a criticism of this kind, but little confidence can be placed in external evidence, because it all comes within the realm of art or accident, and any scientific truth can not be founded thereon. For example, Macaulay says: '^ The handwriting of Junius is the very peculiar handwriting of Francis, slightly disguised.^' Hand- writing is an art, just like chopping wood or playing on the piano. And to tell who wrote an article by the REVIEW. 197 ^^ peculiar" handwritings is about as safe as to hazard an opinion n^ow who is chopping wood by the ^^ pecu- liar" swing of the ax. Nor does the same individual always write in the same style or manner. Such proof is good for nothing. And this is the nature of all ex- ternal evidence, and is the cause of the endless litigation in our courts. A man may go on the stand and swear to a lie. I have known men do it. Then we draw inferences from the associations of men, which the real facts of the case might not warrant. The accidents of place and position, of friendships and age, of times and circumstances, and even of existence, all may or may not, in a world fall of men, have bearing on the facts which form the opinion of an outside spectator. For example, Francis, it is said, " did not deny that he was Junius." If he had denied or affirmed he was, it would have proved just the same. It belongs to the most worthless kind of external evidence. A naturalist does not ask his horse whether or not he is a horse. If the horse could speak and say to his master, '^ I am a jack- ass," the master Avould be a fool to believe him. It is thus persons often put on a character in a w^ord or two which does not belong to them, but nature takes care to always reveal the true character, if they say much. Now if we could get within the meaning of the words, get behind them to the spirit of their author, we would be getting at the very soul of evidence. This would be true, and we could found a scientific conclusion upon it, because natural and not artificial. This is internal evidence. At present, this kind of evidence is known only in such a criticism as this, for the soul of the author shines out of his work, I care not who he is. We may, 198 JUNIUS UNMASKED. for aught I know, write our history on all, we touch. If so, science will some day give the world a knowledge of it. It is then external evidence will have ceased. In a work of this kind, it is incumbent on the critic to ascertain, first, the spirit and object of the work, and then to see if it be inconsistent with itself. If it is not, then the character he finds will be true to nature, and he can not go wrong in his conclusions. There is a passage in Letter 53 on this very point. Junius is speaking of the Rev. Mr. Home, and says : ^' He re- peatedly affirms, or intimates, at least, that he knows the author of these Letters. With what color of truth, then, can he pretend ' that I am nowhere to be encoun- tered but in a newspaper?^ I shall leave him to his suspicions. It is not necessary that I should confide in the honor and discretion of a man who always seems to hate me with as much rancor as if I had formerly been his friend. But he asserts that he has traced me through a variety of signatures. To make the discovery of any importance to his purpose, he should have proved either that the fictitious character of Junius has not been con- sistently supported, or that the author has maintained different principles under different signatures. I can not recall to my memory the numberless trifles I have written ; hut I rely on the consoiousness of my own in- tegrity, and defy him to fix any colorable charge of inconsistency upon me.^^ ^ow, what have I shown? It is that the character of Thomas Paine, as found in his writings (not in what people say about him), is the very same character, with all its shades and coloring, which is found in the Let- REVIEW. 199 TEES OF Junius. This is shown by the best and strongest evidence under the sun, internal evidence, I have purposely avoided all external evidence, from the mere fact of its worthlessness, inasmuch as it is that kind of evidence which itself needs proof. If, fOr ex- ample, Thomas Paine had said to some one : '.' I wrote Junius,'^ it would be no evidence to me, and would weigh just the same as if he had said : " I did not write Junius.^^ It is external evidence, and may be a lie, for lying is common to mankind. It is that kind of evidence which needs proof. But nature never makes two great characters alike, nor at the same time. She is prodigal of varieties. And if two char- acters seem alike, it is because of their insignificance; the orbit of their life is so small it can not be meas- ured. But when a Paine, or a Parker, or a Luther, or a Jesus, is let loose on earth, they each describe an orbit so large and peculiar there is no mistaking it for any thing else the world ever exhibits among men. And in their earthly pilgrimage, however seemingly erratic in their course, nature holds them true to her purposes, and holds up no lie therein to deceive the senses. She is true, also, to herself, in giving to us these world's redeemers. My argument, then, is, Nature would not be natural if Thomas Paine were not Junius, a mere absurdity. But let us suppose he is not. Then, to make out the case, strong evidence of the same internal kind would have to be produced in favor of this supposition. But I have searched for a solitary fact which would even tend to contradict my hypothesis, and have not found it. And I frankly confess, had I found it, this book 200 JUNIUS UNMASKED. would not have been written. Reader, search for it yourself, and, when found, publish it to the world, for the world is suffering for the want of truth. And though my conclusions be false, if I have been the means of revealing the truth, I shall not have written in vain. P^RT II. AN EXAMINATION OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. It is with painful feelings I now call your attention to the famous document which sets forth the political creed of the United States. More than once my pen has refused to set about this work, but I now ask : Who wrote the original Declaration of Independence? I answer boldly, Thomas Paine. To prove this, my method is the same as with Junius, and the prejudices of the united world shall not intimidate me. It is not my purpose to revive the old and long-for- gotten controversy about the authorship of this docu- ment. Enough to say, volumes have been written to prove that it was not Jefferson's. But the method and object of a negative criticism I scorn. If it can not be shown to be some other man's, then let the claim- ant wear his honors; he certainly did not come by them meanly or dishonorably; they were forced upon him. My evidence will be such as to exclude the possi- bility of even literary theft in Jefferson, and that it is, as a whole, the work of the author of Common Sense, and can not possibly be the work of any body else. This is a bold assertion, and a little out of my turn, (201)* 202 DECLARATION OF but my object is to raise the strongest doubt of the truth of what I assert in the mind of my reader, so as to en- list his attention, and hold me to the proof. The method of my argument is as follows : First, to show wherein this document is exactly like Mr. Paine; and, Secondly, wherein it is entirely unlike Mr. Jeffer- son. The points wherein they would agree are necessarily thrown out, and count nothing on either side. For ex- ample, the principles therein contained may be com- mon to both, and can have no weight in an argu- ment. It is said, in defense of this paper being Mr. Jefferson^s, that the " Summary View ^^ of his sub- mitted to, but not passed by the Virginia Delegate Convention in 1774, contained the "germs'' of the Declaration. This I do not admit, but if it did, it would prove nothing, for so did the writings of John Adams, and Benjamin Franklin, and Samuel Adams, and especially of James Otis. A thousand men in America had, perhaps, expressed the cardinal doctrine of equal rights, and that the British Parliament had usurped them. There is nothing peculiar nor indi- vidual in this; but when we find one man only who makes a specialty of the Declaration, it attracts atten- tion, and must have great weight when supported by a multitude of other special facts, all pointing in the same direction. I, therefore, go to show : First, Common Sense was written by Mr. Paine for the sole purpose of declaring independence, and, with this docuQient in view. I have heretofore reviewed Com- mon Sense, beginning on page 156 of this book. If it INDEPENDENCE. 203 were practicable for the reader to read the whole of Common Sense at this time, it would render my labor much less ; but as this may not be the case, I will now give the whole of the third division of that paper, being : AMERICAN AFFAIRS. "In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense; and have no other preliminaries to settle with the reader, than that he will divest himself of prejudice and pre- possession, and suffer his reason and his feelings to de- termine for themselves; that he will put on, or rather that he will not put off the true character of a man, and generously enlarge his views beyond the present day. ''Volumes have been written on the subject of the struggle between England and America. Men of all ranks have embarked in the controversy from differ- ent motives, and with various designs ; but all have been ineffectual, and the period of debate is closed. Arms, as the last resource, must decide the contest; the appeal was the choice of the king, and the continent hath ac- cepted the challenge. "It has been reported of the late Mr. Pelham (who, though an able minister, was not without his faults), that on his being attacked in the House of Commons, on the score, that his measures were only of a temporary kind, replied '* they will last my time." Should a thought so fatal and unmanly possess the colonies in the present contest, the name of ancestors will be remembered by future generations with detestation. " The sun never shone on a cause of greater worth. ^Tis not the affair of a city, a county, a province, or a kingdom, but of a continent — of at least one-eighth part of the habitable globe. ^Tis not the concern of a 204 ' DECLARATION OF day, a year, or an age ; posterity are virtually involved in the contest, and they will be more or less affected even to the end of time, by the proceedings now. Now is the seed-time of continental union, faith, and honor. The least fracture now will be like a name engraved with the point of a pin on the tender rind of a young oak ; the wound will enlarge with the tree, and pos- terity read it in full grown characters. ^' JBy referring the matter from argument to arms, a new era for politics is struck ; a new method of think- ing hath arisen. All plans, proposals, etc., prior to the nineteenth of April, i. e., to the commencement of hos- tilities, are like the almanacs of last year ; which^ though proper then, are superseded and useless now. What- ever was advanced by the advocates on either side of the question then terminated in one and the same point, viz., a union with Great Britain. The only difference between the parties was the method of effecting it ; the one proposing force, the other friendship; but it hath so far happened that the first has failed, and the second has withdrawn her influence. " As much hath been said of the advantages of recon- ciliation, which, like an agreeable dream, hath passed away and left us as we were, it is but right that we should examine the contrary side of the argument, and inquire into some of the many material injuries which these colonies sustain, and always will sustain, by being connected with and dependent on Great Britain. To examine that connection and dependence, on the prin- ciples of nature and common sense, to see what we have to trust to, if separated, and what we are to expect, if dependent. " I have heard it asserted by some, that as America has flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is necessary toward her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing can be more fallacious than this kind of argu- ment. We may as well assert that because a child has INDEPENDENCE, 205 thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the next twenty. But even this is admit- ting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had any thing to do with her. The articles of commerce by which she has enriched herself, are the necessaries of life, and will always have a market while eating is the custom of Europe. '' But she has protected us, say some. That she hath engrossed us is true, and defended the continent at our expense, as well as her own, is admitted, and she would have defended Turkey from the sanae motives, viz.) for the sake of trade and dominion. '^ Alas ! we have been long led away by ancient prejudices, and made large sacrifices to superstition. We have boayted the protection of Great Britain, with- out considering that her motive was interest, not attach- ment; and that she did not protect us from our enemies on our account, but from her enemies on her own account, from those who had no quarrel with us on any other account, and who will always be our enemies -on the same account. Let Britain waive her pretensions to the continent, or the continent throw off the depend- ence, and we should be at peace with France and Spain, were they at war with Britain. The miseries of Hano- ver, last war, ought to warn us against connections. '^ It hath lately been asserted in Parliament that the colonies have no relation to each other, but through the parent country, i. e., that Pennsylvania and the Jerseys, and so on for the rest, are sister colonies by the way of England. This is certainly a very roundabout way of proving relationship, but it is the nearest and only true way of proving enemyship, if I may so call it. France and Spain never were, nor perhaps ever will be, our enemies as Americans, but as our being the subjects of Great Britain, 206 DECLARATION OF '^ But Britain is the parent country^ say some. Then the more shame upon her conduct. Even brutes do not devour their young, nor savages make war upon their families; wherefore, the assertion, if true, turns to her reproach. But it happens not to be true, or only partly so; and the phrase parent, or mother . country hath been jesuitically adopted by the king and his par- asites, with a low, papistical design of gaining an unfair bias on the credulous weakness of our minds. Europe, and not England, is the parent country of America. This new world hath been the asylum for the perse- cuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe. Hither have they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the monster ; and it is so far true of England, that the same tyranny which drove the first emigrants from home pursues their descendants still. " In this extensive quarter of the globe, we forget the narrow limits of three hundred and sixty miles — the extent of England — and carry our friendship on a larger scale. AVe claim brotherhood with every Eu- ropean Christian, and triumph in the generosity of the sentiment. " It is pleasant to observe by what regular gradations we surmont local prejudices, as we enlarge our ac- quaintance with the world. A man born in any town in England divided into parishes, will naturally associ- ate most with his fellow-parishioners — because their in- terests, in many cases, will be common — and distinguish him by the name of neighbor ; if he meet him but a few miles from home, he drops the narrow idea of a street, and salutes him by the name of townsman; if he travel out of the county, and meets him in any other, he forgets the minor division of street and town, and calls him countryman — i. e., countyman; but if, in their foreign excursions, they should associate in France, or any other part of Europe, their local remembrance would be enlarged into that of JEnglishmen. And, by INDEPENDENCE. 207 a iiist parity of reasoning, all Earopeang meeting in Americi, or any other qnarter of the globe, are eountry- ten; for England, Holland, Germany, or bweden, wh"; compare"! with the whole, stand m the same Dlaces on tlie larger scale which the divisions of street, Tw" and county do on the smaller one-dist.ncUons too limited for continental minds. Not one-third of the inhabitants, even of this province, are of English descent. Wherefore, I reprobate the phrase of parent, or mother country, applied to England only, as bemg false, selfish, narrow, and ungenerous " But admitting that we were all of English descent, what does it amount to? Nothing. Britain, being now an open enemy, extinguishes every other name and tHle • and to say that reconciliation is our duty, is tiuly farcical The first King of England, of the present line— William the Conqueror— was a Frenchman, and half the peers of England are descendants from the same country; wherefore, by the same method of reason- ing, England ought to be governed by i ranee. '•Much hath been said of the united strength of Britain and the colonies— that, in conjunction, they mio-ht bid defiance to the world. But this is mere pre- sumption ; the fate of war is uncertain, neither do the expressions mean anything; for this continent would never suffer itself to be drained of inhabitants to sup- port the British arms in either Asia, Africa, or Eu- ™ "'^Besides, what have we to do with setting the world at defiance ? Our plan is commerce, and that well a - tended to will secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe because it is the interest of all Europe to have Amer^lck a free port. Her trade will always be a pro- tection, and her barrenness of gold and silver secure her """^I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation to show a single advantage that this continent can reap by being connected with Great Britain. I repeat tlie 208 DECLARATION OF challenge ; not a single advantage is derived. Our corn will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our imported goods must be paid for, buy them where we will. ^' But the injuries and disadvantages which we sus- tain by that connection are without number; and our duty to mankind at large, as well as to ourselves, in- structs us to renounce the alliance, because any submis- sion to, or dependance on, Great Britain, tends directly to involve this continent in European wars and quar- rels, and sets us at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our friendship, and against whom we have neither anger nor complaint. As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial con- nection with any part of it. It is the true interest of America to steer clear of European contentions, which she never can do; while, by her dependence on Britain, she is made the make- weight in the scale of British 2)olitics. '^ Europe is too thickly planted with kingdoms to be long at peace ; and whenever a war breaks out between England and any foreign power, the trade of America goes to ruin, because of her connection with Britain. The next war may not turn out like the last, and, should it not, the advocates for reconciliation now will be wishing for separation then, because neutrality, in that case, would be a safer convoy than a man-of-war. Every thing that is right or natural pleads for separa- tion. The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of Na- ture, cries, '^Tis time to part / ' Even the distance at which the Almighty hath placed England and America, is a strong and natural proof that the authority of the one over the other was never the design of Heaven. The time, likewise, at which the continent was discov- ered, adds weight to the argument, and the manner in which it was peopled increases the force of it. The reformation was preceded by the discovery of America, as if the Almighty graciously meant to open a sanctu- INDEPENDENCE. 