(top right) "Purity and the Negro," [1905] (top center) SPEECHES & WRITINGS FILE Purity and the Negro In compliance with your request to present some facts on the purity of the Ngro I submit the following, in the hope that it will open the eyes of a few, even if it does not convert them to my view. In discussing the moral lapses of colored people it is customary for people who try to be fair-minded both to forget the past and ignore the present, while they fail to give environment and heredity a passing thought. It is a notorious fact, also that those who throw stones at the moral character of colored people do not spend much time in studying comparative statistics. During slavery it was impossible for bond-women to protect themselves from the lust of their masters, the sons of their masters or their master's friends. The system put a premium upon immorality and made chastity an impossibility. By the slveholders themselves virtue in a slave woman if it was ever thought of at all, was regarded as a joke. Nothing that the cunning ingenuity of lustful men could conceive or their wicked passions conceive for the degradation of the colored women of the South was left undone. Since the war, colored women have been regarded as the rightful prey of every white man who has looked upon them with lustful eyes, and they have been protected from the wiles and lechery of their destroyers neither by public sentiment nor by law. The more beautiful, prepossessing and intelligent a colored girl is in the South to day, the more difficult is it for her to escape the pitfalls laid for her by white men in the South today. In discussing conditions in a certain southern city a friend who was visiting there wrote me last summer as follows: "This is a small place but such a wicked one. All the prominent white men here have their colored mistresses and families. The children who are the result of such unions all go by their fathers names and consequently there two families, a white and a colored, for each name." When I was a student at Oberlin College, one of my teachers told me that a colored girl who is virtuous in the United States deserves a great deal more credit than a white girl who is pure. When this remark was made, 2 My feelings were deeply wounded, because I thought it implied an innate tendecy to immorality on the part of colored girls. But since I have studied the conditions which exist, where the majority of colored girls live I understand exactly what my teacher meant. And yet in spite of the fateful heritage of slavery, in spite of the fact that safeguards usually thrown around maidenly youth and innocence are in many sections of the South entirely withheld from colored girls to day, in spite of the temptations to which they are subject by those belonging to what they have always been taught is the superior race and in spite of the fact that white men may despoil colored girls in the South without fear of punishment by law or incurring the censure of those among whom they live, in spite of all this, statistics compiled by men who would not falsify in favor of my race show that immorality among colored women is nos so great as among women whose environment is similar in France, Italy Germany and Sweden and France. Among what is called the best class of colored people a scandal rarely occurs. Personally I do not know of a single social circle of representative colored people, that is those who have had the advantage of education and moral training in a sigle city North, East or West, in which there have been proportionaely so many divorces and so many glaring, ugly transgressions of the moral law as there have been in New York City among people blessed with fabulous wealth, having been blessed with advantges which education, culture and heredity bring and having every possible incentive to lead correct and decent lives. And yet, it will be exceedingly difficult for many good and fair-minded people to believe that the proportion of moral colored people in the United States is so large. There are no women in this or any other coutry who more virtuous than the the colored women in the United States who have been well educated and carefully reared. Those who insist that colored people are brutes with respect to their 3 sexual natures, as is often asserted by the enemies and traducers of the race, either ignore or maliciously misrepresent the facts. Nothing has done as much to attach the stain of licentiousness to the character of colored men as the charge of violating white women, preferred against them by the mobs in the South who hang them, shoot them to death and burn them alive. In discussing the subject of lynching in the June number of the North American Review which show that out of every 100 colored men who are lunched, only 12 or 15 at the most are even accused of what is so falsely and maliciously called the usual crime. It has also been stated on most reliable authority that in the city of Chicago one white man or boy out of every 20,000 assaults a woman, whereas only one colored man or boy out of every 100,000 in the South is guilty of the same heinous offence. And yet, in spite of these uncontrovertible facts staring them in the face and pointing the finger of accusation at them, southern gentlemen well-known on the literary, social and political life of the nation, unblushingly declare that Negroes are lynched in the South on account of this unmentionable crime. With one breath these spokesmen for the South admit that during the war, when the men of that section generally speaking were on the battle field fighting to keep the iron heel of oppression upon the neck of their slaves, the dusky bondmen, left behind on the plantations protected the mothers, daughters and wives of their masters with a tenderness, a fidelity and sacredness of trust which the men of no race have ever surpassed. With the next breath they insist that these men and their descendants have changed so radically in sentiment and conduct as to have become sexual degenerates and brutes, unable to control their passion for white women and unwilling to bridle their low desires. But one would search history in vain for a revolution in the nature of a race of men so sudden and violent as that which the South claims has taken place in the mental and moral fibre of the colored men of the United States. All colored men are not perfect. It would indeed 4 be strange, if they were. There is no desire on the part of the writer to minimize defects or to deny the truth. Colored men transgress the moral law no doubt, as their white brothers do. The colored man is nothing, if not imitative. He learns his lessons quickly and well. The system of slavery in which the foreparents of the present generation acquired their notions of correct living, and imbibed their ideals for nearly 300 years was not calculated to set their moral standard very high. But when those who wish to be just consider the examples of immorality so generally set colored people by their masters throughout the regime of the awful bondage they endured, the enforced ignorance of the masses in many sections of the South where schoolhouses are so rare today, the temptations to which the women and girls are subjected by the men whose attention naturally flatters them, the degrading environment of multitudes of the youth and the wicked methods employed by the people of the section in which the majority live to keep them as near the level of brutes as they possibly can, [ ] men occasionally yield to their base desires, not colored women and girls occasionally go astray, but that the race as a whole adheres as strictly to the path of virtue as statistics prove they does. Although I have seen the moral status of colored women discussed many times both by friend and foe, I have never read a word or suggestion from anybody concerning the great responsibility resting upon the white women of the South toward their sorely tempted and shamefully debauched sisters of a darker hue. And yet nobody who has considered the matter at all doubts that the white women of the South might, if they would, exert a powerful influence for the elevation of colored women, if they chose. Instead of trying to arouse the conscience of the public toward the open and shameless debauchery of colored women by their husbands, fathers and sons, the white women of the South who discuss the subject in the public prints at all, seem to delight in exposing the weakness of colored women 5 and appear to gloat over their vice. In several articles which have appeared in one of the best magazines in the country southern white women have declared without qualification or reservation of any kind that there is no such thing as a vortuous colored woman in the United States. Mrs. L. H. Harris of Nashville Tenn. who frequently writes for the Independent and who is an author of reput made the most violent, unfounded and unchristian attack upon the colored women of the South about two years ago that I have ever seen. Since then another white woman living in the South has taken her pen in hand to besmirch the character of colored women. In the article which the latter writer contributed to the Independent, she declared that although she had been brought up among colored women, she felt certain she had never seen one who was virtuous and she doubted whether a virtuous colored woman could be found in the United States. Even if these writers believed what they said was true, it is diffucult to understand why they should wish to bring discredit and dishonor through the public prints upon the womanhood of the whole race. It is impossible to explain such hardness of heart and such bitterness on the part of the women belonging to a strong and superior race toward those who [???] belong to one which labors under innumerable disadvantes and is [???????] because of its weakness and public scorn except on the ground of heredity. Descended from generations of mothers who were accustomed to look upon the wholesale debauchery of colored women without a protest and without the shock to their moral natures which they would be expected to receive, their daughters have inherited this indifference to the degradation of colored women by the men of the present day. Morally speaking slavery [?????????] was a weapon which shot both ways, wounding those who