BLACKWELL FAMILY ALICE STONE BLACKWELL SUBJECT FILE ARMENIA, PRINTED MATTER reCROSS REFERENCE SHEET Name or Subject Alice Stone Blackwell Awards Order of the Melusine File No. Regarding Date Awarded by the Armenians to Alice Stone Blackwell See article from May 1897 Munsey Magazine in Armenian folder (Prince de Lusignan) about the history of the "guerdon"POLITICAL PERSECUTION ARMENIAN PRISONERS OF THE CAUCASUS [A PAGE OF THE TZAR'S PERSECUTION] By E. AKNOUNI Author of "The Wounds of the Caucasus," "On to Battle," Etc. 1911 NEW YORKPOLITICAL PERSECUTION ARMENIAN PRISONERS OF THE CAUCASUS [A PAGE OF THE TZAR'S PERSECUTION] By E. AKNOUNI Author of "The Wounds of the Caucasus," "On to Battle," Etc. 1911 NEW YORKTranslated from the Author's Manuscript by A. M. and H. W. AN APPEAL To the Intellectuals of America. With my weak pen, and unflourished words, I appeal to you, intellectuals and writers of the Great Republic - to your tongue, to your pen, and especially to your heart. Do not regard as boldness this step of an Armenian writer unknown to you. It is not my modest past, or my weak pen, that entitles me to address you publicly, but the fact that I belong to a persecuted nation, perhaps, alas, the first among the human victims of history, - a nation, small in numbers, but great in suffering; insignificant in its political standing, but worthy of respect for the victims it offered to the altar of civilization and freedom. It is the grief and the sorrow of the wound-covered and persecuted Armenian people that prompts me, as well as the whole class of Armenian intellectuals of to-day, whose modest soldier I am, to speak, - grief and sorrow that made even the stones cry, and that in the days of unsuppressed rage roused the civilized world from Rome to London, from Paris to New York, and moved even those who have breast, but no heart; head, but no mind. Raise your voices, you who have hearts and minds, and as citizens of a free fatherland are duty bound to voice your protest in behalf of "innocent convicts," who, crushed behind prison doors, are anxiously awaiting for signs of sympathy, for a just protest in the name of their ever-tortured people. I was often told, both in Europe and in this country, that it was useless to appeal to America, that the hope of the persecuted was in vain. It was reiterated to me again and again : "America is not the land of succor, but of money. The great American press is not the soldier of justice and ideal, but it serves Mammon, and through Mammon, again to Mammon." You know better than I how true this sad accusation is ! But I, who traveled this Republic from one end to the other, from city to city, whatever I saw and observed keeps me in my conviction that America is not merely "the land of factories," but that it is also the land of great ideals. 4 Yes, a land where the memory of Washington and Lincoln is held so sacred; where the monuments of revolution, independence, and liberty rear themselves side by side with factory chimneys; where universities and libraries and erected by the side of big stores and pleasant parks; where the democratic spirit demolished the restraining prejudices of the Old World; and where, in the harbor of its Metropolis, burns every night the torch of universal Liberty, - such a land must not and can not desert the Great Ideal. The Nations of the East do not ask you for "intervention." No, it is not necessary to mix up with the "family quarrels" of other nations. But your Great Citizen, if he was risen from his grave could not pass by a dying sufferer without kneeling by his side; could not witness without just anger the cruelty of an executioner who flogs the bleeding victim. No intervention, but protest, when a whole nation or people is slaughtered; protest in the name of man, whose worship is so great with you; protest in the name od liberty for which you gave so much of your blood in the days of the Great Battle; protest in the name of human community, without distinction of race or religion, the pet idea of your Wonderful Fatherland. I know, I feel, you are very far from the Grief-valley of historic Ararat, from the place of tyrannical rule, where so dominant are the knout , the yataghan, and the prison. But now, with my ineffective lines, I will essay to bring before you the pale image of horrible tragedy, one page only, one small page of the deep horrors, which are perpetrated behind Closed Doors, whence for years ring the screams of prisoners, and with them the wrath and the protest of all the persecuted. Listen to that voice, hear that wrathful scream; hear and answer what your mind, what your heart, suggests. Put some of your heart in your voice, in your protest, in your pen, and strike with thunder. Use your pens, writers of all nations! Use your mouths, orators of all lands! E. AKNOUNI. April, 1911, New York. 5 THE WORLD OF CHAINS. Searching by night! Imprisonment by day! This was been the "political life" in the Caucasus since 1908, where, by the regulation of Tzarism, the Armenian people are pronounced dangerous, and out of the pale of law's prosecution. Prison, searching and exile hhave been of frequent occruance in the domains, where the knout of slave [[slave]] despotism is dominant, but what has been taking place in the last few years, even after the Octoberian Manifesto of the Tzar, is exceptionally novel. What a bitter irony! While in St. Petersburg speeches flow from the worthy and unworthy mouths of the members of the Duma in the name of political liberty and security, in Poland, Finland, and the Caucasus tongues are tied by the orders of the police, pens are crushed in the office of the censor, and all good citizens, physicians, lawyers, teachers, officers, farmers, and lead to prisons - political grave-yards, to atone for sins which they have not committed, to suffer tortures which they do not deserve. And sitting behind blosed doors hundereds of prisoners, subjected to many tortures and deprivations, are wondering and asking themselves: "What is our sin?" And the unworthy officer of the Russian Court, called Legine, who is actuated more by caprice than justice, and who takes his orders from the Minister of the Interior, answers them brutally: "Your sin is that you are Armenians. You are responsible for everything that occurs in the Armenian life. It is necessary for us to bury the roaring fire under ashes, to uproot revolutionary movement, to exterminate political parties, and engulf life and energy. Do you want proof? Our caprice is the proof. Do you want documentary evidence? The documentary evidence is the police report. 6 And Stolypin, the president of the unconstitutional ministry, a policeman, and not a statesman, detective, but not a man of law, is instructing with word or consent : "Crush, persecute." And they are crushing! And they are persecuting! - It is night. As soon as the lamps burn in the streets which are filled with soldiers, the terrorized "subjects," rich and poor, run home like frightened birds from an imminent, threatening tempest. Since 1906 when the black terror was organized in Russia, by the efforts of the police, when the criminal-minded government armed the dark element, the mob, in order to cover the awakening land with the veil of terror, then nobody could feel safe in the night. Every man was hastening home to be locked behind double-bolted doors, and latticed windows. That is the signal of political insecurity. The bell rang. Everybody is shuddering inside the house. The bell at a late hour! That is a sign of misfortune. And so it is. "Open the door," yell the gendarmes commanding, threatening. The doors are opened, and in rush officers, fifteen or twenty, the Chief of Police, his assistants, the prosecutor, spies in multifarous uniforms, several "witnesses" gathered from the street, drunken and vulgar, to identify papers that do not exist, and to sign records which they cannot read. This is the police tactics practiced in the land of prisons. The order is given, and lo! the doors are closed. The head of the family is put under arrest, and the searching begun and carried on in all the rooms, in the corners from the kitchen to the sleeping room. "My wife is in bed, permit her to dress before you enter," observes the victim, humbly. "We have no time!" roar the police ironically. And the searchers rush into the bedroom of the terrified 7 woman, and overhaul everything with the curiosity of scoundrels and obscene jestures. Here is the whole proceeding. Huge axes are produced and the drunken people, dressed in the police uniforms, the poor victims of demoralizing officialdom, are beginning the work of destruction. The axes dart toward the ceilings, toward the wardrobes, toward the floors, wherever a hiding place is imagined to be. They smash the doors, tear up the floors, open the walls and spread upon the floor the dresses of the women with obscene remarks. The whole night performing that act of "legal" ruin, rest at morn, tired and proud, and collecting all the books beginning from the Bible to the "Cookbook", all the letters, love letters or business letters, even the papers in which not a word is written, the children's exercise book, and new shaped knives, suspicious "machines," even the boiler for sweets, go out of the house taking with them the head of the family, who with tearful eyes murmurs to his children: "Don't be frightened, I will soon be back." And behind him ruin, tears, mourning. That is the searching. - They are in the street. The prisoner, surrounded with the dreadful soldiers, does not know where and why he is taken. "Where are you taking me?" he inquires. "To the Chief of Police," answer the officers of law indifferently and calmly. And they are taking him to the Chief of Police, and then, in a closed carriage to an unknown office. Everything is unknown and obscure. The "citizen" is moving like a shadow without resistance, speechless and struck with terror. Behold an office. What a sight! Already many prisoners, some known to each other, some strangers, all waiting disposition and instructions. The doors open, and the order is given. Then begins a new search, which is called the "personal search." They search the pockets of the prisoner, the heels of his shoes, his hats and even his beard, The "personal search," also, is finished. Now he must8 be taken away. But where? To which prison? That is known only to the police. The exodus begins. The exodus is different for different men. Sometimes, for the purpose of terrorizing the people, the prisoners are conducted in groups in the main streets of the city, surrounded by Cossacks and mounted officers. The mob retreats from the right and from the left. Who dares approach or stand by? The omnipotent lance is ready to be thrust into the loins or the legs of such a bold person. Often they are taken by night, secretly, from their parents and friends, in closed wagons, through byways. Nobody knows where they are taken, how they are taken, or with whom they are taken. A week passes, then a second, friends and relatives are exhausted from waiting at the door of the prefect in the hope of getting some intelligence from the victims. Are the prisoners dead or alive? The same answer from all lips: "It is not known." And quite often the prisoners are led from station to station, from prison to prison, even from city to city, barefooted, under the rain and snow, subjected to grave dangers. One day two prisoners were led through a muddy street in Tiflis. One a young Armenian writer, the other a gray-haired old man, a rich land owner. It was a rainy day, cold and damp; the way was long and tiresome. The old man, unaccustomed to hardship, was exhausted and tottering, unable to walk. The young prisoner observed the condition of his aged companion and saw that he was nearly exhausted. So he said to the soldiers: "Brothers, I can walk because I am strong, but pity this old man and allow him to ride in a carriage. He is exhausted. He, too, is a man. Pity his old age." "Walk, dog," roared the solder and raising the butt of his gun, "walk and hold your tongue." And they walked. - Behold, also, the prison! With an august calmness is opened the famous castle, by the hand of its unavoidable and eternal guardian, and after a 9 minute a new one is added to the "living dead!" After that moment he is no more a citizen or a man, but a number who will move when they order him, will stand up when they command,entitled to one right only—the right of silence. From the surrounding iron windows which look on the inner court hundreds of eyes watching the new comer—the eyes of the political hero who faced death for liberty, the eyes of the criminal who, perhaps, had killed his mother, the eyes of the thief, the incendiary, the drunkard, because in that "world" there is everything, greatness and meanness, martyrs and murderers. They registered his name and led him inside. He is already behind the closed doors. He must sit there and wait. Has he bread? Has he clothes? Has he any place to rest his head? Are they considering his case? Is he subjected to tortures or to cross-examination? Is he dead or alive? Nobody knows. The doors are closed. 10 SOME HISTORICAL FACTS. - The "political" imprisonment of the Armenians in the Caucasus has a history of fifty years behind it. The first important political prisoner was the famous Armenian publicist and poet, Michael Nalbandian, in 1863. He had committed the crime of writing some soul-inspiring poems which were dedicated to liberty and national regeneration, and while in London, of cultivating friendship with Gerzen, the illustrious Russian leader. Under the infernal conditions of the prison the Armenian prisoner became consumptive, and when the prison authorities saw that death was inevitable - the desire of the police - set him free, that after having "lived" in prison, he might die in "liberty." And after a few months Nalbandian died, faithful to his famous words: "I will be true to thee till death; Yea, even upon the gallows tree; With my last gasp, with dying breath, I'll shout thy name, O Liberty!" Almost fifteen years elapsed more or less quiet. From beyond the Turkish frontier reached the ears of the Armenians in the Caucasus the shocking news of the crime. They cry of agony of the Armenian people, languishing under the shameful yoke of Hamid, and the smell of blood reached the plains of Ararat notwithstanding the unsurmountable obstacles. It was during that time, 1877, that Alexander II declared war against Turkey in the name of Eastern Christianity. But that war did not justify the hopes of the Christians in Asia Minor; and when the Russian soldiers, after the Congress of Berlin, evacuated the Turkish soil, Hamid decided, and intrigued, to avenge his defeat on the Christian Armenians. The yataghan shone. Armenia was transformed into a sea of sorrow and blood. The bloody political catastrophe shocked and moved the Armenians in the Caucasus. Prompted by the sentiment of fraternal assistance, they began to send money to the victims, arms to the defenseless, and men for help. But the government of the Tzar, which had declared war in the name of 11 Christianity, suddenly changed its attitude toward the Christian Armenians in Turkey, and opposed every effort to help them. It not only failed to help the persecuted Armenians in the dark days of massacre and terror, but began to punish the Caucasus Armenians, who desired to stretch a helping hand to their suffering compatriots. - The blow was dealt in 1884. In Erivan, to the great surprise of the whole city, houses were searched in groups. That slumberous city of the Orient was upset entirely. For several weeks, especially the nights, many residences of the citizens became a scene of terror. All classes of the Armenian population were affected, and lawyers, physicians, merchants were arrested, men and women. After "expiating their sins in the prisons" they were banished to remote parts of Russia, where they died without seeing their country.1 That was the first arrest in groups. The next scene is removed to Tiflis. Imagining a "political bond" between the Armenians of Erivan and Tiflis in undertaking to help the Armenians in Turkey, the police and the gendarmerie searched minutely the residence of Grigor Arzrouni, the famous Armenian publicist, and the founder of Mschak, the Armenian daily paper in Russia. The police search lasted three days. All his papers were sealed and taken to court. The same fate fell to Raffi, the illustrious Armenian novelist, and one of the editors of Mschak. The insensate police force seized the manuscripts of his novels as "documents to prove" his political dangerousness. That was a menacing sign. After searching the effects of these two popular and highly respected journalist, the police force began, unchecked, to do the same thing in the towns, and from that date on the officers of safety adopted another office, the office of searching, which became the cause of an ever increasing terror among the patriarchal population. - 1 Among those were Vartanian, a notary; Egiazarian, a lawyer; Mrs. Matakian, principal of the Girls' School; Matakian, an officer; Ter-Zakarian, an officer; Mherian, an agent; Chalalian, an attorney; Tigranian, a physician.12 The severity was increased tenfold in 1890. When the news from Turkish Armenia became extremely horrible and unendurable, a band of young Armenians, students, teachers, artisans and peasants, prompted by the desire of an immediate assistance, organized and armed themselves in order to go to Turkey and protect peaceful people against the Kurd and Hamidian murderers. But before crossing the frontier they were surrounded by the Russian soldiers, and fifty of them arrested. They were chained and thrown into a dungeon under the most rigorous regulations. Then they were tried as "political agitators and as demanding freedom for the Armenians." That band is known as the band of Gougounian, by the name of the leader, Mr. Gougounian, a student at the University of St. Petersburg. Some of the prisoners died before the conclusion of their trial, and the rest were sentenced to hard labor for twenty years in Siberia. Some of the young men died before they arrived in SIberia, and the rest were driven to that bleak land to condone their sin in chains and in caves - the sin of desiring to sacrifice their lives for their brothers. Gradually the severity of the police force increased, not only against those who desired to help their "living brothers," but against those, alas, who wished to bury their "dead brothers" with due honor. Even burial became a political crime. We had the proof of it in 1892. Grigor Arzrouni died. The Armenians of the Caucasus, sad-hearted and affected, desired to show their appreciation of the work of this most popular Armenian publicist. There was a great commotion and preparation for funeral services. From all over the world Armenians sent delegates and delegations, four hundred and eighty floral tributes and thousands of cables and telegrams. There was requiem and mourning everywhere, It was December 27th. A human ocean was heaving in the Kolovinski street of Tiflis. Sixty thousand people were following the coffin, sad and with low heads. The popular mourning expressed itself in a manifestation of popular respect. The people were silent and respectful. . . . Then suddenly the mounted police force and the infantry appeared and ordered: 13 "Turn back, and go through the other street, you cannot use this street." The mourners explained to the police that they desired to pass by the family house of the deceased, and as a last respect offer prayers for his soul. They asked and explained, but in vain, the police stood unmoved. Then the patient people pushed forward, the soldiers drew their swords. The officiating Armenian bishop fainted from that unexpected demonstration. . . . But the mourners penetrated the chain of the police and soldiers, and advanced to the cemetery, and the body of the great publicist was laid to rest. . . . But the despotic government did not respect this fresh grave, and the same night arrests and searching started from one end of the city to the other. Terror was added to sadness. The delegates departed immediately to avoid imprisonment. And the same night dozens of writers, professors, officers, editors, painters, specialists, were driven to prison as the authors of demonstration against the government, and as dangerous agitators. It is incredible, but it is a fact, - Let us also consider the year 1985, which was the carnival of prisons and cruelties. Again the news from Armenia assumed a gloomy aspect. Under the blows of revolution, and under the European pressure the Nero of Yildiz agreed to the reforms called "the Scheme of May," but just then, when the agents of the assassin autocrat went, under the command of Shakir Pasha, to Armena to execute the orders of "reform," when the Bishop of Erzroom, encouraged by the promises of the English Ministry, was announcing the birth of "liberty in Armenia, under the bond of slavery," then rang the alarm of wholesale massacre. Sultan Hamid became reckless more than ever. His bloody hands were indirectly strengthened by the Tzar's Minister for Foreign Affairs, Lobanoff, who wished "Armenia without Armenians." The yataghan was drawn with an unprecedented ferocity. . . . And when these massacres shocked the whole civilized world, the government of the Tzar hastened to close the frontiers against the Armenian refugees, and censored the whole Russian press to prevent the Russian Armenians from hearing the death agony of slaughtered people, and from attempts of help or protest.14 The severity was boundless. After a while the Armenian press not only had no right to protest against the monstrous crime, but even to print the words "Armenia," or "Turkish Armenia." A huge wall was erected between the Armenian compatriots of the two empires. Not a relief fund. Not a weapon. Not a sympathetic action. But wholesale imprisonments in Tiflis, Baku, Erivan, Shoushi, Ganzak. The imprisonments spread to the villages to silence the protests of the revolutionaries. All the Armenian leaders of importance and influence were put under arrest, numbering more than a hundred. Many of them were banished to the remote districts of Russia. The rest fled the country. That was a black period of persecution and tyranny in the political annals of the Caucasus. 2 This lasted until 1896, when the despotism of St. Petersburg realized with pleasure and triumph that the Armenian nation was wounded so seriously that it could not survive. An American missionary, who had lived in Van for a long time, told once: "When we saw the heaped corpses, the sea of blood, the unutterable horror, the mad flight, we thought the Armenian people was no more!" 1895-96 was the grave of Armenia. And the "spade of the Tzar" stood foremost. What a black honor! - 2 Among those arrested were 22 pedagogists, 7 authors, 10 students, 8 government officials, 20 commissioners, 4 clergymen, 21 artisans, 8 merchants, 12 professionals. 15 THE PRISONERS OF 1908. - The new days made us forget the old. The former imprisonments dwindle into insignificance as compared with the policy initiated in 1908. The wholesale, perpetual and universal arrests, which were inaugurated in 1907-1908 were unparalleled in the annals of the Caucasus Armenians, and, perhaps, of the Russians. There has been forcible arrests among the Russians, Poles, Jews, Finns, astonishing arrests, but it was never seen, even under Tzarism, that a whole nation, an entire people, with warring classes should be accused as revolutionary, dangerous, and should be tried as such on the bench of criminals. But it was so. The arrests of 1908 did not respect any class. People were searched indiscriminately, the office of the Armenian Catholicos the head of the whole Armenian Church; the author who preached a new life and new thought; the most ignorant peasant who cannot even read; the millionaire who enjoys life; the laborer who toils; the merchant who does not recognize any world outside his store; the professor whose activities are confined only to the classroom; the clergymen who heartily pray for the permanence of thrones; the student who is the ensign bearer of revolution; the physician and the lawyer who have free professions; the mayor and the official who are the servants of the government; men and women, the rich and the poor; the countryman and the immigrant, the civilian and the farmer; in short, the whole Trans-Caucasus from one end to the other, and the Armenian people living there, every man, every class. That is the characteristic line on this "adventure." The first sign was given in December, 1908, in Tiflis, and in the beginning of 1909 reached its highest point. The number of people searched was nearly a thousand. Five hundred were arrested and imprisoned in the Caucasus and in other prisons. Among the prisoners were included eight authors, twenty-two Armenian physicians, lawyers and specialists, twenty-four professors and teachers, thirty-four officials and attendants,16 forty-five merchants, seventy artisans, and peasants, laborers, clergymen, women and even students. More than three thousand people were under suspicion. Those under suspicion - thanks to the fact that Russian officials sell their secrets - take refuge not only in Europe but, imagine, even in Turkey and Persia, the despotic countries of yesterday. Doubtless, the numerous prisons of the Caucasus, with their hundreds of cells, would not be able to contain those thousands of "guests." The distressing part of the arrests was not their quantity but their quality. From the viewpoint of right and law the whole business is corrupted and even based on false data. Why? For the simple reason that those arrests are not the result of legal searches and visible proofs, but that both the searchings and the arrests are formerly decided and suggested by the central government for political purposes. When in St. Petersburg the central government decided for definite political purposes to persecute the Armenians of the Caucasus, it simultaneously sent orders to the Caucasus to unearth an Armenian plot, and to begin the attack. In the Caucasus, as well as everywhere, there still exists proudly the type of Napoleon's Police Minister, "who always carries in his pocket a scheme of any conspiracy." And those ever ready agents, police, soldiers, prosecuting judges, who understand well the signals of the central government, as well as each other, came together and planned and began. The people, two months and two years ago recognized as peaceful, loyal and law-abiding, were declared anti-royalists, revolutionists, and fomentors for Armenian independence. And the blows were showered right and left. We have already described the terrifying picture of searchings. It was not sufficient, however, to search and intimidate; it was necessary, also, to save the honor of the government by "manipulating some proof," and the officer of the court himself manipulates those proofs and gives them to spy agents for realization. 17 Some examples: Searching had started in Erivan. On an ill-omened night the soldiers were surrounding one of the houses. The owner of the house, innocent and ignorant, asked: "But what is my crime?" And behold, the police found in the basement a very dangerous leaflet as an accusing proof. After many, many bitter days only, a very "dangerous leaflet" was thrown into the basement by the police chief. Another night the police entered into the modest house of a man named Kalousdian. They pulled him out of his bed and punished him with a knout, and demanded: "Where is the box, show it. Where did you hide it?" "What box?" murmured the innocent victim; "spare me, I have not seen any box.: Only after several weeks it was found that the whole proceeding was the result of a criminal misunderstanding. The spy informed the detectives that there was a dynamite box at Kalousdian's house. The police rushed and arrested Kalousdian, and then it was discovered that he was not the one they were looking for. Another event, again in Tiflis, the capital of the Caucasus. A sudden order was given to search the house of the poet Isahakian. And what! They find in the court great quantities of cartridges, then his guilt is certain. But this time the author of the crime had performed his work very poorly. The plot was uncovered. The whole of Tiflis heard it, but was not astonished. Is that not usual? Proofs of that sort are numerous. On account of this wicked and criminal "policy" there was confusion, which was and which will remain the eternal condemnation of the Russian Courts. It is unprecedented in the annals of trials. Innocent ones are arrested instead of the accused. One suffers for the other. The chief of the detectives plans to arrest certain Armenians. They cannot find them, then Legine causes the arrest of altogether innocent men who accidentally have the name or the patronym of the suspect. 18 Let the proofs speak. 1. The police were looking for a revolutionist whose pseudonym was "Prince," and then one day Prince Arghoutian was arrested and imprisoned in Erivan because, as can be seen, he bore the title of Prince. The man protested, but in vain. Several months later it became known that the "Prince" who was sought was out of the Caucasus, and was known in Van as a political leader. The "Prince," who was in Van. regards it a moral duty to inform the investigating judge, through the Russian Consul, that he is in Turkey and that it is unjust to arrest someone else, but Legine persists in his error and Prince Arghoutian has been suffering in prison for two years - and who knows how long yet! 2. Another day they arrested Malkasian, a teacher of the Nersessian School. Not only was he not a revolutionist, but an opponent of revolutionary methods. But he was kept in prison for several months because his Christian name bore resemblance to that of a suspected man who was sought by the police. What is the difference, if it be this man or that man? 3. A man named Kevork Ordoyan was sought in Tiflis. Not being able to find him, the police arrested another Kevork, Kevork Arakelian. The relatives of the former testified that Kevork Ordoyan had been killed by the Persian legation. But in vain. The authorities desired to imprison an Armenian, whose name was Kevork. "If Kevork Ordoyan is dead, let Kevork Arakelian serve the former's term," decided the officer of justice. And for three years Kevork Arakelian with an excusable confidence is waiting in the prison . . . . for justice. 4. In Batoum the police were looking for an Armenian, Hrant Sarafian, a shoemaker, from Trebizonde, Turkey. He could not be found, as he had departed from that city long ago. But there was not another Armenian named Hrant, in Batoum, thought the investigator? With an unfortunate coincidence the son of the Priest Melian was called Hrant. They arrested and imprisoned him. Any why not? Student, 19 named Hrant, and the son of an Armenia priest! The justice of Liegen did not care that this man is Hrant Melian, and not Sarafian; student, and not shoemaker; from Batoum, and not from Terbizonde. It sufficed that his name was Hrant. Let him languish in prison. The world will not be the poorer for it. 5. The wretched cemetery of Erivan had a guard, old, weak, as harmless as the cemetery. He was named Hagop Avedissian, and born in Caesarea, Turkey. One day that poor old man was dragged to the police court, and then to prison. He could not understand what was happening. He was crying and knocking his head against the wall, and trying to wrench the iron bars off the window with his boney hands. He was repeating all day long: "what is my crime, what have I done." And the innocent guard, of course, could not imagine that he was arrested for another Hagop; Hagop Gotoyan. The latter was from Mouch, and not from Caesarea, young and not old, a soldier, and not a cemetery guard. But why these "unimportant" details! He was a Hagop, that sufficed. The poor guard lost his senses, but he is in jail yet. 6. With the same justice and manner Vram Vahanian of Terbizonde was arrested and imprisoned for Vahan Papazian, of Van, now a member of the Turkish Parliament. Karekin Kevorkian was cast into prison for Karekin Mirakian; Levont Melconian, of Ganzak, was imprisoned instead of Ardashes Melconian, of Tiflis; four men whose first names are Nicola were imprisoned in Baku for Nicola Der Hovannessian who was sought by the Government. They had different patronyms, different trades, came from different quarters; but as their first names were Nicola, that proved their guilt! And these cases are innumerable and endless. It is only necessary to have heart to record the sad incidents which have plunged many families in unfathomable suffering and lamentation. But enough is mentioned to give a just idea of what mad proportion these ridiculous persecutions have assumed and which persecutions are disguised under the vizor of court examination. 