209 ary to tlie persecuted in future years, when home should afford neither friendship nor safety. " The authority of Great Britain over this continent is a form of government which, sooner or later, must have an end ; and a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful and positive conviction that Avhat he calls Hhe present con- stitution/ is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not suf- ficiently lasting to insure any thing which we may be- queath to posterity; and by a plain method of argument, as Ave are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it — otherwise Ave use them meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty rightly, Ave should take our children in our hand, and fix our station a few years further into life. That eminence will present a prospect, Avhich a few pres- ent fears and prejudices conceal from our sight. " Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offense, yet I am inclined to believe that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation may be included Avithin the following descriptions : ^' Interested men, Avho are not to be trusted ; Aveak men, Avho can not see ; prejudiced men, who will not see ; and a certain set of moderate men, Avho think bet- ter of the European Avorld than it deserves; and this last class, by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent than all the other three. ^' It is the good fortune of many to live distant from the scene of sorrow. The evil is not sufficiently brought to their doors to make them feel the precariousness with which all American property is possessed. But let our imaginations transport us a few moments to Boston; that seat of Avretchedness Avill teach us wisdom, and in- struct us forever to renounce a power in Avhom we can have no trust. The inhabitants of that unfortunate city, who, but a few months ago, were in ease and af- 210 DECLARATION OF fluence^ have now no other alternative than to stay and starve, or turn out to beg — endangered by the fire of their friends if they continue within the city, and plun- dered by the soldiery if they leave it. In their present situation they are prisoners without the hope of re- demption, and in a general attack for their relief, they would be exposed to the fury of both armies. " Men of passive tempers look somewhat lightly over the offenses of Britain, and, still hoping for the best, are apt to call out, ' Come, come; ive shall he friends again for all this.'' But examine the passions and feel- ings of mankind, bring the doctrine of reconciliation to the touchstone of nature, and then tell me whether you can hereafter love, honor, and faithfully serve the power that hath carried fire and sword into your land? If you can not do all these, then you are only deceiving yourselves, and, by your delay, bringing ruin upon your posterity. Your future connection with Britain, whom you can neither love nor honor, will be forced and un- natural, and, being formed only on the plan of present convenience, will, in a little time, fall into a relapse more wretched than the first. But if you say you can still pass the violations over, then I ask, hath your house been burnt? Hath your property been destroyed before your face? Are your wife and cliildren desti- tute of a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have you lost a parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the ruined and Avretched survivor ? If you have not, then are you not a judge of those who have. But if you have, and can still shake hands with the murderers, then are you unworthy the name of husband, father, friend, or lover; and, whatever may be your rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward and the spirit of a sycopliant. " This is not inflaming or exaggerating matters, but trying them by those feelings and affections which nature justifies, and without which we should be inca- pable of discharging the social duties of life or enjoying INDEPENDENCE. 211' the felicities of it. I mean not to exliibit horror for the purpos'e of provoking revenge^ but to awaken us from fatal and unmanly slumbers, that we may pursue de- term inately some fixed object. It is not in the power of Britain or of Europe to conquer America, if she does not conquer herself by delay and timidity. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed ; but if lost or'' neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune ; and there is no punisliment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so pre- cious and useful. '^ It is repugnant to reason and the universal order of things, to all examples from former ages, to suppose that this continent can longer remain subject to any ex- ternal power. The most sanguine in Britain do not think so. The utmost stretch of human wisdom can not, at this time, compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the continent even a year's security. Reconciliation is iioiv a fallacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connection, and art can not supply her place. For, as Milton wisely expresses, ^ Never can true recon- cilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep.' ^' Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us that nothing flatters vanity or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petition- ing — nothing hath contributed more than this very measure to make the kings of Europe absolute. Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for God's sake let us come to a final sep- aration, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats under the violated, unmeaning names of parent and child. " To say they will never attempt it again is idle and visionary. We thought so at the repeal of the stamp act; yet a year or two undeceived us. As well may 14 212 DECLARATION OF we suppose that nations, which have been once defeated, will never renew tlie quarrel. "As to government matters, it is not in the power of Britain to do this continent justice. The business of it will soon be too weighty and intricate to be managed with any tolerable degree of convenience by a power so distant from us and so very ignorant of us; for if they can not conquer us they can not govern us. To be al- ways running three or four thousand miles with a tale or a petition, waiting four or five months for an answer, which, when obtained, requires five or six more to ex- plain it in, will in a few years be looked upon as folly and childishness. There was a time when it was proper, and there is a proper time for it to cease. '' Small islands, not capable of protecting themselves, are the proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but there is something absurd in supposing a con- tinent to be perpetually governed by an island. Tn no instance hath nature made the satellite larger than its primary planet; and as England and America, with respect to each other, reverses the common order of nature, it is evident that they belong to different sys- tems: England to Europe — America to itself " I am not induced by motives of pride, party, or resentment to espouse the doctrine of separation and in- dependence. I am clearly, positively, and conscientiously persuaded that it is the true interest of this continent to be so ; that every thing short of that is mere patch- work; that it can afford no lasting felicity; that it is leaving the sword to our children and shrinking back at a time when, going a little further, would have rendered this continent the glory of the earth. '^As Britain hath not manifested the least inclination toward a compromise, we may be assured that no terms can be obtained worthy the acceptance of the continent, or any ways equal to the expense of blood and treasure we have been already put to. "The object contended for ought always to bea^ INDEPENDENCE. 213 some just proportion to the expense. The removal of !N'orth, or the whole detestable junto, is a matter un- worthy the millions we have expended. A temporary stoppage of trade was an inconvenience which would have sufficiently balanced the repeal of all the acts com- plained of, had such repeals been obtained ; but if the whole continent must take up arms, if every man must be a soldier, it is scarcely worth our while to fight against a contemptible ministry only. Dearly, dearly do we pay for the repeal of the acts if that is all we fight for; for, in a just estimation, it is as great a folly to pay a Bunker-hill price for law as for land. I have always considered the independency of this continent as an event which sooner or later must take place, and, from the late rapid ])rogress of the continent to maturity, the event can not be far off. Wherefore, on the breaking out of hostilities, it was not worth the while to have disputed a matter which time would have finally re- dressed, unless we meant to be in earnest;, otherwise, it is like wasting an estate on a suit at law to regulate the trespasses of a tenant whose lease is just expiring. No man was a warmer wisher for a reconciliation than my- self before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775,* but the moment the event of that day was made known, I re- jected the hardened, sullen-tempered Pharaoh of Eng- land forever ; and disdain the wretch that, with the pretended title o^ father of his people, can unfeelingly hear of their slaughter and composedly sleep with their blood upon his soul. " But admitting that matters were now made up, what would be the event? I answer, the ruin of the continent. And that for several reasons. " 1st. The powers of governing still remaining in the hands of the king, he will have a negative over the whole legislation of this continent. And as he hath shown himself such an inveterate enemy to liberty, and discovered such a thirst for arbitrary power, is he, or ^Massacre at Lexington. 214 DECLARATION OF is he not, a proper person to say to these colonies, ' You shall make no laivs but what I please f ^ And is there any inhabitant of America so ignorant as not to know that, according to what is called the present con- stitution, this continent can make no laws but what the king gives leave to? and is there any man so unwise as not to see that (considering what has happened) he will suffer no law to be made here but such as suits his pur- pose? We may be as effectually enslaved by the want of laws in America as by submitting to laws made for us in England. After matters are made np (as it is called), can there be any doubt but the whole power of the crown will be exerted to keep this continent as low and humble as possible? Instead of going forward, we shall go backward, or be perpetually quarreling or ridiculously petitioning. We are already greater than the king wishes us to be, and will he not hereafter en- deavor to make us less ? To bring the matter to one point, Is the. power who is jealous of our prosperity a proper power to govern us ? Whoever says No to this question is an independent^ for independency means no more than this, whether we shall make our own laws, or whether the king, the greatest enemy which this con- tinent hath or can have, shall tell us, ^ There shall be no laws but such as I like.^ " But the king, you will say, has a negative in Eng- land ; the people there can make no laws without his consent. In point of right and good order, it is some- thing very ridiculous that a youth of twenty-one (which hath often happened) shall say to several millions of people, older and wiser than himself, I forbid this or that act of yours to be law. But in this place I decline this sort of reply, though I will never cease to expose the absurdity of it; and only answer that, England be- ing the king's residence and America not makes quite another case. The king's negative here is ten times more dangerous and fatal than it can be in England; for there he will scarcely refuse his consent to a bill for INDEPENDENOJS, ■ 215 putting England into as strong a state of defense as pos- sible, and in America he would never suffer such a bill to be passed. "America is only a secondary object in the system of British politics — England consults the good of this country no further than it answers her oivn purpose. Wherefore, her own interest leads her to suppress the growth of ours in every case which doth not promote her advantage, or in the least interferes with it. A pretty state we should soon be in under such a second- hand government, considering what has happened! Men do not change from enemies to friends by tlie al- teration of a name; and in order to show that reconcil- iation now is a dangerous doctrine, I affirm that it would be policy in the king at this time to repeal the acts, for the sake of reinstating himself in the government of the provinces; in order that he may accomplish by craft and subtlety, in the long run, what he can not do by force in the short one. Reconciliation and ruin are nearly related. "2dly. That as even the best terms which we can expect to obtain can amount to no more than a tempo- rary expedient, or a kind of government by guardian- ship, which can last no longer than till the colonies come of age, so the general face and state of things^ in the interim, will be unsettled and unpromising. Emigrants of property will not choose to come to a country whose form of government hangs but by a thread, and which is every day tottering on the brink of commotion and disturbance; and numbers of the present inhabitants would lay hold of the interval to dispose of their effects and quit the continent. "But the most powerful of all arguments is, that nothing but independence, i. e., a continental form of gov- ernment, can keep the peace of the continent and preserve it inviolate from civil wars. I dread the event of a reconciliation with Britain now, as it is more than prob- able that it will be followed by a revolt somewhere or 216 DECLARATION OF other, the consequences of which may be far more fatal than all the malice of Britain. "Thousands are already ruined by British barbarity. (Thousands more will probably suifer the same fate.) Those men have other feelings than us who have noth- ing suffered. All they now possevss is liberty ; what they before enjoyed is sacrificed to its service, and, hav- ing nothing more to lose, they disdain submission. Besides, the general temper of the colonies toward a Brit- ish government will be like that of a youth who is nearly out of his time — they will care very little about her. And a government which can not preserve the peace is no government at all, and in that case we pay our money for nothing ; and pray what is it that Britain can do, whose power will be wholly on paper, should a civil tu- mult break out the very day after reconciliation? I have heard some men say, many of whom I believe spoke without thinking, that they dreaded an independence, fearing that it would produce civil wars. It is but seldom that our first thoughts are truly correct, and that is the case here ; for there is ten times more to dread from a patched up connection than from inde- pendence. I make the sufferer's case my own, and I protest that, were I driven from house and home, my property destroyed, and my circumstances ruined, that as a man sensible of injuries, I could never relish the doctrine of reconciliation or consider myself bound thereby. " The colonies have manifested such a spirit of good order and obedience to continental government, as is sufficient to make every reasonable person easy and happy on that head. No man can assign the least pre- tense for his fears on any other grounds than such as are truly childish and ridiculous, viz.: that one colony wdll be striving for superiority over another. "Where there are no distinctions there can be no su- periority; perfect equality affords no temptation. The republics of Europe are all (and we may say always) in INDEPENDENCE. 217 peace. Holland and Switzerland are without wars, foreign or domestic. Monarchical governments, it is true, are never long at rest; the crown itself is a temp- tation to enterprising ruffians at home, and that degree of pride and insolence, ever attendant on regal author- ity, swells into a rupture with foreign powers in in- stances where a republican government, by being formed on more natural principles, would negotiate the mistake. " If there is any true cause of fear respecting inde- pendence, it is because no plan is yet laid down. Men do not see their way out. Wherefore, as an opening into that business, I offer the following hints, at the same time modestly affirming that I have no other opin- ion of them myself than that they may be the means of giving rise to something better. Could the straggling thoughts of individuals be collected, they would fre- quently form materials for wise and able men to improve into useful matter : ^' Let the assemblies be annual, with a president only. The representation more equal. Their business wholly domestic, and subject to the authority of a continental congress. " Let each colony be divided into six, eight, or ten convenient districts, each district to send a proper num- ber of delegates to congress, so that each colony send at least thirty. The whole number in congress will be at least three hundred and ninety. Each congress to sit , and to choose a president by the following method : When the delegates are met, let a colony be taken from the whole thirteen colonies by lot, after which let the congress choose (by ballot) a presi- dent from out of the delegates of that province. In the next congress, let a colony be taken by lot from twelve only, omitting that colony from which the presi- dent was taken in the former congress, and so proceed- ing on till the whole thirteen shall have had their proper rotation. And, in order that nothing may pass into a law but what is satisfactorily just, not less than 218 DECLARATION OF three-fifths of the congress to be called a majority. He that will promote discord, under a government so equally- formed as this, would have joined Lucifer in his revolt. "But, as there is a peculiar delicacy from whom, or in what manner, this business must first arise, and as it seems most agreeable and consistent that it sliould come from some intermediate body between the governed and the governors — ^that is, between the congress and the people — let a Continental Conference be held, in the fol- lowing manner, and for the following purpose: "A committee of twenty-six members of congress, viz.: two for each colony ; two members from each house of assembly, or provincial convention, and five representatives of the people at large, to be chosen in the capital city or town of each province, for and in be- half of the whole province, by as many qualified voters as shall think proper to attend from all parts of the province for that })urpose; or, if more convenient, the representatives may be chosen in two or three of the most populous parts thereof. In this conference, thus assembled, will be united the two grand ])rinciples of business — hioiuledge and power. The members of con- gress, assemblies, or conventions, by having had expe- rience in national concerns, will be able and useful counselors, and the whole, being empowered by the people, will have a truly legal authority. " The conferring members being met, let their busi- ness be to frame a Continental Chm^ter, or Charter of the United Colonies (answering to wdiat is called the Magna Charta of England) ; fixing the number and manner of choosing members of congress and members of assembly, with their date of sitting, and drawing the line of business and jurisdiction between them (ahvays remembering that our strength is continental, not pro- vincial) ; securing freedom and property to all men, and, above all things, the free exercise of religion, ac- cording to the dictates of conscience; with such other matter as it is necessary for a charter to contain. Im- INDEPjENDENGE. 