fired as well as those who were hit. So far as slavery is concerned, the one feature connected with it which I have never been able to explain was the acquiescence of the white women of the South in the fearful transgressions of the moral law by the masters of female slaves which there was no 6 effort to conceal. It is just as dificult to comprehend the attitude of the white women of the South toward their colored sisters to day. For surely they must know that so long as men may despoil the women of any race with impunity, the prevailing standard of morality must necessarily be very low. If it really is no concern to them, therefore, whether the girls and women who serve them and who touch their lives in a variety of ways are helped to lead decent lives or not, surely interest in their fathers, husbands and sons should prompt them to shield in every possible way from the lust of their men. When one thinks what the white women of the South might do for the elevation of their ignorant, poor and unprotected sisters of a darker hue, their responsibility seems great indeed. When he is obliged to acknowledge that the virtuous, Christian, intelligent women of the favored race are doing practically nothing for the moral elevation of their sisters who so sorely need their aid, he does not know whether to marvel more at the short sighted policy so recklessly pursued or the hardness o hardness of heart which displayed. In answering the question "Why is the prejudice against the colored man in the North greater now than at any time since the war"?, the American Missionary Magazine for November made the floowing reply; I. "The constant iteration on the part of the dominant South that the Negro is a failure, that the education of the Negro only makes him more indolent and dangerous, though absolutely false, secured attention by virtue of its repetition, and comes to be accepted as true by those who have not the evidence to the contrary." Nothing has been said bearing on the race problem truer or more forcible for a long time. In the same way the slurs against the moral character of colored women and the charges of bestiality preferred against colored men may be explained. From the constant repetition of the foul slanders against colored women not only are many white people in the South who try to be fair-minded and just persuaded to believe them, but multitudes in the north are converted to this 7 view. It is a notorious fact that those who circulate most diligently the foul aspersions upon the character of colored women are the descendants of those who were responsible for the moral degradation of their female slaves and who are themselves imitating the example of their departed sires. In reading accounts of the terrible assaults committed by colored men upon white women which appear in the press, one should always remember that mistakes frequently occur. Gov. hywood of South Carolina has just respited the sentence of Aaron Williams, a Negro, sentenced to hang Fridg at Camden to Dec. 23. for committing rape upon a white woman. Some of the best citizens of Kershaw county petitioned the Governor as follows: We, the undersigned citizens of Kershaw county firmly and honestly believe that there are circumstances connected with this case which will appeal to Your Excellency why the defendant in this case does not deserve the imposition of the death penalty, respectfully petition your excellency to grant a respite in this case for at least 30 days, until we can make the proper and convincing show why Williams should not be executed and our reasons therefor. On Oct. 17th Governor Haywood declined to grant this petition because it was too general in terms and showed no specific reason why it should be granted. Then the following affidavits were submitted; County of Kershaw; Personally appeared J.J.B. Truesdale on oath to say that Aaron Williams did not commit rape on Mrs. Langley. Aaron Williams was intimate with Mrs. Langley for some time with Mrs. Langley's consent and that J. J. B. Truesdell does not think Aaron Williams should be hung and should be sent to penetentiary for life. Personally appeared Samuel Amons under oath to say that Aaron Williams did work for Mrs. Langley for several days after it was reported to Langley that Aaron Williams had raped his wife, and that he, S.J. Amons, does not believe that Mrs. Langley was a virtuous woman, and that Aaron Williams has been living in adultery with Mrs. Langley for some time before this happened. 9 and morally to face the world again and begin a new life. Throughout the Southland there is scarcely a single institution of this kind to which a colored girl may go and be encouraged to lead a better life, after she has gone astray. What a blessing such institutions would be to the tempted unprotected colored girls of the South. In considering statistics bearing upon the number of illegitimate children born to colored women, one should never lose sight of the fact that in all the institutions to which they are admitted, a careful record is kept which is easily obtained. On the other hand it is well-known that there are sanitariums and private institutions to which unfortunate girls of other races may go in their hour of sorrow without fear that painful facts will ever go beyond the four walls of their room. There is no desire on the part of the writer to attribute to colored people virtues which they do not possess. A proper regard for truth forces one to admit that colored men and women transgress the moral law, just as people belonging to other races in this country and abroad. Statistics and observation prove however, that vicious habits are not, so common among the colored people of the United States as their enemies and traducers claim. Finally, when one studies the conditions under which the masses of the race live in the South, he is surprised not so much at the morally obliquity which he sometimes finds as he is at the innumerable examples of virtue, sobriety and decency which confront him at every turn. Purity and the Negro. [1905] [If the Negro and Purity had not been assigned me by tge Program Committee of the National Purity-Association, I should not have had the temerity to choose it myself, I assure you. It account it a privilege to have the opportunity of throwing some light upon the morals of a race so often misrepresented and slandered intentionally and unintentionally as the Colored American has been and still is at the present time. It is admitted by akk who have studied the subject that the morals of some of the most highly civilized races in the world-races blessed with centuries of training behind them, spurred on by every psible incentive to decency, surrounded by infkuences conducive to correct living and encouraged by friends eager to render aid-the morals of such racesm I say, often leave much to be desired. It could hardly be expected, therefore, that a race but forty years out of the most brutalizing, degrading and dehumanizing bondage the world has ever seen should present themselves blameless and spotless before the world.] When I was a student at Oberlin College, I was greatly shocked and pained one day, because a teacher of whom I was very fond and on whose judgment I strongly relied, declared that a Colored girl who grew into virtuous womanhood, deserved far more credit than did her white sister who lead a correct life. This statement wounded my feelings, because I thought [that] my teacher meant to imply that all other things being equal, Colored girls, as a rule, are innately more immoral than others. After I left college, however, and began to use my eyes and ears, studying conditions [existing conditions] under which the majority of Colored girls live, I understood exactly what my teacher meant. [and] More than that I agree with her tonight. Although those who give so much of their time, energy, money and b brain as do the members of the National Purity Association for the [moral M] 2 moral uplift of the nation should know as much as possible about the virtue and vice of a race which composes one tenth of the population of the United States, still I should have hesitated to discuss the morals of the Colored American to an audience largely composed of the dominant race, if I had not been especially requested to do so. And yet, there is an imperative need of a thorough, and honest discussion of this subject, since comparatively few facts bearing upon it [won this subject]are known by the general public, although much that is unfounded and unfair is asserted and assumed. Considering how many and how grave are the misapprehensions which even the broad minded and just entertain about the morality of [on this subject which are entertained even by the broad minded the] Colored people, [generous hearted and the fair] it is a wonder the misstatements are so few. For even if we acknowledge for the sake of argument [if we admit] that conditions at the present are bad enough and that the prospects for the future are no brighter than they should be, we must also admit that there is no phase of the Colored American's character and life so imperfectly understood as that touching his morals. I account it a rare privilege therefore, to be permitted to discuss this subject so dear to my heart to an audience like this. It is admitted by all who have studied the subject that among [of a large number of some of] the most highly civilized races in the world the morals of a large number leave much to be desired. And that, too, in spite of the fact that the representatives of these races are blessed with centuries o of training behind them, are spurred on by every possible incentive to decency are surrounded by influences conducive to correct living and are encouraged by friends eager to point the path of virtue to the tempted and weak and to help them walk therein [to render aid]. It could [be] hardly be expected, therefore, that a race but forty years out of the most brutalizing and degrading bondage in which human beings have ever been held should present [themselves] itself blameless and spotless [before] to the world. No discussion of the morals of the Colored America to day which failed [not considered] to refer to the demoralizing effect of slavery upon the race would be either satisfactory [and] or complete. Without going into the disgusting