20 IN THE CELLS. Injustice characterized the search - irregularity the method of arrest. But that was not the end. The cells themselves were remote from prying inquiry, removed from investigation, dark and hidden as their secrets, an inaccessible world, where no eye can penetrate and no voice reach. And in that "autocratic kingdom" where police tyranny is not only countenanced but encouraged, the torture to which the Russian prisoner has been the slave for so many years, continues. "Every means is permissible" was the order of the magistrate and the intention of that official, though criminal, was to encourage the unhappy prisoners to hatch plots to their undoing and thus magnify "the political affair." "The Armenian prisoners in Novotcherkask and Rostove," writes one of the prisoners, "are teeming with inspeakable conditions. It is a lie to say that there is no torture in Russia. Yes! It exists. Twenty-five to thirty men are placed in one cell that hardly holds six or seven. There are no bedsteads, not even bedding; and the miserable inmates aleep on the bare ground, huddled under a single blanket, dirty as the filth in which they are compelled to lie. Nor do they give enough foo even to the unfortunate, who are able and willing to pay. One slice of bread and some water daily. Reading and writing is forbidden and communication with the outside world prohibited. Should a prisoner, by doctor's prescription, be permitted to have an extra piece of bread, some boiled eggs or a box of cigarettes, the loaf is cut open and the eggs broken to prevent the chance of smuggling even a scrap of paper. . . . In the cold cells a loathsome smell prevails and despairing barrenness. The guards are as immovable as the rocks, stern and forbidding, menacing as the lightning. We cannot cry - we are ashamed. We cannot rage and roar. They permit no sound - what shall we do? The walls are thick, the bars strong, and the world remote. What can we do? We are but waiting----" 21 No sanitary precautions are taken, no care offered. Even the sick beseeching for warmth and clothing are refused. In 1910 Restove was wholly infected with cholera, and throughout the district the "subjects" were dying like flies. Soon the news of this plague reached the prison and deep horror prevailed within its walls. It is not difficult to picture the situation of those who realized themselves helpless and shackled in the midst of this pestilence, devoid of air and light, with virtually no medical attendance or proper disinfection. Desperate and impotent they could but protest unavailingly against their tragic plight. "What will happen," they cry with one accord, "should the pestilence invade the prison as well?" The authorities were silent and the prisoners as well as their loved ones at home at last became convinced that Legine, the inspector, connected with the gendarmerie, with diabolical cunning, was deliberately inviting this method of suppressing "the political evil," the life of the prisoners, by means of "the irresponsible evil" - pestilence. What a horrible conviction! I wonder if it requires great power of imagination to picture the horror of those days and nights spent by the unhappy prisoners behind those iron barred windows when cholera was reigning outside as the sword of the jailer within the locked portals. The following year another misfortune befell. In the first part of January, 1911, typhoid fever made its appearance in the prison of Novotcherkask, and soon assumed threatening proportions. That vile dungeon, miscalled a prison, was built to accommodate two hundred and seventy inmates, yet the number crowded in it at this time exceeds eight hundred and fifty people. This condition, coupled with the total lack of sanitary precaution, would naturally hasten the spread of a disease, such as typhoid fever, and, indeed, in March, 1911, the number of the infected exceeded one hundred and the dead twenty. Early in March the Medical Director visited the prison. Let us now listen to the words of his report. "The cells of the prison are overcrowded beyond their capacity; the air vitiated and loathsome. In the cells, wooden 22 boxes, called parashes, are placed for natural necessities of the prisoners; and these are making the atmosphere more unbearable, which was already unbreathable enough. Besides these boxes are placed the wooden vessels containing the drinking water for the unfortunates. The prisoners' underwear is dirty, seldom changed oftener than once in three weeks. "Before this, in January, the prison physician wrote to the Governor of the prison, telling him that typhoid fever has appeared in the prison. The Governor, however, faithful to the instruction of Taube, the head of the district, forbade the doctor to communicate anything concerning the disease to the Medical Director, and for this reason, in the accounts of the prison, nothing was said of typhoid fever and, in fact, it was said that the prisoners had been ill with maleria. "In spite of repeated demands from the doctor to impart to the Board of Health the necessary information regarding the typhoid fever the director of the prison, obstinately and deliberately concealed the existence of the malady." This criminal official "secrecy" horrified the relatives of the unfortunates shut in this jail at Novotcherkask, and they prepared the following telegram and sent it to the Minister of Justice: "In the Prison at Novo Tscheegask, there is now raging a terrible pestilence. More than a hundred prisoners as well as the prison director, three assistants, ten supervisors, six clerks, the prison physician and three assistants are sick. Mortality is assuming alarming proportions and among the dead are two of the overseers; the sanitary conditions are unbearable. The prison built to house only two hundred and fifty inmates now contains in excess of eight hundred inmates. The building is located on the lowest ground in the city where fever prevails. The floors of the cells are asphalt. Those held as accused of the 'Affair of Dashnaktsoutun' are already rounding out their third and fourth years of confinement and all are of impaired health. Most of them seriously affected by consumption, others with diseases of bones, nervous disorders and eye trouble. Some are affected with palsy and two have lost their hearing and all are now exposed to the dreadful typhoid fever. It is easy to understand how their 23 impaired constitutions are unable to withstand the ravages of that terrible disease." "Taking all this into consideration, we request your Excellency to release them on personal recognizance or light bail; for they being economically as well as physically ruined, are unable to provide large sums of money. The preliminary investigation of this 'Affair of Dashnaktsoutun' is already completed and the families of the prisoners are almost beside themselves with terror at the peril to which their dear ones are now subjected." 3 Silence alone from the minister! This was but the natural horror due to natural conditions alone, and yet the agents of tyranny are not satisfied and add to it the artificial, the scourges, the straps and other varied instruments of torture! Let the facts alone speak! It was in the prison of Baku, that the agents of investigation determined to hear secrets, to have G--M--utter words of things not existing. The youth resisted with constancy and continued mildness--the order was given and his head compressed between clamps until he fainted. This was resumed again and again, while the tortures repeated the fateful words: "You cannot be rid of us, until you confess your guilt." In another prison in Tiflis, the poor prisoner G--D--M-- was subjected to continuous flagellation with straps for two weeks, while his poor body was covered with the swollen welts, and yet his cruel tormentors would not cease. They were exacting "Confessions!" [*3 In consequence of this telegram, so ominous in its portent of disaster, one of the St. Petersburg papers, "Rech," published the following: "The condition of the prisoners is indeed appalling and wholly desperate, one cannot imagine how they incarcerate for years, poor wretches wasting with the disease in an overcrowded and wholly unsuitable place, casting fifty into a cell and making them sleep on the bare, icy floor. In one corner where Armenians from Hashdaekhan are, the place is called "Blacktown" on account of the darkness so great that even during day time the inmates cannot see each others' faces without striking matches. Many in this cell where Armenians from Hashdarkhan are, the place is called "Blacktown" entered the prison healthy and strong and now many have their constitutions ruined forever, and this is not the punishment of a sentence, but merely preliminary imprisonment before the actual trial which frequently proves them innocent. This is nothing less than the execution of those not yet convicted. It is not a preliminary incarceration, but a frightful ordeal and a slow and gradual execution and, therefore, far worse."*]24 The prison of Rostove was the scene of more serious cruelties. There was one victim, Mednikian, a lawyer who protested his innocence, demanded investigation, asked for trial. For trial, they gave him the whip, and for investigation, revilings of the foulest language. The unfortunate man, horrified and discouraged, went mad--and is now a helpless imbecile wailing his grief. No one cares--"He is mad," they say, and pass him by. Insane is his neighbor, too, an exhausted old man, lean as a skeleton, guardian of a cemetery, with no thoughts of this world save the grave. They have arrested him also. He does not know his guilt; they have thrust him into a cell, he knows not why, and they lashed and tormented him day after day. Why? God only knows--he scratched the walls with his nails and roaring, raging and screaming, at last lost his mind. Now when with tearful smile he demands his liberty, the jailer points the whip to him. Is he not insane? Here is another victim: The Reverend Nicholas Solomonian, a priest, from the village of Ganzak. They arrested, stripped and tormented him, so that the grief-stricken Father died without even knowing of what he was guilty. The poor priest in his death agony, moaning and sobbing, told his fellow prisoners who were the unwilling witnesses of his torture, that he would soon pass away in death; wept, begged for fresh air, and uttering his wife's name, wished to kiss his children for the last farewell--these young, inexperience children who received their father's dead body could not and never will realize why he was arrested and tortured to death away from them in a prison cell. There were two deaths in the prison of Erivan. The victims being young men from Igtire, who died with their glazing eyes fixed on space, and their mute lips questioning "why?" In the prison at Vladicaucus, a prisoner in his agony roused his failing strength and said, "I know that I am soon to die, but before I do I wish to know of what I am guilty." He died, as did many others, with the question unanswered, and such will be the sad fate of many more. And the survivors! Unfortunate witnesses of these unearthly tragedies, viewing with fearful hearts the removal of 25 the dead bodies from the prison and vowing vengeance, are murmuring dejectedly: "Perhaps tomorrow they may carry out our dead bodies, and why?" And one day the corpse was carried out. It was in front of the door of the prison. A great multitude had swarmed around since early morning and were now impatiently waiting, people of every class and condition having hastened there. The old village priest, who had come to see his son, the county woman coming on foot from a distant village to enjoy at least a few minutes with the son she had not seen for eight months, the student, who with difficulty had obtained a license to see his brother; all of them pale, exhausted and weak with the scorch- ing sun. Their hearts and minds all centered on the discolored stones of the prison walls, and all with the same vain hope in their breasts to see the beloved prisoners at least once, and to hear from their lips one hope inspiring word. And now the doors are opened. The crowed with throbbing hearts moved like a rolling wave and presently fell back as if struck by a bolt of lightning, absolutely petrified as there appeared a funeral casket, which was placed in position by order of the priest who recited the prayers, and all eyes were turned to him. Who was lying there dead in the casket? "My son! My son!" screamed a woman from out of the multitude, and the old woman threw herself on the bier like a flash of lightning, with her bony arms embracing the casket and kissing the cold face of her beloved dead son, now raising her head and turning to the people around her then with yearning eyes turned heavenward, only to repeat her caresses on the dead face before her, the climax of a mother's immense and infinite grief—her cry "my son!" That son whose she had come to see and enjoy, and now only his dead body!26 THE REASONS. I. - Internal. Why so great severity, and why this gnashing of teeth against a people who, although crushed in the talons of Oriental despotism for untold years, has always been the pioneer of Russian advancement, and the firm rampart on the two frontiers against Mohammedan tyranny? Seek for the explanation in the Metropolis of the North, where the jewels of State impudence are found guarded by the agents of the central tyranny. When the Russian throne came out unscathed of the devouring flames of the Pan-Russian Revolution, the government of the Tzar, instead of hearkening to the cries and needs of the people, resorted, on the contrary, to a policy of deceit and persecution. The deceit is the Duma. The persecution is the period of unlimited oppressions under the pretence of the Duma, the like of which were unknown even in the days of Pobiedonostzef under the reign of Alexander III. Persecution against individuals under the accusation of being "Revolutionists." Persecution against nations, under the suspicion of being "Separatists." Prison! Exile! Gallows! These were the only means of smothering the liberty-inspiring breath in the North, where so many hopes died unrevealed, and on the shores of the Volga, which became the silent witness of the greatest crimes, at the foot of the Caucasian Mountains where once inspiring songs were written devoted to the White King Gaisson, and in the cities of Poland, the overwhelming grief of which has furnished material for long ages of history. Finland, that knightly and quiet region, was one of the first to suffer persecution, and in spite of the royal promises the Finnish Constitution was abrogated and trampled upon. 4 [*4 We regret that the scope and plan of the booklet does not permit our giving at least a brief sketch of these crimes and horrors of which Finland, Poland and Central Russia were the stage.] 27 The Tzar had taken oath to be faithful to the Constitution, and "he now retracts his promise," said the Prime Minister of the Tzar, after which he was obliged to use a handkerchief to wipe off the moisture from his brow, spat upon. Then came Poland's turn! Who does not remember the unchronicled terror for three years which scorched and seared this doomed land, and buried in oblivion the date 1863 chronicled in history--crimes of which no gendarmerie was cognizant. After silencing these two distant parts, the present agent of autocracy, Stolypin, extended his bloody hand over all Central Russia--the heartstone of revolution. What crimes unheard of! The sight of the Russian idealistic youth, fresh and revolting, hushed the storm and the earth was reddened with their blood. Once it was only St. Petersburg that had Petro-Povlovsk. What an honor! Now every city shares that honor by the Imperial sacred edict. There was a time when execution, by bullet, was reserved for exceptional "sins against the State." Now it is the usual method for the execution of the lacos. Once women were exempt from the tortures of imprisonment, but now the women also are surrendered to the Cossacks' knout, kotard and spor. The center was silenced and the Jews learned their "lesson"; then St. Petersburg turned its leopard-eyes towards the South, the foot of Ararat and Kasbik, whence came the ringing sounds of the song of freedom, the brotherly echo of the great song of the Pan-Russian Revolution. Caucasus, that beautiful cradle of political love and hatred, the scene of long ages of great Mohammedan and Christian encounters, where Ararat, the historic domain of the Biblical Ark, long awaited but as yet was denied to enjoy its dream of the emancipation of nations. In that country of many languages and races,5 the gov- [*5 In the Caucasus live these nations and races: Georgians, Armenians, Russians, Tartars, Greeks, Kurds, Tats, Assyrians, Utis, Lesgies, Oses, Abaz, Nogei, Avar, Lak, Potlich, Metz, Chechen, Apghaz, Lezgy, Circassians, Germans, Moldavians, &c., aggregating ten millions of inhabitants, of which six and one-half millions live in Trans-Caucasus, of whom the principal elements are Georgians, Armenians and Tartars.]28 ernment endeavored to follow a special programme, mean and really criminal. At first it endeavored to alienate the Georgians from the Armenians. To that effect, promises were made to the Georgian aristocracy, which unfortunately exerts considerable influence on the people, and they received all sorts of political privileges. As soon as the Georgian community, encouraged by these "special favors," started a small movement in Kauria in the name of liberty, the "friendly" and "co-religious" government immediately flooded the unfortunate district with regiments of soldiers and Cossacks, commanding them "to suppress this movement y every means, sparing neither life nor property," which command was effectually carried out with fire and ruin, gun and sword, which killed the small movement in this little unfortunate country completely. After the ruin came exile, and all throughout Georgia arose the wail of horror. Then came the turn to the Armenians! The Armenian inhabitants of Caucasus were the object of the special enmity of St Petersburg for a long time previously. The Governor-in-Chief, Golitzen, a peculiar type of the unbridled Tchinovink, haughty, "causak" and tyrannical (this was from 1987 to 1904), carried out the scheme; he armed all the Caucasus against each other and disseminated the seeds of enmity among the different nationalities, and, with the willing aid of Von Pleve and Stolypin, succeeded in convincing the central government that the chief controllers of the Armenian movement and revolution were the Armenian clergymen, and that the furnace which furnished the fuel was the Church--a very foolish and unwise idea worthy of its author. The conclusion reached was that it "was necessary to confiscate the property of the Church and thus weaken it." On June 12th 1903, came the supreme order to "confiscate the riches and property o the Churches and turn them over to the government." No petition, no protest, on the part of the Catholicos and the people was of any avail--the tyrant was immovable! An extra military force was ordered to carry out this base edict and well they did it, breaking in the doors of many churches 29 and robbing them of their treasures. Even in the religious centre of Etchmeadzin, they broke open the safe of the monastery. Many clergymen were imprisoned. This vandalism, however, was ere long confronted with indignation and bad revolts. The church yards with their moss-covered walls were transformed into battlefields. Blood flowed and corpses piled up around the monasteries, and the spirit of resistance soared above the Armenians. The tyrant was forced to yield! Before the end of the year, the property of the churches was returned. The autocrat, however, did not forget his defeat, but kept it fast in his mind. "Who are these people who dare to resist the soldiers of the Tzar? They must get their 'lesson' and they will." They were waiting for the opportune moment. ----- Two years passed by. The fire of revolution had surrounded the Russian domain and the government of the Tzar had hastened to crush the Armenians as an important factor, so as to render them helpless towards the general revolution now anticipated. In effect, they put into execution a disastrous plan and conspiracy to bring about an Armeno-Tartaric collision, by arming the Tartar hordes and instigating them against the Armenians, thus gaining the favor of the Mohammedan people and on the other hand forcing the Armenian element to self-defense, so that they could no, if they would, join the movement, even with the smallest share. This fiendish plot was prepared through the suggestions of Von Pleve, and was entrusted to the agents of the criminal Minister of the Caucasus to be fully carried out. On a quiet day in Baku the Tartars, inflamed with the Mohammedan spirit, attacked the Armenian quarters without cause or reason. This was on February 6th, 1905. General astonishment prevailed. Notwithstanding the supplications and applications for help made by the Armenians, the police remained both indifferent and inactive. Instead of preventing the bloodshed the police, on the contrary,30 encouraged the Mohammedan Beys and the mob, and the clash of battle extended from one end of the Tran-Caucasus to the other. After Baku, came Erivan, Nakhitchevan, Shoushi, Ganzak, to be the said scenes of unimaginable misfortune and calamity. Once more the blood flowed. The cities were reduced to ashes. The roaring of guns filled the villages. The conflagration consumed whole quarters. The scythes of the quiet villagers were discarded for swords. On every side ruin and desolation reigned supreme. 6 Once more, however, the bullets failed; again with self devotion defensive ranks were formed. Side y side stood the brave people. More than fifteen thousand men sallied out from their generous bosom and enlisted under the flag of resistance to teach their lesson to the Tartaric invasion. Force, united, with the great idea, carried forward its great role of warning. The conspiring government "held its tongue in leash," while all their sombre forces tried their utmost to drench the quiet fields of labor with the blood and tears of their foes, but when vanquished they became as humble as infants and as soft as a summer breeze,--this was their lesson of the revolution. After this sad, fratracidal conflict was over the sealed lips were free and even from among the Tartars themselves, there came out fearless men and good citizens who had the courage to speak out the truth boldly. On June 10th, 1906, the governor of Goutsak Alftan went out to visit the ruine places and when in the city of Khozah, ----- 6 In the years 1905 and 1906 at the sad conflicts of the Armenians and the Tartars 286 villages were sacked and ruined of which number 128 were inhabited by Armenians, 158 by Turks. The number of injured families was 14760. Of these 7265 were Armenians, while 7495 Tartars. The destroyed cities were Baku, 176; Shushy, 126; Ganzak, 132; Hin Nakhitchevan, 55. The villages around Shushy, 160; Minken, 198. The villages of Ganzak, 212. The villages of Nakhitchevan, 114. The number of Tartars killed was still greater, but we have no statistics because the Mohammedans, according to some strange custom, conceal everything pertaining to the number killed and other such informations. 31 among the crowd gathered on a public square, a Turkish Bey came forth and addressed the Governor in the follow words: "Your Excellency is viewing the city of Khazah, which was orderly and populous, seven or eight months ago, but now it is destroyed and ruined, for which we are not responsible; but the arbitrary Judge Orlov, now standing by you; was the one who induced, nay, forced us, to massacre the Armenians, unsparingly, without distinction of age or sex, telling us that it was the wish of the government." In a more severe and scathing language spoke another Tartar, Representative Ziatkhanov, in one of the sessions of the Duman; June 12th, 1906. He said: "The Officers of the government ruined Georgia, that beautiful country,; through their soldiers they provoked the Mussulmans and the Armenians, inciting them to massacre each other. "I declare from this pulpit that there never had been any enmity between Tartars and Armenians on economical grounds alone, we had been living together as good neighbors and liked each other, there had not been any armed collisions, and if cases of murder happened they were single exceptions, and never assumed any great proportions. "Our officials and generals have proved their incompetency, for two entire years we have been literally swimming in a sea of blood up to our knees, and walking over carcasses. "Make them retire, and quit their posts immediately; we have seen enough of the flames and conflagrations, and we have seen enough of the sad picture of falling bodies and listened to the mourning wails, and sobs, of unfortunate mothers. More than enough!" What an awful sentence of condemnation! Did the government chief blush? Did his criminal hands tremble,--those hands which signed the decrees of death? No! No! Furious in his defeat, the tyrant roared: "It is necessary to beat down that force, to bridle that arrogant people."32 II.—External. Beginning with 1907, to the internal reasons were now added the external. Political and important changes beyond the frontier in Persia and in Turkey. The wave of liberty and a constitution at last reached the doors of the palace of Shahinshah! The slumbering people for ages were now awakening, rebels appeared against the mon- arch of Teheran. The government of St. Petersburg, disturbed by the unexpected awakening on the soil of Persia, sent troops to Salmast, Tauriz and Racht, and events to Teheran to keep the road of his invasion open to Azerbaijan, on which its eyes had been fixed for a century. Meanwhile it endeavored vainly to check the liberal movement, the echo of which was heard with great joy in the mountain chains of the Caucasus. In Persia also where the melody of liberty was ringing from the cleft citadel of tyranny, now strong, then sad, there stood against the triumphant soldiers of the Tzar, side by side with the sons of Iran, the Armenian, flag in hand, and with his breast bared to the bullet. The Armenians of Azerbaijan, although small in numbers and in strength, considered it unworthy of them not to par- ticipate in the movement of freedom, and they sent what aid they could to the army of the constitution. The Armenian revolutionists, with the Mohammedan and Georgian soldiers of liberty from Caucasus, gave not only their money and property, but their very life and blood, and their body to the pedestal of this great monument of Freedom. And even in Teheran, the leader of the Constitutionalist soldiers is a modest Ar- menian, named Eprem, who with the aid of Armenian war- riors is resisting the reactionary army and the foreign in- vaders. "Armenians again!" The tyranny of St. Petersburg exclaims in a wild fury, and full of venomous hatred: "They must be destroyed until not a trace of them remains!" "The Armenians here also!" Reports the Russian ambassador of Constantinople, shame- stricken and devious of the fact, that, while on the shores of 33 the Neva the Duma is but a shadow, in the hands of Cossacks, on the shores of the Bosphorus, yesterday's fortress of the Ottoman Nero, the song of liberty is resounding since the month of July, 1908, and Yeldiz has fallen a captive in the hands of the awakened people. Yeldiz has surrendered! The Parliament is open! There is liberty of speech and of the press. The criminal is in prison and beside all this, new hopes and labor thrive in the name of the new tomorrow and regeneration. These are facts that are unendurable for the rotten bureaucracy, monarchical, and despotic, to their very marrow. The agents of this bureaucracy, some in Constantinople as ambassadors, others as consuls in Asia Minor are insisting obstinately that it is the Armenians who are directing the new regime. It was the Armenian revolution that harmonized all of the various elements and deposed the monarch, and especially it is the Armenians who are propagating and dis- seminating an anti-Russian spirit in the Ottoman Empire. Imbued with this detestable conviction the agents of the Tzar, sinse 1909, have spared neither money nor medals, to carry out there plots to rouse the ignorant Turks and Kurds against the Armenians, thus hoping to strike a blow at the infant con- stitution. In Caucasus it is the Armenian! In Persia the Armenian! In Turkey the Armenian! It is the diplomatic nightmare of the deplorable government of the North, which exists by "non- existent facts," and which desires to be revenged by destroy- ing and crushing the Armenian heart and mind—the Armenian who has no sin on his head nor responsibility for the past. What a change of role! In Constantinople, the cradle of the Hamidian Crime, the stammering voice of freedom is ringing out, while the fatherland of Bushkin, Gertsin, Tolstoi, and Karaev, the scence of their struggles, is reduced to the place of torture where the prisons are as full as the temples are on festal days. In Turkey, yesterday's land of dungeons, there are no political prisoners, while in Russia there is not a single prison that has a vacant cell or corner. Once it was in Caucasus that the Armenians of Turkey sought refuge! Now it is in34 Turkey and Constantinople that the Caucasus Armenian seeks shelter to be free from prison and torture; from exile and Siberia. There was a time when from St Petersburg and Caucasus went forth protest and contempt against the Ottoman Neroism, and now it is from Byzantium that protest is heard against that crime which means torture and persecution for the Armenian and shame and insult for the Russian mind and name. Unfortunate Russia! Turkey, that had no credit and benighted Iran, are both constitutional countries and have their own parliament! The Sultan and Shah are exiled, while great Russia is but the realm of tyranny. What an insult! and it is the "different elements of various races" that are to expiate that insult. That is the explanation and also the reason in its brief outline. 35 The Investigation. The premeditated "political" system made one predict that this great affair will not be based on serious judicial investigation within the limits of law and conscience, but, on the contrary, it will be managed from political viewpoints according to the instructions given by the supreme secret police. This happened! The "affair" was committed to Legine. Who is Legine? He is the representative type of the Chinovnik, having but one purpose, to be exalted! An officer of police, but not a judge; a searcher, but not an investigator! He was an insignificant searcher, and was notorious in the affair known as "the Republic of Novorosk," where he forged all the papers, created new writings with capricious additions to existing accusations against the defendants, and for all that, instead of being subjected to condemnation, which was demanded even from the nostrum of the Duma, he was praised and his work approved by the Minister of Justice, Schteglovitov, and he was promoted to one of the pillars of the government police. Afterwards, when many innocent victims were condemned to the gallows, and others were exiled through his criminal investigation, he was rewarded by being put in charge of the new "political" affair, to prove his zeal. And he hopes through the services rendered to the revolutionary oligarchy of St. Petersburg to rise by the bloody steps to the post of Attorney General, and thence, perhaps, to the Minister's chair, which is star-studded, and so lucrative a post in Russia. Many protests were made by the community and the prisoners, against the guilty actions of the police judge, but he remained in his position defended by bands of hired detectives and with singular levity and bold manner he is safe in his citadel, surrounded by the police, from where he issues criminal orders, each even worse than the other. Here in the investigation, is it always the same old "comedy," or is it a sad tragedy, performed in the name, but under the mask of justice?36 Seated in his great chair, the investigator with inhuman severity presumes that he is the little Tzar of Great Russia and acts the part. Opposite sits an officer of gendarmerie, an expert in plots and arrests. In the corners stand the interpreters, with keen scenting noses, and bowing heads, ever ready machines to materialize on paper all sorts of lies, and to complete the picture there is the representative of justice, the Attorney General, silent and mysterious as the Sphinx. "If I were the minister," roared the investigator, jumping from his chair like a madman, "I would destroy and annihilate the Armenian language; its literature, its church, its theatre. I would scatter the Armenians all over Russia and that would end the Armenian movement, this great danger to the State." "It is not you, but we, Mr. Investigator! We the guiltless sinners that are hounded as political plotters and subject to imprisonment and exile, for the mere sympathy we entertain for the just cause of an oft-tormented people." The Attorney General interfered and the storm passed by. "You are guilty on the following counts" began the investigator resuming the harangue, "You have brought arms in illegal ways; you have armed the people, and have sent part to Armenia, in Turkey; you have organized armed bands; founded a secret printing house and are publishing prohibited papers in the name of your secret society, of which you are a member, and finally you are guilty of a number of terrors aimed at the officials of the State." This is a well-known phrase prepared in the offices of the gendarmerie and proposed to every arrested person. Years and years ago, when they pushed to the foreground the awkward suspicion that the Armenians were demanding an "independent kingdon," the government of Caucasus reported to the central government that, Tans-Caucasus was the "heart" of the movement, and that the residence of every young man was a store for arms and headquarters for warriors. Orders came from St. Petersburg, and the investigation was started. They were convinced that they would find thousands of guns, hundreds of thousands of cartridges, and would open up safes of dynamite, secret printing houses, and a strong, organized conspiracy against the State, with a separatist program. 