219 mediately after which ^ the said conference to dissolve, and the bodies which shall be chosen conformable to the said charter to be the legislators and governors of this continent for the time being : whose peace and happi- -ness may God preserve. Amen. '' Should any body of men be hereafter delegated for this or some similar purpose, I offer them the following extract from that wise observer on governments, Drago- nettij ^The science/ says he, 'of the politician con- sists in fixing the true point of happiness and freedom. Those men would deserve the gratitude of ages who should discover a mode of government that contained the greatest sum of of individual happiness, with the least national expense.^ " But where, say some, is the king of America ? I ^11 tell you, friend : he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the royal brute of Britain. Yet, that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly honors, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the Word of God ; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know that, so far as we ap- prove of monarchy, that in America the law is king. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But, lest any ill use should af- terward arise, let the crown, at the conclusion of the ceremony, be demolished, and scattered among the peo- ple, whose right it is. "A government, of our own is our natural right; and when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human affiiirs, he will become convinced that it is infi- nitely wiser and safer to form a constitution of our own in a cool, deliberate manner, while we have it in our power, than to trust such an interesting event to time and chance. ^ If we omit it now, some Massanello may hereafter arise, who, laying hold of popular disqui- etudes, may collect together the desperate and the dis- 220 DECLARATION OF contented, and, by assuming to themselves the powers of govei-nment, finally sweep away the liberties of the continent like a deluge. Should the government of America return again into the hands of Britain, the tot- tering situation of things will be a temptation for some desperate adventurer to try his fortune; and, in such a case, what relief can Britain give? Ere she could hear the news the fatal business might be done, and ourselves suffering, like the wretched Britons, under the oppres- sion of tlie Conqueror. Ye that oppose independence now, ye know not what ye do : ye are opening a door to eternal tyranny, by keeping vacant the seat of gov- ernment. There are thousands, and tens of thousands, who would think it glorious to expel from the continent that barbarous and hellish power, which hath stirred up the Indians and negroes to destroy us. The cruelty hath a double guilt — it is dealing brutally by us, and treacherously by them. "To talk of friendship with those in whom our rea- son forbids us tp have faith, and our affections, wounded through a thousand pores, instruct us to detest, is mad- ness and folly. Every day wears out the little remains of kindred between us and them ; and can there be any reason to ho})e that, as the relationsliip expires, the af- fection will increase, or that we shall agree better when we have ten times more and gi'eater concerns to quarrel over than ever? '^ Ye that tell us of harmony and reconciliation, can ye restore to us the time that is past? Can ye give to prostitution its former innocence? Neither can ye rec- oncile Britain and America. The last cord now is broken; the people of England are presenting addresses against us. There are injuries which nature can not forgive — she would cease to be nature if she did. As well can the lover forgive the ravisher of his mistress, as the continent forgive the murders of Britain. The Almighty hath implanted in us these unextinguishable feelings for good and wise purposes. They are the guard- INDEPENDENCE. 221 ians of his image in our hearts, and distinguish us from the herd of common animals. The social compact would dissolve, and justice be extirpated from the earth, or have only a casual existence, were we callous to the touches of affection. The robber and the murderer would often escape unpunished, did not the injuries which our tempers sustain provoke us into justice. '^Oh, ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth ! Ev- ery spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been haunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warn- ing to depart. Oh ! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.'^ ORIGIXAL DECLARATION. * I now place before the reader the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, as it was presented by JefPerson. I have placed in brackets the matter struck out or amended by Congress. It will be remembered that Mr. Jefferson was chair- man of the committee to draft the document; Benja- min Franklin, John Adams, Roger Sherman, and R. R. Livingston, being the other four of the committee; that they changed but a word or two in it; and that John Adams became its champion in Congress, and fought manfully for every word of it. Jefferson said nothing, as he scarcely ever spoke in public: 1. '^When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to as- sume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of na- *See Note A, page 277. 222 DECLARATION OF tare's God entitle them, a decent respect for the opin- ions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 2. ^' We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal ; that they are endowed by their Creator with [inherent and] inalienable rights ; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happi- ness; that to secure these rights, governments are in- stituted among men, deriving their just powers from tlie consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter and abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundations on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that gov- ernments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all expe- rience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufPerable, than to right them- selves by abolishing the forms to which they are ac- customed. But when a long train of abuses and usur- pations, [begun at a distinguished period, and] pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to pro- vide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferings of these colonies ; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to [expunge] their former systems of government. The history of the present king of Great Britain, is a history of [un- remitting] injuries and usurpations, [among which ap- pears no solitary fact to contradict the uniform tenor of the rest, but all have] in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world, [for the truth of which we pledge a faith yet unsullied by false- hood.] INDEPENDENCE. 223 3. "He has refused his assent to laws the most whole- some and necessary for the public good. 4. "He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance^ unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended^ he has utterly neglected to at- tend to them. 5. "He has refused to pass other laws for the accom- modation of large districts of people, unless those peo- ple would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. 6. "He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 7. "He has dissolved representative houses repeat- edly [and continually] for opposing, with manly firm- ness, his invasions on the rights of the people. 8. "He has refused, for a long time after such disso- lutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby tJie legis- lative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise, the state re- maining, in the meantime, exposed to dangers of inva- sions from without and convulsions within. 9. "He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states ; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the con- ditions of new appropriations of lands. 10. "He has [suffered] the administration of justice [totally to cease in some of these states], refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers. 11. "He has made [our] judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. 12. "He has erected a multitude of new offices [by a self-assumed power], and sent hither swarms of new 224: DECLARATION OF officers to harass our people and eat out their sub- stance. 13. " He has kept among us in times of peace standing armies [and ships of war] without the consent of our legiskitures. 14. ''He has affected to render the military inde- pendent of and superior to the civil power. 15. ''He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitutions^ and unac- knowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation for quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; for protecting by a mock trial from punishment, any murders which they should com- mit on the inhabitants of these states; for cutting off our trade with all ports of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent ; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury; for transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses ; for abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring prov- ince, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these [states] ; for taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and alter- ing, fundamentally, the forms of our governments; for suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. 16. " He has abdicated government here [withdraw- ing his governors and declaring us out of his allegiance and protection]. 17. " He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 18. " He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries, to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny already begun, with circum- INDEPENDENCE. 225 stances of cruelty and perfidy, unworthy the head of a civilized nation. 19. ^^ He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren^ or to fall themselves by their hands. 20. " He has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of the frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruc- tion of all ages, sexes, and conditions of [existence]. 21. ['^ He has excited treasonable insurrection of our fellow-citizens, with the allurements of forfeiture and confiscation of our property.] 22. [^' He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and lib- erty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of INFIDEL powers, is the warfiire of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his nega- tive for suppressing every legislative attempt to pro- hibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of dis- tinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the LIBERTIES of one people with crimes which he urges them to com- mit against the LIVES of another.] 23. " In every stage of these o})pressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injuries. 24. "A prince whose character is thus marked by 226 DECLARATION OF every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a people [who mean to be free. Future ages will scarcely believe that the hardiness of one man ad- ventured, within the short compass of twelve years only, to lay a foundation so broad and so undisguised for tyranny over a peoj)le fostered and fixed in principles of freedom.] 25. '^ Nor have we been w^anting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts, by their legislature, to extend [a] ju- risdiction over [these, our States.] We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settle- ment here, [no one of which would warrant so strange a pretention. These were effected at the expense of our own blood and treasure, unassisted by the Avealth or strength of Great Britain; that in constituting, indeed, our several forms of government, we had adopted one common king, thereby laying a foundation for perpet- ual leao;ue and amitv with them ; but that submission to their Parliament was no part of our constitution, nor ever in idea, if history may be credited ; and] we ap- pealed to their native justice and magnanimity, [as well as to] the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations, which [were likely] to interrupt our con- nection and correspondence. They, too, have been deaf to the voice of justice and consanguinity; [and when occasions have been given them, by the regular course of their laws, of removing from their councils the disturbers of our harmony, they have, by their free election, reestablished them in power. At this very time, too, they are permitting their chief magistrate to send over not only soldiers of our common blood, but Scotch and foreign mercenaries, to invade and destroy us. These facts have p'iven the last stab to ao;o- nizing affection, and manly spirit bids us renounce forever these unfeeling brethren. We must endeavor to forget our former love for them,] and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind — enemies in war, in peace INDEPENDENQE. 227 friends. [\ye might have been a free and a great people together; but a communion of grandeur and of freedom, it seems, is below their dignity. Be it so, since they will have it. The road to happiness and to glory is open to us, too. We will tread it apart from them, and] acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our [eternal] separation. 26. '' We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in general Congress assembled, do, in the name and by the authority "of the good people of these [States, reject and renounce all allegiance and subjection to the King of Great Britain, and all others who may hereafter claim by, through, or under them ; we utterly dissolve all political connection which may heretofore have subsisted between us and the people or Parliament of Great Britain ; and, finally, we do assert and declare these colonies to be free and independent States;] and that, as free and independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do. '^ And for the support of this declaration, we mutu- ally pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.'^ ANALYSIS. We have to do with the original draft, and to let the reader see the hand of a master, I will analyze it. " I love method,'' said Mr. Paine. The method of the piece stands as follows, and, for the sake of elucida- tion, I have numbered the paragraphs in the original ; I. Inteoduction, viz: — Paragraph 1. II. Bill of Rights — Paragraph 2. III. Indictment — under three general charges : Usur- patioUj Abdication, and War, as follows: 15 228 DECLARATION OF USUEPATION^. Par. 3, 4, 5 — Laws usurped, and hereunder: a. Negatived. h. Forbidden and neglected. c. Refused, unless rights are surrendered. Par. 6, 7, 8, 9 — Legislation usurped, and hereunder: a. Legislative bodies meet at the wrong place. h. Legislative bodies dissolved. c. Refused to have them elected. d. Obstructing legislation for naturalization. Par. 10, 11, 12 — Judiciary powers usurped, and here- under : a. Destroyed by his negative. h. Made the judges dependent on his will, c. And erected new offices by his own will. Par. 13, 14 — Military powers usurped, and hereunder: a. Established without consent of leg-islatures. h. Made superior to civil power. Par. 15 — Jurisdiction usurped, and hereunder: a. Troops, the quartering of. b. Trial, of a mock nature. c. Trade, the cutting off. d. Taxes, without consent. e. Trial, depriving of. /. Transportation, to be ♦ g. Tried, for pretended offenses. h. Laws, abolishing the English. i. Charters, the taking of. j. Laws, abolishing special ones. h Constitutions, altering form of. I. Legislatures, suspension of. m. Power, to legislate for us in all case^ ^-vhatsoever. INDEPENDENCE. 229 ABDICATION. Par. 16 — Declaring us out of his allegiance and pro- tection. WAE. Par. 17 — Warfare begun, and hereunder: a. Seas plundered. h. Coasts ravaged. c. Towns burnt. d. Lives destroyed. Par. 18 — Invasion. Par. 19 — Pressing of seamen. Par. 20 — Indian massacres. Par. 21^Insurrection. Par. 22 — Waging war against human nature. lY. Peaceful Method of Redeess, viz: Peti- tioning — Paragraph 23. Y. Necessity of Separation — declared in Para- graphs 24, 25. YI. Powers of an Independent State De- clared to the World — in Paragraph 26. ARGUMENT. Let us now examine Articles III, lY, Y, and YI. As they form the piece proper, namely, the indictment and the declaration thereunder, let us compare them with reference to the following: In the conclusion of Common Sense Mr. Paine wrote : " Should a manifesto be published and dispatched to foreign courts setting forth — I. ^\ The miseries we have endured ; [This is Art. Ill of the Declaration.] 