details incident particularly when so many temptations beset the women and in that section of the country where the majority live they draw so little protection either from public sentiment or law e3 slavery which are well known to the majority of [these] this audience, I am sure & let us just pause just long enough to observe that all the rules and regulations, all the customs and laws peculiar to [this pernicious] that diabolical system seem to have been designed for the express purpose of debasing the womanhood of the enslaved race. In an article written for the Atlantic Monthly which discussed this phase of the subject Colonel Thomas Wentworth Higginson expressed himself as follows "For my part I have been in a positionto know the truth even on its worst side upon this subject. apart from knowledge derived in college days from southern students then very numerous at Harvard with whom I happened to be much thrown through a Southern relative, my classmate. I have evidence much beyond this. I have in my hands written evidence unfit for publication, but discovered in a captured town. during the Civil War--evidence to show that Rome in its decline was not more utterly degraded as to the relation between sexes than was the intercourse often between white men and Colored women on a slave plantation. How could it be otherwise, asks Mr. Higginson "when one sex had all the power and the other had no means of escape?" The historyn of enslaved races may be searched in vain for a more shocking example of human depravity than the system of slave breeding for gain deliberately and systematically pursued by the slave holders of the South. [*3-First sentence on the other side of this page--*] When clergymen, priests of the Most High God, went through the farce of marrying slaves, they admonished them to faithful to each other, until seperated by death or by inexorable necessity. [*Over*] And so one example after another might be given to prove the truth of the statement made by Rufus Choate, one of the most conservative men of his day, that for the Colored women the condition of slavery was hell. And yet, to day, these who are foremost in casting foul aspersions upon the character of Colored women are the direct descendats of parents who but fifty years ago were directly responsible Slave women, many of them as beautiful as [pictures] Madonnas, were publicly advertised as extraordinary breeders were publicly sold on the auction block as such and commanded a higher price on that account. [Write this sentence first] And it is one of the most terrible indictments that can be brought against slavery that a bondman was more often seperated from his wife or she from him by what southern clergymen called "inexorable necessity" than by death. [*4*] for the moral degradation of their female slaves. But thanks to the brave sons of the North who poured forth their blood like water during the War of the Rebellion, slavery is dead and [let the dead] to night we shall let that dead and disgusting past bury its dead. ¶ Let us consider how the South has treated its former bondmen since the Emancipation Proclamation set them free-consider how it treats them to day. Have the former masters and mistresses atoned for the cruel and unspeakable degradation to which their helpless bond women were subjected for nearly 300 years by [helping] assisting them to lead decent and correct lives, since they have been nominally free? [*Over*] [possible for the ignorant and tempted women of the race that served them so long and so faithfully to follow their strong and intelligent master's virtuous lead?] By answering these questions in the affirmative would it were possible for me to tell the truth. In every conceivable way the path to virtue has been made as thorny and as steep to Colored women and girls as the former master class and their descendants could possibly make it during the past forty years. They have been a prey to the evil passions of the men of the dominant race and have been protected neither by public sentiment nor by law. The more beautiful, intelligent and prepossessing a Colored girls is in the South to day[m] the more difficult is it to shield her from harm a former slaveholder or his son. The Omniscient Father who reads the secrets of our inmost soul knows that this statement is made more in sorrow than in wrath-- It is made more as a plea for the protection of the daughters of my people than an arraignment of those by whom they are continually destroyed [them however much they may deserve it.] And what is the attitude of the white women of the South toward their Colored sisters you may ask? What efforts are the white women making to guide aright the daughters of the women whose dusky arms first received them at birth, [welcomed them at berth] who watched over them with a mother's love and care during childhood, [and] who tenderly nursed them from illness to health or tearfully Indeed have they made it possible for the ignorant and tempted women of that race which served them so faithfully and so long to pursue the path of virtue, since the shackles fell from their manacled limbs and theoretically it has been in their power to choose between right and wrong? In considering how the S has treated truth 5 closed their eyes in death? [What] efforts are the white women of the South making to rescue their Colored sisters from lives of evil and shame? Alas! Blind to the moral welfare of their own fathers, husbands and sons, if there were no other incentive or reason to start a crusade against the shocking debauchery of Colored girls, [with] hard [ness] of heart and cold, indifferent to the wretched fate which they know overtakes many a Colored woman and girl, who is more sinned against than sinning, the white women of the South, generally speaking, are not lifting a finger in the Colored woman's protection and defense. More than that, southern white women, who shine brilliantly [in] the galaxy of letters are not ashamed to prostitute their talent by publicly proclaiming [to the] their Colored sister's weakness to the world while they gloat in ghoulish glee over her shame [an innate immorality of Colored Women]. In the press of the South, as well as in the some of the leading periodicals of the North. A Mrs. L. H. Harris, for instance, a well known [author] writer who lives in Nashville, Tenn., declared a short while ago that altho she had been brought up among Colored people from her earliest childhood, and had known innumerable Colored women and girls, she was certain she had never seen one who was virtuous in all her life. This statement was made over Mrs. Harris's own signature in an article written for the Independent [which is publishe in New York] to which Mrs. Harris is a regular contributor. A short while after there appeared in the same magazine another article on the same subject written by another southern woman who stated [wt] without qualification or reservation of any kind that she too, had known Colored women and girls all her live, had played with them as a child and had employed them after her marriage as servants in her home, and she was certain she had never seen a Colored girl who was virtuous, after she was 11 years old. Both these articles appeared in the Independent, as I have already stated, a magazine published in New York and [which is] noted far and wide for the breadth and justiceof its One wd have thot that if they had had no interest in their col sisters that in order to promote the moral welfare & 6 views on all questions affecting the oppressed and struggling race. It is difficult to understand how the women of any race, under any circumstances or for any reason whatsoever could bring themselves to slander in so wanton so wholesale and so cold-blooded a manner the womanhood of another race, particularly, if they with the withering, blighting, character assinating pens[belonged to a race which is] are the daughters of parents responsible in the sight of God and men for the heredity and environment of the [those] very women whose moral delinquincies and defects they publicly expose[d] and assail[ed]. Indeed the attitude of southern white women toward their Colored sisters is so unkind and unnatural that it can be explained only on the ground of inherited indifferenc to the latter's fate. It [is] may be too much to expect, [perhaps,] that the daughters of mothers who for nearly 300 years calmly [silently] acquiesced in the debauchery of their female slaves by the silence which they continually and systematically preserved, who accepted without a general uprising or protest, so far as the records of history show, the revolting conditions under which they knew their helpless bondwomen forced to live conditions too, which might have been expected to shock the sensibilities of savages much less those of the delicate, refined white women of the South it may be too much to expect, I say, that the daughters of generations of slaveholding mothers should resent or take measures to prevent the despoiling of Colored women to day. There are few men who can be induced to give damaging evidence against the character of a woman, no matter how frail or how friendless she may be, nor how urgent the necessity that her unsavory record be secured. But this rule of chivalry and charity which is usually observed toward all women by all men has not always protected the Colored women of the U.S [South] from some of their white countrymen. In 1895 the President of the Missouri Press Association sent an open letter to Miss Florence Belgarnie of England, well known for her interest in the Colored people of the United States [oppressed and struggling race], which is probably the most unjustifiable and venomous attack upon the womanhood of a race which was ever made by man or has ever appeared in print. This letter was published in the press of nearly every civilized country in the world. After emphasizing the breadth and profundity of his knowledge concerning the character, 7 the habits and particularly the vices of the American Negro, Mr. Jacks, for by a sort of irony of fate or as proof of her sense of the eternal fitness of things Dame Nature so managed it that the man whom Iam about to quote was born into [the] family of Jacks, this President of the Missouri State Federation declared [in the first place] that the