37 The hopes of the gendarmerie were not justified, and hence the source of their entanglement and anger. "If you have called us to be tried, Mr. Investigator, simply to pile accusation upon accusation upon us, without listening to our explanations, then all this is of no avail. Shut us up in the prison or send us to exile, as already"---- "Return to prison," the investigator interrupted wildly. "I know that you wish to create an independent Armenia and rule over others as we Russians do. But you seriously mistake. The friendship of England will not avail you, and we do not wish to give Armenia to you. We are going to possess it and annex it to Caucasus. See! the railway is ready on the frontier, and we are waiting for an occasion to send troops to Turkey." After a short pause, he continued" "If you do not confess withing three days, I am going to shut you up in the prison for a year, two years, I will deprive you of food and bed. I will not allow any communication with your relatives and friends. I will do whatever I wish to do with you to help realize my purpose." He attained his desire, and "he magnified the flea to the size of a camel." He manufactured the impossible. He at last wrote a history, each page sadder than the other, and he made up his lines from what did not exist. To complete the picture, some more features will be given, taken, as always, from the facts. The well-known Armenian writer, Aharonian, was arrested and was kept for two years in prison for the reason that as a member of a delegation sent by the Catholics of the Armenians he presented himself to the conference at The Hague, the chairman of which was Count Nelidoff himself, the ambassador of the Tzar. An Armenian millionaire, Melik Azarian, an old man of sixty, was cast into prison simply for the reason that he had transferred money several times through his business office. 38 Dr. Atabekian remained in prison two years under the accusation of committing certain crimes in Shoushi although he presented irrefutable proofs that he was in Baku and not in Shoushi at the time. A youth, B. M., eighteen years old, is now imprisoned for the "terrors" he is charged with having committed in 1905, when this formidable terrorist was but thirteen years old. Ohanjanian, an able physician, has been pining away in prison for three years under the accusation of participating in a meeting held in Vlatikavkas, notwithstanding the fact that he has never been to that city and therefore could not possibly have had any share in it. Tateosian, an officer, was imprisoned for two years, for the sole reason that the name Tateosian was mentioned in some suspicious telegram. Etgarvian, an old man of seventy, was arrested, confined and tortured in prison, simply because one of his employees was a revolutionist. He was released, under heavy bail, but died soon after. We could mention many more instances as sad as those but there is no end to them. No alibi! No official, or even conclusive proof, demonstrating that the accused person could not possibly have been in a said place at the said time received any attention from the police investigator who ordered them imprisoned, surrounded by an awesome silence, while his lowering glances looked for some utterance which might be racked from them. Indirect prosecutions also were inaugurated. In some of the villages of Ganzak they threatened to arrest women if their husbands refused to present themselves to the police. In many places they arrested the innocent brother in order to compel the accused brother to come forward and surrender. A letter, or some incidental writing was a sufficient reason to issue an order for imprisonment. In one of the villages of Erivan a poor man was arrested and pronounced guilty for having convoyed a traveller on his horse, because the traveller was suspected to be a "revolutionist." 39 Here is a characteristic instance. One day a young investigator, as yet uncorrupted by the police atmosphere, was conversing with the Governor-in-Chief of Ganzak, regarding the arrest of an Armenian bishop. "In the absence of any positive proof," he said, "I am hesitating about ordering him under arrest." "Is the bishop young?" asked the Governor-in-Chief. "Yes, he is hardly twenty-nine years of age." "If he is young, he must be guilty, arrest him!" Such is the policy of Legine. Another example: One night the police rushed into the house of a lady, by the orders of Legine, and for a time the house was in a state of confusion, and children were crying. "What do you wish?" asked the lady of these dreadful visitors. "Where is your husband, Davtian, we are looking for him." Confused, and with tears in her eyes, she answered: "Oh, how happy I would be if I could send you where he is! He is in the grave!" Davtian had died eight years ago, in 1903. But neither this shameful rebuff nor hundreds of similar defeats could halt the investigator in his devilish cunning. On the contrary, he became more haughty and aggressive. He ordered the arrest of the living instead of the dead. The relatives instead of the missing ones; this without proof and without proper inquiry. Real investigation there was none, but the so-called investigation of Legine lasted over two years and a half, and as a result one hundred volumes were written, with more than one thousand pages to each volume, an eternal monument of lies and deceit.40 THE AFFAIR OF DASHNAKTSOUTUN. Thus an entire nation composed of various classes is put on the bench of accusation by an unwise government. A singular phrase in the annals of political trials, singular in the utter groundlessness of the accusations and even more singular in its external form. Be it even the Tsar as the head of injustice, or Stolypin as the inspirer, or Legine as the executor. Bear in mind that to accuse a whole nation is a most unwise and disturbing thing, which puts its author in an untenable position. It is utterly impossible that a revolutionary movement against the State and government should join such elements and classes which in their social position represent diverse opinions and views. It is on account of this fact that the group of police judges were obliged to disguise under a party name the persecution they had inaugurated against a whole nation; so they called it the "Dashnaktsoutun Affair." What is a Dashnaktsoutun? It is an Armenian revolutionary party, organized in 1890, twenty years ago, having as its aim the political liberty of the Armenians in Turkey, and as means to that end the revolutionary struggle, and as applied method the solidarity of all the nationalities in Turkey. It was founded in the Caucasus, but were used in Turkey which was chained by Hamid's hands. The Russian monarchical bureaucracy, beginning from 1890, often dealt blows to the Armenians of the Caucasus, but the Dashnaktsoutun never deviated from its agim, and did not enter into any conflict with the Russian authorities until 2903, when the news of the confiscation of the property of the churches excited and so disturbed the Armenians and compelled the Dashnaktsoutun, as a servant of their people, and, as a body born of the people, to stand by them and defend their violated rights. Two years later, in 1905, at the period of the breaking out of the Pan-Russian Revolution, when the agents of the Tsar created the Tartar-Armenian collisions, the Armenian party 41 participated in that conflict, inevitable, and thus began its activity in the Caucasus, also, as a revolutionary and socialistic organization. At the convention of the party which convened i n Vienna in 1907, their tactics were approved and adopted as a direct result of the severe persecutions to which the Armenians in the Caucasus were subjected. The October constitution, drawing a veil over the past, officially recognized this situation. The government not only failed to persecute the Dashnaktsoutun and other political organizations, but permitted them to come forward and be recognized politically in the country. Thus, in 1905, during the conflicts between the Armenians and the Tartars, the supreme authority itself distributed arms through the police-commissioner, Tsis, to the Dashnaktsoutun and to social democrats to defend Tiflis, where the victory sits, against the invasions of Tartars. In 1906, when the representatives of Tartars and Armenians convened at the palace of the viceroy, Vorontsov-Dashkov, under the chairmanship of General Malhama, the representatives of the Dashnaktsoutun were invited to the official convention. Beginning from 1905, in the election of the Duma in the Caucasus, the Dashnaktsoutun came forward as a separate body, the government recognized officially their electioneering campaign, and those elected were recognized in the Duma as the representatives of the Dashnaktsoutun and now they form a special faction in the Ottoman Parliament. From the same year, 1905, onwards all over the Caucasus, in almost all its districts, the governors, governors-in-chief, as well as the police officials have often entered into official relations with members and the governing bodies of the organization, and have requested its assistance and advice. Thus it remained from 1905 to 1908, after which the attitude of government changed, They began to persecute the Armenian organization not only from 1908 onward, but went back to years past, beginning with 1903, and even further back than that, having forgotten that in the past the same government had itself, on many occasions both officially and unofficially in the life of the State, recognized the activity of the Dashnaktsoutun and its right of existence. 42 There is, however, a more important point. There is a secret which the government of the Tsar wishes to conceal forever in its chambers, but which must be brought out for the sake of those innocent people who suffer in the prisons. It was in March, 1908, that a rumor was circulated of a probably war between Russia and Turkey with Bulgaris's participation. Bulgara would attack Turkey from Macedonia, while the Russian soldiers would capture the village of Erzroum in Asia Minor. The government at St. Petersburg began sending ammunition to the frontier, and centralized forces near Kars. In this important moment it was the desire of St. Petersburg to ascertain what would be the attitude of the Armenians of the Caucasus. For this purpose special military officers were sent from St. Petersburg to the Caucasus, by the military authorities, at the suggestion of the Minister for Foreign Affairs. The mission of these emissaries was to enter into relation with the governing bodies, and the representatives of the Dashnaktsoutun, in order to ascertain the attitude of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation in case of war. To fulfill this important mission the military and civil representatives of St. Petersburg made overtures in a very courteous manner and did not forget to be very lavish in their sympathy and appreciation and respect for the Armenian people and for their organizations. The Dashnaktsoutun replied that its attitude would largely depend as to how the political question of the Armenians should end in Turkey. Fortunately, war was avoided by outside pressure, and the negotiations came to an end. Now the question arises: By what logic does the government which in the beginning of 1908 was in amicable negotiation with the Dashnaktsoutun suddenly turns towards the end of the same year and begin as unutterable and unnatural persecution, not only for deeds committed during 1908, but also for deeds supposed to have been committed from eight to ten years prior to the negotiation. IT is a curious and rapid change even for monarchical tactics. IT is a mean political conspiracy, the bitter fruits of 43 which are enjoyed today by the deluded Armenia people. And how serious is the contrast of facts. The government which in 1904 returned the confiscated property of the churches, actually confessed the justice of the demands of the Armenians. But in 1908 it imprisoned innocent men with the accusation that they had supported the cause of the Church. In 1906 the government, itself, distributed arms to the Armenian organization to defend Tiflis. In 1908 the same men, and many others, who belong to the Dashnaktsoutun, were arrested as authors of illegal and guilty actions. In 1906 was held the Central Convention of the Armenians, with this permission of the Catholicos of the Armenians, and with the knowledge of the police. But those who participated in that convention are pursued as dangerous socialists and revolutionists in 1908. In the beginning of 1908 the government had entered into secret negotiations with the party for very important and secret affairs of the State, while toward the end of the same year, those who belonged and even many who did not belong to the same party are put in chains as dangerous terrorists and political agitators, deserving the gallows and exile. The government which negotiated which the socialist organization and the representatives who sat face to face with the delegates of the same party in the Duma in the beginning of 1908, toward the end of 1908 undertook an unprecedented persecution against the Dashnaktsoutun, for the reason that it was preaching socialism and that in the days of affliction it stood by the people, in their defense, resorting to "terrorism," which was necessitated by the bloody and stern realities. So it was that in the wild outburst in 1910, youths barely eighteen and nineteen years old today, were accused of committing terrors in 1903-1904, when they were mere lads of thirteen and fourteen, playing and catching ball, like schoolboys. This criminal deceit, practiced for years, and the present persecution, following the policy of deceit, it an indelible stain on the record of een a monarchical government, a black stain44 which should be washed out, not by the blood of the persecuted and innocent victims, but by the blood of those who are the authors of the criminal policy. The great task of rehabilitation is left to the Russian court, which, defective and police-bound as it is, is called upon to uphold the torch of justice and become the shelter of the innocent. The court! This is what in three years of protest, in tears, in silence, and in vain appeal, has been the constant demand of the Armenians behind locked doors, and the Armenians in the Caucasus and throughout the world. There is no court, because the heroes of the sad tragedy know by sad experience that in the court proofs are required - proofs which can stand the inquisition of the law. For this reason they are postponing the trial in order that in the prison cells they may smother the consciences of the revolters, and terrify the whole Armenian people, hoping thus to quench the last breath, which has incurred the hatred of Russian despotism, from Finland to the land of Ararat, For this same reason the government police is endeavoring to conduct the trial behind closed doors, through which the watchful eyes of the people and especially those of foreign nations, cannot penetrate and disclose the terrible proofs of disturbing justice. Will they succeed? 45 THE MONARCHICAL RUSSIAN BUREAUCRACY. There was a time when the Trans-Caucasus was the center of the Russophile winds. All the races, and all CHristian nations turned their eyes towards the Eagle of the North. With an inexplicable historic foolishness, the Caucasus - "The Wild Land" - was a place of exile for the Russians in the beginning of the nineteenth century. To the Caucasus were exiled all the undesirable military and civil officials, also those restless poets - Poushkin, Lermondov, to atone for their "sins." And again to the Caucasus, in 1863, were exiled all the political agitators of Poland to bewail their fond dreams of liberty. The exile, however, loved the Caucasus instead of hating it. They say the beautiful country, with its charming mountains, the stupendous Mount Massis with its white-crowned peak, the proud Kasbek, the penitentiary of invincible Prometheus, who stole from Heaven the fire of freedom. They saw the ever-smiling Gour, they saw Araxes, with its sad memories! and they saw the land of the nightingale and the rose and they liked it. They saw, also, the people of various tribes and languages, who were full of love toward the "White Tzar," and trusting in the northerners, even in the Christian Cossacks. The exiles enjoyed everywhere, in the cities and villages, love, respect, and unreserved friendship. No wedding in the distant village, no ceremony of baptism in the city, no gathering whatsoever, without a blessing and cheering for the Tzar. The aged priest raising the first cup would pronounce the following words in fervent faith: "May God keep firm the throne of the Russian King!" But now? All is hatred, scorn and vengeance. Hatred towards the Russian Chinovnig, enmity toward the Russian officers, military or civil, regrets for the past, and revenge for the coming days.46 The chief reason for this state of affairs in the destructive spirit of the bureaucracy of the Tzar. Its unrestrained persecution of what is not Russian but local, a spirit which is as narrow as the mind of a Cossack, rude as a soldier and irritating as a master itself - a spirit if incarnate prejudice and partiality, of contempt for local languages, enmity toward their letters, hatred of other nationalities and insult to other religions. In addition to this the Chinovnig, great or small, is bribed and is lazy, wanton and wicked; unacquainted with the country, he is to govern and therefore he cannot but inspire hatred toward what is Russian, and everything concerned with its government. The past history of the Russian dominion revealed a bitter truth. The Russian was strong and charming as a military force. Situated on the border of two Mohammedan countries, enslaved and oppressed under the tyranny of the Shahs and the Sultans, and the Armenians and the Georgians were both aspiring to come under the domain of Christian Russia, under whose sovereignty they thought they would enjoy political peace and rest. And it is not a secret that it was the Georgians of the Caucasus who, with the aid and encouragement of the Armenians, paved the road of the Russian domination toward the valleys on Gour and Araxes. In Tiflis, on the "Temple of Glory," which stands in the center of the city, and which is the museum of the Russian Military Victory, the following words are inscribed from the edict of Alexander I, addressed to Georgia in 1801: "It is neither for our own interest, nof for the extension of the limits of our domain, that we undertake the hard task of controlling the Georgian Kingdom. It is humanity and kindness that obliges us to listen to the supplication of the suffering people, and establish in Georgia a just government." And in the first period, which was the military period, the Russian government was attractive, the Russian soldier was liked. Military authorities, either to gain a firm foothold in the newly subjugated country, or, perhaps, sincerely respecting 47 the native people of the country, its like and its customs, were trusted implicitly. The central government, also, did not miss any opportunity to bring in close relation the remote regions and the center of its domain. Alexander I went personally to Etchmiadsin, the religious center of the Armenians, to pay an official visit. There existed a close intimacy in Tiflis between the Georgian aristocracy and the royal family. The Armenian Catholicos and the VIceroy of the Caucasus were often most friendly, for instance: Nerses and Voronstovo. The Catholicos Nerses himself at the head of the Armenian volunteers, fought against Persia in 1827 to extend the Russian dominion as far as old Nakhitcheven and Araxes. The Georgians gave to the Russian army brilliant generals, whose efforts helped greatly in the capture of the Oriental Caucasus. And from the Armenians sprang forth famous military men: Lois-Melikoff, Lazarian, Der-Ghoukasian, and Shekovnikoff who fought against Turkey in the war of 1878 and caused her defeat. But when the second period arrived, the period of so-called peaceful advancement, the period of the Chinoving was ushered in, when everything was undone. The bureaucracy subverted what the military authorities had built up. The Chinovig is incapable of creation, and government; he can only command, Russianize, and open an impassable chasm between the various elements. Not only the sword but even the law became a cause of estrangement. The court, the capitol, the police-station, were reduced to places of deceit, bribery, and horror. The people were looked down upon and began to fear, to detest, and hate, and finally to retire. Add to this the anti-national, and anti-demotratic spirit which is the core and marrow of the Russian bureaucracy. In Poland they hate the Poles; in Finland they are enemies of the Finns, in the Caucasus they cannot endure the sight of Armenians, and it is this policy, systematically pursued, which has created what we witness now, - enmity instead of friendship, hatred instead of sympathy. A brief comparison. In the old period Voronstov was intrusted with the duty of attracting the local elements, while in the new period48 Golitzin was commissioned to suppress the local nationalities. Voronstov opened schools. Golitzin closed 260 Armenian schools in one year. In the past the government was the connecting link between native races. Now it is a disrupting poison. Once officials came from St. Petersburg and Moscow to establish rule and order, now come thousands of spies to fill the dungeons with prisoners. Once Armenian and Georgian volunteers were the flower of the army were assigned the chief place during official receptions, now the police push the people aside, using whips, during the receptions of the Governors-in-Chief. There was a time when all Tiflis rose to receive the Exarch, the head, of the Orthodox Church, while in 1808 the Exarch was assassinated and none but the officials and the police were present at his funeral procession. In the olden times men used to run to the police and to the gendarmerie, while in danger, but now they flee away from them, as from a pestilence. Up to 1870 Russia was a land of learning and advancement but now it is a barrier against advancement. Once the government was a welcome guest. But now? An aged Armenian officer, whose grandfather was formerly in the Russian army and present at the capture of Garabag, said on his death-bed : "I do not wish to die before I see the Russian exit from the Caucasus. Then only can I rest." The forefathers invited and welcomed the Russians! Their grandsons would rejoice at their absence. This is the fruit of the despotic and destructive regime. It made the Russians miserable in their own land -- that ocean of grief and oppression; and it spreads poison and hatred among foreign peoples, everywhere reaches the breath of tyrannical regime. 49 A VOICE OF PROTEST ----- What tears around the prisons! What sobs and sighs along the roads of exile! and endless hours of waiting at the doors of the investigator. The police and the investigator! Each are Tzars, in their circles of influence, silent when they should answer, roaring and raging when they should be silent. The same scene everywhere. Wives, sisters, brothers, sons, who have come from who knows from what state nor in how many days and with what bereavement and suffering. One desires to see a prisoner who is sick, wished to give him some money, clothing, or some food, ---he is refused! He wants to exchange a few words of comfort with the prisoner in regard to his condition, even in the presence of the police,---he is refused! Each and all of them are beseeching to see the investigator, to ask him a few questions, to get some information about their friends. His answer is : "Impossible! apply in writing." They apply in writing and wait for days, weeks, nay months, but get no answer. The little Tzar, surrounded by his group of spies, is cruel, proud, and arrogant. He is proud of the fact that instead of his going where the prisoners are he orders several hundred prisoners brought on a four or five days' journey to the "foot of his throne;" from the Caucasus to Rostove, and Novotcherkask, with their relatives and friends who, perhaps, have no money for travel, no means of living, and have left their children in poverty. Let them wait and suffer! Are they not more "subjects?" Finally, patience and human endurance was at an end. Complaints, dissatisfaction and righteous indignation broke out. The complaints reached the Duma, which though handicapped, attempts occasionally to raise its voice. There in the "supreme legislative council," several representatives echoed the general dissatisfaction. "It is a misunderstanding," they said, "to imagine a whole body as revolutionists and to persecute them so severely."50 The Armenian Catholicos also interfered. In July, 1909, when Izmirlian went from Constantinople to St. Petersburg to present himself to the Tzar, he said in his official address: "If your Excellency wishes me to influence and pacify the minds of the Armenian people and bind them to the throne, when I arrive at the Caucasus, then please be so kind as to fulfil my request - give orders to release the Armenian prisoners, and in this way you will have strengthened me to serve the State more efficiently." Nicholas II, Emperor of Russian, by the mercy of God, interrupted and said: "They will be released before your Holiness arrives at the Caucasus." The Catholicos went to the Caucasus, moving from city to city, proud of the imperial promise given him, but found not only that the prisoners were not released but, on the contrary, their number increased. Supplications and protest are not even heard in the domain of the Tzar. It is therefore natural and the time has arrived that protest and complaints should find an echo outside and beyond the boundaries of Russia, in order to show to the world at least a glimpse of the tragic scenes enacted in the prison of the Autocrat, in whose dominion there is a Duma but no constitution, books of statute laws but no justice. Protest. Protest, and Sympathy! That is the demand of the suffering Orient. The just demand of the warriors of liberty: Russians, Polish, Armenian, Finn, Jew and Georgian, who under chains or on the gallows have but one comfort, - the encouraging word from every tongue which hates tyranny; from every land where the torch of liberty is shining. And that protest should be as great as the suffering, as immense as the oppression, and as international as the persecution. The sufferers do not belong to one nation, nor should the protests be confined to one nation either. The protest should not be partial or general, from the land of oppression to the remotest regions of Europe, and 51 across the great ocean to America, to the very borders of the Great Republic, everywhere, in every country where on the ruins of slavery the flag of civilization now flies. Every man who has a mind, every citizen who has a conscience, every being who has a heart, should open his mouth in protest, move his tongue in sympathy, stretch his hand to help, - this is the duty of humanity! The suffering men and races in our times belong not only to their race and community but to the whole mankind; and the bodies of men, trampled down by tyranny, are not only a disgrace to that country, but to the entire world. "The time has arrived" - says the California Legislature, in its resolution on March 21, "in the affairs of this world for every civilized nation to protest against such conduct on the part of any nation, and we do hereby express our abhorrence of the treatment accorded these men of Armenia because of their political convictions." . . . "The time has arrived when there should be a concerted action between all the nations that lay claim to civilization and enlightenment to compel the observance on the part of any nation of the laws of humanity and common justice towards its citizens* . . ." The protest broke out, despite the endeavors and the obstacles of the agents of the Tzar. IT was in Vienna that the socialist party gave the first signal of indignation. Another day in Constantinople - yesterday's fortress of tyranny - Armenians, Turks, Bulgarians, joined hands to brand the brow of tyranny. Another day, in Paris, the adorable cradle of international revolution, the bet minds united to defend the persecuted justice, and, lately, on this side of the Atlantic, in fifteen cities of the great Republic of America, were from San Francisco to New York, large mass-meetings were held where resolutions were passed expressing sympathy for the sufferers and contempt for the ghouls who under the name of law and religion are spreading crime over that unfortunate part of the globe which forms the property of the Tzar. Let us united all the voices of protest as the drops of water which form the mighty ocean; and in that union let us [*See the Appendix.]52 create a strong and vigorous wave of sympathy and protest to surge over and cool the innocent victims of all nations, giving them new strength and heart, to endure, and to hope, and to love the great ideals of liberty even in the prison where through there is no sum yet there is dream, where the cell is small but the heart large, the body weak but the soul strong. In the expression of international sympathy the warriors of all lands find encouragement. In the expression of international contempt the tyrants of all lands find the death-poison. This is merely a page, a little portion of the terrible political sufferings, just as widespread as the Russian domain itself, endless as the surging billows of mournful Volga. "We die with satisfied conscience and without regret," uttered that Russian volunteer for liberty from the scaffold, "with this firm belief that after us will come others, braver than we, greater than their predecessors, until the wave of freedom, fierce and ruthless, uproots and overthrows that bloody tyranny which is the curse of entire Russia and the shame of all humanity." They came by the hundred. Will come by the thousand. This awful suffering is the agony of the unbridled tyranny, the portending of the coming Great Day. Take courage warriors,—that day is at hand. And you, friends of liberty, strengthen the protest,—the victory is certain! APPENDIX.54 RESOLUTIONS. In thirty-five cities of the United States and Canada there took place mass-meetings for the benefit of the prisoners of Caucasus. In fourteen cities, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Boston, Providence, Worcester, Troy, West Ho-boken, New Haven, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Fresno; and Brendford and Hamilton, Canada; resolutions of protestation were drawn up by votes and sent to Washington, to the President of the Republic, to the Secretary of State, to members of Congress, and to some of the foreign ambassadors there, especially to that of Russia.