230 DECLARATION OF II. " The peaceful methods which we have ineffect- ually used for redress ; [This is Art. IV of the Declara- tion.] III. "Declaring at the same time that, not being able any longer to live happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the British court, we had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connection with her; [This is Art. Y of the Declaration.] lY. "At the same time assuring all courts of our peaceful disposition toward them, and of our desire of entering into trade with them." [This is Art. YI of the Declaration.] Here are, in their order, the directions for producing the four last articles of the famous document, and which constitute, as a special instrument, all there is of it. Did Mr. Jefferson study this production of Thomas Paine's so closely as to get the exact order, without transposing an article? A cursory reading would not do this, and if he did not study it for this purpose, then the same peculiar mind belonged to Jef- ferson that belonged to Thomas Paine ; and in writing the Declaration a greater special miracle was performed than any recorded of Jesus of Nazareth. In the above there is a striking coincidence of docu- mentary facts, in the same order, and it is safe to say there is not one man in a million who, in reading Com- mon Sense, would remember this order, unless he read it with such special purpose. But it is known Jeffer- son never consulted a book or paper upon the subject, nor for the purpose of producing it. Here is what Bancroft says, and I have found hira to be a truthful historian as to current facts touching on the subject : INDEP^NDENQE. 231 " From the fullness of his own mind, without con- sulting one single book, Jefferson drafted the Declara- tion ; he submitted it separately to Franklin and John Adams, accepted from each of them one or two verbal unimportant corrections," etc. — Hist., vol. viii, p. 465. The above history is doubtless taken from the reply of Mr. Jefferson to attacks on the originality of the Declaration, which is as follows : " Pickering's observa- tions and Mr. Adams' in addition, ^ that it contained no new ideas ; that it is a common-place compilation ; its sentiments hackneyed in Congress for two years before, and its essence contained in Otis' pamphlet,' may all be true. Of that I am not to be the j udge. Kichard Henry Lee charged it as copied from Locke's Treatise on Gov- ernment. Otis' pamphlet I never saw ; and whether I had gathered my ideas from reading, I do not know. I know only that I turned to neither book nor pamphlet while writing it." — Works, vol. vii, p. 305. This was written when he was eighty years old. But it seems that Mr. Jefferson had never read the pamphlet. Common Sense, as the following gross error in regard to it will show. Speakuig of Mr. Paine, he says : " Indeed, his Common Sense was for awhile be- lieved to have been written by Dr. Franklin, and pub- lished under the borrowed name of Paine, who had come over with him from England." — Works, vol. vii., p. 198. In the above sentence there are two historic errors. First, Common Sense was not published under the name of Paine ; and, second, Mr. Paine did not come over with Franklin from England. He preceded Franklin six months. 232 DECLARATION OF That Mr. Paine did not attach his name to the pam- phlet, Common Sense, there is abundance of evidence to prove. The author of a pamphlet, subscribed Ration- alis, in answer to Common Sense, says : " I know not the author, nor am I anxious to learn his name or char- acter, for the book, and not the writer of it, is to be the subject of my animadversions." But we have Mr. Paine's own testimony, in the sec- ond edition of Common Sense, direct to the point. In a postscript to the Introduction, he says: '^Who the author of this production is, is wholly unnecessary to the public, as the object for attention is the doctrine, not the man. Yet it may not be unnecessary to say that he is unconnected with any party, and under no sort of influence, public or private, but the influence of reason and principle." An examination of all the earliest editions which can be seen in the Congressional Library at Washington will satisfy any one on this subject. If Mr. Jefferson had read Common Sense before the writing of the Declaration, he would never have erred so in regard to this fact. This goes to show he had not even read it, much less studied it. How, then, was the exact order followed, in writing the Declaration, which Mr. Paine laid down in Common Sense? My first proposition, then, I have proven, namely: that Thomas Paine wrote a work fof the sole purpose of bringing about a separation and making a Declaration of Independence. I have proven, also, that he therein submitted the subject-matter in the 07'der in which it w^as afterwards put. This much on the positive side. On the negative side, I have shown that Mr. Jefferson INDEPENDENCE. 233 did none of these things, for it was produced from '^ the fuUness of his own mind, without consulting one single book." But if Mr. Bancroft be a truthful historian, there is already great doubt thrown on Jefferson's authorship of it, and it would have been better to have made Jef- ferson a close student and thorough reader for this special purpose. This is the view, in fact, taken of the question of authorship in the New American Cyclopedia (article Thomas Jefferson), and I will give an extract therefrom, to show how historians differ. Speaking of the Declaration, the Cyclopedia says : " Two questions have, however, arisen as to its originality : the first, a general one upon the substance of the document; the second, in regard to its phraseology in connection with the alleged Mecklenburg declaration of May, 1775. It is more than probable that Jefferson made use of some of the ideas expressed in newspapers at the time, and that his study of the great English writers upon consti- tutional freedom was of service to him. But an impartial criticism will not base upon this fact a charge of want of originality. It should rather be regarded as the pe- culiar merit of the writer that he thus collected and em- bodied the conclusions upon t>;overnment of the leadino' thinkers of the age in Europe and America, rejecting what was false, and combining his material into a pro- duction of so much eloquence and dignity.'^ This does not sound much like Bancroft. The two historians have placed Mr. Jefferson in a sad dilemma. The one, to make him an original in the production of the Declaration, says he did not consult one single book, but produced it from the fullness of his own mind. 234 DECLARATION OF The other^ to defend him from the charge of want of originality, says he made use of the newspapers, col- lected and embodied, etc. But the single fact which I have brought from the conclusion of Common Sense destroys the first hypothesis, and the last hypothesis, in being contradictory in itself destroys itself. How the reader will fathom this labyrinth of contradictions, and reconcile this conflict of historic opinion, is a question which does not trouble me, and I pass on to something more important. STYLE. The style of the Declaration of Independence is in every particular the style of Mr. Paine and Junius ; and it is in no particular the style of Thomas Jeifer- son. This I now proceed to prove. That equality in the members of the periods, which gives evenness and smbothness, and the alliteration which gives harmony in the sound, and which together render the writings of Mr. Paine so stately and met- rical, are qualities so prominent that no one can mistake the style. And what renders the argument in this re- gard so strong, is the entire absence of these qualities in Mr. Jefferson^s writings. In fact, if Mr. Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence, he never be- fore nor since wrote any thing like it, in the same style, order, or spirit; -or produced any thing which evinced genius, or the hand of a master in literature. What I have already said on style, in the former part of this work, will render this readily understood by the reader; but I will now make a few comparisons, and first with Junius, and then Paine and Jefferson. INDEPENDENCE. 235 Junius wrote two declarations, or rather pieces, after the very same style and manner, namely, the first and the thirty-fifth Letters. They can be thrown into the same synoptical form in which I have put the Dec- laration. But to show the rythm, and alliteration, and peculiar style, I give the following : '^When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to as- sume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect for the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. '^ — Declaration. " When the complaints of a brave and powerful peo- ple are observed to increase in proportion to the wrongs they have suifered ; when, instead of sinking into sub- mission, they are roused to resistance, the time will soon arrive at which every inferior consideration must yield to the security of the sovereign and to the general safety of the state. There is a moment of difficulty and dan- ger at which flattery and falsehood can no longer de- ceive, and simplicity itself can no longer be misled." — Junius. ^^When the tumult of war shall cease, and the tem- pest of present passions be succeeded by calm reflection ; or when those who, surviving its fury, shall inherit from you a legacy of debts and misfortunes; when the yearly revenue shall scarcely be able to discharge the interest of the one, and no possible remedy be left for the other, ideas far diflerent from the present will arise and embitter the remembrance of former follies.^' The above three extracts are from the Declaration, Junius, and Crisis, viii. There is in them the same stately measure or tread; the same harmony of sounds; 236 DECLARATION OF the same gravity of sentiment; the same clearness of dic- tion ; the same boldness of utterance ; the same beauty and vivacity; in short, the same spirit and the sanie hand. Now an extract from Jefferson will be in place, and I give it from one of his most impassioned pieces, the " Summary View.'^ I do this for two reasons : first, be- cause it is the only piece, up to the writing of the Dec- laration, which he ever produced worthy of note; and second, because it is his best. I give also the best of this piece, the exordium : '^Resolved, That it be an instruction to the said dep- uties, when assembled in General Congress, with the deputies from the other states of British America, to propose to the said Congress that an humble and duti- ful address be presented to his Majesty, begging leave to lay before him, as Chief Magistrate of the British empire, the united complaints of his Majesty^s subjects in America ; complaints which are excited by many un- warrantable encroachments and usurpations, attempted to be made by the legislature of one part of the empire upon the rights which God and the laws have, given equally and independently to all. To represent to his Majesty that these, his states, have often individually made humble application to his im})erial Throne to ob- tain through its intervention some redress of their in- jured rights, to none of which was ever even an answer condescended. Humbly to hope that this, their joint address, penned in the language of truth, and divested of those expressions of servility which would persuade his Majesty that we are asking favors, and not rights, shall obtain from his Majesty a respectful acceptance; and this his Majesty will think we have reason to ex- pect, when he reflects that he is no more than the chief officer of the people, appointed t>y the laws, and circum- scribed with definite powers to assist in working the INBEPENDENOE. 237 great machine of government, erected for their use, and consequently subject to their superintendence, and in order that these our rights, as well as the invasions of them, may be laid more fully before his Majesty, to take a view of them from the origin and first settle- ment of these countries/' It will be observed in the above extract from Mr. Jefferson, that there is no proportion between the mem- bers of the sentences. We have them of all lengths, interlarded with phrases, and thrown into a confused mass. Hence, there is no harmony. Mr. Paine's pe- riods are almost faultless in this regard; the members of the periods follow each other like the waves of the ocean, which gives evenness of "tread'' and majesty of expression. While the style of Mr. Jeiferson is abso- lutely devoid of all harmony, for the members of the periods move on like the rumbling of a government wagon over a rough and stony road. ' This peculiarity of style is one of mental constitu- tion. It is an effect of nature which education can never remedy. No art can reach it, for no mental training can annul a law of nature. It may be said of the writer in this regard as of the poet : " He is born, not made.'' It is herein nature made these two men entirely unlike. -Paine was a poet; Jefferson was not. The former had the most lively imagination ; the latter had none at all. It is this quality of the mind — imagination — which adorns language with the figure. In the proper use of the figure Mr. Paine can not be excelled. Mr. Jefferson makes but infrequent use of figures of speech, and when he goes out of the ruts of custom, he almost always fails in his efforts. Two or three examples will suffice. In vol. i, p. 58, he says: "I 238 DECLARATION OF never heard either of them speak ten minutes at a time, nor to any but the main point which was to decide the question. They laid their shoulders to the great points, knowing that the little ones would follow of them- selves/^ In this men are arguing the points of a ques- tion. But Mr. Jefferson says they ** laid their shoulders'' to them, instead of their tongues. In vol. i, p. 358, he says : " The Emperor, to satisfy this tinsel passion, plants a dagger in the heart of every Dutchman, which no time will extract.'' Perhaps these planted daggers will take root. He speaks also about ^^ confabs " and " swallowing opinions." Let us look now, for a moment, at the grand requi- sites of style, PreGision, Unity, and Strength. Of the first, I would say, I have never yet seen an ambiguous sentence in Paine's works. Mr. Jefferson's style is confused, labored, and prolix. There is no paragraph he ever wrote, especially in the first half of his life, but will bear me out in the assertion, that he uses a great many words to express a few ideas. The above quotation I cite on this point. It could all have been put into one-fourth of the space, and thus have been rendered clear and distinct. His style, however, grew better as he grew older. He is diffuse, which at once destroys Unity of expression. He puts subject after subject into one period, often into one sentence. The consequence is, there is no order in his style, and his ideas tumble over each other in the greatest confusion ; and the consequence of this is, there is no Strength to his style. That the reader may see all these faults, I will INDEPENDENCE. 239 make a brief analysis of the Introduction to the '^Summary View," quoted above: FIEST PEEIOD. 1. Instruction^ to deputies. 2. When assembled in Congress. 3. With other deputies. 4. To propose to Congress. 5. To present an address to his Majesty. 6. Begging leave to lay before him complaints. 7. Complaints excited. 8. By encroachments and usurpations. 9. By the legislature of a part of the empire. 10. On the rights which God and the laws have given 11. Equally to all. This is the first sentence. In it he has put the Introduction, the Bill of Rights, the Indictment, a proposition to Congress to go a begging before his Majesty, and several other particular? But let us continue with the next sentence : SECOND PEEIOD. 12. To represent to his Majesty. 13. That his states. 14. Humble application. 15. To Imperial Throne. 16. To get redress of injured rights. 17. No answer. Here there is no relation between the beginning of the sentence and the conclusion. 240 DJECLA RA TION OF THIRD PERIOD. 18. Humbly to hope. 19. By joint address. a. Penned in truth. h. Divested of terms of servility. 20. Would persuade his Majesty. 21. That we ask no favors. 22. But rights. 23. Shall obtain a respectful acceptance. 24. His Majesty will think. 25. We have reason to expect. 26. When he reflects. a. That he is only the chief officer. h. Appointed by law. c. Circumscribed with powers. d. To assist in working the great machine of government. e. Erected for their use. /. Are therefore subject to their superintend- ence. 27. And that these our rights. 28. As well as invasions. 29. May be laid before his Majesty. a. To take a view of them. h. From their origin. c. And first settlement of these countries. It is only necessary to remark on the above, that thirty or forty subjects can hardly be handled success- fully in three periods. How different is this from the Declaration, or, in fact, from any production of Mr. Paine^s. INDEPENDENCE. 241 In the three great requisites of style, Precisiorij Unity, and Strength, where Mr. Paine is so perfect, we see great defects in Jefferson ; and in the fourth. Har- mony, a complete failure. If we now take the '^ Summary View," and submit it to the same critical analysis as I have the Declara- tion of Independence, we will find the same defects in it, as a whole, that we find in the first paragraph, which I have just analyzed. There is a complete mix- ture of all subjects. But this I leave to the reader, should he question the truth of my assertion. If we now turn to the synopsis of the Declaration, we will find an exhibition of the most perfect order. The Introduction is short, to the point, and complete. The Bill of Rights contains the first principles. These apply to mankind universally. It then proceeds as a specialty. The Indictment is divided into three grand divisions. Usurpation, Abdication, and War, and the separate counts are stated, clearly containing but one subject. Nowhere do we find a mixing up of differ- ent subjects. We do not find a count of war under the head of usurpation, nor one of usurpation under the head of war. There is also seen the passion for alliteration throughout the whole instrument^ and especially in the following passages : " Fostered and fixed in principles of freedom." Paragraph 22 is filled with examples. But in paragraph 15 it seems he uses the power of the mind to aid him in itemizing counts. He takes t for the letter under which he marshals this army of charges : '' Troops," "trial," " trade," " taxes," " trial," 242 DECLARATION OF [No. 2,] " transportation/^ " tried." Here are seven words comprising as many charges following in suc- cession. He follows it with others, but never uses the t again. This shows a passion for order and allitera- tion. I presume there is no other document in the world with these peculiarities so marked, and I pre- sume there is no writer in the world who ever exhib- ited to such a remarkable degree these peculiarities of style, as did Thomas Paine. [See on this subject Ju- nius Unmasked, p. 107.] Now, these peculiarities are almost entirely wanting in Thomas Jefferson, and without them it is absolutely impossible for him to be the author of the Declaration of Independence. I wish now to call attention to the word " hath." It is found but once in the Declaration, and is in paragraph 2, in the following connection: ^^And accordingly all experience hath shown." It is put in here for the sake of harmony and force in sound, for if we substitute the word has, there will be a halting at shown, and a disagreeable hissing sound. At the time this was writ- ten Mr. Paine frequently used the word, and it may have slipped in unnoticed, on account of sound, or he may have put it in so that the critic could track him. I have never seen the word in any of Jefferson's writ- SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS. I have heretofore shown that Mr. Paine had the Declaration of Independence in view in the production of Common Sense, and that he sketched therein the outlines in the same order in wdiich they afterward appeared. I have shown its architecture and plan, and INDEPENDENCE, 243 also its style, to be that of Mr. Paine's, aod not Mr. Jefferson's. I have shown this somewhat in detail, but not more than the subject demanded. Herein I have given the grand outlines and general features, but I shall now review the whole, to point out its special characteristics, that, in the multitude of small things all tending one way, it will be made conclusive to the mind of the reader that it is Mr. Paine's, and not Jefferson's. In this I shall be compelled, some times, to refer to propositions already proven in the first part of this work, to shorten the argument, not wishing to go over the same ground twice. In the demonstration of a theo- rem in geometry, what has been proven is made to aid what shall come after. I shall proceed with the same method, and not be guilty of taking any thing which Mr. Paine may have written afterward, to prove some- thing which has gone before. But mental chai^acteris- tics may be taken wherever we can find them. I am confined to Common Sense, and shall use also Junius as aiding, but never to entirely prove a point. In my ref- erences to Common Sense, I shall be compelled to refer to the page. I use the political works of Mr. Paine as published by J. P. Mendum, Boston, as they are most generally known and read in this country. With these explanations, the reader can not go wrong. I now take up the original Declaration, beginning with the Introduction; andj as I have numbered its paragraphs, I shall use the figures to denote them, pro- ceeding in their numerical order: Paragraph 1. '^Political bonds." The same figure is found on page 64, Common Sense. 