American Negro not only is wholly devoid of morality but he [they] knows nothing whatever about it, [says Mr. Jacks]. Then after painting in the most lurid colors possible the depth of the Colored-American's degradation he cites an example to prove his case against Colored women which for coarse vulgarity and malicious mendacity cannot be surpassed in the bewildering confusion of false charges preferred against the victims of oppression and degradation by those who are responsible for their ruin. According to Mr. Jacks not only are all Colored women impure without a single, solitary exception, but the depth of depravity is such that they punish with contempt and scorn any one of their number who shows the slightest inclination [dares] to lead a virtuous life. But this is only one of many examples [of the vitriolic] of the vitriolic slander pour out without mercy and without stint upon the defenceless Colored women of the United States. Let me assure you my friends that the quotations from Mr. Jacks and from the two women [to whome reference has been made] whose articles appear in the Independent have been given, not for the purpose of abusing the South myself or inciting any one else to do so, but in order to tell one side of the Colored American's story which the public is rarely permitted to hear. It seldom occurs that a woman [individual] with African blood in her veins has an oppotunity to show the broad-minded, justice loving people of the dominant race how huge are the obstacles which block the colored woman's [race's] path to virtue [correct living] and how relentlessly she is pursued. And surely one may call attention to the extenuating circumstances which render the moral lapses of the African-American less shocking than they would otherwise be, and the transgressors themselves less depraved 8 than they are often represented [to be] without being charged with a desire to minimize serious offences or to exonerate the moral lepers of the race. In the short time allotted me to night I wish so to frame my remarks so that they will appeal to your hearts as a plea for the protection of the tempted and slandered [weak] daughters of my race rather than strike you as a fierce polemic against the South. If I fail to do this, I shall not make the impression I desire. The uncharitable and unchristian attacks upon the moral character of Colored women [by both] have been cited, simply to show you against what desperate odds the mothers and daughters of my race are obliged to contend in their effort to lead virtuous lives and to establish a reputation for chastity among the people with whom they live. When a race or a class is marked in any community, when its vices and defects are on everybody's tongue and its depravity is conceded [considered a foregone conclusion] by all, it requires an amount of courage and goodness and grit such as few human beings possess for even a single individual in that underestimated or slandered race or group to live down the [vicarious] opprobium of which he is a vicarious victim on account o existing conditions rather than any crime or misdemeanor committed by himself It is an axiom that whatever the hardships and misfortunes of a race may be they fall with the greatest severity upon women. The very air which a Colored girl breathes in that section where the majority live is heavy with traditions and accusations of the frailty of both her race and her sex. But the public is being educated to deny to Colored women the consideration shown those of every other race, class or kind in the United States not by the South alone, but occasionally by the North as well. Last years Collier's Weekly under date of November 5th contained the grossest and most gratuitous insult to Colored women which I have ever seen in a Northern publication. As many will doubtless recall, a white soldier, John Smith by name, married a Colored woman who had nursed him through a 9 serious illness from death unto life. A great commotion was created about the matter, although the laws of New Jersey where the couple were united do not prohibit the intermarriage of the races. [Charges of some kind were preferred aginst the Colored woman, which were considered sufficiently serious by the Powers that be to cause the soldier, who had had a splendid record, to] For this reason, the Powers that Be decreed that John Smith, who had a magnificent record as a soldier should be dismissed in disgrace from the United States Army. According to some of the newspapers in which the subject was discussed, it was notorious that the same charges which had lead to John Smith's discharge from the army, namely that he associated with improper persons, could be preferred w with equal truth and force against a large number of his brothers who [would never be disturbed] however were in no danger of being either disturbed or disgraced, so long as they did not marry Colored women. In commenting upon John Smith's marriage Collier's Weekly de clared editorially: "The usual arguments on intermarriage seem to us entirely silly. They maintain that a legal marriage is better than the relations which produce mulattoes in the South. This contention childishly ignores the fact that social sanction for intermarriage would reduce what restraint there is." There can be but one interpretation placed upon these words. If any body else in the North has ever believed that the white men of this country are justified under any circumstances in making Colored women their mistresses instead of marrying them, he has been ashamed to proclaim his contempt for morality and decency in the public prints so unblushingly and vulgarly as the writer of this editorial has done. So for as I know, no other magazine in the North has ever put itself on record as advocating the degradation of Colored women either for the sake of [preventing] perpetuating the restraint which will prevent intermarriage or for any other reason. Even the most violent opponent of the intermarriage of the races must be shocked at the immoral views expressed in the editorial to which reference has just been made. Surely there is something for the National Purity Association to do when a leading magazine 10 in the United States openly declares that [the wholesale debauchery of any race or class of women in this country is more to be desired than the legal sanction of marriage] it is better for American men to degrade the women of any race by living with them as mistresses instead of making them their wives. [Could anything do none to] It is difficult to mention anything that would more surely and more quickly blunt the moral sensibilities of Americans than the general acceptance of such views as these. Even in the Courts Colored women are taught by the decisions rendered against them that no mercy will be shown those who have been forced to resort to violence to defend themselves or some loved one from the lust of men [those] who seek their ruin. Under such circumstances the women of all other races in this country at least are shown great clemency in the courts, whereas Colored women are not infrequenlty punished to the full extent of the law. About two years ago in the Capital of this nation a Colored woman shot a man who had tried to destroy her sister who was only 17 years old and who was employed as a domestic in his family. The man referred to belonged to the dominant race and was a high salaried clerk in one of the government departments in Washington. Fearing longer to remain in the service of the family from the master of which she was constantly in danger, the young girl left and went home to her sister, who was several years her senior. So determined was her employer to accomplish her destruction, however that he pursued her even unto her sisters home and tried to intimidate her under her sister's roof. In an effort to protect her young sister the elder [sister] woman shot the man who dared to invade her home. Although the Colored woman's attorney emphasized the fact that his man had gone in his client's home to dishonor her young sister, his former servant, and although the Colored woman had inflicted but a slight flesh wound from which the government clerk shortly recovered, nevertheless this Colored woman [who was obliged to resort to violence] was obliged to serve a long sentence in jail at the Capital of the U.S. Is there anybody here who believes that a similar sentence would have been passed upon a woman of any other race under the circumstances for the same offence? After a thorough investigation had been made, it was claimed that evidence against the moral character of the Colored woman was discovered. 11 And so, my friends, whenever you discuss Purity and the Negro [the Negro and Purity], remember, I beseech of you, that both the press and the Courts of law are in many instances making it exceedingly difficult for Colored women to lead virtuous lives. Remember that unintentionally, perhaps, but very effectively, alas, the opinions expressed in the [one] public prints and the decisions rendered by the [other] courts are educating the public to place Colored women in a class apart, so far as concern the consideration, the charity, the sympathy and the assistance which the women of all other races, classes and kinds have a right to expect in the United States and which they usually receive. No one who has studied conditions as they exist in the South to day c can doubt for a moment that if an effort were made in a southern court to mete out justice to the white destroyer of a Colored girl's honor, and this is rarely if ever done, such an effort would signally fail. Although hundreds of Colored girls are being tempted in some instances and in others actually forced to lead lives of shame in one great section of this land, it is a well known fact that the autors of their destruction are not only exempt from the law but lose prestige neither in society nor in the Church. Indeed so notorious has this condition become that it seriously affects the Servant problem in the South. "I would rather see my daughter deadd, said the mother of a prepossessing Colored girl in a certain southern city not long ago, "than have her hire out in many of the families here." And this woman voiced the sentiment of many a Colored mother"s heart. When the Circuit Court convened in Jackson Miss. last December, the key note of Judge Anderson"s charge to the grand jury was what he called the "Unlawful, Habitual Relations existing between Colored women and white men. Among other things he declared that the facts were too well known to try to conceal them."The evil", he declared, "is not One of the Causes Boston Hearld. If The Herald had said it in the same caustic language, we suspect there would have been no end of condemnation of our ignorance of real conditions in the South. We have spoken of it guardedly in discussing the Atlanta affair, but a southerner blurts out the truth in a southern newspaper — The State, of Columbia, S.C. He signs his communication "Southerner", and there is no reason to suppose that the editor of the State does not know the writer and that his signature is truly descriptive. He makes his statement as the result of personal observations "in almost every nook of every county of every state in the South," and what he declares is this: "Much of this trouble is caused by the vile, low, contemptable cohabitation of self-styled southern gentlemen with negro women," and he adds: " What I am writing is no secret . ... Our women know it and blush with shame." This is the example of virtue which the "superior" race is setting before the 'inferior," and at the same time protesting with vociferous indignation its fear of race degeneray through miscegenation if the negro is not deprived of political rights and prevented from obtaining justice in the courts. 