* Copies of the resolutions were published in the papers. The following are some of the resolutions: New York: At a mass meeting held by the Armenian residents at Carnegie Lyceum, in the City of New York, on February 5, 1911, the following preamble and resolutions were adopted: 1. WHEREAS, for two years, more than five hundred Armenians, - professors, authors, physicians, lawyers, merchants, artisans and peasants - are subjected to unspeakable incarceration in Russia; 2. WHEREAS, ten or fifteen are imprisoned in damp and cold cells without bread or food; 3. WHEREAS, this indescribable condition still continues, and their trial is postponed arbitrarily; 4. WHEREAS, the Russian Government tries to punish innocent people for crimes that have never been committed by the accused; 1. RESOLVED, that we, the Armenian citizens of this Great Republic, protest against the inhuman attitude of the Russian Government, and demand an immediate and just trial of the innocent victims; 2. RESOLVED, that a copy of these resolutions be forwarded to the Government at Washington and request it to please interfere in behalf of these innocent victims as it sees prosper; 3. RESOLVED, that copies of these same resolutions be sent to the foreign representatives at Washington, and to the American press, requesting all of them to raise their voices in behalf of justice and in behalf of the political rights of the unjustly prosecuted Armenians in the Caucasus, Russia. *The Russian embassy, with strange apprehensions, twice replied that it was not able to receive these resolutions or do anything with them. This is the way they do things in Russia. 55 Philadelphia: In a meeting of Armenians, held on February 12, in Philadelphia, Pa., where speeches were given in behalf of the political prisoners in Caucasus, the following preambles and resolutions were passed. WHEREAS, the 500 prisoners are merely the victims of the premeditated and unjust policy of the Russian Government; WHEREAS, the prisoners are subjected to unbearable conditions, destitute of food, clothing and external relation; BE IT RESOLVED, 1. To protest against the anti-Armenia and unjust persecution of the Russian government, 2. To demand immediate trial of the prisoners, free form gendarme oppression. 3. To send copies of this protest to the government at Washington as well as to the ambassadors of other governments. On the same occasion the meeting also appeals to the American public opinion and press, asking them to raise their voice in defense of this just cause. Boston: A public mass meeting was held on the evening of January 8, 1911, at Paine Memorial Hall, Boston, Massachusetts, where a thousand or more Armenians passed resolutions protesting against the unjust imprisonment of five hundred or more of their leading countrymen in the Russian prisons. The meeting was presided over by Dr. V. H. Kazanjian, and speeches were made by several distinguished gentlemen, including Honorable E. Aknouni, of Constantinople. A large collection was made for the benefit of said prisoners, and the following resolutions were adopted, viz.: WHEREAS: The present Russian government has deliberately commenced a general prosecution against the Armenian people of the Caucasus, and WHEREAS: Five hundred Armenian men, men of letters, scientists, merchants and others are the victims of the above mentioned prosecution, without any legal or moral justification, be it RESOLVED: To protest against this policy of the Russian government, which is contrary to the letter and spirit of the constitution, as well as to the dictates of civilization, and be it further RESOLVED: To demand an immediate trial before a just tribunal and to establish their rights as loyal citizens, and it is further RESOLVED: To send copies of these resolutions to the Secretary of State of the United States, at Washington, and to the Russian Ambassador at Washington, as well as to all other representatives of foreign powers, and be it further56 RESOLVED: To appeal to public opinion in the United States and to arouse a sympathetic movement in behalf of these Armenian prisoners, whose sole demand in the Caucasus is the right to enjoy the privileges of the constitution and those other rights which belong to every civilized community. San Francisco: WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the undersigned organizations, citizens and inhabitants of the city and county of San Francisco, State of California, by representation of Hon. E. Aknouni, the Armenian writer from Constantinople and other evidence to us submitted by Armenian citizens of the United States, residing in said city and county of San Francisco, that about 260 Armenians of education, rank and standing, are imprisoned in Novo Cherkask, in the monarchy of Russia, for political causes, and have so remained in prison for long periods without any preliminary hearing or other opportunity to present their cases to any court of justice, which imprisonment is revolting to the sense of justice in any country; AND WHEREAS, said Armenian citizens have by resolution duly protested against such imprisonment; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned, hereby protest against such imprisonment and ask our representatives in Congress to use all lawful and honorable means within their power to bring this condition of affairs to the attention of the government of Russia in such a manner as to lead to immediate hearing and disposition of all these cases in accordance with justice. RESOLVED further that a copy of this resolution be sent to each of the Senators and Congressmen for the State of California, to the President of the United States, and to such other persons as may tend to bring about this desired end. San Francisco, California., January 17,1911. Providence: At a public mass meeting held on the evening of December 25, 1910 in Fay's Hall, Providence, Rhode Island, more than a thousand Armenians gathered to protest against the inhuman treatment of five hundred or more of their countrymen in the hands of the Russian government. The meeting was presided over by Mr. T. Gelalian and speeches were made by a number of leading Armenians, including the Honorable E. Aknouni of Constantinople. The following resolutions were adopted: WHEREAS: The present Russian government, with deliberate and premeditated policy has begun a general prosecution against the Armenian people of the Caucasus, and 57 WHEREAS: Five hundred Armenian prisoners belonging to almost every class, teachers, physicians, scientists, men of letters, merchants and others, are the victims of the above mentioned prosecutions without any legal basis and without trial, be it RESOLVED: 1st. To protest against the policy of the Russian government, which policy is an insult to the constitution, as well as to the idea of civilization; 2nd. To demand immediate trial and the discharge of these prisoners, and the recognition of all of their rights as loyal citizens; 3rd. To send copies of these resolutions to the United States government, at Washington and to the Russian Ambassador, at Washington, D.C. 4th. To appeal to public opinion of this country and to arouse a sympathetic movement in behalf of these Armenian prisoners, who have no other demands or desires in the Caucasus, except to enjoy the privileges of the constitution and those rights which belong to every civilized community. Worcester: On the fifteenth day of January, 1911, the Armenians of Worcester, Massachusetts, having gathered in Eagle's Hall for the purpose of signifying their sympathy and aiding financially the five hundred or more Armenian political prisoners in Russia, passed the following resolutions: WHEREAS, the five hundred Armenians who are imprisoned in Russia represent politically as well as intellectually the best among the Armenians of this generation; WHEREAS, these men have been subjected for the last two years to untold sufferings in the hideous prisons of Russia without a trial and without a legal cause; BE IT RESOLVED: 1. To protest against the Russian government for its premeditated policy of prosecuting our intellectual leaders. 2. To demand an immediate trial for these men and the recognition of their legal rights as citizens. 3. To send a copy of these resolutions to the United States Secretary for Foreign Affairs and to the Russian Ambassador at Washington, and to arouse public sentiment and sympathy in behalf of these unfortunate prisoners. Troy: A public meeting was held on January 22, 1911, in Proctor's Theatre by the Armenians of Troy, N.Y. The purpose of the meeting was to arouse public sentiment and sympathy in behalf of the five hundred or more Armenian political prisoners in Russia who are considered as the foremost exponents of Armenian art, literature and science.58 The following resolutions were passed: WHEREAS, the Russian government has commenced a policy of prosecution against the Armenians in the Caucasus; WHEREAS, this prosecution of the Armenians in the Caucasus is not only contrary to the spirit and letter of the constitution but also an insult to the whole Armenian race; BE IT RESOLVED: 1. To protest against the Russian government for this unjust imprisonment and demand through proper channels an immediate and fair trial before a tribunal which is not only competent, but free from military despotism. 2. To send a copy of these resolutions to the United States government at Washington, asking its aid and influence on co-operating with us in this work. 3. To call on the American public and to arouse public opinion and sympathy against the unjust imprisonment of these men. West Hoboken: At a great mass meeting held on February 5, 1911, by the Armenians at the Liberty Hall of West Hoboken, N. J., the following preamble and resolutions were adopted unanimously: WHEREAS, our compatriots in Russia are subjected to cruel persecutions, and five hundred of them, for two years, are tortured in the prisons of Rostov, Novochirgasoff, and other cities; WHEREAS, the innocent are arrested without any cause; and, notwithstanding their demands, are not still tried; WHEREAS, these arrests by groups are the result of the policy of the Russian government, which ignores all the elemental rights of the Armenians in Russia; it is therefore RESOLVED, that we, the Armenian citizens of New Jersey, protest against the injustice of the Russian government, and demand that the trial should be free of police interference and pressure; RESOLVED, that a copy of this preamble and resolutions be forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior, and to all embassies at Washington, requesting them to use their good office in behalf of the prisoners, and be it further RESOLVED, that a copy be also sent to the American press, and an appeal be made to the political writers of this country to exert their good influence in behalf of the five hundred unfortunate Armenian political prisoners in Russia. California: WHEREAS, it has been made known to use, the executive officers of the California State Federation of Labor, that five hundred Armenians of education, rank and standing are imprisoned in Rostiv and Novocherkaska , in the monarchy of Russia, for political causes, and have so remained for long periods of time without any preliminary hearing or 59 opportunity to present their cases to any court of justice, which imprisonment, without trial, is revolting to the sense of justice of all mankind. Therefore, RESOLVED, that we, in the name of California State Federation of Labor hereby protest against such imprisonment and request the Hon. Hiram W. Johnson, Governor of the State of California, and the legislature of this State, to take such measures by way of legislation or resolution as will bring this condition of affairs most effectively before the government of the United States with a view of having the United States make representations to the Russian government for the purpose of remedying this apparent injustice; and further RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to each of the following named persons; the President of the United States, the Senators and Congressmen representing California, the Secretary of the State, the Governor of the State of California, and the senators and assemblymen.* California State Federation of Labor. San Francisco, March 10, 1911. Resolutions of the Legislature of California. (Voted in Senate and Assembly, March 21-22, and sent to Washington on March 27th.) WHEREAS, the Russian government has imprisoned hundreds of prominent Armenians who are teachers, lawyers and editors, and all of whom are in the forefront of progressive thought and action, in the prisons of Rostove, and other towns in the monarchy of Russia, and has kept these men confined for a long period of time without giving them any preliminary hearing or opportunity to present their cases to any court, which is revolting to the sense of justice of all mankind; and WHEREAS, the said "Russian government has frequently tolerated riot, pillage, outrage and murder of men, women and children by reason of their religious belief;" and WHEREAS, such acts are a disgrace to civilization and repugnant to all people who love justice and fear God; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Senate and Assembly jointly, of the Thirty-ninth Legislature of the State of California, that we believe the time has arrived in the affairs of this world when it becomes necessary for every civilized nation to protest against such conduct on the part of any other nation, and we do hereby express our abhorrence of the treatment accorded these men of Armenia because of their political convictions and to other men, women and children because of their religious belief; and be it further RESOLVED, that in the opinion of the Legislature of the State of California, the time has arrived when there should be a concert of action [*Same resolution has been drawn up by the Labor Council of San Francisco.]60 between all nations that lay claim to civilization and enlightenment, to compel the observance on the part of any other nation of the laws of humanity and common justice towards its citizens; and be it further RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be sent to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, earnestly urging them to use their good offices to secure to the Armenians herein referred to a just and public trial without further delay.Christmas Greetings Merry Christmas and Happy New YearAMERICAN WOMEN'S BRANCH OF THE ARMENIAN NATIONAL RECONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MISS ALICE STONE BLACKWELL, CHAIRMAN "Therefore, all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do you even so to them." Extract from "L'Humaine Tragedie" by Tigrane Polat, Armenian Artist, Paris.THE scene on the foregoing page illustrates in powerful manner not only the present intense suffering and need of the Armenian people after their prolonged resistence and martyrdom, but the remarkable spirit of charity which animated the survivors of this greatest of all national tragedies. It is to help them in their heroic effort to rebuild their broken and devastated national life in their own homeland that this organization has been formed. We invite you to cooperate with us in our work of helping to forward the native undertakings in all charitable and reconstruction lines. Help! and especially now at this Christmas time. Remember that noble and innocent men, women and children, our allies in the war, are dying for lack of food, contracting disease for lack of soap with which to wash themselves, shivering and suffering for lack of clothing, or for lack of thread and needles with which to mend their miserable garments. Help that Armenia may live, and that it may not be said of America, that she forgot her obligations and suffered a great people to perish. Send contributions to us of money and of clothing. We shall see that they are immediately forwarded through the proper channels and to the proper authorities whose "activities" according to American advices recently received from Constantinople "are limited only by the means at their disposal." Miss ALICE STONE BLACKWELL, Honorary Chairman MOORFIELD STOREY, Esq., Honorary Counsel. Committee Members: Miss Jane Addams, Mrs. Fannie B. Ames, Mrs. George Minot Baker, Miss Katherine Lee Bates, Mrs. Clara B. Beatley, Mrs. Charles Summer Bird, Miss Kate Buss, Mrs. George W. Coleman, Mrs. Maud Howe Elliott, Mrs. Herbert Gurney, Mrs. Sidney Hosmer, Mrs. Edwin D. Mead, Mrs. Bertha S. Papazian, Mrs. Alexander Petrunkevitch, Mrs. Laura E. Richards. Photo by Paul Thompson TALAAT PASHA AND THE ARMENIAN WHO KILLED HIM. The leader of the Young Turks, it was proved, had ordered massacres of Armenians, including men, women, and children, in a way unparalleled in modern times. He was killed on the streets of Berlin by the young Armenian student. Solomon Teilirian, shown on the right, and a Berlin court, after a sensational trial, declared the murderer "Not guilty." About Falaet Bey Armenian file Personal Glimpses A TURKISH HEROD A YOUNG ARMENIAN deliberately murdered one of the most prominent Turkish government officials on the streets of Berlin, and yet a German court adjudged him "Not guilty." That was the riddle which the cables spread abroad a short time ago. The murdered man Talaat Pasha, the chief of the Young Turk party, and during the latter part of the war Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire. The murderer was an Armenian student named Solomon Teilirian, a youth with the general appearance of a successful young American business man - in short, nobody in particular. It was expected, writes George R. Montgomery, director of the Armenia-America Society, in The Current History Magazine (New York), "that the known sympathy of the German Government would result in the prompt conviction of the Armenian. To the surprize of the world he was acquitted." The reason for his acquittal, aside from the fact that he found a champion in a liberal-minded German professor, has just come out in the publication of a series of documents which, in Mr. Montgomery's words, "establish once and for all the fact that the purpose of the Turkish authorities, in the case of the Armenians, was not deportation but annihilation," Incidentally, it appears, the evidence establishes that Talaat Pasha was even more thorough in his methods than was that Herod of the Bible who ordered the slaughter of the first-born sons of the Jews. According to evidence strong enough to convince a naturally unsympathetic German court, men, woman, and children, including helpless orphans, were, by Talaat's orders, herded together and slaughtered. "The trial of the Armenian developed into the trial of the murdered Talaat as the greatest of war criminals," writes Mr. Montgomery. More than that, it developed into a case against the German military authorities, who had at least allowed the massacres to continue without protest. Even Gen. Liman von Sanders, who had had charge of the German military forces in Turkey, was called as a witness. The German official reports were produced, showing the total number of Armenians who had perished was over 1,000,000. The word "deportation," it was shown, was euphemism for "slaughter." Regarding the children who were orphaned by the massacre of their parents, Talaat writes in an order to the Governor of Aleppo: "The Government will regard the feeding of such children or any attempt to prolong their lives as an act entirely opposed to its purpose since it considers the survival of these children as detrimental." Another order decrees that "all such children" shall be collected and sent to the "places of deportation," which places, as other orders show, were prepared for the extermination of all Armenians sent there. These considerations resulted in the acquittal of Talaat's confessed assassin, whose mother had been a victim of the Turk's orders. Mr. Montgomery writes of the trial: Altho the technical defense of Teilirian was temporary insanity brought on by a vision of his murdered mother, the real defense was the terrible record of Talaat Pasha; so that in the eyes of Germany the acquittal of the Armenian of the change of murder became the condemnation to death of the Turk. That such a trial and such a result occurred in Germany with Germans as jurors is particularly significant. With respect to the present situation in the Near East, the most important phase of this dramatic trail was the ability of Professor Lepsius to produce Turkish official documents which proved the heads of the Turkish Government at Constantinople -- and particularly Talaat himself -- to be directly responsible for converting the deportation into shambles. Heretofore there have been defenders of the Ottomans who held that the massacres were not a plan of the Government, but were due to the brutality of those who carried out the deportation instructions. At the trail of Teilirian there were placed in evidence facsimiles and translations of signed orders from Talaat--letters and eipher telegrams which prove that the instructions to massacre originated in Constantinople. As Aleppo was the headquarters of the "Deportation Committee," the capture of Aleppo by the British made possible the securing of these official documents from the archives. This evidence directly linking the murdered Talaat with the inhuman deeds that were covered by the general term "deportation" was irrefutable and overwhelming. The documents established once and for all the fact that the purpose of the Turkish authorities was not deportation but annihilation. The first document on which the decision of the court was based, says Mr. Montgomery, altho not signed by Talaat, "is from the committee of Young Turks, of which he was the head, and inasmuch as its contents are referred to in dispatches signed by him, was valid as evidence." it was written in the spring of 1915, before the massacres had begun, and shows the extermination of the Armenians to have been the determined policy of the Government. Jemal, to whom the document is addrest, was the third in the triumvirate of Young Turks--Talaat, Enver, and Jemal. At that time he was Governor of Adana and soon afterward became Governor of Aleppo. The translated order runs: March 25, 1915 To Jemal Bey, Delegate at Adana: It is the duty of all of us to effect on the broadest lines the realization of the noble project of wiping out the existence theThe man who was thru at Thirty This happened in Chicago; but the place is unimportant. It might have happened anywhere : as a matter of fact it is happening everywhere: in your office and in the office across the street. A young man entered the employ of a Chicago manufacturer and moved along rapidly until he was office manager. The president of the company liked him. More than once he said to friends: " I intend to make that young man general manager some day. I should like to train him to be my successor." But the young man never did become general manager: his career is one of those countless tragedies of business. The president who wanted to promote him, found that he could not promote him. He knew enough to manage an office, but for larger responsibilities, he lacked knowledge, held-confidence and decision. He has never grown beyond an office managership. He was thru at thirty. And the other man who kept on growing Contrast that man with another of the same age a man who worked as a salesman for a Hartford company : and in course of time became sales manager. The office of secretary became vacant, and the company looked around for a man. Sales experience was a requisite: but the man must have more. He must know something of factory organization and control, of costs and accounting, of office management, of advertising and merchandising and corporation finance. To their surprise they found that the young sales manager knew all these things. His practical experience had given him sales training: the Alex-ander Hamilton Institute had given him a grasp of the fundamentals which are found in every business. A few days after his election to the Board of Directors of his company he wrote : "The day when I enrolled in the Alexander Hamilton Institute's Modern Business Course marked the turning point in my career." Thousands of men who are going ahead. In all the business world there are two just types of men. There is the man who goes only as far as experience in one department of business can carry him and settles down in a departmental position for life. The other man takes a new hold upon himself in his twenties or thirties or earlier forties; he adds training to experience and travels far. The Alexander Hamilton Institute training means larger vision, more rapid progress, increased earning power. The Advisory Council Only a training vitally sound and practical could have the endorsement of such men as form the Advisory Council of the Alexander Hamilton Institute. That Advisory Council consists of: Frank A. Vanderlip, the financier; General Coleman duPoint, the well-known business executive: John Hays Hammon, the eminent engineer; Jeremiah W. Jenks, and the statistician and economist; and Joseph French Johnson, Dean of the New York University School of Commerce. Only you can decide where will you stop Every man in business is paying for this Course whether he benefits by it or not. The Chicago man paid, and at a tragic price. He might have moved on up to large success -- and he stopped at thirty. Only you can decide where you will stop. Training which has done so much for thousands of other men is open to you also. It is worth your investigation at least; make the investigation now. "Forging Ahead in Business" For men who are asking themselves, "Where am I going to be in business ten years from now?" the Alexander Hamilton Institute publishes a 120-page book. It contains a full explanation of what the Modern Business Course and Service is and does; It contains letters from men whose business situation was precisely like yours. It will richly repay a careful reading, and it is sent without obligation; the coupon will bring it. Alexander Hamilton Institute 853 Astor Place, New York City _________ Send me "Forging Ahead in Business" which I may keep without obligation Name Print Here Business Address Business Position Canadian Address, C.P.R. Building, Toronto Australian Address, 8a Castlereagh St., Sydney Copyright, 1921, Alexander Hamilton Institute (page 2) The Literary Digest for July 30, 1921 37 Pal -the pencil "The pen is mightier than the sword." And for daily, instant service Pal is mightier than a horde -- of pens and pencils! Pal is mechanically right. His leads are always pointed. And he grips them so they never turn or wiggle, jam or break. A renewable eraser, improved pocket clip (or ring on cap) and extra leads complete Pal's perfection. He's hand- some too in chased silver plate, sterling or gold filled. Made in two styles: long, with pocket clip; short, with ring in cap. "Perfect is as perfect does." Pal is and does! Ask for PAL leads- indelible or black. Pack 12 in orange colored box. We recommend Pal leads for all metal pencils, and any high-grade leads fit PAL- the pencil. PAL is easily filled. After turning back the knob of pencil, insert lead at the point, and twist pencil slightly round the lead as lead is pressed down. Choose you Pal In silver plate $1 In sterling or $3 in gold filled For either long or short style Slightly higher in Canada The Hoge Mfg. Co., Inc. 215 Fulton St., New York Canadian Representative, A.J. McCrae, 23 Scott St., TorontoThe Literary Digest for July 30, 1921 well-known elements who have for centuries been constituting a barrier to the empire's progress in civilization. For this reason we must take upon ourselves the whole responsibility, saying, "come what may", and appreciating how great is the sacrifice what has enabled the Government to enter the world-war. we must work so that the means adopted may lead to the desired end. As announced in our dispatch dated February 18, the Jamie [Young Turk Committee] has decided to uproot and annihilate the various forces which have for centuries been an obstacle in its way, and to this end it is obliged to resort to very bloody methods. Be assured that we ourselves were horrified at the contemplation of these methods, but the Jamiet sees no other way of insuring the stability of its work. Ali Riza [the committee delegate at Aleppo] criticized us and called upon us to be merciful; such as simplicity is nothing short of stupidity. For those who will not cooperate with us we will find a place that will wring their delicate heart-strings. I again recall to your memory the question of the property left. It is very important. Do not let its distribution escape your vigilance; always examine the accounts and the use made of the proceeds. Reference to this document, says the writer is contained in the following order, signed by Talaat and sent to the same Jemal. This order shows that women and children were to be included in the holocaust: September 6, 1916 To the Prefecture of Aleppo. We recommend that you submit the women and children also to the orders which have been previously prescribed as to be applied to the males of the intended persons, and to designate for these functions employees of confidence. Minister of the Interior, Talaat Apparently, comments Mr. Montgomery, the instructions regarding the women and children called for some reiteration, for on September 16 the following eipher telegram which showed the instructions as going back to the decision of the Jamie, or Young Turk Committee, was sent: September 16. To the Prefecture of Aleppo: It has been previously communicated to you that the Government, by order of the Jemiet (the Young Turk Committee), has. decided to destroy completely all the indicated persons living in Turkey. Those who oppose this order and decision can not remain on the official staff of the empire. An end must be out to their existence, however tragic the measure taken may be, and no regard must be paid to either age or sex or to conscientious scruples, Minister if the Interior, Talaat Mr. Morgenthau, the Americans Ambassador at Constantinople, we are told, began to exert himself in behalf of the Armenians, and the result was an official order suggesting caution: November 18,1915 To the prefecture of Aleppo: From the interventions which have recently been made by the American Ambassador at Constantinople on behalf of the Government, it appears that the American consuls are obtaining information by secret means . In spite of our assurance that comfort, they remain unconvinced. Be careful that events attracting attention shall not take place in connection with those [Armenian] deportations will be accomplished in safety and comfort, they remain unconvinced . Be careful that events attracting attention shall not take place in connection with those [Armenias] who are near the cities and other centers. From the point of view of the present policy it is most important that foreigners who are in those parts shall be persuaded that the expulsion of the Armenians is in truth only deportation. For this reason it is important that, to save appearances. a show of gentle dealing shall be made for a time and the usual measures be taken in suitable places.It is recommended as very important that the people who have given such information shall be arrested and handed over to the military authorities for trial by court martial. The Minister of the Interior, TALAAT. Reference to the effort of the American Consul at Aleppo, Mr. Jackson, to send information to Mr. Morgenthau is contained in the following eipher dispatch: December 11,1915. To the Prefecture of Aleppo: We learn that some correspondents of Armenian journals are obtaining photographs and letters which represent tragic events and are giving them to the American Consul at Aleppo. Have dangerous persons of this kind arrested and supprest. Minister of the Interior Talaat The need for caution is further indicated in the following telegram: December 29, 1915 To the Prefecture of Aleppo: We learn that foreign officers are encountering along the roads the corpses of the intended persons and are photographing them. I recommend you the importance of having these corpses buried at once and of not allowing them to be left near the roads. Minister of the Interior, Talaat. The heartlessness of the Turks in regard to the doomed children made a deep impression on the Berlin jury, says Mr. Montgomery. The following are some of the documents presented on this point: November 5, 1915. To the Government of Aleppo: We are informed that the little ones belonging to the indicated persons [Armenians] from Sivas, Mamuret-ul-Aziz, Diarbekir and Erzerum are adopted by certain Moslem families and received as servants when they are left alone through the death of their parents. We inform you that you are to collect all such children in your province and send them to the places of deportation, and also to give the necessary orders regarding this to the people. Minister of the Interior, Talaat. January 15,1916. To the Government of Aleppo: We hear the certain orphanages which have been opened received also the children of the Armenians. Whether this is done through ignorance of our real purpose or through contempt of it, the Government will regard the feeding of such children or any attempt to prolong their lives as an act entirely opposed to its purpose, since it considers the survival of these children as detrimental. I recommend