NAWSA SUBJECT FILE Congressional Union Moque, Alice L. H. Moqui Alue L.H. Et al Washington, D. C. February 19, 1914. Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, President, Natl. American Woman Suffrage Assn. , New York, N. Y. Dear Madam:- A number of members of the Congressional Union have publicly expressed their dissatisfaction with the methods of the Congressional Union, by which its financial affairs are controlled and its policies dictated by a self-appointed chairman and a self-constituted committee, who have made to the members of the Union no financial report, save a printed resume in the Suffragist of February 9th, and who arbitrarily and entirely of their own volition announce what courses of action shall be taken by the so-called "Union." A general statement of the reasons for such local dissatisfaction is given in the same resolutions herewith enclosed, which were passed at a mass meeting of members and formers members of the Congressional Union on January 28, 1914. We understand from various sources that the conduct of the chairman and the committee of the Congressional Union has given the National Association considerable embarrassment in financial and other ways. Therefore we, the committee from a number of members of the Congressional Union, appointed in pursuance of the of the final clause of the enclosed resolutions, feel the need of authentic information in regard to these matters, before taking any further steps. For this reason, we take the liberty of asking you to answer as fully as possible the following questions: 1. In your opinion, is it reasonable to expect any cooperation between the Congressional Union and the National Association, or any of its branches? 2. Can you give us any data of proof in regard to alleged attempts of the Congressional Union to undermine or otherwise injure the National American Woman Suffrage Association? 3. What is your opinion of the probable effect of the published policies, recent actions, and proposed methods of procedure of the Congressional Union, upon the general cause of woman suffrage? 4. Has the the legislative work of the Congressional Union been of value to the general cause of suffrage? 5. Has the Congressional Union done organization work -2- outside the District of Columbia, and if so has such work been helpful or detrimental to the work of the National Association and suffrage in general? 6. Is it true that the Congressional Union has retained in its possession and refused to relinquish certain properties and records belonging to the National Association, and does such refusal hamper and embarrass the National Congressional Committee in its work in Washington? 7. Inasmuch as the chairman of the Congressional Union has, by publication in the Suffragist, submitted to its members only a general statement for the financial reports of both the Congressional Union and the Congressional Committee of the National Association during the past year, with no distinction whatever between their respective funds; has the National Association received such separate, precise and detailed accounting on the part of the former congressional committee for the last year, that by a process of elimination the membership of the Congressional Union could thereby obtain an accounting of the funds received and disbursed in the name of the Congressional Union itself? 8. Have we your permission to make public your answers to these questions in the case it should be deemed expedient to do so? We would greatly appreciate an answer to the above questions, together with any suggestions or advice which you may feel free to give us in regard to the local situation. Very respectfully yours, (signed) Alice L. H. Moque', Chairman, Ivy Kellerman Reed Mrs. Mosshart Committee. Transcribed and reviewed by contributors participating in the By The People project at crowd.loc.gov.