12 confined to any caste or standard of society, but the best men of the community, men with beautiful wives and children at their homes maintain illicit relations with Colored women, and the result has been" continued the Judge,"that I believe to a great degree the servant problem has become more serious, resulting from this condition of affairs. In many instances, said this "the very stars of society, said this very and courageous [and honest] southern judge, walk along the street and meet their unlawful children and see them going to school. The condition has become so extreme that it is to a great degree the great problem between the races, as many of the good Negroes now condemn and are fighting against it. The Colored women should not be made more to blame," said the Judge, "than the men. There is no use going down into the slums, where disreputable women live to correct this evil. The example should be made of the white men who brazenly indulge in this vice and are living double lives, while many of them have beautiful wives and daughters at home. I think", he concluded, "as I said before, the servant problem is greatly chargable to this bad practice of the white men. In many instances instead of the servant being willing to give references, she herself wants reference, before she will go to work." [*Over*] [Under such circumstances can you wonder] that Colored mothers [are] who love their daughters and hold their honor dear are loath to see them work in service in communities where their downfall is almost certain and where when dishonor and misfortune overtake them they have absolutely no redress. But this side of the servant problem as it affects the Southern Colored girl [in the South] is rarely if ever told. Her enemies and traducers declaim eloquently about her laziness, her irresponsibility, her lack of skill and her inordinate vanity which alone they claim causes her to shun domestic service, but the dangers 13 which confront the Colored domestic in the South who wishes to lead a decent life are rarely revealed to the public and seldom discussed. Some startling revelations on this subject have recently made by Miss Kellor, however, who is General Director of the Inter-Municipal Committee on Household Research. After a thorough and careful investigation, this capable and energetic woman has discovered that there are employment agencies which resort to all kinds of schemes and offer all sorts of inducements to get Colored girls North, ostensibly to secure good paying places for them as servants in New York, Philadelphia and other cities of that section, but [which] really to place them in houses of illfame. The contract which the ignorant Colored girl sign in the South places her for at least two months completely in the power and at the mercy of the unscrupulous agent, after she reaches what she believes in her innocence and hope will be a veritable Eldorado or Promised Land. While some of these agencies may intend to place the Colored girls whom they lure from the South in good homes in the North, Miss Kellor says, the majority have no such intention at first. According to this same high authority the employment agencies licensed by the Northern seaport cities are the chief mediums through which disreputable houses get their supply of women. To the charge that Colored girls taken from the South by employment agancies to engage in domestic service in the North have already started on the road to immorality, before they leave home, Miss Kellor replies that in many cases it can be proved beyond a doubt that the Colored girl's first wrong step was taken in the North, where she was friendless and subjected to dangers greater than those that beset any other woman except the most ignorant of immigrants. But why do Colored girls want to leave the South, you may ask. Page 183 Thaddeus amiable timidity When a southern white man publicly admits that Colored domestics [are] stand in such dread of the men in the families for whom they work in the South that they themselves ask[s] for refernces, guarantees, so to speak that they will be permitted to work in peace, unmolested by the men, can you wonder& 14 Although this step often leads to disgrace and shame, alas, the Colored girl's desire to leave the South for the North is both legitimate and natural. The wages paid Colored women for general house work in some parts of the South are rediculously low. One need go no further South [to substantiate this point] than Richmond Va. to find Colored women doing the cooking, washing, ironing and chambermaid work for families of 7,8, or 9 people for the small sum of $5 and perhaps in some cases $7. a month. [what wonder is it then] With the brilliant promises of [big] large wages and [easy] little work so deftly made by dishonest agents ringing in her ears, what wonder is it, then, that Colored girls are willing to exchange a life of drudgery and poor pay in the south for [one which they regard as] what they are assured will a veritable Heaven by comparison in the North. [Has it never occurred to you that] And so it is perfectly clear that so far as Colored women are concerned the question of purity and the servant problem are indissolubly linked and intertwined. With the trade unions increasingly hostile to them the industrial outlook for Colored men is gloomy and threatening enough. But to Colored women who are forced to earn their own living, the cruel, unreasonable race prejudice in this country which excludes them from most of the gainful occupations and limits them to an unlucrative few means in many cases misery and despair. There is no doubt whatever that the inability to secure employment has caused [many a] more than one Colored girl to lead a life of shame. For this reason it is difficult to discuss the subject of the Colored woman's purity without referring to the labor question as it affects them. With the exception of teaching, sewing, nursing and a few menial pursuits there is little that a Colored girl in this country van get to do no matter how intelligent or how good she may be and no matter how great her need. So overcrowded are the few occupations in which Colored women may engage and so poor is the pay in consequence that only the barest livelihood can be eked out by the rank andfile. Those who are interested in the moral welfare of Colored 15 [*next page 13*] girls therefore can not consistantly ignore the industrial boycott by which they are so seriously handicapped in the struggle for existence, and which not infrequently [causes them to yield to temptation] leads to their ruin. [*Begin*] It is of the highest importance, therefore, that those who are interested in the moral elevation of this nation should do everything in their power to create a humane public sentiment [be created] in the Colored girls behalf, so that she may have the same chance as others to earn a decent living by honest toil. The picture which pains the heredity of the Colored woman of the present day based on the unspeakable degradation to which her grandmothers were subjected for nearly 300 years, which depicts the environment from which it is impossible for thousands of them to escape, which outlines the customes and laws which seem to be designed for the express purpose of debasing Colored women in at least one section of our land such a picture is hideous and depressing indeed. But there is another side to the canvas [just described], I am glad to say. One of the most convincing and encouraging signs of the Colored American's development is the high moral standard in which those who have blessed with education and high moral training believe to which in their daily lives they rigidly adhere. Among what is called the best class of Colored people comparatively speaking a scandal rarely occurs. In a social circle of such people if a girl or a woman transgressed the moral law, it would be practically impossible for her to retreive her lost reputation or ever occupy again the position in society which she formerly held. If a Colored wife became enamored of her husband's best friend or he with her and a convenient divorce made it pssible for the guilty twain to wed, I doubt very much that such a couple would be received in what is called good society among Colored people in any city of the United states. We are an imitative people , however, and are prone to imitate the example of our superios, so there is no telling what we may do, when we are further advanced. 