that such children shall not be received into the orphanages, and no attempts are to be made to establish special orphanages for them. Minister of the Interior, Talaat. The production of the following eipher telegram (No. 830) is said to have been particularly telling in its effect on the jury: From the Ministry of the Interior to the Government of Aleppo: Collect and Keep only those orphans who can not remember the terrors to which their parents have been subjected. Send the rest away with the caravans. Minister of the Interior, Talaat. That the Moslem Population was not to be held accountable for its share in the massacres was ordered in a telegram dated October 8, 1915: The reason why the Sanjak of Zor was chosen as a place of deportation is explained in a secret order dated September 2, 1915, No. 1,843. As all the crimes to be committed by the population along the way against the, Armenians will serve to effect the ultimate purpose of the Government, there is no need for legal proceedings with regard to these. The necessary instructions have also been sent to the governments of Zor and Ourfa. Minister of the Interior, Talaat All the evidence tends to show, with cumulative effect, concludes Mr. Montgomery, that it was the pity awakened in the hearts of some of the local Turkish officials by the miseries of the Armenians which produced a certain mitigation of the heartless orders that emanated from Constantinople. A small remnant of the race survived. Talaat and his group in the government were obliged continually to spur some of their tools on to greater severity. The headquarters of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief in Chicago are located in Room 1119, No. 19 South La Salle Street. Tel. Majestic 7737. The following are members of the Chicago Committee: Rufus Dawes, Chairman Harry A. Wheeler Treasurer William T. Abbot, Secretary . Herbert L. Willett, Jr., Field Secretary Miss Jane Adams Right Rev. Chas. P. Anderson Dr. Ozora S. Davis Chas. G. Dawes D. A. Dikijian John C. Eastman Dr. A. M. Hitchcock Harold L. Ickes Dr. Jenkins Lloyd Jones James Keeley Andrew M. Lawrence Dr. George M. McFatrich Dr. Shailer Matthews F.J. Michel Rev. V.V. Nazaretian P.J. O'Keefe James A. Patten G.T. Pushman H.E. Rompel John C. Shaffer Rev. John Timothy Stone Dr. Graham Taylor Prof. James H. Tufts J.B. Willey All subscriptions and gifts from Chicago and vicinity can be paid to Mr. H. A. Wheeler at the above address. Correspondence concerning meetings, speakers, literature and other local plans should be addressed to Mr. H. L. Willett, Jr., Secretary, at the address given. Sincerely yours, C.V VICKREY[*Federal Writer Project page 7, 13 15*] A REPORT OF PROGRESS June 15, 1939 THE FEDERAL WRITERS' PROJECT OF MASSACHUSETTS Division of Professional and Service Projects WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION 25 Huntington Avenue Boston FEDERAL WRITERS' PROJECT Henry G. Alsberg, Federal Director Frank Manuel, Regional Director for New England Muriel E. Hawks, State Director for MassachusettsTHE FEDERAL WRITERS' PROJECT OF MASSACHUSETTS A REPORT OF PROGRESS June 15, 1939 Introduction The Federal Writers' Project, a branch of Federal Project #1, was established in October 1935, as a part of the Works Progress Administration. It is one of the Federal Arts Projects, which collectively have been called "the clearest and most characteristic expression of the policy of the Government to give relief to the unemployed by giving work suitable to their experience and training." In planning toward that objective, the idea was conceived of a series of State and local guidebooks which should reveal the extraordinary natural, economic, and cultural resources of this vast country, hitherto largely undescribed. The Federal Writers' Project was established in each of the forty-eight states, in the District of Columbia, and in Hawaii, and undertook the monumental task of portraying the infinite variety of the American background. That variety is more than geographical, and consequently the Project includes within its work scope regional and local histories, a series of studies of immigrant groups, State encyclopedias, bibliographies, non-technical accounts of living and working in particularized areas, children's books, living folklore, and occasional books such as New England Hurricane, difficult to classify.2. Employment Quota Since June 1936, when the Federal Writers' and Historical Records Projects became separate units, the employment quota allotted to the Federal Writers' Project in Massachusetts has varied between the peak of 295, effective for the first six months, to the present quota of 190 established January 15, 1939. The average quota for the three-year period has been under 200. Analysis of personnel (as of March 13, 1939) Total number employed 190 Clerical staff 27 Research workers, writers, and supervisory staff 163 (The figure used in obtaining percentage below) Academic degrees Bachelor of Arts or Science 69 42% Master of Arts or Science 20 12% Doctor of Philosophy 5 94 3% 57% Newspaper experience 1 to 5 years 8 5% 5 to 10 years 12 7% 10 or more years 14 34 9% 21% Publicity experience 11 7% Authors of published writing In local and national magazines 34 21% Free-lance newspaper feature stories 24 15% Authors of published books 17 10% Authors of published poetry 9 6% Editors (magazine and newspaper) 9 6% Teachers (high school and college) 23 14%3. The Project includes graduates of the following colleges and universities: Boston College Boston Teachers College Boston University Brown University Bowdoin College Clark University Columbia University Cornell University Dartmouth University Emerson College of Oratory Harvard University Holy Cross College John Hopkins University Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts State College Mount Holyoke College New York University Providence College Radcliffe College Smith College Tufts College Union College University of Alabama University of Chicago University of Michigan University of Southern California Wellesley College Worcester State Teachers College Yale University Backgrounds of representative men and women Lawyer and one-time magazine publisher. Editor of a foreign language newspaper in one of the largest Massachusetts cities. Superintendent of schools in a district of China, who has also been editor of a house organ, a publicity director, and author of a book. Author of five published volumes; his biography is included in Who's Who in America. Editor of a woman's magazine of large national circulation. Doctor of Medicine, practicing since 1925, who has published a medical treatise. Two present members of city school committees. Author of numerous detective stories; his biography is in Who's Who in America. Managing editor of a scientific journal. Author of a history of a foreign country, later editor of a foreign language paper in the United States. Poet of reputation, whose work has been published in book form and has appeared in leading magazines of the "quality group."4. Foreign correspondent who has published three books. Principal of an industrial school. Author of four novels. City editor of the leading newspaper in a Massachusetts city. Principal of a school in Japan. Publicity director of a large charitable institution. Associate editor of a well-known historical periodical. Editor of a trade paper. Three members of the Christian ministry, who served their churches from nine to over twenty years. Age groups The distribution of present personnel by age groups in as follows: No. Percent 60 to 70 15 8 50 to 60 24 13 40 to 50 25 13 30 to 40 66 35 20 to 30 58 31 Total 188 100% Return to private industry Since June 1936, 128 persons have resigned from the Project to accept private employment. This is an average of 43 annually, or 24% of our average actual employment, which for the same period has been 194. Costs: The present man-month cast in this State is $94.76 for labor and $2.92 for non-labor expenditures, a total of $97.68. The man-month cost on a national basis is naturally lower because of the inclusion of rural areas. The total cost of the Writers' Project nationally, to October 31, 1938, was only about 11% of the expenditure for the Federal Arts Projects as a whole.5. Among Massachusetts authors, historians, and educators who have praised our work are: Abbot, Rev. Wenonah Stevens Bartlett, Ruhl J., Department of History, Tufts College Billington, Ray A., Department of History, Smith College Blackwell, Alice Stone Bolton, Charles K. Bowen, Lee, Department of History, Boston College Boyle, Rosalie Dunlap Hickler Brandenburg, Samuel, Department of Economics, Clark University Bridenbaugh, Carl, Department of History, Brown University (formerly at Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Brigham, Clarence, S., Director, American Antiquarian Society Brinton, Crane, Chairman, Department of History, Harvard University Caldwell, Erskine Cary, Harold W., Department of History, Massachusetts State College Colcord, Lincoln Converse, Florence Cross, Captain George, Worcester Historical Society Curtis, Edward E., Chairman, Department of History, Wellesley College Davis, Jesse, Dean, School of Education, Boston University Dos Passos, John Eaton, Walter Prichard, Department of Drama, Yale University Emerson, Rupert, Department of Government, Harvard University Faulkner, Harold U., Department of History, Smith College Foote, Henry WIlder Foster, William Trufant Gibbs, A. Hamilton Henshaw, Francis H., Librarian, Berkshire Athenaeum Hidy, R. W., Department of History, Wheaton College Hillyer, Robert Houghton, Samuel G. Hubbard, C. C., Department of History, Wheaton College Irwin, Inez Haynes Johnson, Owen Jones, Howard Mumford, Department of English, Harvard University Keller, Charles E., Department of History, Smith College Lee, Dwight E., Department of History, Clark University Lerner, Max, Department of Political Science, Williams College Little, Homer P., Dean, Clark University Long, Norton E., Department of Political Science Mount Holyoke College MacLeish, Archibald Mahoney, John K., School of Education, Boston University Marx, Fritiz M., Department of Government, Harvard University 6. Mather, Kirtley, Department of Geology, Harvard University Matthiessen, F.O., Department of History and Literature, Harvard University Maxwell, James A., Department of Economics, Clark University Merk, Frederick, Department of History, Harvard University Mitchell, Stewart, Massachusetts Historical Society Moody, Robert Earle, Department of History, Boston University Murdock, Kenneth B., Department of English, Harvard University Neilson, William A., President, Smith College Orcutt, William Dana Powell, Warren, Boston University Prall, David, Department of Philosophy, Harvard University Roberts, Franklin C., School of Education, Boston University Sanguinetti, Haughton Schlesinger, Arthur M., Department of History, Harvard University Scramuzza, Vincent M., Department of History, Smith College Sheldon, James, School of Social Work, Boston University Simmons, Ernest, Department of English, Harvard University Skinner, Clarence R., Dean, Theological School, Tufts College Spiegel, Edward, Chairman, Poor Richard Associates Struik, Dork, Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Tarkington, Booth Tripp, William H., Curator, Old Dartmouth Historical Society Tryon, Stenson, Department of History, Simmons College Vail, Robert W.G. Librarian, American Antiquarian Society Warne, Colston, Department of History, Amherst College Weiner, Norbert, Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Williams, Ben Ames7. Project Accomplishment Publication prior to January 1, 1939 Up to January 1, 1939, this Project has issued the publications listed below. Those printed and distributed at the expense of the cooperating sponsor are marked with an asterisk; publications not so marked were brought out by commercial publishers at their own expense, in expectation of steady return through sales. The Federal Writers' Project in no instances pays any part of publishing expenses. Title Sponsor An Almanac for Bostonians, 1939 Poor Richard Associates *The Armenians in Massachusetts Armenian Historical Society *Auburn: 1837-1937 Auburn 100th Anniversary Committee Cape Cod Pilot Poor Richard Associated Massachusetts: A Guide to its Secretary of State, Commonwealth Places and People of Massachusetts *Motor Tours in the Berkshire Hills Berkshire Hills Conference, Inc. New England Hurricane Poor Richard Associates (a regional publication, collated and edited in Massachusetts) *Old Newbury Tales Old Newbury Historical Society *Selective and Critical Bibliography Massachusetts Department of of Horace Mann Education *Whaling Masters Old Dartmouth Historical Society *Winter Sports in the Berkshire Hills Berkshire Hills Conference, Inc. Of this varied list of publications, three were for protracted periods on the list of best-sellers: the Cape Cod Pilot, Massachusetts: A guide to its Places and People, and New England Hurricane. Publications on Spring List - 1939 *THE ALBANIAN STRUGGLE IN THE OLD WORLD AND NEW -- Sponsor, Albanian Historical Society; published May 17 by The Writer, Inc. 164 pp. Illustrated. The second in the Massachusetts series of studies of immigrant groups. THE BERKSHIRE HILLS -- Sponsor, Berkshire Hills Conference, Inc.; July publication by Funk & Wagnalls. 400 pp. Illustrated. An informal guide to the towns and the folk of Berkshire, including a comprehensive section on recreation facilities. *FAIRHAVEN, MASSACHUSETTS -- Sponsor, Fairhaven Board of Selectmen; June publication. About 80 pp. Illustrated. The history of a whaling town and its modern development. *OLD SUDBURY, MASSACHUSETTS -- Sponsor, Sudbury Tercentenary Committee ; June publication. About 50 pp. Illustrated. An account of the founding and development of one of the State's most interesting towns. *THE STATE TEACHERS' COLLEGE AT WESTFIELD -- Sponsor, Westfield State Teachers' College; August publication. About 75 pp. Illustrated. A complete history of the development of a State institution. HERE'S NEW ENGLAND -- Sponsor, New England Council; published by Houghton Mifflin Company in June. 120 pp. Illustrated. Compiled in all New England States; collated and edited in Massachusetts. A brief guide to 21 great recreational areas in New England, intended primarily for visitors to the New York World's Fair, and including an invitation to New England from the six New England Governors. Publications on Fall List - 1939 AN ALMANAC FOR BOSTONIANS, 1940 -- To follow the pattern of the 1939 Almanac and to be issued by the same publisher. This book will give under each day of the year relative excerpts from the history of Boston and will include a variety of useful information. FROM THESE STRAINS -- A brief survey of the ethnic groups in the Commonwealth. Information hitherto unavailable relating to the backgrounds, numbers, concentration, occupations, and achievements of component groups of our population.9. *THE FINNS IN MASSACHUSETTS AND THEIR COOPERATIVES -- Sponsored by Ralvaaja as agent for the Finnish Cooperatives. One of our series of social-ethnic studies, this book will particularly emphasize the cooperative movement widely developed in Massachusetts by Finnish citizens. THE FOREIGN PRESS IN NEW ENGLAND -- A history of foreign language newspapers in New England, analyzing their origins, development, policies, and social influence. Compiled in all New England States; collated and edited in Massachusetts. THE GROWTH OF SPRINGFIELD -- Sponsored by the City of Springfield. 100 pages, illustrated. An historical sketch of the City and a detailed analysis of its resources today. THE PORT OF BOSTON -- A history of the Port and a detailed study of its contemporary facilities, problems, and potentialities. RIGHTS OF MAN -- A compilation of important statements by Massachusetts people upon the fundamental human liberties, together with explanatory background material. An impressive social document including three centuries in its scope. STORIES OF MASSACHUSETTS -- Sponsored by the Boston School Committee; bulletins to be printed in the Boston trade schools and distributed to pupils in the Boston schools. Publisher's offer received for later publication in book form. Other books in preparation We are engaged upon research for the following future publications: *HISTORY OF HAMPDEN COUNTRY -- An account of the government, development, and character of the county. Sponsored by the County Commissioners. ORIGIN OF MASSACHUSETTS PLACE NAMES -- Exhaustive research has for the first time made available in one source all known data on the origin of the names of counties, cities, and towns in Massachusetts. *THE SYRIANS IN MASSACHUSETTS -- A social-ethnic study. Sponsored by the St. George Orthodox Young People Association. *THE JEWS IN EARLY MASSACHUSETTS -- A study from hitherto unpublished sources. Sponsored by the Jewish Culture Club. YANKEE FOLK -- Revealing portrait sketches of New England characters. NEW ENGLAND COASTAL WATERWAYS -- A yachtsmen's guide to New England; informative and entertaining. Compiled in all New England States; collated and edited in Massachusetts. 10. *THE PORTUGUESE IN NEW ENGLAND -- A comprehensive survey of an important ethnic group, rich in content; among our major publications. Compiled in all New England States; collated and edited in Massachusetts. Sponsored by Amportus Historical Society. OLD HOUSES IN MASSACHUSETTS -- Photographs and accompanying text illuminating the development of New England architecture. BIOGRAPHIES OF MASSACHUSETTS ARCHITECTS -- For inclusion in a national publication. STATE ENCYCLOPAEDIA -- A monumental publication to make readily available data on the State and its municipalities; education, religion, medicine, the arts, industry, commerce, recreation, and similar topics treated on the basis of achievement and resources within the State. BOSTON IS THE HUB -- One of our major undertakings; approximately 450 pages, profusely illustrated. An inclusive survey of modern Boston -- its history, people, resources, and attractions, together with descriptive tours in each of the twenty sections described. Probably a fall, 1939, publication. WE WORK IN NEW ENGLAND -- The economic pattern of the region graphically presented through selected industries of significance, under such headings as "The Loom and the Flying Shuttle," "Leetle Fish and Beeg," and "The Way of Yankee Ingenuity." Profusely illustrated with industrial photographs. Compiled in all New England States; collated and edited in Massachusetts.11. TYPICAL COMMENT BY LITERARY CRITICS ON FEDERAL WRITERS PROJECT PUBLICATIONS IN GENERAL "Throughout its length and breadth the book business is benefiting from the Government's program for literature." (The Publishers' Weekly March 18, 1939) "Of all the good uses of adversity, one of the best has been the conception and execution of a series of American guide books; the first attempt, on a comprehensive scale, to make the country itself worthily known to Americans . . . . Within a surprisingly short time, considering the many special problems that must have arisen, this work was organized and has been partly brought to completion; and the best of new guides that are so far available, those for Massachusetts, Vermont, and the city of Washington, give one a great thrill of pride; pride in the country they describe and in the capacity and the devotion and the fine anonymous collaborations that has gone into this work . . . . These guide books are the finest contribution to American patriotism that has been made in our generation; let that be the answer to the weaklings who are afraid to admit that American justice may miscarry or that the slums of Boston may be somewhat this side of Utopia." (Lewis Mumford in The New Republic) "I was amazed at the patience, the skill, the scholarship that went into these books, and heartened by the number of people who bought them." (Ernest L. Meyer in New York Post) "Here is the real America . . . . Here lies before us the rich and varied nature of our country, for us to see, absorb and appreciate." Bookman Radio Program) "Its definition of America's 'where, what, how,' will probably be studied by historians long after 20th century civilization is dead and done with." (The Pathfinder, Washington, D. C.) "It is likely that many of the writers will re-discover many important aspects of American life, a discovery that results of which will probably be reflected in American letters for years to come." (The Publishers' Weekly) "These are fascinating and invaluable books, books which everyone who is interested in New England or who intends to do any touring there must be overwhelmingly grateful to have." (Bernard DeVoto) 12. TYPICAL COMMENT BY LITERARY CRITICS ON MASSACHUSETTS PUBLICATIONS The Massachusetts Guide "The WPA has done a great service in supplying Massachusetts with a volume that approaches the high standard long ago set by many similar works covering the British Isles and most of the Continent." (Kenneth B. Murdock, Harvard University, Review in The New England Quarterly, March 1938) "The reader who comes to this guide for information about Massachusetts will get it in full measure. This not only is a well-made book giving the history and notable buildings in every town, but many photographs of landmarks and views . . . . Everywhere the comment is lively, suggesting the wealth of historical interest in every hamlet and cross-roads . . . . The American guide series is having an auspicious start." (Harry Hansen in New York World Telegram) ". . . the industries, and the government and literature and so forth provide much good material. And then there comes 500 pages of minute description of Massachusetts' towns and cities, which are the glory of the guide. Some of these little essays are worth preserving, some of the material is superb. After this major section there follows an excellent chronology of Massachusetts history, and a very full and well gotten up index. Altogether a first rate job. Even the photographs are good." (Ansonia, Conn. Sentinel) "The W.P.A. guide to Massachusetts . . . is a surprisingly lively and stimulating book. Although based on probably the greatest mass research in history ever attempted, it has individuality, literary color, and verve . . . . The reader . . . will be amazed at the versatility of his state and at the ability of the editors to condense so much information about it into one volume . . . . The Massachusetts guide is one of six to be published on the New England states. If the others are as good, the WPA may be credited with providing New Englanders with a valuable introduction to their own countryside, their own traditions, and their own people." (Editorial in Boston Herald) New England Hurricane ". . . the text to each picture and the short account of the hurricane are superb, the full tragic drama brought home to us with all its force and meaning . . . . There is not a phrase, a sentence, in text and in short narrative that is not that of an artist in prose who is conscientious about and proud of his work." (Burton Rascoe in Newsweek) Almanac for Bostonians - 1939 "A hilarious and interesting little book . . . . Nearly every page of the Almanac contains some little surprise and it may be said that the reader 13. will be hard put to find a passage too tedious for consumption.... It's a volume which should be on the shelf of every lover of good books." (La Notizia, Boston, Dec. 17, 1938) "The Almanac is another commendable work accomplished by the Federal Writers' Project of Massachusetts." (Andrew F. Donnell in Boston Sunday Post) "It is good to find an authentic sense of humor in these young writers." (Boston Transcript, Dec. 14, 1938) Whaling Masters "The work which the Federal Writers have done shows the result of a great deal of intensive research. It will be of lasting value, particularly in answering the hundreds of queries the Society receives each year." (William H. Tripp, Curator of the Old Dartmouth Historical Society, nationally known as an information source on the subject of whaling." The Albanian Struggle in the Old World and New "The Federal Writers' Project of Massachusetts has undertaken to publish a series of books presenting the lives of the various immigrant groups.... The whole series promises to be of great interest to the general reader, to the scholar, and to the American patriot alike. The new enterprise is worthy of widest support. It is to be hoped that volumes of similar value (to The Albanian Struggle) will follow about all the many other population groups which make up the unique miracle of American democracy." (Hans Kohn in The Boston Transcript) The Armenians in Massachusetts "An honest, competent, and far-reaching survey of Armenian history, culture, and contributions to American civilization." (The Armenian Mirror) The Cape Cod Pilot "A contribution to American literature as well as to Cape folklore." (Lewis Gannett in New York Herald-Tribune) Old Newbury Tales "The last chapter brings the book up to 1930, leaving the adult as well as the juvenile reader with the conviction that the history of the town is as important a study locally as that of the great nation of which it is a part." (Newburyport News)14. CONTENT FROM MASSACHUSETTS PEOPLE ON THE VALUE OF OUR PROGRAM Governor Leverett Saltonstall: "I have received many letters and calls protesting against reduction of the Federal Arts Projects. The Federal Arts Projects are making a substantial contribution to American culture." Mr. Robert W.G. Vail, Librarian, American Antiquarian Society: "The Federal Writers' Project has done valuable work through its American Guide Series in making available, often for the first time, the essential historical facts of communities all over the country. These guides have been favorably received by historians, for the most part, and have been eagerly bought and read by the public. This work should go on." Mr. John S. Clapp, Book Director, Hale, Cushman & Flint, Publishers: "I should like to be on record to the effect that the project, during the time that NEW ENGLAND HURRICANE was being written and prepared for the press, functioned smoothly and efficiently. The cooperation I received both from the state director and her staff as well convinced me that the federal government, in sponsoring the Federal Arts Projects, has made a valuable contribution not only to relief but to the furtherance of cultural activities in New England." Mr. Kenneth D. Lippincott, 50 Oliver Street, Boston: "Judged by any standard, the work they are turning out is of a high class and well worthwhile." Mr. Charles H. Way, Chairman, Sudbury Tercentenary Committee: "Your writers have caught the very thing we wanted...a dramatic word picture of the time with the part that Sudbury men and women played in it....It must have taken a vast amount of research to do all this, and we know how little time we gave you, but it came through on schedule." Miss Marjorie Wetherbee, Librarian, Fall River: "Under this project many worthwhile books have been compiled, books for which there has long been a need--such as the Guide books. Another need is being filled by the compilation, in concise form, of information on the foreign elements in certain sections of our country. As a librarian I endorse the Writers' Project." 15. Professor Hans Kohn, Smith College: "I received today your volume on the Albanian struggle and I wish to congratulate you upon this excellent achievement. These social- ethnic studies seem to me of utmost value. I hope they will be continued. They are a most important contribution to a better understanding of Americans as well as of Europeans and their problems." Mr. D.H. Boyajian, President, Armenian Historical Society: "Many universities, libraries, research institutions, philanthropic and other organizations have not only received the book, (The Armenians in Massachusetts), but have considered it a valuable addition to the country's collection of books of reference.... The Writers' Project afforded the only means whereby the characteristics, peculiarities and best traditions of each (ethnic group) could be made known. That work has just begun and must be given an opportunity to grow into real usefulness." Professor Rupert Emerson, Harvard University: "I can only hope that the Writers' Project will continue to use its unparalleled resources to open up to us the lives of these many peoples from which a new America is continually being forged." Mr. A.B. Burack, Publisher, The Writer, Inc.: "I want to take this opportunity to express my satisfaction with the splended work that has been done and is now being done by the Federal Writers' Project. Judging your efforts from professional standards, it seems to me that your Project is adding to literature a heritage that will permanently enrich the cultural life of our country. "In all my contacts with your workers and administrators in connection with our recent publication of your, THE ALBANIAN STRUGGLE IN THE OLD WORLD AND NEW, I have been impressed by the businesslike way in which they are conducting their work. I have the feeling that their interest is not merely perfunctory, but that they take a keen pride in their work, which naturally adds to their efficiency. "To my mind, the contributions made by your Project form an important part of our American life. I sincerely hope that your good work may proceed unimpaired, and I look forward with interest to your continued success."16. REHABILITATION It is impossible in limited space to give an adequate picture of the rehabilitation of human lives through employment at a living wage in the line of work for which men and women have been trained. The following cases were chosen almost at random: Mr. W. was an automobile mechanic out of work. He published an excellent technical article in one of the country's largest periodicals. On that basis, with some misgivings, he was given an opportunity on the Writers' Project in September 1938. Six months later Mr. W. resigned to accept an offer to do research and writing on technical subjects for an automobile manufacturing corporation. He wrote, "I would like you to know that I am deeply grateful. The financial security and moral courage this employment gave, came at a time when things looked very dark indeed. For this reason, my association with the W.P.A. will always be a grateful memory; it more than justified itself in my case - how much, only my wife and I will ever know." Mr. B. was a young writer of talent, unable to finance himself under depression conditions. He did valuable work for us until he resigned, in May 1938, to accept a Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship. Since then his name has become well-known among American writers through publication of a book and a number of stories in leading magazines. Another book will soon be issued. Mr. H. was a scholar and an ordained minister. Unable to obtain a pastorate because of economic conditions, he came to the Writers' Project and supported himself and his family through this employment until, in October 1938, he received a call to an Ohio church. Mrs. K. is a well-known writer who has sold fiction and non-fiction to many well-known periodicals. Handicapped by the support of an invalid mother and the sole support of five children in school and by the decline in the market from periodical writing, she turned to the Writers' Project in desperation and is sustaining herself and her six dependents on the security wage. There is no question that the aid will be temporary and she will succeed in re-establishing herself. Miss D. wrote in May 1939: "When I came to you for a job I was in desperate need....While working on the Project I regained my self-confidence, poise and health, that enabled me to take advantage of the first offer for return to private employment."17. SUMMARY In terms of human values, the Project has meant a chance for impoverished professional men and women--writers, newspaper reporters, librarians, teachers, lawyers, technical research workers,--to earn their livelihood and so retain their self- respect. It has maintained and sometimes increased their skills. Employment is not static: between March 15, 1938, and May 10, 1939, with a quota limitation on 190, the Project dropped 102 persons and 123 persons were assigned to work. The rehabilitation process is progressive. Under present conditions with regard to white collar employment in Massachusetts, the need for professional projects remains acute. In terms of standards of work and contribution to contemporary culture, our accomplishment is recognized by literary critics, historians, civic organizations, and the general public. And the Federal Writers' Project in Massachusetts has gathered momentum. The heavy publishing program for 1939 shows significant accomplishment. It presents a substantial list of books planned to meet definite needs expressed by Massachusetts communities. In such publications, for one example, as The Port of Boston, we are happy to feel that through our research facilities we can render a service to New England.