NAWSA General Correspondence Burleigh, Florence ROOM 210 Tel. 3500 EQUAL SUFFRAGE LEAGUE MYRICK BUILDING SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS President, Eliza R. Whiting 1st Vice-President, Mary C. Bowden 2nd Vice-President, Jennie J. Starr Treasurer, Virginia M. Southworth Recording Secretary, Florence Burleigh Corresponding Secretary, Anne M. Chapin 1st Auditor, Abby P. MacDuffie 2nd Auditor, Marie Ames 82 Belmont Ave. Springfield Mass. My dear Miss Blackwell, Your editorials are always interesting and to the point and I almost always agree with you, but in that headed "Women and Honesty" in the issue of Sept. 27th I must differ with you on a matter of principle so write to tell you of it. You say, If Mrs. Johnson could show that in the enfranchised states more women 2. than men cheated at elections she would service fair forms against woman suffrage. If the number of men and women cheating were about equal, it would not be an "argument either way." In which case it would logically follow that if more men then women cheat at elections (which is the case) that would be a "fair argument" against male suffrage, would it not? It seems to me your argument should be founded on bedrock principle that women should have the vote as a natural right 3 to self protection as criticizing in a community; that one class - or sex - has no right to say what another class - or sex - should do so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. Each woman should decide for herself just what her course of credit should be just as each man should for himself. If we make a plea for what women will do with the vote when she gets it we weaken our stand. The question is, are women human beings and as such have they a right to 4 a part in the government housekeeping? If so, grant their right to vote; if not, the burden or proof is with the antis. I don't mean to say that we should never show what has been done in the suffrage states because some minds work that way and want results rather than fundamental principles; but I do feel very strongly that we want to keep pretty strait to the line when we are giving arguments if we can, but at any rate 5 not leave a loophole in our logic for our friends the enemy to take hold of. Do you get my point and will you pardon my criticism? It is so seldom that you are caught napping I almost hesitate to write but am sure you will feel, with me, that what we want most in this work is to advance the course. And it is certainly growing faster than we had dared hope five years ago. Very sincerely yours, Florence A. Burleigh October 5th Transcribed and reviewed by contributors participating in the By The People project at crowd.loc.gov.