16 But in spite of the fateful heritage of slavery, in spite o f the numerous pitfalls and traps to ensnare Colored girls and though the safeguards usually thrown around maidenly youth and innocence are in some sections entirely withheld from them [Colored girls], statistics compiled by men not inclined to falsify in favor of my race show that immorality among the Colored women of the United States is not so great as among women similarly situated in several foreign lands. And when figures showing the number of [illegitimate] children born to the unmarried Colored women of the United States are considered and compared with statistics on illigitimacy among women of the dominant race, [other] [home] it should be remembered that in one section prejudice and the poverty in all sections of erring or unfortunate Colored women and girls make it impossible for them to enter sanitariums and other institutions to which their more favored [conceal their immorality and guilt in sanitariums] sisters may go and in which they may [and other institutions where their more fortunate sisters may go to] bury their misfortune from the eyes of the world and hide their shame. [*Over*] No discussion of the Colored American's [attitude on the subject of pu] purity would be complete without special reference to the men. Wherever I go in the United States, if lynching is discussed, no matter how broad and just and well informed on the race problem may be the individual who expresses his views [or how broad and just he may be], I have invariably discovered that the misapprehension on this subject was as prodigious as it was painful. In order to mislead and poison the mind of the North against the Colored man and to offer a palusible excuse for the awful atrocities perpetrated upon him, distinguished southern gentlemen whose words unfortunately carry great weight in the North are constantly declaring in the halls of Congress, in the pulpit, on the lecture platform and in the press that assaults upon white women by Colored men are responsible for most of the lynchings in the South. And that, too, in spite of statistics compiled by white men themselves and [which are] available to all [and] which show that out of every hundred Colored men who are lynched, from 75 to 85 are not even It is very easy to keep [tab] an exact account of the number of sins a Colored girl commits, because neither she nor anybody else makes the slightest effort to conceal her guilt 17 accused of what is so falsely and maliciously called the usual crime by the South. And among the 12 or 15 in a hundred who are accused of it, it is safe to assert that some are absolutely innocent of the charge. More than once white men in the South bent on committing some foul crime have blackened their faces, so as to fasten the guilt upon Colored men and thus escape detection themselves. But [Just] a few weeks ago [*Sept. Oct. 1905*] in Alexandria Va., just across the river from the national Capital two women were attacked by a highwayman who was described by the victims as being a Negro. But a close inspection of some marks left on a package of money which the highwaymen had tried to snatch proved beyond a doubt that however black the face and hands of the highwaymen were at the time he committed the crime, they were not black when he was born, [nature had nothing whatever do] Among the police who investigated the matter there was no doubt that the highwayman's [do with the highwaymen's ebony hue at berth. There was no doubt that] swarthy complexion which lead the women who were waylaid to describe their assailant as a Negro was acquired for the purpose of concealing his identity by an allopathic application of lamp black. [*Over*] [Our friends in the North are frequently imposed upon by the press accounts sent from the South which announce in startlung headlines] [*Begin*] that the Colored man who was put to death by a mob composed of the best citizens of the place confessed [to] the crime of which he was accused, before he was shot to death or burned at the stake. But these so called confessions of Colored victims of mob violence in the South should be taken with a grain of salt by those who want to know the truth as well as that other statement so frequently made that the black criminal was positively identified by his white victim before he was perforated with bullets or consumed by flames. [Less than two months ago] On the 27 of last July, [*1905*] [in fact] a Colored boy was charged with robbing three white women and attempting a criminal assault upon one was released from jail in Roanoke, in spite of the fact that he had been positively identified by all three of the women as their assailant. His alibi, however, which was testified to by reputable white people including the man and his wife by whom he was employed Again it is easy to understand why there is so much misapprehension in the North about the brutality and immorality of Colored men [people]. Whenever a lynching occurs in the South, [the] accounts of it are sent North by the Associated Press, whose representations are usually Southern men. In their zeal to shield their section from the course it so justly deserves if they do not distort the facts, they present only the South's side of the story to the world. And of nothing is it truer than that there are always two sides of a lynching story in the South. And so it happens that the Northern newspapers announce in sensational headlines. 18 accounted for every hour yes every minute of his time when the alleged assault and robbery took place. It was just one of the innumerable cases of mistaken identity which has put the halter around the neck of more than one innocent Colored man in the South [or applied the torch to mo] applied the torch to his quivering frame. [more than one innocent Colored man in the South.] Just a few days before I took the train for La Crosse, on the 23 of [Se] Sept., a Colored man was lynched by a mob composed of the best citizens of Conway Ark.m altho the[re] sheriff and others in a position to know the facts declare that there is not the slightest doubt that he was perfectly innocent of the crime of assault with which he was charged. Just a short while before another Colored man accused of what is called the usual crime was to be hanged in Fayetville, N.C. last April, the Governor of that State received a letter from the white woman whose testimony he was convicted and sentenced to death stating that she had sworn falsely on the witness and acknowledging that she had perjured herself because [one was paid$10 to perjure herse and] she had been paid $10 to swear away an innocent man's life. But this is side of the [Colored American's] big, black, burly brute's story which rarely appears in glaring headlines in the daily press. Does it not seem strange that there should be such a sudden sharp revolution in the Colored American's moral nature in the short space of forty years as to metamorphose him into such a bruteand monster as his enemies represent him to be? But forty years ago the mothers, wives, sisters and daughters of the men who lynch and burn Colored men to day were left[*see 1*], (in charge of [the] slaves on the plantations all over the South) while the masters were off fighting forever to keep these slaves and their children in the most cruel bondage the world has ever seen. And yet the records of history [I challenge any one to prove that] shows that not a single white woman was harmed by a slave through out the entire Civil War. Far easier would it be for the leopard to change its spots and the African his skin than that the moral nature of a whole race of men should be so radically revolutioned in the 19 the short space of forty years as their enemies [of the oppressed and struggling race] would have the world believe. In connection with the Colored Ameri-can's unblemished record both before and during the War of the Rebellion it is well to remember also that in the West Indies assaults upon white women by Colored men are practically unknown. Not long ago in the International Quarterly over his signature an English official, familiar with the judicial statistics of the West Indies paid the Colored men of the Island a glowing tribute. After stating that he was the head of a household of women and girls who have frequented the suburbs of Kingston and lived for weeks and months in remote country districts with neither himself nor any other white man within call, this Englishman emphasized the fact that assaults committed by the natives upon women almost never occur. And the only terror sad he "in the highways and byways of Jamaica are [from] the white sailors, wastel runaways from European vessels." In discussing the Negro and Purity at least four facts must be well kept in mind, in order thoroughly to understand the sbject and justly to decide upon the merits of the case. In his native land the conduct of the untutored African savage toward women is irreproachable and his ideals of virtue are high, measured by his standard, of course, and judged from his point of view. In Africa, the penalty for the violation of woman is death and if a woman diliberately transgresses the moral law she is punished in the same way. In the second place [The attitude of the slaves] throughout the War of the Rebellion the attitude of slave men toward their white mistresses who were entrusted to their care, were completely at their mercy and absolutely in their power on hundreds of southern plantations all over the South bears eloquent testimony to their honor, their high regard for woman and their self control. Thirdly, the unblemished record of the Colored man in the West Indies is but another proof of the same fact. [*Over*] In the fourth place, the crime of rape as committed by the naives of Liberia is practically unknown, 20 Let me hasten to assure you that there is no desire or intention on [m] my part to represent the men of my race as perfect or the women as entirely above reproach, for like the rest of mankind of whatever race or color they are human and are prone to err. From the very nature of the case the Colored-American needs constantly to be instructed concerning the righteousness of correct living as well as encouraged to adopt and to adhere to high moral ideals. From the very nature of the case he needs as many precepts and particularly as many examples of virtue and morality as can be presented to his view. [The great pity of it is that so little precept and example is furnished him in the very section where the majority of the Colored people of the United States live.] The pity of it is if actions speak louder than words, that where the majority of colored people live,those in power