[?] Vol. IX. No. 16 August 15, 1917 THE NEW ARMENIA PUBLISHED SEMI-MONTHLY CONTENTS Frontispiece (His Holiness Kevork V.) The Kaleidoscope of the Near East Edward H. Clement Armenia and Her Future The Hon. T. P. O'Connor Christ and Abgarus Moses of Khorene The Liberalism of the Armenian Church Alice Stone Blackwell Armenian Relief X. For Armenian Soldiers Frank A. Wiggin Armeno-Tartar Hostilities Luigi Villari The Armenian Deportations The English Blue Book An Armenian Child to God Maurice Ferber Single Copies, 10 Cents. Yearly Subscription $2.00, in advance. Foreign Countries, $2.50. Address all Communications to Editor of THE NEW ARMENIA. 949 BROADWAY. NEW YORK, N.Y. Entered as second-class matter November 29, 1915 at the post office at New York, N.Y., under the act of March 3, 1879.HIS HOLINESS, KEVORK V., CATHOLICOS OF ALL THE ARMENIANS THE NEW ARMENIA A Semi-Monthly Periodical Issued by the New Armenia Publishing Company 949 Broadway, New York, N. Y. Established as "Armenia" in Boston, Mass., under the honorary editorship of Julia Ward Howe, Alice Stone Blackwell, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Lucia Ames Mead, Rev. Charles Gordon Ames, Edward H. Clement, Prof. Albert S. Cook, Ph. D., L. H. D., Rev. Charles F. Dole, Rabbi Charles Fleischer, William Lloyd Garrison, Edwin D. Mead, Rollo Ogden, James Bronson Reynolds, and Prof. William G. Ward. European honorary editors, Anatole France, Georges Clemenceau, Victor Berard and Jean Longuet. "Who can foretell our future? Spare me the attempt, We are like a harvest reaped by bad husbandmen Amidst encircling gloom and cloud." JOHN CATHOLICOS Armenian Historian of the Tenth Century. "To serve Armenia is to serve civilization." WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE Volume IX. August 15, 1917 Number 16 The Kaleidoscope of the Near East By EDWARD H. CLEMENT (Editor of the Boston Evening Transcript, 1881-1906) ANOTHER shake has been given to the kaleidoscope of the New East by the Russian Revolution. Six months ago Russia was standing out for Constantinople and the Dardanelles; the Allies had had enough of imperialism - one English writer has gone so far as to say that the British are cured forever of imperialism by their experiences at the Dardanelles - and official announcement was made through several different spokesmen, on several important occasions, that Constantinople was officially earmarked for Russia in the coming division of the spoils of the war. After its long prorogation by the then ruling despotism (what an age ago that seems through it was only December last!) the Duma reassembled, apparently expressly to hear from the then premier, Trepoff, the most important announcement of the war . It is curious to recall some particulars of the scene. The instincts of the Duma's Radical minority were sound - the German-brought traitors in authority were to be distrusted, and disowned by the true Russia, whatever they proposed. Accordingly, the Socialists there demonstrated in the denunciation of whatever the Premier might be about to say, even in advance, and prevented him from speaking for a quarter of an hour, though he thrice attempted to do so. The uproar was ended only by the President's moving the suspension, for eight sittings, of twelve members of the Socialist and Labor parties, including the since famous leaders, Tcheidse and Kerensky! How little one could have believed at that time that Kerensky was the wield not only such power as Trepoff was then master of, as premier, but later that of the Dictator, acclaimed by his countrymen in the place of the Czar, a suppliant prisoner. Their expulsion was voted, and then, in the stillness of a wondering suspense, the Premier made the announcement that the traditional goal of the Russian people for a thousand years, Constantinople, door to the deep open sea,- had been reached; that after failing to restrain Turkey from entering the war on Germany's side, Russia had concluded an agreement with the Allies which established in the most definite manner her right to the Straits and Constantinople. "Russians should know for what they are shedding blood," said Trepoff, "and, in accord with our Allies, announcement of this agreement is made to-day from this tribune. Absolute agreement is firmly established among the Allies; and there is no doubt that after she has obtained sovereign possession of a free passage into the Mediterranean, Russia will grant freedom of navigation for the Rumanian flag, which now, not for the first time, floats in battle, side by side, with the flag of Russia." The whole history of the seething politics of the Near East is sampled in this episode, and the commentary of history will doubtless point to it as containing all the elements of the devil's brew in that still boiling and tossing cauldron. The already bought and prepared Russian betrayal of Rumania was close at hand behind the curtain in spite of the fair words which could be taken not otherwise at the moment than as the official proclamation of the Czar's government. The bourgeois Duma went wild in exultation over this realization of Russia's historic dream,- but, it244 THE NEW ARMENIA must be noted, not until after it had got rid of its Socialist radicals for the time. This historic session of the Duma had been eagerly awaited, because it was the first session after the crisis between the government and the people in which the people had won, ridding the country of the traitorous, reactionary and corrupt pro-German Premier, Sturner. But it was realized even at that time Trepoff was no more than a stopgap ; that his premiership was not to be relied on by the Left. The real significance of the demonstration ending in the expulsion of Kerensky was that, for the first time, demands for a change in the character of the Russian autocracy were not only voiced in unequivocal terms, leaving not the slightest doubt of the determination of the comparatively moderate Duma, but were allowed to be published in the newspapers. In three months' time came the Revolution and with in the enthronement of Kerensky, and the Socialists' principle of repudiating even the guaranteed grant of Constantinople and the Dardanelles in the Revolutionist's slogan, "No annexations, no indemnities." It is too soon yet to know whether in Kerensky has risen the Napoleon of the Russian Revolution. He has, to be sure, not only created and maintained, for some weeks together, the semblance of national rule and civic order, but he has also heroically reformed, and personally led into battle, disintegrating Russian forces. But his own physical strength is slight, his enemies and rivals in the Revolutionist councils are cunning and persevering, and his control may turn out to be a rope of sand, amid such widespread chaos in a vast land of enormous diverse populations. The next shake of the kaleidoscope may bring so entirely a different set of factors into some new arrangement of colors and design, as regards political purposes and ideals, that it is utterly useless to consider them until they are actually before us. Think of it ! It was only little more that a year ago that the so-called "Black Congress" assembled in Petrograd and the presiding bureaucrat, Chtcheglovitoff, former Minister of Justice, warned it that the destruction of Germany would carry with it the destruction of conservative politics ; the triumph of England and France would be that of democracy and Germany once beaten, political radicalism would sweep over Europe. It was the Jews another member of the band said, not the Germans, who brought on the war. No wonder that, a year ago, the spokesmen of the Kaiser in the country were confidently giving us the details of the separate peace Germany had arranged with Russia, with the Berlin-to-Bagdad Railroad making ready to open for business. No wonder, either, that Russia is in collapse, with the great end and object of all its wars heretofore suddenly disavowed. The Constantinople prize was its only real cause of conflict with Germany, -- otherwise the two autocracies were in natural political and spiritual harmony. For possession in Asia Minor, and with " an Armenia emptied of Armenians" Russia must play the games as Germany and Turkey had played it. Not only the honest, simple, generous masses of the Russian people revolted at the program, but even the official class of which the Duma was mainly composed, voted down, under the lead of Miliyukoff, the officially prepared project for the depopulation of Armenia, and the installation of Russian ex-soldiers on lands of the deported natives. Bureaucratic Russia had to fight the Germany she believed in : the Russia people hated the conquest and imperialism that herded them in armies under the Grand Dukes. All that has gone to pieces ; root and branch the whole pernicious tangle has been cast into the fiery furnace of Revolution, and will cumber the earth no more forever. What use, then, to play any longer with the implements of the old gamesters, matching pieces on the chessboard of diplomacy, with nations and peoples as mere pawns to be thrown away in barter or sacrifice on the battlefield for the safety of kings and dynastics? Events have proved the falsity of the traditional belief that "the Russian liberals are as deeply absorbed in the Constantinople dream as the most reactionary of the Slavophils." The new Declaration of Independence for the forming United States of Europe, with its equivalent for our "consent of the governed" and our "decent respect for the opinion of mankind" in its "no annexations, no indemnities", is the new charter by which the new civilization is to the organized, and the world of governments placed on a higher plane than ever before. The latest partition of Turkey on paper, by a Russian political writer, gives the Straits, Constantinople and Armenia to Russia ; Syria to France and Palestine to England ; leaving Turkey only Anatolia, making two Arabian independent states, and a protectorate out of Mesopotamia.... The only sound, reasonable or practice thing about this fantasie after the old style, is its basic principle,-- that whatever else comes out of the peace, for which, remember always, we are now to share responsibility is -- "Turkey must not be left undivided." There is no future for it; there is no health in it ; its "Young Turkey" is baser, crueler worse every way than the Old Turkey even! The earth must be relieved of it. Concord, Mass., August, 1917 Armenia and Her Future By The Hon. T. P. O'CONNOR, M. P. On August 3, we request the Honorable T. P. O'Connor, the Irish nationalist leader, now sojourning in this country, to express his opinion concerning the future of Armenia. The subjoined brilliant speech delivered by him on August 11, at Chautauqua, N. Y., meets our desire admirably. The story of the Armenian massacres is familiar. The thousands murdered at different points, the terrible shame and more prolonged agony of deportations--- the women betrayed by officers, then passed on to the gendarmes, then to the Kurds ; the women compelled to march on foot, sometimes naked under burning suns, and pushed on with the bayonet or hook when they fell fainting. The madness that resulted, the suicides, and the abandonment of children whose cries of agony could no longer be borne, are known to all. So it went on day after day, month after month until the number of those who died of the persecution rose to appalling figures. And now let me ask two questions : First, what is the duty of the citizens of the British Empire? The answer is but too clear. It was the diplomacy of Lord Beaconsfield as Prime Minister that gave back in the Treaty of Berlin the Armenians who had been transferred from Turkish to Russian rule by the Treaty of San Stefano. Those who, like myself, followed the Eastern policy of Gladstone when this controversy was being fought out can say that our withers are unwrung. But after all the responsibility remains and many Englishmen to-day abhor the policy which they acclaimed in the older time, and are doing their best to repair it. This is one of reasons why the Armenian Committee in London has been able to make so successful an appeal to the generosity of the British people. What I ask next is, What is the duty of the American people? They also are responsible for Armenia, though in a different way. One of the things which struck me most when reading the stories of these atrocities is the large part which America has played in the history of Armenia and of other countries of the East. It was her Universities, among other Harvard, Yale and Princeton, that trained many of the Armenians who first played a large part in educating and uplifting their country and afterwards were among the American mission school and that especially famous school, Robert College at Constantinople, which educated and trained young Armenian men and women to teach in their own elementary schools. But there was another debt which Armenia owed America apart from this magnificent contribution - the education of her people -- and that was the spirit of hope, of energy, of aspiration towards liberty which must radiate from every centre of American culture. That responibility, though a glorious one, is also onerous, for it throws on the American people the duty of rescuing, helping, starting again the remnants of the American race which the massacres have left. That responsibility has been met with apparently a fine sympathy and generosity. Tens of thousands of Armenian men, tens of thousands of Armenian women, above all tens of thousands of Armenian children are alive to-day who would have been in their graves from hunger, from disease, from exposure, but for the dollars that have been sent from over the seas to them. The United States must not weary in this well doing. The need is still great. I say great, it is gigantic, it is appalling. I have been asked to say a word about the future of the Armenians. I can speak with this much authority, that I have been in closet touch with Boghos Nubar Pasha, the energetic and wise leader of his race. I know the views of some of the British statesmen who have to deal with this problem. Let me first make this statement,-- massacred though they have been to such an appalling extent, gigantically reduced though they have been in numbers, the Armenian race is not doomed to die. No great race dies. A race is like one of those great stream that looked in the icy embrace of winter and frost for ten thousand winters, shrunk to a rivulet under the sweltering suns of ten thousand summers, yet flow on and on and will flow on till time and earth have come to an end. So it has been with the races which racial or religious hate, the sharp sword, the unequal law, the periodical massacre have attempted to destroy. So it has been with the Irish, with the Jews, with the Armenians. The Armenian, like the great river, flows on and on. In the meantime we have to keep the Armenian alive ; we have to train his children for future work ; we have to give seed for the ground to which they will in time return. But that is not enough. I hear people to-day talking peace when there is no peace. Can any man of sense or who loves liberty, who hates oppression, who deplores the ocean of blood which has been shed during the last three years contemplate that happening without bringing some divine compensation to the suffering world? And must not the very first compensation be that every oppressed nationally shall be liberated? The case is strong for the Slavs, the Poles, for Ireland, but assuredly strong as is the claim for each of these nationalities, in no case is it as strong as in that of the Armenians. To give these people back to Turkey only to be massacred again would to my mind be one of the most abominable crimes over committed. I know that the present Prime Minister of England is pledge never246 THE NEW ARMENIA Copyright Clinedinst, Wash., D. C. THE HON. T. P. O'CONNOR to consent to such a crime; I am perfectly sure that Mr. Wilson will never consent to such a crime. Whatever happens after this war, the Armenian man must be saved forever from the knife of the Turkish assassin, the Armenian woman must be saved from outrage and from death, the Armenian babe must be preserved from torture and murder. I may be now asked what form the future government of the Armenians may take. At an early period of the war this question was discussed in the Armenian committee in London with Lord Bryce in the chair. At the time the one thing we could think of was that the Armenians should be saved from future massacres, and therefore that any country - any government - which secured them from massacre, should be welcomed. We knew, too, that a good many Armenians and much Armenian territory had passed into the hands of the Russians, and that on the whole the Russian government had acted well. The Armenians had prospered and had multiplied and there had been no attempt in recent years to attack them. We therefore rather looked to Russia as the Power that would have to liberate Armenia, and we found it difficult to give any encouragement to the ideal of an Armenia united and self-governed, deeply as we sympathized with it. But Russia has had her Revolution. There is a new and enlightened Russia, and we note with satisfaction that one of the very first pronouncements of the new Russian rulers was that Armenia should have such autonomy as she desired. I view the Armenian problem from a different angle accordingly now, and for myself I give my full adhesion to the ideal of the Armenians themselves, namely, that they should be all united - those not merely in the Turkish territory of to-day but those in Russia as well; that when united they should have self-government, guaranteed if need be by some of the Great Powers; that they should have free access to the sea and that thus they should start once more and begin the building up from the ruins of so many centuries the great cultured, united and free Armenia of the ages before Turkish savagery conquered their ancient and historic kingdom. This word finally: How does the case of Armenia bear upon the merits and the issues of this war? I am content to have my view of these two things decided by this single factor in the great struggle. I am content to have the merits and the aims of the two sets of belligerents tested by this case. For it is one of the most lamentable facts in this whole tragic story that the German rulers have played a terrible part in these massacres - I say rulers deliberately for we have many Germans earnestly interested in the fate of the Allies - I have met one of them at various Armenian Conferences, Dr. Lepsius. There was a German Consul in nearly every single one of the great Armenian settlements where the massacres took place. The wires were open as we know between the Armenian settlements and Constantinople, for as I have said already the massacres were ordered by telegram from the Government in Constantinople. If the wires were open between Armenia and Constantinople, they were open between Armenia and Berlin. For a generation the voice of Berlin has been omnipotent in Constantinople. At the very moment the troops of Germany and Turkey were fighting side by side. Is it not clear, therefore, that Berlin had only to say a word and the massacres would not have begun, and even if they had begun would not a word have brought them to an immediate end? For these reasons I feel entitled to say that the guilt of these hideous massacres lies at the door of the German as well as of the Turkish authorities. If I needed further proof of this fact I would point to the action of the representatives of Germany: to Wangenheim refusing Ambassador Morgenthau's appeal for intervention; to Count Bernstorff's attempt at Washington to deny the massacres; to the statements of Bethmann-Hollweg, Zimmermann and other German officials in Berlin, - if they did not justify, at least extenuated this horrible, gigantic, unsurpassed crime against humanity. And having that conviction how can I, - how can any man who loves liberty, hates oppression, loathes cruelty and massacre, - how can I help feeling that I am on the right side when I feel myself in hostility to the present regime in Germany? How can I look for hope for the Armenians except in the defeat of both Turkey and Turkey's ally, the militarist party in Berlin? For these reasons I rejoice that this great country has entered the war, has made the wise and the just and the humane choice in the war. I claim to know something of American history and of American character. America, it is true, is patient, long suffering, slow to move, a peaceful nation, living and wanting to live in peace with all nations, to the sons and daughters of whom she had opened her THE NEW ARMENIA 247 hospitable shores and given prosperity and freedom. America was unprepared for war, but never has America undertaken any task which she has not had the tenacity and courage to carry through. She can be ruthless and relentless as well as gentle and patient, and it is my confident prophecy that of all the nations that will hold out to the last hour and to the last man until liberty and justice, democracy and peace once more are enthroned in men's hearts and in the institutions of nations, America will be the chief one. Christ and Abgarus (From the History of Armenia) By Moses of Khorene Abgarus the son of Arsham began to reign in the twentieth year of the reign of the Arshavr King or Persia. This Abgarus was called the Great Man because of his exceeding meekness and wisdom. In the third year of his reign the whole of Armenia fell under the jurisdiction of Rome. . . . Therefore the Romans sent commissioners unto the land of Armenia who brought the image of Cæsar and placed it in all the temples. At this time was born our Saviour Jesus Christ, the Son of God. And there was a dispute between Abgar and Herod. For Herod commanded that his image also should be placed in the temples of Armenia, with that of Cæsar; to which Abgar not acceding, the anger of Herod was kindled against him. And he sent his brother's son with a great army against him. And Abgar met and fought him; and he was slain in the battle and his army fled. Soon after these things Augustus died, and Tiberius reigned over the Roman Empire; and Germanicus sent messengers from Rome unto Arshavr and Abgar concerning the battle in which Herod's brother's son was slain. Whereupon Abgar was displeased, and thought to prepare for revolt and war. Then did he build the city of Edessa wherein to keep the hosts of Armenia, and removed thither his court from Mdzpin, with all his idols: Nebog, Bel, Batnikol, and Tarata; also with the Royal Palace he removed the books of the schools belonging to the temples. But strife had arisen between his kinsmen of the reigning house of Persia, and Abgar collected his armies and went to reconcile and pacify them. And having settled their disputes he returned home; not sound in his body, but tormented with a painful disease. At that time Marinus was governor over Phoenicia, Palestine, Assyria, and Mesopotamia. And Abgarus sent two of his notables unto him to show him the treaty of peace between Arshavr and his brother (for the Romans suspected that he had been to Persia to collect armies against them). And Marinus received them with peace and great honour, sending word unto Abgarus, "Fear nothing, only hasten to raise all the taxes." And on their return the messengers went up to Jerusalem to see our Saviour Christ, having heard of His wonderful deeds. And when they had seen Him with their own eyes they returned and told Abgarus; at which the king marvelled, and believed Him to be the very Son of God. And because His body was tormented with a painful disease contracted in the land of Persia seven years before, and he was not able to find any cure by men, he sent unto Him a letter asking Him to come and heal him of his disease. The Letter of Abgarus to our Saviour Jesus Christ. "Abgarus, a prince of the world, unto Jesus, the Saviour and Benefactor, Who hast appeared in the City of Jerusalem, greetings. "I have heard of Thee and of the healings wrought by Thy hands, without drugs and without roots; for it is said that Thou givest sight to the blind, Thou makest the lame to walk, and Thou cleansest the lepers; Thou curest those who have been long tormented by diseases, and raisest even the dead. And when I heard all this concerning Thee I thought that either Thou art God come down from Heaven that workest these things, or the Son of God. I have written unto Thee that Thou shouldest trouble Thyself to come unto me, and heal me of my disease. I have heard also that the Jews murmur against Thee, and think to torture Thee. My city is a small one, but it is beautiful, and it is sufficient for us twain." And taking the letter they found Him in Jerusalem. And unto this the gospel beareth witness, saying: "There were some amongst the heathen that came up to Him." But our Saviour did not undertake to come at the time when they called Him, but made Abgarus worthy of a letter thus. The Answer to the Letter of Abgarus, written at the command of our Saviour by the Apostle Thomas. "Blessed is he who believeth on Me though he hath not seen Me. For it is written concerning Me thus: 'They that have seen Me believed not on Me, but they that have not seen Me shall believe and live.' And concerning that which thou hast written unto Me to come down unto thee, it is needful that I fulfil all that for which I was sent; and when I have fulfilled it I will ascend unto Him that sent Me. And after My ascension I will send one of My disciples, who shall heal thee of thy disease, and give Life unto thee and unto all them that are with thee." This letter did Anan the messenger bring unto Abgarus, with the Image of the Saviour, which remaineth in the city of Edessa until this day. Trans. Zabelle C. BoyajianThe Liberalism of the Armenian Church BY ALICE STONE BLACKWELL THE Armenian Church is the oldest national Christian church in the world. It has always set a shining example to the rest of Christendom in its heroic resistance to persecution, throughout the many centuries when its members were subjected to such pressure to make them apostatize as no other Church has had to bear during so long a time. The Armenian Church has now set a good example to the rest of Christendom in another respect. The head of the Church, the Catholicos, from his See at Etchmiadzin, in a very ancient monastery near the foot of Mt. Ararat, has sent out an official decree that women are henceforth to have equal rights in every respect, in the Armenian Church throughout the world. They may vote on all Church questions, and they are made eligible to all Church offices. The Bull issued by His Holiness Kevork V. Sourenian, Catholicos of All the Armenians, permitting the Armenian women to take part in public affairs, bears the date of April 7, 1917. His Holiness, remarking that the democratic principle of the Armenian Church had always recognized the right of both sexes to participate in the management of public affairs, and that, unfortunately, that spirit, on account of foreign influence, was obscured, says: "We have kept long enough this spirit of our Church under a bushel,--a spirit with which our Church was renowned in the past. We, henceforth, permit the restoration of the rights of women in public affairs. Armenian women have the right both to vote and to receive votes, both to elect, and to be elected." This action is particularly noteworthy as being taken by an Oriental Church. It is a fresh illustration of the fact that the Armenians are the most progressive of Eastern races. Many of the Western Churches have given women the right to vote in church affairs, but a number of important denominations still refuse it to them; and women are debarred from church offices, even in some denominations that allow them to vote. The Episcopal Church in the United States, which has been particularly sympathetic toward the Armenian Church, has been wrestling with the question for some time. That Church ought to be influenced by the good example now set her by her elder sister. The Unitarians and Universalists have given women equal rights for many years, and the Quakers have always done so. The Methodists are said to be more numerous in the United States than any other denomination. They are split into a good many branches. The largest, the Methodist Episcopal Church, divided during the Civil War into the Methodist Episcopal Church North and the Methodist Episcopal Church South. Both allow women to vote in church affairs. About twenty years ago, after a long fight, the Methodist Episcopal Church North gave women the right also to be elected as lay delegates to the General Conference. the Methodist Episcopal Church South still refuses it to them, unless its rules have been changed very recently. Neither of them yet allows women to be ordained, but most of the smaller Methodist denominations do. It was for this reason, many years ago, that the Rev. Dr. Anna H. Shaw (who has lately been appointed by the United States Government as head of the Woman's Committee of the Council for National Defense), left the Methodist Episcopal Church, which had refused to ordain her, and was ordained in the Methodist Protestant Church. In the Congregational Church, women vote in church affairs, and may also be ordained. The first woman to receive ordination in the United States, and probably in the world, was the Rev. Antoinette L. Brown, who was ordained as pastor of the Orthodox Congregational Church of South Butler, N.Y., in 1853. A few years later she married my father's brother. She is still living, at the age of 92. Less than a year ago, she preached a good sermon; and only a few days ago she gave me a contribution for the Armenian orphans. When she applied for admission to the theological school of Oberlin University in Ohio, about the year 1846, the professors were shocked, and would have kept her out if they could; but a clause in the University's charter said that all its courses should be open to women. It had never occurred to any one that a woman might want to study theology. In later years, the University became very proud of her; and about fifty years after her graduation, it gave her the honorary degree of D.D., although in the meantime she had become a Unitarian. Her ordination in 1853 made a great commotion, and was bitterly denounced by the pulpit and the press. Now the census shows that there are more than 3,000 women ministers and preachers in the United States. In the Congregational Church, as elsewhere, the principle of equal rights for women was not conceded without a hard fight. About 1835, the General Association of the Congregational Churches of Massachusetts issued a "Pastoral Letter" against women's speaking in public. It was called out by the activity of three young women of the noblest character, who were lecturing against negro slavery. It said that "the female character was threatened with wide-spread and permanent deterioration," and that true reform could never be promoted by " the harangues of female orators." When this letter was read aloud in the church, Lucy Stone was sitting in the gallery. Through only seventeen, she listened to it with great indignation. Her cousin, who sat beside her, said afterwards, laughingly, THE NEW ARMENIA 249 that her side was black and blue from the wrathful nudges of my mother's elbow. In the Congregational Church of West Brookfield, Mass., Deacon Henshaw was brought to trial for his anti-slavery activities, and was expelled from the church, with a number of other members. In those days, of course, women had no vote in church affairs; but my mother, who had only lately joined the church, did not know this. When a vote was take on Deacon Henshaw's case, she held up her hand with the rest. The minister, standing up tall and dark, looked over to the church officer who was counting the votes, and said, "Don't you count her." "Isn't she a member?" asked the church officer. "Yes," answered the minister, "but she is not a voting member." The accent of scorn in his voice touched her to the quick. A vote was taken six times, and she held up her hand every time. She held it up again, with a flash in her eyes, when she told me the story on her death-bed. What a world-wide contrast there is between the present day and eighty years ago, when that one uncounted hand was the only open protest against the subjection of women, in Church and State! In the Catholic and Greek Churches, the movement for an enlarged representation of women in ecclesiastical matters is less marked. But an interesting fact was lately mentioned in a public address by Mr. Dudley Field Malone, Collector of the Port of New York. He says that in the diocese of Turin, Italy, it has been the