16 244 DECLARA TION OF ** To assume among the powers of the earth the sepa- rate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them.'' Here the crowning thought is that God, through his natural laws, and by natural proofs, designed a separation. Thus Mr. Paine, in Common Sense, page 37, says: ^^ The distance at which the Almighty hath placed England and America is a strong and natural proof that the authority of the one over the other was never the design of Heaven." . . . ^' Every thing that is right ov natural pleads for separation." Note also above the phrase, " separate and equal sta- tion." The writer of the Declaration considered Eng- land and America equal, and thus Mr. Paine says, above : " It is proof that the authority of the one over the other was never the design of Heaven." ^*A decent respect for the opinions of mankind re- quires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." Note hereunder the phrase, ^' decent respect.'^ Thus, in his introduction to his first Letter, which was an indictment and declaration of principles also, Junius says : " Let us enter into it [the inquiry] with candor and decency. Respect is due to the station of ministers, and, if a resolution must at last be taken, there is none so likely to be supported with firmness as that which has been adopted with modera- tion." The above are perfect parallels in idea, and in the ex- pression of the prominent thought, "decent respect,'^ But the thought is expanded from the narrow confines of the British nation to the whole world, and if Mr. Paine wrote both, as they strongly indicate, to make INDEPENDENCE. 245 tbe conclusion good we must find this change or mental growth in Mr. Paine to coincide therewith. Here it is: "In this extensive quarter of the globe, we forget the narrow limits of three hundred and sixty miles (the ex- tent of England), and carry our friendship on a larger scale. We claim brotherhood with every European Christian, and triumph in the generosity of the senti- ment. " It is pleasant to observe by what regular gradations we surmount local prejudices as we enlarge our acquaint- ance with the world. A man born in any town in England,^^ etc. I wish the reader to read the whole of the paragraph I have begun. See Common Sense, pages 35 -and 36. See also Crisis, viii, near its close; a noble passage on the same subject. Mr. Paine fre- quently takes the pains to tell us how he outgrew his local prejudices, and how he at last considered the " world his country." He undertook, also, for America what he calls 'Hhe business of a world.^^ — Common Sense, page 63. Paragraph 2. "We hold these truths to be self- evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable rights." Compare from Common Sense, pages 24, 25, atid 28, as follows: " Mankind being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could not be de- stroyed by some subsequent circumstance. '^ " The equal rights of nature." ..." For all men being originally equals," etc. So, also, Junius says: "In the rights of freedom we are all equal." . . . " The first original rights of the people," etc. To show that he believes these rights to be inalienable, he says : 246 DECLABATION OF "The equality can not be destroyed by some subse- quent circumstance." '' Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Jun- ius uses the terms, "Life, liberty, and fortune." — Let. 66. And Mr. Paine frequently, "Life, liberty, and property." But these terms were in quite common use with many writers. " To secure these rights, gove^^nments are instituted among men." What is said on government in this paragraph is paraphrased or condensed from page 21, Common Sense. It is a concise repetition of Mr. Paine^s pet theme and political principles, first given to the world in Junius, and then elaborated in Common Sense. ^'Prudence indeed will dictate." This word p7'u- dence is ever flowing from the pen of Mr. Paine. See an example on page 21, Common Sense. It is quite common in Junius. The same may be said, also, of the word experience. "And accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer tvhile evils are suf- ferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Compare Com- mon Sense, page 17, as follows : " As a long and violent abuse of power is generally the means of calling the right of it in question, and in matters, too, which might never have been thought of, had not the sufferers been aggravated to the inquiry," etc. " FormsJ' That is, the " forms of the constitution." See Junius, Let. 44, where he says : " I should be con- tented to renounce the forms of the Constitution once more, if there were no other way to obtain substantial INDEPENDENCE. 247 justice for the people/^ And here the Declaration is renouncing the forms. ^^But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an ab- solute tyranny over these States/' Paine says on tyranny : ^^ Ye that oppose independence now^ ye know not what ye do, ye are opening a door to eternal tyranny, by keeping vacant the seat of government." . . . '^ Ye that dare oppose not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth." Common Sense, p. 47. ^' To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world, for the truth of which ive pledge a faith, yet un- sullied by falsehood.'^ The above sentence is very pe- culiar, and I will show wherein. The last member of the sentence which I have italicised was stricken out of the original draft by Congress. The peculiarity in it is that ^' the truth of a fact " is affirmed, and its falsehood implied. Now a fact is always true. There can be no false facts. What is here meant, is, that we pledge a faith yet unsullied by falsehood, that the state- ments are true. Not that the facts are true, but that they are facts. It is the passion (if I may so express it) for conciseness, to speak of facts being true or false. Now this is a peculiarity of Junius. In Let. 3 he says : " I am sorry to tell you. Sir William, that in this article your first fact is false." It is thus Mr. Paine frequently sacrifices both grammar and strict definition to conciseness ; but never to obscure the sense. An example from the publicly acknowledged pen of Mr. Paine ought to be here produced; I, therefore, give one from his letter to the Abbe Raynal, which is as follows : '' His facts are coldly and carelessly stated. 248 DECLARATION OF They neither inform the reader, nor interest him. Many of them are erroneous, and most of them are de- fective and obscure." Here "erroneous facts," "false facts/' and " facts for the truth of which we pledge a faith unsullied by falsehood," are evidence of the same head and hand. It is thus an author puts some pecu- liar feature of his soul on paper unwittingly ; and it lies there a fossil, till the critic, following the lines of nature, gathers it up to classify, arrange, and combine with others, and then to put on canvas, or in marble bust. It may be well to remind the reader that the above peculiarity I can nowhere find in Jefferson's writings. I now call attention to the sentence : " But when a long train of abuses and usurpations [begun at a dis- tinguished period, and pursuing invariably the same object] evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." I have placed in brackets what has been interpolated by Jefferson. I conclude this from the following reasons : 1. It breaks the measure. 2. It destroys the harmony of the period, and the sentence is complete and harmonious without it. 3. " Begun at a distinguished period," is indefinite. 4. It refers to time, and is mixed up with other subject matter, and is therefore in the wrong place. 5. It is tautology, for two sentences further on it is all expressed in its proper place, in referring to the his- tory of the king. In all of these particulars it is not like Mr. Paine, INDEPENDENCE. 249 for he is never guilty of such a breach of rhetoric. But in all of the above particulars it is just like Mr. Jefferson. The above two paragraphs comprise the Introduc- tion and the Bill of Rights, and are the foundation of the Declaration. It is a basis fit and substantial, be- cause one of universal principles, so that whatever special right may be enunciated, it will rest firmly on this foundation ; or whatever special denunciation of wrongs, it will have its authority therein. I now pass to consider the indictment under its three divisions — Usurpation, Abdication, and War. If the reader will now turn back to page 223, he will find from paragraphs 3 to 15, inclusive, the whole charge of usurpation included therein. But, sep- arately, we find paragraph 3 to be a charge of the abuse of the king's negative; and he concludes in para- graph 15 with the climax, '^suspending our own legis- latures, and declaring themselves [the king and parlia- ment] invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever." Now, if the reader will tdrn to page 41, Common Sense, which is page 213 of this book, he will find Mr. Paine beginning the first of his *^ several reasons " as follows : "1. The powers of governing still remaining in the hands of the king, he will have a negative over the whole of this continent.'^ It will be observed, in a general view, that the reasons given by Mr. Paine cover the whole thirteen paragraphs; and it will be observed specially that he begins the reasons the same as he does the indictment — namely, with the king's negative. Mr. Paine was vio- 250 DECLARATION OF lently opposed to the king's negative,, and all through life he never fails to attack it, when the opportunity of- fered itself. This would weigh most lieavily on his mind, and be most naturally uttered first. On page 59 of Common Sense will also be found reasons for inde- pendence, which come within this part of the indict- ment. But pages 41, 42, 43 of Common Sense cover nearly, or quite all of it. But they are stated generally for the sake of argument — not specially for the sake of indictment. Paragraph 16. *^ He has abdicated government here, withdrawing his governors, and declaring us out of his allegiance and protection. '^ Com{)are with this the fol- lowing, to be found on page 61 of Common Sense: *^ The present state of America is truly alarming to every man who is capable of reflection. Without law, without government, without any other mode of power than what is founded on and granted by courtesy. Hehl together by an unexampled occurrence of senti- ment, which is, nevertheless, subject to change, and which every secret enemy is endeavoring to dissolve. Our present condition is legislation without law. wis- dom without a plan, a constitution without a name." I now take up the third part of the indictment — War. Paragraph 17. " He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people." Paragraph 18. '^ He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun, with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy unworthy the head of a civilized nation." INDEPENDENCE, 251 On the above two counts, which charge war and in- vasion, I submit from Common Sense, page 62, as fol- lows ; ^^It is the violence which is done and threatened to our persons, the destruction of our property by an armed force, the invasion of our country by fire and sword, which conscientiously qualifies the use of arms ; and the instant in which such mode of defense became neces- sary, all subjection to Britain ought to have ceased, and the independence of America should have been consid- ered as dating its era from, and published by the first musket that was fired against her." Under the above, also, may be classed paragraph 19. Paragraph 20. ^' He has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions of existence." Compare Common Sense, page 47, as follows : " There are thou- sands and tens of thousands who would think it glori- ous to expel from the continent that barbarous and hellish power which hath stirred up the Indians and negroes to destroy us." . Paragraph 21. ^' He has excited treasonable insurrec- tion,^^ etc. Compare Common Sense, page 61, as fol- lows : " The tories dared not have assembled offensively, had they known that their lives, by that act, were for- feited to the laws of the State. A line of distinction should be drawn between English soldiers taken in battle and inhabitants of America taken in arms: the first are prisoners, but the latter traitors — the one for- feits his liberty, the other his head." The above paragraph and the following one, it will be remembered, were stricken out by Congress. 252 DECLARATION OF I now come to the closing paragraph of this part of the indictmentj and, as it is the most important of all, the author kept it for a climax, and he throws his whole soul into it. I will transcribe it here: Paragraph 22. " He has waged cruel war against hu- man nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty, in the persons of a distant people, who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of INFIDEL powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce; and, that this assem- blage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them; thus paying oif former crimes, com- mitted against the LIBERTIES of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the LIVES of another.'^ The capital words in the above are his own. Let us begin with the last sentence, and go backward. The substance of the last sentence is, that by exciting the negroes to rise on the people of this continent, the king was guilty of a double crime, both against the lib- erties of the negroes and the lives of the American people. Compare Common Sense, page 47, as follows: ^' He hath stirred up the Indians and negroes to destroy us ; the cruelty hath a double guilt — it is dealing brutally INDEPENDENCE. 253 hy us and treacherously hy them.^^ This is the same complex idea, well reasoned out, and expressed almost in the same language — certainly in the same style. But Jefferson '^ never consulted a single book/^ so original was the Declaration to his own mind and habits of thought ! Let us now take the sentence : " This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of INFIDEL powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain." The antithesis above between infidel and christian, falls upon the mind with such stunning weight; with such boldness of religious sentiment; with such emphasis in expression, and with such withering sarcasm toward the king, that it becomes an epitome of Mr, Paine him- self, and a concise record of his whole life, up to that period. The reader can not fail here to see the pen of Junius, and to recall the great power of antithesis in all his Letters. This peculiarity of style is absolutely wanting in Jefferson. The first sentence in the paragraph, is in every phrase so like Mr. Paine, the reader must think it superfluous to comment upon it. The expressions, "cruel war,'^ "against human nature," "sacred rights,'' "life and liberty," "in the persons of," and especially ^^ prostituted y^ are all to be found in Common Sense and Junius. For the phrase "in the persons of," see it repeated three times on page 22 of Common Sense. Thus ends the Indictment. It is Article I, of Mr. Paine's Manifesto, heretofore pointed out. I now pro- ceed with Article II of the Manifesto, which he states to be " the peaceful methods which we have ineffectually used for redress." See Common Sense, p. 66. It is as follows : 254 DECLAB4-TI0N OF Paragraph 23. " In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned in the most humble terms ; our repeated petitions have been answered by repeated injuiies/^ Compare Common Sense, pp. 39-40, as follows : ^' Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers hath been rejected with dis- dain, and only tended to convince us that nothing flatters vanity or confirms obstinacy in kings more than in 7'epeated petitioning J' Paragraph 24. "A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a people who mean to be free* Future ages will scarcely believe, that the hardiness of one man, adventured within the short compass of twelve years only, to lay a foundation so broad and so undis- guised for tyranny over a people fostered and fixed in principles of freedom.'^ The first sentence pronounces the king a tyrant, and is so often repeated heretofore by Mr. Paine, it is useless to cite any thing in proof The second sentence was stricken out of the Declaration by Congress, and con- tains new matter which must be attended to. And First, ^' Future ages will scarcely believe thatJ^ This phrase is peculiar to Mr. Paine, for his mind was continually dwelling on the future. So Junius says: " Posterity loill scarce believe that.'' — Let. 48. And Mr. Paine says: ''Mankind will scarcely believe thaf — Rights of Man, p. 94. I parallel this phrase not so much to show a vei'^>al construction as to show a mental characteristic wh;ch must express itself in the same language. Second, " That the> hardiness of one man adventured/'^ INDEPENDENQE. 