in that section those who make the laws, those who admonister them, and those who mould public sentiment [the men and the women, too, also] are doing everything in their power to make it difficult for the race in general and [particulary] for the women in particular to lead virtuous lives. Laws against intermarriage have been enacted in almost every State in the South. [* See Below*] How rigidly On the other hand illicit relations between Colored women and white men are openly maintained wthout receiving the condemnation from the dominant race as a whole which one would naturally expect. [*Over*] Particularly [In many instances the white men representing the culture,] [*begin*] the wealth and the aristocracy of the communities in which they live [and] openly flagrantly rolate the moral law, while they are neither banished fromgood society nor disciplined in the Church [*Next pars to Page 2/ and begin Strangely enough &c*]. How rigidly these laws against intermarriage are enforced, [however,] may be seen from a case which has recently occurred. On the 28th of Sept. 1905 [just passed] a white woman in Magnolia Miss. was sentenced to the penetentiary for ten years for marrying a Negro, and that too, in spite of the fact that the woman stoutly maintained she did not know he had a drop of African blood in his veins. In passing Particularly from men and women who call High Heaven to witness that they would rather die the death than hear their superior blood tainted by that of an inferior race. [As Judge Henderson of Miss openly declared, white men openly] As has already been stated, southern white men representing the culture, 21 sentence upon her the Judge regretted that he could make the punishment no heavier. [*Return to page 20 and begin with the words On the other hand &c*] Strangely enough it seems never to occur to the white mothers and wives in the South that the debauchery of Colored women cannot be winked at and condoned without blunting the moral sensibilities of their respective communties and corrupting the lives of their own husbands and sons from which their fair daughters must inevitably suffer. And I sometimes wonder if the white North realizes how closely the two sections are interwoven and intertwined and how inevitably the moral taint of one is felt by the other. Let me emphasize the point that in describing conditions as they exist in the South today, in referring to [describing] the temptations to which Colored women and girls are constantly subjected, in enumerating the snares and pitfalls laid to trap their unwary feet, in showing how perilous and thorny is the Colored girl's path to virtue, I have neither intended nor desired to shield my erring sisters from whatever reproach [which] they [highly] deserve nor do I wish to exonerate them from their complicity in guilt. I have tried to present the truth and nothing but the truth, tho to an audience like this the whole truth could not possibly be told. I have tried to present the Colored woman's side of the story, and leave you to pass judgment upon her yourselves. There is no doubt that in many instances Colored women and girls are responsible for their own downfall and have nobody to blame but themselves. [They lack] Like the weak and tempted women of other races they lack the decency and the courage to turn a deaf ear to the tempter's voice. If there are extenuating circumstances in the shameof many Colored a girls reared in the South, however, it is that the tempter frequently belongs to the race which she [have always looked as superior] has been taught is superior to their own, so that she feels greatly flattered by the attention he condescends to bestow. It is that the tempter is in many cases wealthy or at least in comfortable circumstances and the Colored girl is 22 as poor in prospects as she is in pocket at the time the temptation presents itself owing to the prejudice against her race and is thus dewn irresistably drawn to her ruin by the alluring promises of a future free from the want she has always known and full of the comforts [and luxuries] which she has always desired but which she is persuaded can come to her in this way alone. [money alone can bring.] Again in many instances the Colored girl's ignorance is pitted against the intelligence, the craftiness and above all against his ability to present just those specious reason and the plausible arguments which would appeal to his victim most. [most strongly to the Colored girl's heart.] And so among intelligent, thoughtful Colored women all of this country the conviction is growing more and more that they themselves must put forth herculean efforts to save their girls. All through the South, all over the country, in fact, Colored women who are as pure and good as the women of any other race can possibly be both by precept and by example are pointing the path of virtue to their girls. As a race we are eager to work out our own salvation along mental, moral, spiritual and other lines and we are doing so with might and main. But we need the help of the race which is stronger in numbers, in intelligence, in opportunity and in wealth and blessed with an [superior in he] heredity and environment superior to our own. There is much that the broad of mind and generous of heart among the more favored race can do to solve the vexed race problem in the United States. By word and deed they can teach the people of this country to treat a struggling and oppresses race with common humanity by giving thts representatives a fair chance and a square deal in every field of labor or human endeavor in which they are fitted and trained to work. By pursuing such a magnanimous course not only would the citizens of this Republic demonstrate to the world that is Christian in fact as it is in name, not only would they atone in part at least to a race, many of whose vices and defects are attributalble to the cruel bondage in which it was held for 250 years, [not only would they] and help [to] lift it to a higher plane [that race], but they would use one of the swiftest, surest and most effective means of purifying the morals of the mnation as a whole which can possibly be employed. [*1905*] PURITY AND THE NEGRO. When I was a student at Oberlin college, I was greatly shocked and pained one day, because a teacher of whom I was very fond and on whose judgement I strongly relied, declared the Colored girl who grew into virtuous woman hood, deserved far more credit than did her white sister who lead a correct life. This statement wounded my feelings, because I thought my teacher meant to imply that all other things being equal Colored girls, as a rule, are innately more immoral than others. After I left college, however, and began to use my eyes and ears, studying conditions under which the majority of Colored girls live, I understood exactly what my teacher meant more than that, I agree with her tonight. Although those who give so much of their time, energy, money and brain as do the members of the National Purity Association for the moral uplift of the nation should know as much as possible about the virtue and vice of a race which composes one tenth of the population of the United States, still I should have hesitated to discuss the morals of the Colored American to an audience largely composed of the dominant race, if I had not been especially requested to do so. And yet there is an imperative need of a thorough, and honest discussion of this subject, since comparatively few facts bearing upon it are known by the general public, although much that is unfounded and unfair is asserted and assumed. Considering how many and how grave are the misapprehensions which even the broad minded and just entertain about the morality of Colored people, it is a wonder the misstatements are so few. For even if we acknowledge for the sake of argument that conditions at the present are bad enough that the prospects for the future are no phase of the Colored American's character and life so imperfectly understood as that touching his morals. I account it a rare privilege therefore, to be permitted to discuss this subject so dear to my heart to an audience [l] like this. It is admitted by all who have studied the subject that among the most highly civilized races in the world the morals of a large number leave much to be desired. And that, too, in spite of the fact that the representatives of these races are blessed with centuries of training behind them, 2 are spurred on by every possible incentive to decency are surrounded by influences conductive to correct living and are encouraged by friends eager to point the path of virtue to the tempted and weak and to help them walk there. It could hardly be expected, therefore, that a race but forty years out of the most brutalizing and degrading bondage in which human beings have ever been held, should present itself blameless and spotless to the world. No discussion of the morals of the Colored American to day which failed to refer to the demoralizing effect of slavery upon the race would be either satisfactory or complete. Without going into the disgusting details incident to slavery which we are well known to the majority of this audience I am sure. Let us pause just long enough to observe that all the rules and regulations, all the customs and laws peculiar to that diabolical system seen to have been designed for the express purpose of debasing the womanhood of the enslaved race. In an article written for the Atlantic Monthly, which discussed this phase of the subject, Colonel Thomas Wentworth Higginson expressed himself as follows: For my part I have been in a position to know the truth even on its worst side upon this subject, a part from knowledge derived in college days from southern students then very numerous at Harvard with whom I happened to be much thrown through a southern relative, my classmate. I have evidence much beyond this.I have in my hands written evidence unfit for publication, but discovered in a captured town. During the Civil War— evidence to show Rome in its decline was not more utterly degraded as to the relation between sexes than was the intercourse often between white men and Colored women on a slave plantation. How could it be other wise," asked Mr Higginson "when one sex had all the power and the other had no means of escape?" [*Don't