custom for centuries for each congregation to elect its parish priest, and the women have voted as well as the men. The present Archbishop of the diocese did not like to have the women vote. He made a journey to Rome to ask the Pope to put a stop to it; and the Pope refused. Mrs. Julia Ward Howe, who was President of the "Friends of Armenia," was also deeply interested in the movement for equal rights for women in the churches. Although unordained, she often preached herself; and she was president for many years of the "Association of Women Ministers." Frances E. Willard, another distinguished friend of the Armenians, took a prominent part in the movement to make women eligible as lay delegates to the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and was herself chosen as a delegate. The action now taken by the Catholicos of All the Armenians may have been influenced in part by the action of the new Russian government. In giving women the ballot, Russia has followed the example of Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and twenty States of our own Union. The tendency is world-wide; and the trend of events is all one way. But the Armenian Church by this act has placed itself in the van of all the Oriental Churches. With many thoughtful persons, this will be an additional argument for giving Home Rule to Armenia at the end of the war. The position of women has been said to be the criterion of civilization. When any set of men are willing to concede home rule to their women, it is at least presumptive evidence that they are fit to have home rule themselves. Chilmark, Mass. Armenian Relief A CABLE dispatch from the American Consul at Tiflis, disclosing the increasing misery of hundreds of thousands of Armenian and Syrian refugees in the Caucasus and Eastern Armenia, has been made public by the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief. It reads: "Estimates place the number of Armenian and Syrian refugees in the Caucasus at 250,000, and in Eastern Turkey at 100,000. The total is being slowly increased by newcomers. Of these 250,000 are without employment. A large proportion of them are women and children. Our committee is anxious to help these. The minimum estimate necessary for each individual is $3.00 per month. In order to meet the needs of the situation the minimum estimate is $500,000 per month. "I strongly urge the need of support of fatherless children. Of these 5,000 are now on our list, and about 15,000 others require immediate help. No funds are available at present for this department. "The medical department is caring for many old and sick and for babies. The need is great in other centres. Send new workers at once as follows: One doctor, two women for orphanage, one man, well trained, for leader of technical industrial work, and three or four general workers. "We urge that not less than the following sums be sent immediately for the departments indicated: Repatriation, $1,000,000; fatherless children in homes, $500,000; industrial relief, $500,000; animals, $150,000; orphanages, $100,000; medical relief, $100,000; seed, $100,000. Machines, looms, and engines for weaving wool would greatly help to meet the needs of the coming Winter and be of permanent value in establishing the industry." Three women representing the American Board of Foreign Missions, Mrs. Harry H. White, Mrs. Carl Compton and Miss Susan W. Orvis, are now on their way to the Caucasus, to take up the work for orphan girls. The relief agents are giving a great deal of thought to the problems of repatriation and rehabilitation, which must find an early solution. Provision is being made for clothing refugees and for educating boys and girls. The latest report regarding the situation in Turkey250 THE NEW ARMENIA comes in a letter to the Chairman of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief. The writer says: "We cannot impress upon you too strongly the need of prompt action if the remnant of the Armenian people is not to perish. It seems a horrible thing to sustain them thus far and then let them die through neglect. It is possible that your Committee thinks there are not means of distributing relief since the Ambassador came away, but I want to assure you that it is not so. There are members of the American Embassy force sill in Constantinople and they are working with and through the Swedish Legation, which now has charge of American interests in Turkey. They may be relied on to see to the wise and careful distribution of all funds. The banks here have correspondents in Constantinople so that funds sent here can be transferred by wire and become immediately available. "We do not think our Missionaries remaining will suffer bodily harm, but living conditions are growing steadily worse and they must have large increase in funds to make up for the high prices of food. In each station which our people have left they have arranged with responsible people to look after relief, so that funds will not be misapplied, and there are yet thousands of Armenians who have no place to look for help but to the American Missionaries or their representatives. "We want to make it clear as words can do it that at least $150,000 per month is still needed for relief work, that the Constantinople Committee will be able to forward it to the field and will see that none of it is misapplied; that the customary distributing centers in the interior are, with unimportant exceptions, still supplied with a sufficient force for making the distribution as usual." This correspondent speaks of only one relatively small section of the field of need. His suggested $150,000 must be multiplied many times to enable the Committee to reach all districts. The movement to relieve all those who are suffering in Syria, without regard to race or creed, has lately received a new inpetus from Bishop MacInnes of Jerusalem, temporarily in Egypt, who describes conditions throughout the land as more than appalling. Committees are being formed in England under the patronage of Princess Christian, all Bishops of the Anglican Church, the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, and prominent laymen like Lord Bryce. Sir Henry McMahon, who formerly represented the English government in Egypt, is chairman of the London Committee. At a meeting held in the Mansion House, $250,000 was collected, to which another fifty thousand was added later. The Committee formed in Egypt is under the direction of Bishop MacInnes, who already has made good progress in the work of organization. Distribution will be made by persons conversant with the country and its varying peoples, just as soon as the way is opened. More than $400,000 was sent abroad in July to be distributed by agents of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief in those parts of the Near East where suffering and destitution is greatest. A like amount, or one slightly larger will be sent during August if sufficient money is received. The plan which has been successfully followed so far is to cable money to accredited representatives of the Committee who are working in the larger towns of various districts like the Russian Caucasus, Persia and Asia Minor. From such central points the money is distributed according to local needs. An interesting sum of money which the Committee expects to send to Beirut during August for distribution is $130,000 received from the sale of the cargo of the relief ship Caesar sent abroad last Christmas, and forced by political conditions to discharge her cargo at Alexandria. Mr. Charles R. Crane, Treasurer since its organization of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief, and now in Russia as a member of the Root Commission, has tendered his resignation on account of his prolonged absence, as he may be detained there for some months to come. Mr. Cleveland H. Dodge, the well known New York business man and philanthropist, has been selected to succeed Mr. Crane. The Treasurer's office has been removed from 70 Fifth Avenue to 1 Madison Avenue, the general headquarters of the Committee. For Armenian Soldiers To the Editor of The New Armenia: At the urgent request of certain Armenians the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions has authorized me to accept for the Board from Armenians who are entering or are about to enter the military service of the United States sums of money on deposit, of $100.00 or more in amount, and to give receipts for the same. On such deposits the Board will allow 2% interest per annum, reckoned for full months only on such deposits as remain with the Board for at least three months. The Board will require each depositor to sign his name in his own handwriting and to furnish such other information as the Board may require for identification. In case the depositor cannot write his name either in Armenian or English he will be required to present himself at our Boston office when making the deposit, that some other method may be adopted for his identification. In the event of the death of the depositor the money at his credit will be paid only to a regularly appointed executor or administrator of his estate. It is strongly recommended that the legally executed will of the depositor be left with the deposit. Frank H. Wiggin, Treasurer Boston, Mass. The Armeno-Tartar Hostilities By LUIGI VILLARI THE virtues of the Armenians are of a kind which are bound to become more and more valuable as civilization progresses, while his vices are for the most part the rough edges which, under a wise and progressive Government, will be rubbed away. This people is the civilizing element of the Middle East, and is likely to remain so. Other races will also, no doubt, become really advanced in course of time; the intelligence of the Georgians is an important factor to be reckoned with, and even the Moslem peoples may eventually shake off the paralyzing influence of tradition and take their place in the general scheme of the world's progress. The rivalry between the Armenians and the Tartars is of ancient date, and differs little from the general rivalry of the two races in other parts of the Caucasus. The Tartars have always considered Baku as a Tartar city. The Tartar khans have rules it for centuries, the great bulk of the native population of the whole province is Tartar, and the general character of the country until the recent influx of foreigners was mainly Tartar and Mohammedan. But the Armenians, with their superior education, their greater intelligence and push, have acquired an increasing influence in the town and the industry, and have edged the Tartars out of many professions. There are only two small Tartar oil firms, although many Tartars are interested in the business. At Baku, where they are numerically inferior, the Armenians form a majority on the town council, as the law does not allow the non-Christian races to have more than half the seats on local bodies. Even in competition with foreigners the Armenians hold their own, for while their interests on the naphtha industry are only 35 per cent. of the total, they are represented by five members out of seven on the Soviet Siezd (council of naphtha producers). There are also no Tartars on the Bourse Committee. One fact which struck me very forcibly during my stay at Baku was the extreme bitterness of the foreign element against the Armenians; its sympathies, save in two or three instances, seemed wholly on the side of the Tartars. This attitude, I confess, impressed me at the time, and having come to the Caucasus with an open mind, I became inclined to believe that the sufferings of the Armenians had been grossly exaggerated by the European Press, and that the Tartars were a much-maligned people. While a man like Agaieff, on whom I called, was able to make out a good case for the Tartars, Englishmen, Russians, and other outsiders were almost unanimous in their condemnation of the Armenians. Even the common Russian soldiers and policemen, when questioned as to who was to blame for the troubles, replied unhesitatingly, "Armiane." In a place where racial and religious animosities have reached a white heat it is very difficult to arrive at a fair estimate of the rights and wrongs of a controversy, and one naturally tends to trust in the judgment of foreigners who know the country well but should be free from bias. But on closer investigation I could not help coming to the conclusion that the foreigners were by no means so impartial as they at first appeared. The views of foreign financiers and managers are greatly influenced by the fact that they are in close commercial competition with the Armenians. If it were not for them the foreigners would soon have got the whole oil industry into their own hands, instead of being obliged to compete with capable, business-like, and energetic rivals. At the same time the Armenian workmen are much less tractable than the Tartars. They demand better food and higher wages, more comfortable lodgings, baths, reading-rooms, etc., whereas the Tartars are content with anything that is given them. The Armenians belong to workmen's societies, and if they do not get what they want they organize strikes, and even take part in revolutionary movements. With the Tartars, once you have their own chiefs and the Russian authorities on your side, you can do anything; but with the Armenians you must be careful. The latter, being politically more advanced than the Tartars, are more exacting. Then, since the Government instituted persecutions against them and their Church, they indulged in political agitation, which, if not primarily directed against the capitalists, did cause them loss by disturbing the general conditions of the town. This explains the attitude of the foreigners, and accounts for their bitterness against the Armenians. One prominent Englishman said to me that he would be glad to see the whole Armenian nation wiped out! He accused them of every conceivable crime, of having been the cause of the whole trouble, of being at the bottom of every revolutionary agitation, and even of having attempted his own life. The evidence adduced in support of these charges was, I am bound to say, quite Caucasian in its inconclusiveness, and I have never subsequently come on a particle of proof of their truth from any source. Prince Golytzin, who had been busy carrying out his anti-Armenian policy, had a few weeks before executed the confiscation of the Church property; in October his life was attempted. Early in 1904 Prince Nakashidze, a Georgian noble, who as Vice-Governor of Erivan had been actively implicated in the said confiscation, was appointed Governor of Baku. His arrival coincided with a recrudescence of Armeno-Tartar hostility, and an outbreak seemed imminent at that time, so that many Armenians sent their families away from the town. In July, 1904, Prince Golytzin left the Caucasus for good and went to St.252 THE NEW ARMENIA Petersburg. Towards the end of the year Prince Nakashidze was summoned to the capital, where he had several conferences with his former chief, and subsequently returned to Baku. Excitement in the oil city and the hatred of the two races increased, and the Governor did nothing to reconcile them. On the contrary, he was perpetually talking of an Armeno-Tartar pogrom as imminent; he openly encouraged the Tartars, and treated the Armenians with marked coldness. When a deputation of Armenians came to express their fears and ask him for protection, his only reply was, "Do not you shoot and no one will shoot at you." In the meanwhile a number of murders of Armenians, attributed to Tartars, had been committed in the Shemakhinka street, and, on the other hand, several mutilated corpses of Tartars, supposed to have been murdered by Armenians, were discovered under the snow which had just melted away. There is a strong presumption that the police was at the bottom of these affairs, which it had instigated with a view to promoting Tartar-Armenian hatred, but I cannot say whether the suspicion is well-formed. The authorities were perpetually telling the Tartars that the Armenians were meditating a massacre of Mussulmans, and that they should be on the qui vive. Early in February a Tartar shopkeeper named Gashum Beg, who had assaulted several Armenian boys and girls, was attacked by an Armenian and wounded, but he succeeded in killing his assailant. He was subsequently arrested, and as he was trying to escape a soldier of the escort, also an Armenian, shot him dead. The assailant proved to be a member of the revolutionary committee, but the Armenians deny that that association ordered him to kill Gashum Beg, and state that he had been deputed to do so by the family of one of the boys he had assaulted. A relative of Gashum Beg's, a rich Tartar named Babaieff, determined, according to the Tartar custom of vendetta, to avenge him, and a few days later tried to shoot an Armenian in the courtyard of the church, who had been pointed out to him as the man who had killed Gashum Beg; but he failed, and in the emeute which ensued, another Armenian killed him. This deed caused great excitement in the town, and Prince Nakashidze summoned some Armenian journalists to his Chancery, and delivered them a long discourse on the dangers of an Armeno-Tartar pogrom. He declared that if the Tartars did rise against the Armenians he would be powerless to defend them, as he had not enough troops, and the police were unreliable, many of them being Tartars. In fact one of the said Armenians told me that parts of his speech corresponded almost word for word with the report which the Governor made after the massacre, which suggests that he had foreseen the whole affair. The body of Babaieff was carried in procession through the Tartar quarter, and exposed to view. Had Prince Nakashidze wished to prevent trouble he would have stopped the procession; the sight of the murdered man roused the Moslems to fury, and on the 19th of February they proceeded to massacre every Armenian they came across. The Armenians defended themselves as best they could, but the Tartars were much more numerous and better armed. The authorities remained absolutely passive, and to the frenzied appeals for help which Prince Nakashidze was constantly receiving from hard-pressed Armenians besieged in their own houses, he replied that he had no troops and could do nothing, although as a matter of fact he had 2,000 men. He was seen driving about the town openly encouraging the Tartars, and slapping them on the back; and on one occasion, happening to see some too officious soldiers disarming a Tartar, he ordered them to give the man back his rifle, which of course they did! M. Adamoff, one of the richest Armenians in Baku, was besieged for three days in his own house, and being a first-rate shot he killed a number of his assailants with his own hand; at last he and his son were shot dead, the Tartars set fire to the house, rushed in and butchered all the inmates. A similar fate befell Lalaieff, another rich Armenian, who defended himself until ammunition gave out, after which his house was burnt and the whole household killed. To his appeals for help the Governor made no reply, but came himself when all was over. At last on the fourth day, when both sides were exhausted, the pogrom came to an end, after some 300 to 400 people had been killed. The Tartar Sheikh-ul- Islam arrived from Tiflis and paraded the town in company with the Armenian bishop, and a sort of peace was patched up. The Sheikh-ul-Islam, a worthy, well-meaning old man, but without much influence over the more turbulent elements of his people, preached a peace sermon in the Armenian cathedral, while the bishop preached in a similar strain in the mosque. The cooler heads on both sides were beginning to see that the chief responsibility lay with the Government, but the race hatred was now so bitter that no lasting reconciliation was possible. For some months things remained comparatively quiet although isolated murders were very frequent. Both Armenians and Tartars armed themselves, but the former did so on a larger scale, for they had had such experience of the Government's hostility that they felt they now had only themselves to rely on. The Tartars, thinking themselves secure in the Government's favor, were less active. An official inquiry into the outbreak was conducted by Senator Kuzminsky, but none of the guilty were punished. The Armenians, however, took vengeance into their own hands, and on May 24th Prince Nakashidze was blown up by a bomb. As for his own guilt in this matter there can, I think, be no doubt whatever. The direct responsibility of Prince Golytzin is more questionable, for he had left the Caucasus several months before the Baku outbreak; but the troubles were unquestionably the direct outcome of his own policy, and he may have given suggestions to Prince Nakashidze when the latter was in the capital. The Armenian Deportations (From the English Blue Book) THUS the second contention breaks down, and we are left with the third, which lays little stress on justice or public safety and bases the case on revenge. The Armenian civil population in the Ottoman Empire, it is argued, owes its misfortunes to the Armenian volunteers in the Russian Army. "Our Armenians in Turkey," say the Turks in effect, "have certainly suffered terribly from the measures we have taken; they may even have suffered innocently; but can you blame us? Was it not human nature that we should revenge ourselves on the Armenians at home for the injury we had received from their compatriots fighting against us at the front of the Russian ranks--men who had actually volunteered to fight against us in the enemy's cause?" This is almost the favorite argument of the apologists and yet it is surely the most monstrous of any, for these Armenian volunteers owed no allegiance to the Turks at all. but were ordinary Russian subjects. Through territorial acquisitions and free immigration from across the frontier, the Russian Government had, by 1914, acquired the sovereignty over little less than half the Armenian race (the statistics of the Armenian population in Russia, up to date, are 1,636,486 for the Caucasus, and approximately two million for the Empire as a whole. For the Ottoman Empire, statistics compiled in 1912 estimate the Armenian population at 2,100,000). Russia was as much the lawful "fatherland" of this substantial minority as Turkey was of the remainder. It is a misfortune for any nation to be divided between two allegiances, especially when the states to which they owe them elect to go to war; but it is at least an alleviation of the difficulty, and one that does honor to both parties concerned, when either fraction of the divided nationality finds itself in sympathy, even under the test of war, with the particular state to which its allegiance is legally due The loyalty of the Russian Armenians to Russia cast not imputation upon the Ottoman Armenians, and was no concern of the Turks. The latter will probably explain that they had no objection to the Russian Armenians doing their duty, but resented their doing more: "The conscripts naturally answered the summons, but why did those who were exempt equip themselves so eagerly as volunteers? The Ottoman Armenians adopted a painfully different attitude. At the beginning of the war, the Young Turkish Party sent representatives to the Congress of the Armenian 'Dashnaktzoutioun' Party at Erzerum, offered them concessions to their nationality, and called upon them to organized volunteers and join in the invasion of Russian territory. Yet they decidedly refused--refused in this case when their kinsmen did not wait to be asked in the other. This reveals the real sympathies and aspirations of the Armenian people, not only the Armenians in Russia, but those in our country as well." There is, of course, a crushing answer to these tirades. If the Armenians felt so differently towards the Turks and the Russians, then that was a serious reflection on their treatment by the Turks, and the logical way to change their feelings was to treat them better. Could the civilian Armenians who remembered the massacre of their innocent kinsfolk at Adana a few years before have been expected to volunteer in support of those who had commanded these massacres? Could their feelings have been other than they were? But so long as only their feelings were in question and their behavior remained correct, the Turks had no right to proceed with them in any but a humane and constitutional manner. The argument can be driven home by a parallel. There are Polish volunteer legions in the Austro-Hungarian Army. What would the Turks' German apologists have said if the Russian Government had appeased its resentment against these Austrian-Polish civilians on their own side of the frontier? It is a significant fact that all these Turkish complaints are directed against Russian Armenians in Russian service. These is no hint of treachery or malingering on the part of those Ottoman Armenians who had been drafted, many of them illegally, into the Turkish Army--no insinuation that their record was not as satisfactory in 1914 as in 1912. To the editor's knowledge, the German apologists have only been able to fasten upon two "traitors" in the legal (though not in the moral) sense of the word. There have been refugees, of course, like Mourad of Sivas, who escaped into the Caucasus when the atrocities were in full course--men who had just been compelled to fight for their lives, and had seen their neighbors and kinsfolk massacred once more on all sides of them. Not even the German apologists would dare to censure these men under these circumstances for enrolling in the volunteers. But there are only two cases adduced of Ottoman subjects who went over to the Russians before the atrocities began--a certain Karakin Pasdermadjian, a deputy in the Ottoman Parliament, and another Armenian named Suren, stated to have been a delegate at the "Dashnaktzoutioun" Congress at Erzerum. "In face of this," argues the German writer from whose pamphlet these instances are taken, "it was the Ottoman Government's duty to uphold public law and order. In war-time, measures of this kind assume an especially weighty and pressing character"-- and with this generality he implicitly condones the atrocities of 1915. If this represents the official apologia of the Ottoman Government, the only answer is a reductio254 THE NEW ARMENIA ad absurdum. On the same principle, when Sir Roger Casement landed from a German submarine on the Irish coast, it would have been the British Government's duty to deport all the Roman Catholic inhabitants of Ireland and maroon them, say, on the coast of Labrador or in the central desert of Australia. The parallel is exact, and leaves nothing more to be said, unless, indeed, what was said by Talaat Bey, the Young Turkish Minister of the Interior, in a recent interview with a correspondent of the Berliner Tageblatt. "The sad events that have occurred in Armenia," he vouchsafed, "have prevented my sleeping well at night. We have been reproached for making no distinction between the innocent Armenians and the guilty; but that was utterly impossible, in view of the fact that those who were innocent to-day might be guilty to-morrow." There is no need of further witnesses. The various Turkish contentions thus fail, from first to last, to meet the point. They all attempt to trace the atrocities of 1915 to events arising out of the war; but they not only cannot justify them on this ground, they do not even suggest any adequate motive for their perpetration. It is evident that the war was merely an opportunity and not a cause--in fact, that the deportation scheme, and all that it involved, flowed inevitably from the general policy of the Young Turkish Government. This inference will be confirmed if we analyze the political tenets to which the Young Turks were committed. The Young Turkish movement began as a reaction against the policy of Abd-ul-Hamid. Its founders repudiated his "neutralization of forces"; they maintained that the Ottoman Empire must stand by its own strength, and that this strength must be developed by a radical internal reconstruction. From their asylum at Paris they preached the doctrines of the French Revolution--religious toleration, abolition of caste- privileges, equality of all citizens before the law, equality of obligation to perform military service, constitutional government through a representative parliament. And when they came into power, they made some attempt to put these doctrines into practice. In Turkey for a brief space of the year 1908, as in France twelve decades before, the vision of "Pure Reason" did bring peace and goodwill among men. Nearly all the foreign observers who were in the country when "Huriet" came, testify to this momentary, magic transfiguration of hatred into love; and the Armenians, who had desired more than any of their neighbors to see this day, might well believe that the Young Turks' ideal was identical with their own. Yet there were vital differences beneath the surface. The Young Turks realized that the Christian elements were an asset; they did not propose, at the outset, to destroy them, as Abd-ul-Hamid had done; but they wanted still less to co-operate with them as separate partners in the Ottoman State. The "Millets" were as abhorrent to them, as an institution, as the autocracy of Abd-ul-Hamid. They set up against the principle of the "Millet" the programme of "Ottomanization." The Turkist leaven was to permeate the non-Turkist lump, until it had all become of one uniform Turkish substance. In Parliament this programme took such forms as a bill to make the Turkish language the universal and compulsory medium of secondary education (the vast majority of secondary schools in the Empire being, of course, American, Armenian or Greek, and practically none of them Turkish), and the Armenian deputies found themselves opposing it in concert with the Liberal Party, which included the Arab bloc and stood for the toleration of national individualities. The Young Turks, in fact, had imbibed both the good currents and the bad in the modern political atmosphere of Western Europe--its democratic doctrines but its chauvinism as well. Most political theorists debarred from responsible practice give this same confused allegiance to incompatible ideals, and all, when they come into power, are compelled by circumstances to choose which master they will serve. In 1908, the choice of the Young Turks was not predestined; the "Committee of Union and Progress" might have set its face towards either of its divided goals; but disillusionment soon decided its orientation. The magic dawn of "Huriet" faded; the old, crushing burden of Ottoman Government descended upon shoulders not expert, like Abd-ul-Hamid's, at balancing the weight; the Austro-Bulgarian violation of the Treaty of Berlin and the subsequent territorial losses of the Balkan War shook the Young Turkish Party's prestige, aggravated the difficulty of their problem, and embittered their attitude towards its solution. The' current of chauvinism gained upon them more and more, and their intervention in the European War demonstrated that its mastery was complete, for their calculations in intervening were of a thoroughly Prussian character. A military triumph was to restore them their prestige; it was to recover ancient territories of the Empire in Egypt, the Caucasus and the coveted Persian province of Azerbajan; it was to shake off the trammels of international control, and solve the internal problem by cutting the Gordian Knot. But the hopes of conquest and prestige were early shattered by the strategical failures of the winter of 1914-5, which were almost as humiliating as those of 1912, and then the Young Turks concentrated savagely upon "Ottomanization" at home. Ottomanization has become the Young Turks' obsession. Their first act after declaring war was to repudiate the Capitulations; their latest stroke has been to declare the Turkish language the exclusive medium of official business in the Empire, with only a year's delay--a step which has caused consternation among their German allies. And in this mood they turned to the Armenian question, which happened at the moment to have reached an important phase. In 1912-3 the diplomatists of Europe had once more met in consultation over the Ottoman Empire, and the Armenians had presented their case to the Conference at London, as they had presented it at Berlin thirty- five years before. The Delegation of 1912 was nominated THE NEW ARMENIA 255 nominated by His Holiness the Catholicos of Etchmiadzin. Its President was His Excellency Boghos Nubar Pasha. When the Conference proved unable to take cognizance of their petition, they applied to the individual governments of the Powers. The Russian Government took the initiative and drafted a new scheme for the administration of the Six Vilayets, which it submitted to the Signatories of the Treaty of Berlin. The