255 Compare with this from Common Sense^ page 41 : "No man was a warmer wisher for reconciliation than myself, before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775; but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen-tempered Pharaoh of England forever,'^ etc. How different is this language in the Declaration, from that used by Mr. Jefferson in the " Summary View,'' when speaking of the king. Jefferson used the word majesty, as though he was speaking to a god; and seems to delight in the repetiton of it. See p. 236. Third, " Within the short compass of twelve years only.'' The Declaration was dated July 4th, 1776. Twelve years would take it back to 1764. This was the year the stamp act passed, and made an era in colonial troubles. Now, if Mr. Paine had been speak- ing of the troubles of the English people, he would have used the same expression, with the exception of adding a year ; for, as before stated in the first part of this work, Mr. Paine dated the miseries, oppressions, and invasions on the rights of the English people from the close of the Seven Years' War, or the beginning of 1763. And the time was estimated in round numbers as follows : Junius says, in the beginning of 1769: "Outraged and oppressed as we are, this nation will not bear after a six years'^ jpeaGe,^ etc. ; and, also, in the beginning of 1770 : "At the end of seven years we are loaded," etc. Mr. Paine, at the close of the year 1778, says to the English people : " A period of sixteen years of mis- conduct and misfortune," etc. These round numbers all refer back to the beginning of 1763, and the ex- 256 DECLARATION OF pression in the Declaration, '^ within the short compass of twelve years only/^ is not, as it appears, inconsistent with this peculiarity, for the English era with him was 1763, and the American 1764. Nowhere do I find this mental characteristic in Jeiferson. This is strong proof — it goes beyond proof, it is demonstration. Mr. Jefferson, nor any man living, could steal this fact; it is one of mental constitution, stamped there and point- ing with fingers of truth both backward and forward to Thomas Paine, and at right angles to the character of Thomas Jefferson. The figure " compass ^^ is often found in Mr. Paine's writings, as "compass a plan," and the like. But I call attention to the perfect similarity in style between the Declaration and every passage from Common Sense. Paragraph 25. "Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time," etc. It is the peculiarity of Mr. Paine to hold up a warning to the sense. See on this point, page 163 of this work. "We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here." Compare Com- mon Sense, p. 35, as follows: "This new world hath been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from evety ^jart of Europe. Hither have they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the monster, and it is so far true of England, that the same tyranny which drove the first emigrants from home pursues their de- scendants still." Thus, also, says the Declaration (and note the style) : " These were affected at the expense INDEPENDENCE. 257 of our Own blood and treasure, unassisted by the wealth or strength of Great Britain; that in constituting in- deed our several forms of government we had adopted one common Mng^ I call attention to the" phrases, '^ common hing,^^ " common blood/' and " common kindred/' in the same paragraph. Mr. Paine was never guilty of calling England the ^^ parent'^ or '^mother'' country, but the ^^ common" country. (See Common Sense, p. 36.) Junius in Let. 1 says: '^A series of inconsistent measures has alienated the Colonies from their duty as subjects, and from their natural affection to their com- mon country,'' Jefferson uses ^^ parent'^ and "mother^' country, both before and after the writing of the Dec- laration. In connection with the above sentence from Junius, I subjoin the same sentiment in regard to natural affec- tion from the Declaration a few sentences further on, as follows : " These facts have given the last stab to agonizing affection, and manly spirit bids us to renounce forever these unfeeling brethren. We must endeavor to forget our former love for them, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.^^ Compare with this. Common Sense, p. 47, as follows : '^ To talk of friendship with those in whom our reason forbids us to have faith, and our affections wounded through a thousand pores instruct us to detest, is madness and folly. Every day wears out the little remains of kindred between us and them.^^ In regard to the phrase ^Wenounce forever" above, as quoted from the Declaration, compare Common Sense, p. 38, as follows : " That seat of wretchedness [speak- 258 DECLABATION OF ing of Boston] will teach us wisdom and instruct us to forever renounce a power in whom we can have no trust." See also Common Sense, p. 37, as follows : ^' And our duty to mankind at large, as well as to our- selves, instructs us to renounce the alliance.'^ The expression "forever" will not be mistaken, for it runs through Junius^ and all of Mr. Paine's writ- ings as a common expression. The figure " to stab " is one which Mr. Paine adopted in Junius and carried through his whole life. Thus he talks about " stabbing the Constitution," and " to stab the character of the nation." The former is found in Junius, the latter in his Letter to the Abbe Paynal. The italicised phrases in the following expression, ^^ These facts have given the last stab to agonizing affec- tion, and manly spirit bids us to renounce forever,^' etc., are so very like Mr. Paine, and so entirely unlike Mr. Jefferson, that the cursory reader, with the commonest understanding, Avould not fail to pronounce in favor of the former being the author. I now call attention to a striking peculiarity in re- gard to the mention of the Scotch. It is found in the same paragraph, and is as follows : "At this very time, too, they [our British brethren] are permitting their chief magistrate to send over not only soldiers of our common blood, but Scotch and foreign mercenaries, to in- vade and destroy us." The word mercenaries is used once before in the Declaration. The writer of the Declaration is speaking of the " British brethren," whom he designates as " of our common blood," but excludes the Scotch therefrom. Now, we know Mr. Paine to have been an English- INDEPENDENCE. 259 man, and that in Junius he often inveighed bitterly against the Scotch. The reader will remember what he said of Mr. Wedderburn^ on page 195 of this work. Mansfield was a Scotchman, and this fact embitters Ju- nius. He speaks of the Scotch "^ cunning/^ " treach- ery/^ and ^-fawning sycophancy/' of ^'^the character- istic prudence, the selfish nationality, the indefatigable smile, the persevering assiduity, the everlasting profes- sion of a discreet and moderate resentment.^' It is quite evident that the writer of the Declaration did not consider the Scotch as included in the term ^^ British brethren," whom he warned, as he called them ^^ mer- cenaries;^^ nor as having the like origin, nor as being of the same race as the term " common blood '' indi- cates. These are facts which speak out of the Declara- tion, and as such Jefferson could not have written them, for two reasons : 1. He had no antipathy to the Scotch, but rather a liking. This is seen in the selection of his teachers, both by his parents and himself At nine years of age he studies Latin, Greek, and French under the Rev. Mr. Douglas, a Scotchman, living with the minister at the same time. At fourteen, and after his father's death, he goes away to attend the school of Mr. Murray, a Scotchman ; and when he goes to college at Williams- burg, being then a young man grown, he becomes strongly attached to one Professor Small, a Scotchman. In short, Jefferson was peculiarly attached to the Scotch, and why? 2. Because he was nearer related to them by "com- mon blood " than to the English. He was of Welsh origin — a perfect Celt, and not a Briton. Now, the 17 260 DECLARATION OF Cimbri of Wales and the Gael of Scotland are of the same blood, build, habits, and instincts. Jefferson, on Scotch soil, would have been taken, from personal ap- pearance, to be a red-headed Scotchman, and a fine spec- imen at that. From ^^ common blood '^ then, he could not consistently have written it, if he knew any thing about his origiu, or compreheuded what he was writing. But there is an argument in this connection, which goes toward the whole instrument, showing that Mr. Jefferson could not possibly be the author of it. In a special commentary of Mr. Jefferson\s on this phrase, ^^ Scotch and foreign mercenaries/' he misquotes the Declaration, which he would not be likely to do if he wrote it. In volume viii, page 500, of his works, he says : " When the Declaration of Independence was un- der the consideration of Congress, there were two or three unlucky expressions in it, which gave offense to some members. The words, 'Scotch and other foreign auxiliaries' excited the ire of a gentleman or two of that country." In the phrase " Scotch and other for- eign auxiliaries," Jefferson is trying to quote the words " Scotch and foreign mercenaries.'' There is a vast dif- ference between the two words ^^auxiliaries" and "mer- cenaries." But the former expresses the real spirit of Jefferson, the latter of Paine. Entirely different senti- ments produced the two expressions. The style, also, is changed from Paine's to Jefferson^s, by putting in the word "other." It is thus changed from the concise to the diffuse. Mr. Jefferson says this expression was "unlucky;" and it still proves to be, near the close of a century. Now, the word mercenaries, which, with the author INDEPENDENCE. 261 of the Declaration, means prostituted hirelings, is used twice in the instrument, but auxiliaries, which would mean lionorable allies, is not used once. It is not strange that he should forget, for the sentiment is for- eign to his own character; and I had written my argu- ment, and given my reasons above why Mr. Jefferson could not possibly be the author of that sentiment, a month before I found that Jefferson had misquoted the Declaration. I reason from first principles, which rest on established facts, the silent language of nature, com- pared with which the vain babblings of men amount to nothing. For example, John Adams says that he and Mr. Jefferson met as a sub-committee to draft the Declaration; that he urged Jefferson to do it; that afterward they both met, and conned it over, and he does not remember of making or suggesting a single al- teration. This Mr. Jefferson denies. He says there was no sub-committee; that Adams has forgotten about it; that he [Jefferson] drew it, and turned to neither book nor pamphlet while writing it, and that Adams did correct it. — Jefferson^s Works, vol. vii, pages 304, 305. Here are two men, one eighty and the other eighty-eight, on whose words histor}^ rests, differing materially about historic facts. The one who can not quote an important passage correctly, as to fact or lan- guage which he says he wrote himself, accuses the other of forgetting about a committee which never existed. The reader must fudge. " Be it so.'^ Let us find the feeling which produced this expression. It is peculiar to Junius. See Letters 18, 34, and 44, where the sentence is used. And now let me remark, that the reaAer may he led to a just crit- 262 DECLARATION OF icism, and not ramble after vague and unmeaning ex- pressions, the spirit of the writer must be found, the prominent sentiment of the heart must be felt, the cause must be seen which shall give utterance to the expres- sion, " Be it so.'^ How trifling it appears to the cursory reader! But let me arrest your attention. Junius uses the expression three times, and every time in con- nection with the sentiment of dignity. So, also, in the • Declaration. It is only produced in him by a feeling, and the peculiar and particular feeling of dignity, in antithesis to contempt, littleness, disrepute, or mean- ness. I will now give the context. In Let. 18 he says : " You seem to think the channel of a pamphlet more respectable, and better suited to the dignity of your cause, than a newspaper. Be it so." In Let. 34 he says: "We are told by the highest judicial authority that Mr. Yaughan^s offer to purchase the reversion of a patent place in Jamaica amounts to a high misdemeanor. Be it so ; and if he deserves it, let him be punished. But the learned judge might have had a fairer opportunity of displaying the powers of his eloquence. Having delivered himself with so much energy upon the criminal nature and dangerous consequences of any attempt to corrupt a man in your grace^s station, what would he have said to the minis- ter himself, to that very privy counselor, to that first commissioner of the treasury, who does not wait for, but impatiently solicits the touch of corruption, who employs the meanest of his creatures in these honor- able services, and forgetting the genius and fidelity of the secretary, descends to apply to his housebuilder for assistance ? '^ INDEPENDENaE. 263 In Let. 44 he says : '' There may be instances of contempt and insult to the House of Commons, which do not fall within my own exceptions^ yet, in regard to the dignity of the house, ought not to pass unpunished. Be it so.'' In the Declaration, paragraph 25, we read: ^^We might have been a free and a great people together, but a communication of grandeur and freedom, it seems, is below their dignity. Be it so, since they will have it. So much for the trifling little trinity of words made up of six letters, when traced to their mental origin. The reader will see an aura of dignity always darting out from the sentence when used by Mr. Paine. It might never have this connection in the soul of any other man. This closes paragraph 25, and I proceed to the conclusion. Paragraph 26. Here the nation is named. "The United States of America,'^ are declared " free and in- dependent States.'^ ..." And for the support of this declaration we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor." Compare Common Sense, conclusion, as follows : " Wherefore, in- stead of gazing at each other with suspicious or doubt- ful curiosity, let each of us hold out to his neighbor the hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetful- ness every former dissension. Let the name of whig and tory be extinct; and let none other be heard among us than those of a good citizen, an open and resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the eights of majs- E"ixD, and of the Free and Independent States OF America." 264 DECLARATION OF I have now gone through with the Declaration, both in a general and special manner. In the former regard I have found it to be the soul's image of Mr. Paine, in style, order, and construction, and, in the latter, a com- plete synopsis of Common Sense. I have fully and con- clusively shown that the substance of every paragraph is found in Common Sense, with much of the language the same, and also that many special, mental peculiarities, common to Mr. Paine, and wanting in Mr. JefPerson, are found there. Now, Mr. Jefferson never before, nor since, ever produced any thing like it in any of these particulars. If we take a hasty re\^iew, we will find that in as many particulars as the Declaration has, in just so many there is a reproduction of Mr. Paine. In no single fact does the Declaration disagree with Mr. Paine. It does with Mr. Jefferson in very many. I have shown also that it would be impossible for Mr. Jefferson to steal it, for he would have to steal the very soul of Mr. Paine, and write under its influence. This is above proof, it is demonstration. But I will hold the reader to history. It is a fact, well established, that he did not consult one single author thereon. He says so himself. Mr. Bancroft, the great American historian, says so. If I had found him mis- taken in this statement, I would have shown wherein. He is correct, and it is unnecessary for me to add any thing to support his fame. But will he change his con- clusions, and will he re-write his own history to support the statement that Mr. Jefferson produced it, not from ^' the fullness of his own mind," but from the fullness of Common Sense? I would not cast an aspersion, by the remotest insinuation, upon the faithfulness of Mr. Ban- INDEPENDENCE. 265 croft as a historian. He penned the troth in regard to a historic fact, but founded a conclusion thereon not warranted by the fact. This will prove a lesson to the historian, and, therefore, I will further remark, that a scientific method has also dawned upon history. Vol- taire struck the principle when he brought history within the realm of natural causes, and Mr. Buckle began to develop the method in an able manner, but his life was too short to complete it. That he has erred in some particulars, may be true, but he has traveled far out on the highways of nature, and, in the main, he is right. In this age the historian has no business to write unless he travels the same road. In fact, he would not be a historian, unless he did, but merely the chronicler of events. There is a vast distance in the realm of mind between the high station of a historian, and the low office of a chronicler. But, with this remark I pass on with my argument. Is it at variance with nature and the general order of things that Mr. Jefferson should reproduce Common Sense, in all its small particulars, as well as grand outlines, observing the same order in its consti-uction, a perfect epitome thereof, without studying it. But if he did study it, and thus reproduce it, the theft wouhl be too monstrous, and there is not in human nature an impudence so audacious as to do such a thing under the very eye of its author. It would have been a literary piracy too disgraceful for human nature to commit or to endure. It would have been a robbery too easy of detection by Mr. Paine, and there could not be found on earth a man so devoid of shame, or of all personal 266 DECLARATION OF honor, or of self-respect as to have committed it. Now if Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, never vv^as man more disgraced in the literary world. But on the other hand, as chairman of a committee of five to whom collectively belong the duty to produce it or procure it, and who collectively shall share its honor, for him as such chairman, to receive from the hand of Mr. Paine, as a gift to the nation, the document which the country needed, there would be no dishonor connected with it. It was nobody^s business who wrote it. Mr. Paine and JefPerson understood it, and none but themselves could be wronged. History records that Mr. Paine and JefPerson were ever after bound heart and hand together. Jefferson confided in the most fiiithful heart of the world. But after Mr. Paine died, it was wrong for Mr. Jefferson to take advantage of the silence of death and claim the document. It was the wickedness of vanity and a narrow mind that wonld direct to be carved on his tombstone, " The author of the Declaration of Independence.