German Government opposed, but was won over by the Russian diplomacy and by the representations of the Armenian delegates, who repaired to Berlin in person. Then, when the German opposition had been withdrawn, the Russian draft was revised by the Ambassadors of the Powers at Constantinople, accepts, with modifications, by the Young Turkish Government, and actually promulgated by them on the 8th February, 1914. In its final shape, the scheme still embodied the main points of reform which had been regarded as cardinal ever since 1878. There was to be a mixed Gendarmerie, under a European chief, recruited from the Turks and Armenians, but closed to the Kurds; Moslem and Christian were to be equal before the law; the Armenian language was to be a recognized medium in the courts and public offices (a bitter clause for the Young Turkish nationalists); there were to be no restrictions on the multiplication of Armenian schools. Finally, the vilayets affects by the scheme were to be divided into two groups, and each group was to be placed under a European Inspector-General. The two Inspector-Generals were authorized to appoint and dismiss all officials in their respective spheres, except those "of superior rank." They were themselves to be appointed by the Ottoman Government, on the recommendation of the Powers, for a term of ten years, and not to be removable within this period. The Government duly proceeded to select two candidates for these Inspectorates, a Dutchman and a Norwegian, but its treatment of these gentlemen soon showed that in diplomacy, at any rate, the Young Turks had adopted the methods of Abd-ul-Hamid. A clause was inserted in the Inspectors' contract of engagement, empowering the Government to denounce it at any moment upon payment of an indemnity of one year's salary--a flat violation of the ten years' term provided for under the scheme; and the list of "superior officials" was inflated until the patronage of the Inspectors, which, next to their irremovability, would have been their most effective power, was reduced to an illusion. The unfortunate nominees were spared the farce of exercising their maimed authority. They had barely reached their provinces when the European War broke out, and the Government promptly denounced the contracts and suspended the Scheme of Reforms, as the first step towards its own intervention in the conflict. Thus, at the close of 1914, the Armenians found themselves in the same position as in 1883. The measures designed for their security had fallen through, and left nothing behind but the resentment of the Government that still held them at its mercy. The deportations of 1915 followed as inexorably from the Balkan War and the Project of 1914 as the massacres of 1895-6 had followed from the Russian War and the Project of 1878. Only in the execution of their revenge the Young Turks revealed all the sinister features of their dissimilarity to Abd-ul-Hamid. The Sultan, so far as he differed from the familiar type of Oriental despot, had been an opportunist in the tradition of Metternich--a politician of mature experience and delicate touch, unencumbered by any constructive programme to disturb the artistry of his game of finesse. He repressed the Armenians to a nicety after preparing for it eighteen years. The Young Turks were adventurers who had caught the catchwords of another generation and another school--the apes of Danton and Robespierre, and doctrinaires to the core. For the old, anachronistic ascendency of Moslem over Rayah, to the maintenance of which Abd-ul-Hamid had cynically devoted his abilities, they substituted the idea of Turkish nationalism, which clothed the same evil in a more clearly-cut and infinitely more dynamic form. They were fanatics with an unreasoned creed, builders with a plan that they meant to carry through, and no half-measures would content them, no inhibitions of prudence or humanity deter them from the attempt to realize the whole. Hindrances only exasperated them to sweeping action, an a blind concentration on their programme shielded them from doubts. "Our acts," Talaat Bey is reported to have said, in the interview quoted above, "have been dictated to us by a national and historical necessity. The idea of guaranteeing the existence of Turkey must outweigh every other consideration." The first of these sentiments is the pure-milk of the Eighteenth Century ideologues; there is a Prussian adulteration in the second, which smacks of more recent times. It is the voice of the youngest, crudest, most ruthless national movement in Europe, and the acts which it excuses, and which the documents in this volume describe, where the barbarous initiation of the Near East into the European fraternity. An Armenian Child to God BY MAURICE FERBER "I was an Armenian child, and my father was peacefully gathering in the apples, when the Turks came, laughing, down the highway: and they mocked my father, and they said, 'To-morrow you shall eat the apples of Eden,' and they plunged at him with bayonets. Then a tall Turk, with a curse, shouted: 'And the little seedling, too, must we cut off.' Then he shot me dead; and it was pitiful to see my blood flow, for I had not an overrunning measure of the ruddy fluid. Thus I tarried on Earth but the short days of my life, before I came back to Thee." --Boston HeraldTHE NEW ARMENIA A LITERARY and POLITICAL PERIODICAL THE NEW ARMENIA, published semi-monthly, is the only English Periodical in America for those who are interested in Armenian life and letters; and for all devotees of justice who believe, with the late Gladstone, that "To serve Armenia is to serve civilization." Yearly Subscription, twenty-four issues, $2.00 in advance. Canadian and foreign Subscriptions, $2.50 Remittance may be made by New York draft, Postal or Express order, or by Registered Letter. Notice of a change in address should reach us at least two weeks before it is to take effect. ADDRESS: Editor of THE NEW ARMENIA 949 Broadway, New York, N. Y. ARMENIA Eco Delle Rivendicazioni Armene Rivista mensile illustrata Prof. Corrado Corradino, Direttore Onorario Abbonamenti Annui: Direzione Ed Amministrazione: Per l'Italia L. 2,50 — Estero Frs. 5 Corso Reg. Margherita, 73, Torino, Italy ARARAT A SEARCHLIGHT ON ARMENIA Yearly Subscription, Six Shillings All communications should be addressed to the Editor, "ARARAT," The Armenian United Association of London, 47a, Redcliffe Square, London, S. W., England. THE FRIEND OF ARMENIA ORGAN OF THE SOCIETY OF THE "FRIENDS OF ARMENIA." PUBLISHED QUARTERLY. Office: 47, Victoria Street, Westmister, S. W. 1. LONDON, ENGLAND ARMENIAN POEMS Rendered into English verse by MISS ALICE STONE BLACKWELL A new and much enlarged edition of Miss Blackwell's book of Armenian Poems is just published, and is to be sold for the benefit of the relief fund. It contains poems by Siamanto, Varoujan, Toumanian, Hovhannessian, Chrimian Hairig and many others. PRICE $1.50. With foreign postage $1.58 For sale by Robert Chambers, Room 616, Ford Building, Boston, Mass. Armenian Legends and Poems ILLUSTRATED AND COMPILED BY ZABELLE C. BOYAJIAN J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd., London, Eng., Publishers. This volume contains a selection of gems from Armenian Literature, both ancient and modern. There are 12 beautiful colored plates to illustrate some of the legends and poems. In these illustrations Mis Boyajian has evolved an entirely new style of art, based upon the decorative scheme of ancient Armenian missal work. All the profits will be given to the Lord Mavor's Armenian Fund Price $8.00 Apply to: E. P. Dutton & Co., 681 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y.[?] atro [?] barbar [?] which is pr [?] ing [?] r country, and thus assist as in o [?] efforts for freedom. Resolved, that we express our thanks to the press of this country, which has given so much attention to our national question and presented to the country the terrible condition of our people, and by it securing for us the sympathy of this free people, thus getting our just cause better understood by the civilized nations. Resolved that we express thanks to all individual Americans who, by word and action, did all they could for our beloved nation. Resolved, that we appoint a committee who have power to join with other committees, in framing a protest to the great powers of Europe. Several newspaper accounts of the outrages were read at last night's [?] thig, but perhaps the most startling [?] s a special cable dispatch to the [?] w York World, under the date of Nov. [?] It is as follows: [?] e terrible massacre of perhaps ten thousand Armenians by Turkish soldiers [?] and Kurdish tribesmen has horrified [?] the English public. But there is [?] ch indignant outburst from the [?] press as followed the discovery [?] e Bulgarian atrocities, which [?] butcheries equal both in enormity [?] magnitude. [?] World correspondent talked to- [?] h Mr Hagopian, an Armenian [?] and the president of the Ar [?] Patriotic Association, through [?] the account of the massacre [?] the press. He complained bit- [?] t the Daily News did not even [?] the full description from Bitlis, [?] e Times sought to minimize [?] r and to discredit the particular [?] ause the letter was anonymous [?] ated. [?] Hagopian declares that it would [?] valent to a sentence of death on [?] writer of the letter if his name [?] divulged, as the Turkish authorities [?] would instantly mark him. He [?] the World correspondent that the [?] nt comes not from an Armenian, but from an American missionary stationed near the scene of the massacre. [?] letter was not intrusted to the [?] ish mail, where it would have [?] certain of being stopped, as after [?] ges of this description Turkish [?] ls devote all their energies to [?] ating communication with Eu- [?] the courage of American missionaries, who, at considerable risk, sent this account beyond the frontier by hand, aided by friendly merchants. Nothing would have been heard of these atrocities for months. From personal experience with Turkish savagery in Armenia and from his confidence in the source from which the account comes Mr. Hagopian absolutely relies on its accuracy. As to the proposed sending of a commission of inquiry by the sultan, Mr. Hagopian thinks it will be useless unless it is conducted under international supervision and accompanied by full guarantees that witnesses shall not be murdered afterwards by Turkish officials. Otherwise no one will dare to give evidence, for he would do so on peril of his own life and the lives of his relatives. Speaking with passionate earnestness, Mr. Hagopian asserted that no words can adequately picture the unspeakable indignities and the incessant persecution the Armenians have suffered under Turkish governors. They have sunk hopeless into despair because Turkey has been permitted for 12 years to ignore her solemn pledges to introduce reforms, though these pledges were guaranteed by the European powers, and by England most strongly of all. Asked as to the possibility of getting further information now that the Turkish officials have been put on the alert, Mr. Hagopian says it will be more difficult than ever, as no correspondent would be permitted to enter Armenia. Even the consuls are powerless, for when they attempt to intervene the persons on whose complains they act are doomed. The World correspondent subsequently called at the foreign office, where he was informed that the British ambassador to Turkey had already made representations to the sultan and than an inquiry is promised. The political conditions here are not [?] to the Armenians getting [?] from further Turkish bru- [?] ugh British influence. The [?] indisposed to raise [?] for the government [?] always op- [?] mbar- [?] rly is [?] dition of things is [?] [?] the public. Occasional [?] other letters smuggled [?] the lines tell direful tales of [?] ing and torture. The Armenians are now united, without regard to sect or creed, in protest against the outrages committed in Armenia. They will now work together in an effort to rouse the Christian world to the true state of affairs in Armenia. The Huntchagist Society maintains its independent organization, which is the revolutionary society, will do all in its power to help Armenia to rise and throw off the yoke of tyranny by force of arms. The Armenians claim that the Turkish government has its spies in this city and that copies of the local papers are sent to Turkey and they consequently refuse to give out names of speakers or committees appointed last evening for publication. They say relatives or friends there will be singled out and made to suffer. The evening service of the Protestant Church was a memorial service for the massacred countrymen. Upon Thanksgiving day all the Armenians of the city will unite in a memorial procession. They will assemble at the Laurel Street Church at 8 o'clock and after Memorial services will proceed to Curtis Hall in a body, headed by muffled drums and the National and Armenian colors. Both pastors will ride at the head of the line in an open carriage. At Curtis Hall memorial services will also be conducted. The Armenian colony in this city is the largest in the country. Its numbers between 700 and 800 men, most of whom are employed by the Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Company. AN APPEAL TO ENGLAND. Mass. Spy The Cradle of Liberty Rocked by Armenians Nov. 30, 1894 Gov. Greenhalge and Other Prominent Persons Join in the Protest Against Turkish Inhumanity. Boston, Nov. 26--An audience which crowded "the cradle of liberty" to the doors, made up largely of Armenians, but with a goodly number of Americans, gathered at Faneuil Hall tonight to hold an indignation meeting over the recent atrocious treatment of their countrymen by representatives of the Turkish government. Rev. J. S. Barrows, editor of the Christian Register, presided. On the platform were Gov. Greenhalge, Mrs. Julia Ward Howe, Wm. Lloyd Garrison, Rev. Francis E. Clarke, Rev. Thomas H. van Ness of Boston, Dr. Samuel F. Gumbart of Cambridge, and Col. Albert Clarke, secretary of the Home Market Club, all of whom made addresses, which were received with great applause. M. Gulesian, secretary of the United Friends of Armenia, the last speaker, read reports from his fellow countryment in Armenia, giving accounts of the massacre of between 8000 and 10,000 men, women and children early in September. Resolutions were adopted, reciting that it was the report of the Amercan commission of inquiry that convinced Mr. Gladstone of the [tru?t] the similar Bulgarian atrocities, and petitioned President Cleveland to instruct our minister at Constantinople to investigate the matter, either by sending a trusted messenger or by joining in a commission sent by united European powers. Any investigation decreed by the Sultan is denounced as wholly untrustworthy. The signatory powers are appealed to for the immediate enforcement of the 61st article of the Berlin treaty, for the reforms in Armenia therein guaranteed have never been carried out. On the contrary, the condition of Armenians in Turkey has grown more deplorable. Appeal is made specially to England, because she has the care of Armenians in Turkey, just as France has the care of those in Syria. England holds the island of Cyprus as a guaranty of the protectorate. THE ARMENIAN MASSACRE A Turkish Official Admits That 2000 Were Killed. Vienna, Nov. 23--The Politishche Correspondenz prints a letter from an official Turkish source, whose intention is to minimize the significance of the Armenian massacre in the Sassoun district. The letter repeats the old statements as to Armenian rebellion, and asserts that at Sassoun all the Armenians fell in open combat. The troops, the writer admits, killed 2000 of them. Meetings to protest against Turkey's treatment of the Armenian Christians have been held in Minneapolis, Chicago, New York, Boston and in many minor cities, indeed, wherever the Armenians are found in any number. The meeting in Boston very properly was held in Fanueil Hall. Julia Ward Howe presided, and Lloyd Garrison was one of the speakers. It is well that the American people should in some way make its indignation felt. There can be no doubt of the substantial truth of the reports that have come from Bitlis and vicinity. Letters from the missionaries of the American Board in the vicinity, received this week, corroborate the dispatches of the past two weeks which have been based on letters to the friends of Armenia in London. Think of it! The thousands were slaughtered last September and Christendom is just learning of it. This fact in itself is an indictment of Turkey. The commission which Turkey has appointed to investigate is not deserving of confidence--its verdict is predestined to be one of excuse, and at best what self-imposed remedy can it suggest? Turkey, however, fears somewhat the condemnation of Christendom. She already has taken steps to prevent all papers from entering the empire which in any way refer to the massacres. If Great Britain, the United States and Germany could agree upon a policy that would force Turkey to permit an investigation that would be thorough, and if Great Britain would resolutely live up to the treaty which makes her the guardian of the interests of the people whom Turkey is permitting the Kurds to ravage and murder, then a new day might dawn for the Armenians. Unfortunately, thus far the British Foreign Office has given no sign of any such conception of its duty in the matter, and the Armenians seem to have no ray of hope save as it may come out of the semi-darkness of Russia. But Russia and England seem to be coquetting just now, so that source of hope and comfort is denied. Congregationalist The in Memphis, Tenn., of the sheriff and those implicated with him in the recent lynching of the six colored me, gives evidence that the governor and other officials in that state, where the six widows of the murdered men lately were themselves in evidence together in court and gave their testimony, are in earnest in trying to put a check to this form of barbarism and national disgrace. The anti-lynching agitation in England has not been without its influence. As Mr. William Lloyd Garrison in a letter printed in the London Times a few days ago remarks, it is no unusual thing for the down-trodden people of a nation to appeal for justice to the world's tribunal. It was, doubtless, impertinent, he says, for Lafayette to interfere with England's treatment of her colonies, but America cherishes his name as sacredly as that of Washington; to shame Austria for the wrongs of Hungary, Kossuth submitted his case to the enlightened sentiment of England and America; Mazzini could gain the ear of Italy more easily from London than from Rome; to-day oppressed Russia, through Kennan and exiled Stepniak, speaks with more force than would be possible in the dominion of the Czar. And now Armenia seeks redress, not by changing Turkish sentiment, but by appeal to English and American sympathy and sense of justice. So to-day the South, which had resented Northern protests, is no longer indifferent to the broader public sentiment. It does not wish to put itself in the same class with Turkey. Advance, Nov. 29 There is dissatisfaction by Armenians in London, in regard to the Turkish commission appointed by the Sultan to inquire into the reent massacre in Armenis. They charge that Abdullah Bey, the head of the commission has a bad record, and that the purpose of such an appointment is to suppress the truth. The British Foreign office seems to [?] complications in the [?] Letters have been received by private persons in Boston, confirming the reported massacre of Armenians near Bitlis, Turkey, which occurred in September last. According to these letters, the massacre was the result of an affray between some Kurds and Armenian villagers, from whom the Kurds had stolen their flocks. The Sultan ordered the military to the scene to put down the rebellion, and numbers of innocent women and children were killed with the others. The Turkish government has excluded American newspapers from Turkey because of their reports of the massacre. Friends' Intelligencer and Journal. Nov. 29 Indian [Bank?], Nov. 19;94 Advices received from a Turkish source show that 2,000 Armenians were killed in the recent massacres in Armenia.city of Moosh, and the claim was made that Armenian soldiers had overrun the land, killing and plundering on every side. This furnished another pretext, and troops were called in from far and near. The commander of the military post in Erzingan, a hundred miles distant, made a desperate race on, and is said to have hung from his breast, after reading it to his soldiers, an order from Constantinople to cut the Armenians up, root and branch, as they loved their King and Government. No compassion was shown to age or sex, not even when the victims fell suppliant at the feet of the officers. Women and babes were slaughtered without the slightest mercy. The details as given are too horrible to narrate. Women and girls were violated by the hundred and then slaughtered. It is believed that from five to ten thousand were killed. Had the reports come from the Armenians themselves it might appear as if there were some exaggeration. As a matter of fact the worst stories are told by the Turkish soldiers who participated in the carnage. Some of them declare that what they did was simply under the pressure of orders from their officers, and that even the most that they did was far exceeded by the outrages of the Kurds. There is a perfect reign of terror throughout the whole region ; refugees escaping to cities a hundred miles and more away, dare not tell the story of what they have been through, and it is only as, now and then, one with a little remnant of courage or confidence overcomes his fear that the facts are coming out. These facts speak for themselves. They simply show that the end has come, and that the system of Turkish rule which for these years has utilized the worst elements of the most barbarous people known on the face of the earth, not exceeded by the fiercest tribes of Africa or the South Seas, must stop. The fact that the British Consul at Van on investigation indorsed the statement of outrage, and the fact that the British Ambassador at Constantinople was unwilling to accept the official denial of the Turkish Government, but has started an independent investigation, give us hope of some definite results, and that the Sultan and his advisers in Constantinople will see that they cannot longer fly in the face of the humanity of the world. Radical measures must be taken, and taken at once. There must be to imprisoning of a few Kurds as an offset to blind Western eyes. The men who are responsible for these orders, whoever they may be, whe her Kurdish chiefs, local governors, military pashas or Cabinet officers, must be punished or the Turkish Government is at an end ; and Europe will enter in and take into its own hands the control of a country of as fine resources as any on the face of the earth, but too long under the heel of an ignorant and outrageous despotism. The responsibility rests chiefly upon Great Britain. For these years since the Crimean War she has stood as the defender of Turkish autonomy. She has accomplished much. Of late her hand has been relaxing ; it must tighten or she must leave the grasp to somebody else. The entente between Great Britain and Russia, and the probable opening of the Dardanelles to the Russian fleet will make this further intervention easier. The powers must do for Asia Minor at least what they have done for Syria. N.Y. Independent, Nov. 29 Missions ANXIETY IN EASTERN TURKEY BY THE REV. W. N. CHAMBERS, MISSIONARY OF THE AMERICAN BOARD. One of the first out-stations organized in the Ezrûm region was the village of Chevermeh, in the Khanoos district. That was in the year 1853. There were a few descendants of the old Tondragians, supposed by some to have sprung from the Paulicians, and who had retained some of the traditions of their fathers. Persecution had driven them to hold those traditions and to celebrate their rites in secret. Soon after the arrival of the missionary the Gospel was put in their hands, and some of these men became eager to declare themselves for evangelical Christianity. They heroically endured most bitter persecution. Tho once and again driven from the district, they were finally able to establish themselves as a community, organize a church, secure a pastor, and build a chapel and school. This building, for the place, is a large and commodious one, and enjoys—what few other chapels do—an Imperial firman (special permit from his Majesty the Sultan). The work prospered. The people had struggled well up toward self support. Hard times and resultant poverty, however, led to the uniting of this place with Heramik, a near village which later had been organized as an out-station. These two places were united under the care of the Rev. Mr. K., who has now been the pastor of that flock, first as preacher and later as ordained pastor, for a quarter of a century. [?] r of a vigorous evangelical work which made itself felt through [?] plain The other day this faithful and devoted pastor [?] me, his utterance punctuated by sobs: "Ah, sir, [?] reached this age. I have passed the prime of my life and am almost gray. After twenty-five years of service there should be something to which I could point as indication of work accomplished for the Lord. But now little more than the buildings in which we have been accustomed to worship remain to really indicate what has been accomplished. I see my people in deep distress. They are being scattered—many of them are fleeing to Russia. The greater part of them are suffering from hunger. I dread to think of the condition that will prevail the coming winter. The people naturally appeal to me for assistance and advice. What can I do to relieve them? what can I say to encourage those who remain? May God, indeed, have mercy upon us." Robbery, oppression and famine have left the plain well-nigh desolate. Many have fled to Russia. Those remaining are living in terror. Yesterday a man with his wife and two small children came from that district to this city to beg. I said to him that his coming here was useless, as the people here were in need. "Yes," he said, I will go back to my village. It is better for us to die there at home, than here or on the mountains as friendless wanderers." The work has had good organization and good success on this plain. It has been established in several places, and there is much to be done throughout the district. It is today almost in confusion. In order to keep it from entire confusion this pastor has been engaged as an evangelist to travel the entire plain. At this time of distress when we should stretch out our hands in larger assistance, we are forced to take away the pastor of this oldest and very important out station and leave the brethren without even the consolation of a winter school. In 1895 will we be able to keep even this evangelist in the field? The $116,000 debt does not inspire us with great hope for that. ESZRUM. N.Y. Independent, Nov. 29 The great difficulty about the Armenian massacres is the difficulty of getting correct intelligence. There is a great deal of Turkish oppression going on in those remote regions, aggravated by the marauding and kidnapping of the Kurds, and there is intense hatred between the Christian and Mussulman populations; and both sides, of course, exaggerate this feeling for the purpose of working on European opinion. But that the Turkish oppression is frightful there can be no doubt, and it is highly probable that some Armenian resistance was punished by wholesale massacre. This has been the Turkish mode of repressing insubordination of any kind on the part of its Christian subjects ever since the Turks began to have any Christian subjects. They have perpetrated these massacres now and again in every part of their dominions. That of Scio in 1822 made a profound impression on Christendom, but that of Bulgaria in 1876 was nearly as bad, but would have passed comparatively unnoticed if Mr. Schuyler and Mr. McGahan had not happened to be on the spot. The truth is that there are no remedies for Turkish rule but abolition. The Armenians, once a warlike people, and furnishing some good soldiers to the Russian service, have, through ages of oppression, become warlike and are incapable of effecting their own deliverance. It will probably come some day from Russian interference. In letting the Turks have a free hand in that region the western Powers are playing into Russian hands. But there is little use in remonstrating with the Turks or exposing them, and their own press, even the European version of it, is muzzled by censorship such as has not been seen in Europe since the middle ages. One of the horrible incidents of Turkish rule from which the Armenians suffer severely is the insecurity of their young women. The kidnapping of Christian girls is a time-honored Turkish pastime, and keeps the Christian parents of pretty daughters in horrible anxiety. Down to the emancipation of Bulgaria, the entrance of Turks, especially high official Turks, into a Christian village in that province was always a signal for the close concealment of the young women. N.Y. Nation, Nov. 29, 1894 (or Dec. 1) [?] Mass Meeting of Her [?] in Association Hall. Worcester Spy A LOUD CRY FOR JUSTICE Nov. 30, 1894. European Powers to be Appealed to Against Turkey. The Sympathy of Christendom Invoked— Public Memorial Services Thanksgiving Day. The mass meeting of the Armenians of the city at Association Hall Sunday was one of the largest and most enthusiastic ever held by Armenians in this county. All the Armenians of the city u [?] regardless of religious or society [?] nection, and discussed the terrible [?] ferings of their unfortunate co [?] for nearly four hours. Fully five [?] dred men and three women were [?] ent. There were scores of speakers [?] each was frequently interrupted [?] plause and occasional comment [?] preciation from the big audience [?] The meeting was opened at [?] Rev Manghakian Deroonian [?] Laurel Streel Gregorian Church [?] Rev. Kyos Kemalion of the P [?] Church presiding. M.B. Se [?] as secretary. The speakers dwelt upon t [?] soon massacre and the present [?] tion of the country at length [?] said the massacre occurred because [?] people did not pay their taxes [?] they could not do, for they h [?] reduced to a state of destitu [?] Turkish tyranny. They had [?] robbed of their land and their [?] devastated by the outrages of [?] Kurds. They said that the blo [?] Sarssoon was upon the heads [?] civilized nations. The object of the meeting was to appoint a committee to meet other committees that will be appointed by Armenian colonies in America. The [?] vention will be held in the near future and a petition will be drawn up and sent to Russia and all other European powers who signed the Berlin treaty demanding that they insist that [?] key comply with the conditions of [?] treaty. They will ask the nations [?] rise up and demand a cessation [?] the outrages and that Armenia [?] given an independent government. A letter was read from Diarbeki Moosh in Armenia, purporting to have been written by an American resident that awakened much feeling. It was in substance as follows: In the mountains of Armenia there is a district of thirty Armenian villages. They have been subjected to the outrages and plundering of Kurds and the oppression of the government until the torture became unbearable. Last fall, the people arose and, obtaining a position easy of defense, held it for a time against the marauders. But the government sent soldiers against them, and between the soldiers and the Kurds thousands have been massacred. Homes have been destroyed and villages burned. The interest of the evening centered upon a set of lengthy resolutions which were presented and adopted. In substance, they were as follows: Whereas the Turkish government has not introduced the reforms as promised by the Berlin treaty; has perpetrated unheard of atrocities, as the Armenian nation is being daily consumed by the heartless and tyrannical Turkish government, as homes are being devastated and cities desolated, the country paralyzed, innocent men, women and children massacred by the thousands, we, the Armenians of the United States of America, Resolve to appeal to the Christian civilization directly, asking them interest themselves in our behalf, consideration of the fact that the massacre of Sarssoon has been only a small part of what the Turkish government has been guilty of since the beginning of the century, and that the outrages continue with time. Resolved, that we lament the [?] our thousands of martyred [?] and sisters, respect their [?] and will see to it that their [?] not have been shed in vain [?] Resolved, that [?] ments have h [?] morally res [?] still [?] st [?] c [?]