^' For his own name's sake, it ought to be struck out with some friendly chisel. It is as painful for me to write this as it would be to receive the news of the death of a dear friend, who had died with " some curse upon his character. But while we look with compassion, let us tell the truth. At first, Mr. Jefferson did not write himself down the author of the Declaration, and there seems to be a growth in this like all other things. Here are the different stages : 1. Notes written on the spot, as events were passing, for the truth of which he pledges himself to Heaven and earth. He writes as follows : INDEPENDENCE. 267 ^'It appearing In the course of these debates that the colonies of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina, were not yet matured for falling into the parent stem, but that they were fast advancing to that state, It was thought most prudent to wait awhile for them, and to postpone the final decision to July 1st. But that this might occasion as little delay as possible, a committee was appointed to prepare a Declaration of Independence. The com- mittee were John Adams, Dr. Franklin, Roger Sherman, Robert R. Livingston, and myself. This was reported to the House on Friday, the 28th of June, when it was read and ordered to lie on the table.^^ Works, vol. i, page 118. There is no acknowledgment at this time. This is July, 1776. Mr. Paine is in Philadelphia. Had Mr. Jefferson been the author, this would have been the time for him to have recorded it, as he has not failed to record all his other public acts. He is now thirty-three years old. 2. Eleven years afterward, when in Paris, he writes to the editor of the Journal de Paris as follows, in regard to the history of the Declaration : '^ I was on the spot and can relate to you this transaction with precision. On the 7th of June, 1776, the delegates from Virginia moved, in obedience to instructions from their constituents, that Congress shall declare the thirteen united colonies to be independent of Great Britain, and a confederation should be formed to bind them together, and measures be taken to procure the assistance of foreign powers. The House ordered a punctual attend- ance of all their members the next day at ten o'clock, 268 DECLARATION OF and then resolved themselves into a committee of the whole and entered on the discussion. It appeared in the course of the debate that seven states, viz., TSTew Hampshire, Massachusetts, Ehode Island, Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia, were decided for a separation; but that six others still hesitated, to-wit: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Dela- ware, Maryland, and South Carolina. Congress desirous of unanimity, and seeing that the public mind was advancing rapidly to it, referred the further discussion to the first of July, appointing in the meantime, a committee to prepare a Declaration of Independence; a second, to form articles for the confederation of the states; and a third,, to prepare measures for obtaining foreign aid. On the 28th of June, the Declaration of Independence was reported to the House, and was laid on the table.''— Vol. ix, pp. 310, 311. There is no acknowledgment that he was the author of it yet. This is August, 1787. Mr. Paine is in Paris, just on the eve of starting for London. Jeffer- son is forty-four years old. 3. In September, 1809, in answer to a proposition to publish liis writings, after mentioning niany of them, he says: "I say nothing of numerous drafts of re- ports, resolutions, declarations, etc., drawn as a member of Congress, or of the legislature of Virginia, such as the Declaration of Independence, Report on the Money Mint of the United States, the Act of Religious Free- dom, etc., etc. These having become the acts of public bodies, there can be no personal claim to them.'' This is nearly three months after the death of Mr. Paine. INDEPENDENCE. 269 And here he says he makes no personal chiim to it. He is now sixty-six years old. 4. In May, 1819, he gives the same account as first above given. Mr. Paine has been dead about ten years. He makes no acknowledgment yet that he was the au- thor of it, but in the same account pledges himself to Heaven and earth for the truth of the statement. — Works, vol. vii, page 123. He is now seventy-six years old. 5. In January, 1821, he indirectly acknowledges him- self to be the author, but with a great deal of ambigu- ity. He takes the same account as given first and third above, but interpolates into it a clause, which I have placed in brackets in the passage which I give, as fol- loAvs: ^' It appearing, in the course of these debates, that the colonies of New York, New^ Jersey, Pennsyl- vania, Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina were not yet matured for falling into the parent stem, but that they were fast advancing to that state, it was thought most prudent to wait awhile for them, and to postpone the final decision to July 1st; but, that this might occasion as little delay as possible, a committee was appointed to prepare a Declaration of Independence. The committee were John Adams, Dr. Franklin, Roger Sherman, Robert R. Livingston, and myself [Com- mittees were also appointed at the same time to prepare a plan of confederation for the colonies, and to state the terms proper to be proposed for foreign alliance. The committee for drawing the Declaration of Independence desired me to do it. It was accordingly done, and, be- ing approved by them, I] reported [it] to the House on Friday, the 28th of June, when it was read, and ordered 270 DECLARATION OF to lie on the table." — Yforks^ vol. i, pages 17 and 18. This is the first insinuation. I say insinuation, for the sentence, " It was accordingly done, and I reported it," is not frank and outspoken, as it ought to be, if he meant to say he drafted it. Mr. Paine has been dead almost twelve years, but Mr. Jefferson has dropped the pledge to Heaven and earth for the truth of it, which he has heretofore been careful to put in. He is now seventy-eight years old. 6. In August, 1823, he now comes forward, and says: ^^ The committee of five met ; no such thing as a sub- committee was proposed, but they unanimously pressed on myself alone to undertake the draft. I consented. I drew it." — Works, vol. vii, page 304. John Adams had said there was a sub-committee of two, viz., JefPer- son and himself, appointed by the other three. But Jefferson says there was not — ^^ that John Adams had forgotten about it." Query : Can a person forget about something which never was? To this statement there is no ^^ pledge to Heaven and earth." He is eighty years old. 7. In the year 1825 he says once that he wrote it, and once that he drafted it; but no ^^ pledge to Heaven and earth " as before. Now, he never acknowledged that he was the author of it in any of his works before the death of Mr. Paine. He gave several full accounts of the whole transaction, and calls on Heaven and earth to witness the'truth of his statements. About the time Mr. Paine dies he says he can make no personal claim to it. Ten years after Mr. Paine's death, he very ambiguously claims it, as if his pen refused to write it, and drops his oath. But INDEPENDENCE. 271 twelve years after Mr. Paine's death, and he now in his eightieth year, he first says he drew it. Was he too modest to affirm it till he had got into his dotage? The reader mnst answer. It is with painful feelings I re- cord the above facts. " But they are too true, and the more is the pity.^^ But to proceed. Mr. Jefferson could not have followed so closely Com- mon Sense in the production of the Declaration of In- dependence, if he had studied it for a whole year with this special purpose in view. For, the style he could not have imitated; the figures of speech he could not have adopted; the impassioned eloquence would have stuck to the dry leaves; the exact order would have been missed; the fine shades of sentiment would have been blotted out; the complex ideas he w^ould have failed to grasp; its architectural plan he could not have idealized ; and its construction would never have arisen from the chaos of scattered materials which he would have gleaned. And, above all, the personal character of Mr. Paine would have been left out. He would have failed in every one of these things. And why? Want of mental similarity thereto. This, and nothing else. I will sum up his mentality as I find it in his writ- ings. I have given you Mr. Paine's already. In this I shall be brief, speaking only of those powers which would be incompatible with, or necessary to, the pro- duction of the Declaration. Mr. Jefferson was a zealous partisan. Mr. Paine was a consummate statesman. Here was the great difference between the two men. Those qualities of the mind which produce the former are very unlike those which 272 DECLARATION OF produce the latter. The former mind must be narrow and selfish, the latter broad and generous. This will take in the whole world, that but a small portion of it. The partisan has an understanding subject to the vice and discipline of cunning; the statesman has an under- standing subject to the noblest and most generous af- fections. It was this which made Mr. Jefferson such a grand success as a party leader, and that, too, which perhaps saved the nation from passing into the hands of the monarchists. Without these consummate powers of the partisan, it would have been impossible for Mr. Jefferson to have taken command of the people, to have organized his party, to have marshaled his forces, and with his army of followers to have put royalty under his heel. How unlike Washington and John Adams, who preceded him. Hamilton, who would toast a presi- dent of America and give three cheers for George the Third of England, ruled Washington and governed the nation. John Adams, who was so beguiled with roy- alty and the British constitution, could not heartily sympathize with the people ; the dupe of his own pas- sions, he was unfit to be the ruler of a free people. But Jefferson, while secretary under Washington, began to form his party and draw his party lines. Through Freneau he drove Washington to cry out : ^' By God, I had rather be in my grave than in my present situa- tion ! ^' And, afterward, the party he was marshaling made John Adams, then president of the United States, desert his post for seven months, at the most trying crisis of this government. But the cold, unfeeling par- tisanship of the great democrat saved the nation. The other crowning difference between the two men INDEPENDENQE. . 273 is, Mr. Paine had extraordinary genius, Mr. Jefferson had not; and by genius I mean a lively constructive and comprehensive mind, one that can generalize facts and deduce principles therefrom, one that can idealize and build in the imagination what it would put into material shape or on paper. If this comparison be true (and the reader is at liberty to bring facts to con- tradict it), then Mr. Jefferson could not produce the Declaration for want of capacity. Tlie Declaration is the work of a master. It is the work of one with great experience in the art of com- position, one who produced the whole in the ideal before he touched pen to paper, and one who followed plan and specifications with unerring precision. It is a work of the most finished rhetoric, and produced with such skill as to defy adverse criticism. It shows vast labor and time bestowed upon its execution, hi its mechanism I have never seen its equal in all my reading and study. It is the most masterly work of genius I ever saw in composition. It stands alone in the world of letters. There is nothing its equal which has come down to us from the ages, and I know of no oue save Thomas Paine capable of producing it. That he was a master in the art of composition, no one can dispute, and he frequently takes pains to give the prin- ciples which reveal his success; here is one of them, to be found in his Letter to the Abbe Raynal: "To fit the powers of thinking and the turn of language to the subject, so as to bring out a clear conchision that shall hit the point in question, and nothing else, is the true criterion of writing/^ See a fine passage on this point in the introduction to the same letter. Now 274 DECLARATION OF Jeiferson had not the genius to produce the Declara- tion. If we look also at several passages in the Declara- tion we can only feel their full force after knowing the previous career of Mr. Paine as Junius in England. Take for example the two paragraphs^ 24 and 25, the one of the king and the other of the ^' British brethren.'' We see in the one the proud disdain and haughty con- tempt for the tyrant; in the other that tender sympa- thy for the English people, with a sly thrust at the Scotch, and then the wounded affection which comes from betrayal of friendship — " the last stab to agonizing affection." And then regathering himself from the afflic- tion of a broken heart, he exclaims, " Manly spirit bids us to renounce forever these unfeeling brethren." But no, this can not be done, and in the next breath he says, '' we must endeavor to forget our former love for them ; " and then comes the wail of anguish in the loss of his native country, " We might have been a great and a free people together, but a communication of grandeur and of freedom it seems is below their dignity. Be it so." He now bends beneath the hand of fate and cries out, '' I acquiesce in our eternal separation," but persist in denouncing it. This is the very picture of Mr. Paine's own heart. It is a pitch of enthusiasm and aneuish which Mr. Jefferson had neither circum- stance in his life nor capacity in his soul to work him- self up to. It is neither art nor contrivance, it is the recorded beating of his own heart, the sequel to his previous life. Take again the passage on human slavery. " He has waQ:ed cruel war ao;ainst human nature itself." It is INDEPENDENCE. 275 well known that Mr. Paine, before he wrote Common Sense, attracted the eyes of the world to him by de- nouncing human slavery in the most impassioned elo- quence/ This piece he termed ^-Serious Thoughts/' etc. Herein he hopes when the Declaration is made that " our first gratitude to the Almighty may be shown by an act of Continental legislation, which shall put a stop to the importation of negroes, soften the hard fate of those already here, and in time procure their freedom/' And he says, long afterward, to the French inhabitants of Louisiana who wished the power to im- port and enslave Africans, '' Dare you put up a petition to Heaven for such a power without fearing to be struck from the earth by its justice?'' But the person who wrote the passage on slavery in the original draft of the Declaration could never have kept a slave in bond- age, if any thing can be gathered from the nobility, the manliness, the justice, and the philanthropy of its spirit. But Jefferson, while he has left on record his opposition in ivords to slavery, has left also on record his acts to contradict both them and the Declaration. I here draw the veil over Jefferson as a slaveholder. While Mr. Jefferson was far above the average mind, yet from his mental make-up, either in his head, heart, character, or capacity, he could not be the author of the Declaration of Independence. Neither in the circumstances of his previous life nor personal history, neither in the heart nor the head, can we find a foun- dation for the famous document. I know of but one man American born, at that day, with sufficient genius to write it— Benjamin Franklin— and he would have 18 276 DECLARATION OF failed in the style and language, and especially in those fine strokes of the affection.* For Mr. Paine to write the Declaration and be ready to hand it to the chairman of the committee, is charac- teristic of the man. He did the same thing at the "Thatched House'' tavern meeting in England in 1791. Mr. Home Tooke who signed the Address and Declaration as chairman of the meeting, received the document privately from the hand of Mr. Paine, and had Mr. Tooke not afterward disclaimed the author- ship of it when charged upon him, Mr. Paine would never have revealed the secret. It was revealed in this * Since writing the above criticism, I sent for and obtained Theodore Parker's work entitled Historic Sketches. Previous to this I had not read a word of the work. With this explanation I will give two ex- tracts from the work, pp. 281, 282: "Mr. Jefferson had intellectual talents greatly superior to the common mass of men, and for the times his opportunities of culture in youth, were admirable." " But I can not think his mind a great one. I can not point out any name of those times, which may stand in the long interval [of capacity] between the names of Franklin and John Adams. In the shorter space between Adams and Jefferson there were many. There was a certain lack of solidity ; his intellect was not very profound, not very comprehensive. Intelli- gent, able, adroit as he was, his success as an intellect- ual man was far from being entire or complete. He exhibited no spark of genius, nor any remarkable de- gree of original, natural talent." This so coincides with what I had written, I add it to excite the reader to an investigation, for I know full well, the intellectual fame of Mr. Jefferson will not bear looking into. INDEPENDENCE. 277 manner : Mr. Tooke having spoken in commendation of the Declaration which he signed ^' was jocularly accused of praising his own work, and to free him from this embarrassment [says Mr. Paine], and the repeated trouble of mentioning the author, as lie has not failed to do, I make no hesitation in saying, I drew up the publication," etc. Now, Mr. Paine was never guilty of praising his own worh, and nowhere can I find that he ever p^raised the Declaration of In- dependence as a \York, or that he ever mentioned Junius. Had Mr. Jefferson been the author of the Declaration, Mr. Paine no doubt would have called it ^'A masterly performance J ^ And thus it is, his hand is seen, though not pub- licly acknowledged, in all those first principles upon which the fabric of our government rests. And it was the peculiarity of this great man to do the work, and let others carry off the honors. " But truth shall conquer at the last ; For round and round we run, And ever the right comes uppermost, And ever is justice done." ]N"OTE A. Truly speaking, there is no original Declaration in existence. There are several ^' original " Declarations extant, all differing somewhat. John Adams had one, Benjamin Franklin, it is said, had one in England. 278 DECLARATION OF Richard Henry Lee and others had '' originals, " all in manuscript. The one I have followed may be found in MarshalFs Life of Washington, and does not differ only in a few minor respects from the one in Jeffer- soh^s works, Washington edition. The real original was destroyed as soon as copied, and we have only nature to guide us in the study of one which is almost a faithful copy. GEAND OUTLINES OF THOMAS PAINE^S LIFE. Were I to write the biography of Thomas Paine, I should, with a bold hand, transcend the low oJBfice of a chronicler, and hand him down in history thus: Thomas Paine was of Quaker origin. In this he in- herited more than paternal flesh and blood, more than family form and feature : he had transmitted to him the principles of George Fox — principles which were, when Mr. Paine was born, more than a hundred years old. These were a reliance on the internal evidences of the conscience, prompting to moral action and to the love of God. In this the shadow of Fox fell athwart the Scriptures. The internal light was with him greater than that which shone down on the centuries from Je- sus of Nazareth. The religions, and creeds, and opin- ions of the world were to be brought to the bar of conscience for trial, and *^the motions of the spirit'' — not the teachings of the Bible — were to be taken in ev- idence. His principles were universal in the heart of man — not particular in any special book. To these religious principles was added simplicity of conduct in all the ways of life. In religious or civil affairs, whether at home or abroad, with his fellow-man or his God, he was to obey the behests of nature, and (279) 280 \ GRAND OUTLINES OF not of man. To avoid the extravagance of dress, to walk with dignity and grace, to deal uprightly, to love mercy, to rely on the light within, to train the heart to courage and the head to understanding, became the chief aim of all the followers of Fox. The consequence was, they never bent the knee to the forms of worship, nor uncovered the head to the forms of fashion. To the Quaker, a virtuous, upright, and honorable laborer was of as much consequence, in the line of respect and the eyes of God, as the noblest lord of the realm. No out- ward show, no pageantry of church or court, could awaken him to respect. He looked within : there he felt the movings of the spirit, there he saw the image of his God, there he went in to worship. What must be the result of this religion? It must transmit self-reliance, fortitude, courage, and morality to the individual, and a sympathy for mankind which will grant the equality of rights, and produce a con- tempt for outward show, for outward forms and cere- monies. These characteristics will be transmitted to children's children, and democracy is born into a race of men before they know it, or before they know how or why. But here an effect must not be taken for a cause. It was the democratic principle abroad in the world which produced the Quaker religion, not this re- ligion which produced it, and this religion became after- ward an engine for thrusting democracy more deeply into the constitution of man. It had a work to do, and it did it by inheritance. It was the democracy of Cromwell, " that accomplished President of England," tvhich could sympathize with the religion of Fox, ^/ PAINE' S LIFE, 313 rather than the unfortunate prisoner, and then asks: '' What shall be done with this man?^' He has now taken his own life in his hands, when he proffers to the King of France an asylum in America. Besides, he has a duty to perform for the United States, which now he offers his own life to fulfill. He has not forgotten the great feat of youiig Laurens, when he touched his sword in presence of this same king, demanding that aid which made his country free and independent, and which was granted. He therefore says : " It is- to France alone, I know, that the United States of Amer- ica owe that support which enabled them to shake off the unjust and tyrannical yoke of Britain. The ardor and zeal which she displayed to provide men and money, were the natural consequence of a thirst for lib- erty. But as the nation at that time, restrained by the shackles of her own government, could only act by means of a monarchiccd organ, this organ, whatever in other respects the object might be, certainly performed a, good, a great action. Let, then, these United States be the safeguard and asylum of Louis Capet.^' Marat cries out : " Paine is a Quaker,'' and the benev- olence of this good man is whelmed over by the fierce and bloody sentiment of revenge. This is one of the sublime deeds which give us faith in man, but which appear at such wide intervals that they mark eras in the world's history. I know of but one other which rises to such touching sublimity — it is Socrates, at the head of the Athenian Senate, refusing to put the vote demanded by the laws, religion, and united voice of his country, which would condemn to death the admirals who were unable to bury the dead that had been slain 314 GRAND OUTLINES OF in battle. Both offered their lives that others might live^ rather than be themselves unjust. Mr. Paine, by this effort to save the king's life, lost his influence in the assembly, and he became afterward a silent member, and, in the minds of many, set apart to die. Foreigners are now expelled from the conven- tion, and an order having passed that all persons born in England, and residing in France, should be impris- oned, he was, by order of Robespierre, arrested, and thrown into the Luxembourg. Of his narrow escapes, Mr. Paine says: " I was one of the nine members that composed the first committee of constitution. Six of them have been destroyed. Syeyes and myself have survived — he by bending with the tiuies, and I by not bending. The other survivor joined Robespierre, and signed with him the warrant of my arrestation. After the fall of Robespierre, he was seized and imprisoned, in his turn, and sentenced to transportation. He has since apolo- gized to me for having signed the warrant, by saying he felt himself in danger, and was obliged to do it. '^ Herault Sechelles, an acquaintance of Mr. Jefferson, and a good patriot, was my suppliant as member of the committee of constitution — that is, he was to supply my place, if I had not accepted or had resigned, being next in number of votes to me. He was imprisoned in the Luxembourg with me, was taken to the tribunal and the guillotine, and I, his principal, was left. ^' There were but two foreigners in the convention — Anacharsis Cloots and myself We w^ere botli put out of the convention by the same vote, arrested by the same order, and carried to prison together the same night. THOMAS PAINE' S LIFE. 315 He was taken to the guillotine^ and I was again left. Joel Barlow was with us when we went to prison. " Joseph Lebon^ one of the vilest characters that ever existed, and who made the streets of Arras run with blood, was my suppliant as member of the convention for the department of the Pays de Calais. When I was put out of the convention, he came and took my place ; when I was liberated from prison, and voted again into the convention, he was sent into the same prison, and took my place there ; and he went to the guillotine in- stead of me. He supplied my place all the way through. One hundred and sixty- eight persons were taken out of the Luxembourg in one night, and one hundred and sixty of them guillotined the next day, of which I know I was to have been one; and the manner I escaped that fate is curious, and has all the appearance of accident. When persons by scores and hundreds were to be taken out of prison for the guillotine, it was always done in the night, and those who performed that office had a private mark, or signal, by which they knew what rooms to go to, and what number to take. We were four, and the door of our room was marked, unobserved by us, with that number, in chalk; but it happened, if hap- pening is a proper word, that the mark was put on when the door was open and flat against the wall, and thereby came on the inside when we shut it at night, and the destroying angel passed by it. A few days after this Robespierre fell, and the American embassador ar- rived and reclaimed me, and invited me to his house. " During the whole of my imprisonment, prior to the fall of Robespierre, there was no time when I could think my life worth twenty-four hours, and my mind 316 GRAND OUTLINES OF was made up to meet its fate. The Americans in Paris went in a body to tlie convention to reclaim me, but without success. There was no party among them with respect to me. My only hope then rested on the gov- ernment of America, that it would remember me. But the icy heart of ingratitude, in whatever man it may be placed, has neither feeling nor sense of honor. The let- ter of Mr. Jefferson has sei'ved to wipe away the re- proach, and has done justice to the mass of the people of America. ^^About two months before this event, I was seized with a fever that, in its progress, had every symptom of becoming mortal. ... I have some reason to believe, because I can not discover any other cause, that tiiis illness preserved me in existence.'^ In these hoiH's of death, and when he expects to be beheaded at any moment, he is writing his Age of E.EASOX. The first part he completed just before going to prison; the second part he studies upon, and partly writes, while in prison, and publishes it a few months after his release. This work was planned years before it appeared, and its completion was deferred till near the close of his life, that the purity of his motives might not be impeached. It was written at that time, too, before he had intended it, because he expected soon to be })ut to death, and lest, in '^the general shipwreck of superstition, of false sys- tems of government, and false theology, the people lose sight of morality, of humanity, and of the theology that is true.^^ It was written to combat superstition, fanati- cism, and atheism on the one hand, and to defend re- ligion, morality, and deism on the other. It is the good THOMAS PAINE' 8 LIFE. 817 and religious work of a good and religious man. The work it was designed to aceomplisli is not yet done, but it is well begun. As the world grows wiser it will be valued the more highly, and the more it is read the bet- ter will people become. Had Mr. Paine died at this time, his life's work would have been fulfilled, and the tranquillity of his life would not have been disturbed by the curses of the whole order of the priesthood. But there are fourteen years of life before him yet, in which he is maligned, vilified, slandered, and publicly' and privately insulted. I will briefly sum them up. Seven of these years he spends in France. He writes his essays "On the English System of Finance," " Aggrarian Justice,'' and the '' Letter to General Washington ; " also, one '' To the People and Armies of France." It seems he be- came attached to Napoleon, for the project of the gun- boat invasion of England is started, and should it suc- ceed, Mr. Paine is to give England a more liberal government. In 1802, he came to America, and the folly of gun-boats also enters into Jefferson's adminis- tration. These seven years of life in America are years of trouble and grief. Jefferson, the great Democratic partisan, secures his services to write for his party ; but he had never been a partisan, he had stood on higher ground, he had labored for all mankind, and the work, which ill became him, served only to aggravate his own life. We can see a mental change coming over the old man; the reason is yet strong, but the temper is irritable ; he grows peevish and broods over his wrongs. ''I ought not to have an enemy in America," he said. But the generation of people he 318 GRAND OUTLINES OF now lived among^ near the close of his life, were not yet born ^^in the times that tried men's soals/' and they knew him not. He was the friend of Jefferson, and Jefferson had bitter enemies, who said ^^ they both ought to dangle from the same gallows.'' He had been paid but little for his revolutionary services, and he now felt the ingratitude of the old Congress, which had treated him badly, and the new one, which could not be bothered with him. Thus his miseries multiply. ^^ After so many years of serYice, my heart grows cold toward America,'' he writes, a year before his death, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Jefferson ought to have kept the old man aloof from politics, instead of thrusting him into his party broils, and bringing down on his head the whole host of his own personal enemies. Paine had enemies enough of his own without these. But great ideas and generous affections, it seems, Jefferson never had. Now, in his old age, the great apostle of liberty is deserted by many he had labored to befriend, and, though he does not meet death at the hands of his en- emies, they have venom enough in their hearts to slay him. It is sad to think that his last hours were embittered for the want of a friend. Washington had long be- fore forgotten him while a prisoner in the Luxembourg. Samuel Adams had condemned him. John Adams has it in his heart to blast his memory, and four years after he is dead writes to Jefferson, " Joel Barlow was about to record Tom Paine as the great author of the American Revolution. If he was, I desire that my name may be blotted out forever from its record.*' THOMAS PAINE' jS LIFE. 319 This came from the man who twice deserted his post in the trying hour of his country ; once for four mouths when at the head of the war committee, and once for seven months when president of the nation. It came from the man who said : Jefferson had stolen his ideas from him to put into the Declaration of Inde- pendence. "Blotted out," No! John Adams, your name will live forever on the records of your country. You were sometimes a great man. But by the side of Thomas Paine, on the records of your country, you stand thus : History, John Adams, Member Thomas Paine, the Ju- of Congress, the Colossus nius of England, author of debate, signer of the of Common Sense and the Declaration of Indepen- Declaration of Independ- dence, famous in the world, ence, wlfose fame is un- chief of the war com- known, on whom no trust mittee, on whom great was imposed by the pub- trusts were imposed, in lie, undertakes the business whom great faith was had, of a world ; enlists in the in the first trying crisis of army of Washington, and the new nation DESERT- in the first trying crisis of ED HER. Brave in his the new nation, by the inspi- home by the sea. ration of his pen, SAVED HER. Bravest when stout hearts fail. Franklin, the firm friend, has been dead these nine- teen years, and many more of the old first friends had gone the same way. His mind now reverts to his home in England, and the religion of his father haunts his affections. He asks to be buried in the Quaker burying-ground, and is refused, lest this act of decency 320 GRAND OUTLINES OF should offend the sanctified followers of Fox. It is as well. The old man\s will records, that if this be not granted him on account of his father's religion, he was to be buried on his own farm at New Rochelle. On the 8th of June, 1809, he took his final leave of the world. ^^I have lived," said he, "an honest and use- ful life to mankind ; my time has been spent in doing good ; and I die in perfect composure and resignation to the will of my Creator — God." Thus the great eevolutionist passed away. Like all great men, he lived a virtuous^ upright life. He had a noble object in view, and labored manfully to ac- complish it. But having done his work well, his ene- mies have added to his fame by trying to undo what time has approved, and by reviling him when nature has applauded. CONCLUSION. Thomas Paine is now placed right before the world. He was peculiarly a favored child of nature. The great strokes of his character are these : A spirit to re- sent an injury which made him sometimes revengeful and vindictive. Yet a friend in his defense could call upon him for his life, and it would be granted. Too proud to be vain, he rose above the common level in personal honor, and demanded that the character of a nation should be without spot. Benevolent beyond his means, he lived like a miser, that he might have wherewith to bestow upon the needy, whether man, ■woman, child, or country. Secretive beyond estimate, he lived a perfect spy THOMA S PA INK'S LIFE. 321 upon the world, and obtained from friend and foe, from society and government, what they wished to conceal, and stored away facts which he locked up in his own mind to be used if needed, or everlastingly kept. He was too hopeful to estimate the future cor- rectly, and had too much faith in man to judge cor- rectly of his actions. Yet character he scarcely ever misjudged. As for courage, he dared to do any thing that was right. He dared to think like a philosopher, and to act like a man. Intellectually he was a prod- igy ; and as for genius, under which I combine the constructive analytic and imaginative faculties the world has never seen his equal. He was, in short, an artist, inventor, scholar, poet, philosopher, enemy and friend. These mental characteristics were so combined and regulated by his will, that nature could never re- peat what she produced in Thomas Paine. I have faithfully followed the lines of nature in this criticism, and have endeavored to produce a work which the student and statesman can study with profit ; which the lawyer may consider as an argument; which will arrest the attention of the historian, and present new themes to the mind of the philosopher; one which will open up a new method for the critic, and in all these a work which the scholar will not despise. This I say without vanity. Mine indeed are humble labors ; and my work, whatever it is, has not been laborious and artful, but easy and natural. I have not written this to make proselytes to his religion, but to do a much injured man a good service. Yet, as hero-worship is a part of man^s nature, it may not be improbable that one age will extol what a pre- 322 CONCLUSION. vious one reviled, and a temple be erected to the religion of a man who was once thought to be a devil. This reminds me of a story which long ago I remember of reading in a volume of the Letters of the Turkish Spy; and as I quote from memory I will give only the substance : Two hundred years ago, somewhere in Spain, in front of a Christian house of worship, stood a statue. This was the black image of a man sitting on an ass. As each pious devotee passed in to worship, or came out therefrom, he spat upon the statue. But a Mussul- man embassador coming from the king of Morocco, observing these rites, which he was told had been performed for centuries, asked the king why they treated this image with such insult. He was told it was the image of Mahomet. The follower of Mahomet, being better informed, replied : This can not be, for Mahomet rode always on camels, and it was Jesus Christ who, it is recorded, rode on an ass. This fact was soon confirmed by the priests, and thereupon the people took to kissing and worshiping what they had before insultingly spat upon, and afterward erected a temple where it stood in honor of it. RD -7.6 A OOBBSBROS. cf^"^^ °WW^* ^^^"^ ''^ 'V o N o ^ <$> r>^ ,v ST.AUGUSTmE ^t.„,>^ * FLA. ;, 32084 '„ ^^-;^. .0 .>