copy*] The history of enslaved races may be search in vain for a more shocking example of human depravity than the system of slave breeding for gain deliberately and systematically pursued by the slave holders of the South. Slave women, many of them beautiful as Madonnas, were publicly advertised as extraordinary breeders were publicly sold on auction block as such and commanded a high price on that account. [*Begin*] When clergymen, 3 priests of the Most High God, went through the farce of marrying slaves, they admonished them to be faithful to each other, until separated by death or by inexorable necessity. And it is one of the most terrible indictments that can be brought against slavery that a bondman was more often separated from his wife or she from him by what southern clergymen called" inexorable necessity" than by death. And so one example after another might be given to prove the truth of the statement made my Rufus Choate, one of the most conservative men of this day, that for the Colored woman the condition of slavery was hell. And yet, today, those who are foremost in casting foul asperations upon the character of Colored women are the direct descendents of parents who but fifty years ago were directly responsible for the moral degradation of their femal slaves. But thanks to the brave sons of the North who poured forth their blood like water during the War of the Rebellion, slavery is dead and tonight we shall let that dead and disgusting past bury its dead. Let us consider how the South has treated its former bondmen since the Emancipation Proclamation set them free— consider how it treats them to day. Have the former master and mistresses atoned for the cruel and unspeakable degradation to which their helpless bond women were subjected for nearly 300 years by assisting them to lead decent and correct lives, since they have been nominally free? Indeed have they made it possible for the ignorant and tempted women of that race which served them so faithfully and so long to pursue the path of virtue, since the shackles fell from their menacled limbs and theoretically it has been in their power to choose between right and wrong? By answering this question in the affirmative would it were possible for me to tell the truth. [*Before*] In every conceivable way the path to virtue has been made as thorny and as steep to Colored women and girls as the former master class and their descendants could possible make it during the past forty years. They have been a prey to the evil passions of the men of the dominant race and have been protected neither by public sentiment nor by law. The more beautiful, intelligent and prepossessing a Colored girl is in the South to day the more difficult is it to shield her from harm a former slaveholder or his son. The Omniscient Father, who reads the secrets of our inmost soul knows that this statement is made more 4 in sorrow than in wrath— it is made more as a plea for the protection of the daughters of my people than an arraignment of those by whom they are continually destroyed. And what is the attitude of the white woman of the South toward their colored sister you may ask? What efforts are the white women making to guide aright the daughters of the women whose dusky arms first received them at birth, who watched over them with a mother's care during childhood, who tenderly nursed them from illness to health or tearfully closed their eyes in death? What efforts are the white women of the South making to rescue their Colored sisters from lives of evil and shame? Alas! blind to the moral welfare of their own fathers, husbands and sons, if there were no other incentive or reason to start a crusade against the shocking debauchery of Colored girls, hard of heart and cold, indifferent to the wretched fate which they know overtakes many Colored woman and girl, who is more sinned against than sinning the white women of the South, generally speaking, are not lifting a finger in the Colored woman's protection and defense. [*Begin*] [More than than,] Southern women who shine brilliantly in the galaxy of letters are not ashamed to prostitute their talent by publicly proclaiming their Colored sister's weakness to the world while they gloat in ghoulish glee over her shame. The press of the South, as well as in some of the leading periodicals of the North. A Mrs. L.H. Harris, for instance a while ago that although she had been brought up among Colored people from her earliest childhood, and known innumerable Colored women and girls, she was certain she had never seen one who was virtuous in all her life. This statement was made over Mrs. Harris's own signature in an article written for the independent to which Mrs. Harris is a regular contributor. A short while ago there appeared in the same magazine another article on the same subject written by another southern woman who stated without qualifications or reservation of any kind that she too had known 5 Colored women and girls all her life, had played with them as a child and had employed them after her marriage as servants in her home, and she was certain she had never seen a Colored girl who was virtuous, after she was 11 years old. Both these articles appeared in the Independent, as I have already stated, a magazine published in New York and noted far and wide for its breadth and justice of its views on all questions affecting the oppressed and struggling race. It is difficult to understand how the woman of any race, under any circumstances or for any reason whatsoever could bring themselves to slander in so wanton, so wholesale, and so cold-blooded a manner the womanhood of another race, particularly, if they with the withering, blighting character assassinating pens are the daughters of parents responsible in the sight of God and men for the heredity and environment of those very women whose moral delinquincies and defects they publicly expose and assail. Indeed the attitude of southern white women toward their Colored sisters is so unkind and unnatural that it can be explained only on the ground of inherited indifference to the latter's fate. It may be too much to expect, that the daughters of mothers who for nearly 300 years silently acquiesced in the debauchery of their female slaves by the silence which they continually and systematically preserved, who accepted without a general up rising or protest, so far as the records of history show, the revolting conditions under which they knew their helpless bondwomen were forced to live— conditions too, which might have been expected to shock the sensibilities of savages much less those of the delicate, refined white women of the South it may be too much to expect, I say, that the daughters of generations of slaveholding mothers should resent of take measures to prevent the despoiling of Colored women to day. There are few men who can be induced to give damaging evidence against the character of a woman, no matter how frail or how friendless she may be, nor how urgent the necessity that her unsavory record be secured. But this rule of chivalry and charity which is usually observed toward all women by all men has not always protected the Colored women of the United States from some of their white countrymen. In 1895 the President of the Missouri Press Association sent an open letter to Miss Flor- 6 Belgarnie of England, well known for her interest in the colored people of the United States, which is probably the most unjustifiable and venomous attack upon womanhood of a race which was ever made by man or has ever appeared in print. After emphasizing the breadth and profundity of his knowledge concerning the character, the letter was published in the press of nearly every civilized country in the world. The habits and particular the vices of the American Negro, Mr. Jacks, for by a sort of irony of fate or as proof of her sense of the eternal fitness of things Dame Nature so managed it that the man whom I am about to quote was born into the family of Jacks, this President of the Missouri State Federation declared that the American Negro is not only wholly devoid of morality but he knows nothing whatever about it. Then after painting in the most lurid colors possible the depth of the Colored-American's degradation he cites an example to prove his case against Colored women which for course vulgarity and malicious mendacity cannot be surpassed in the bewildering confusion of false charges preferred against the victims of oppression and degradation by those who are responsible for their ruin. According to Mr. Jacks not only are all Colored women impure, without a single solitary exception but the depth of their depravity is such that they punish with contempt and scorn any one of their number who shows the [slit] slightest inclination to lead a virtuous life. But this only one of many examples of the vitriolic slander poured our without mercy and without stint upon the defenceless Colored women of the United States. Let me assure you my friends that the quotations from Mr. Jacks and the two women whose articles appeared in the Independent have been given, not for the purpose of abusing the South myself or inciting any one else to do so, but in order to tell one side of the Colored-American's story which the public is rarely permitted to hear. It seldom occurs that a woman with African blood in her veins has an opportunity to show how the broad-minded, justice loving people of the dominant race, how huge are the obstacles which block the colored woman's path to virtue and how relentlessly they pursue. And surely one may call attention to the extenuating circumstances which render the moral lapses of the African American lass shocking than tey would otherwise be, and the transgressors themselves less depraved than they are often represented without being charged with a desire to minimize serious offences or to exonerate the 8 [in which the subject was discussed, it was notorious that the same charges which had lead to John Smith's discharge from the army, namely, that he associated with improper persons, could be preferred with equal truth and force against a large number of his brothers, however were in danger of being either disturbed or disgraced, so long as they did not marry Colored women. In commenting upon John Smith's marriage Collier's Weekly declared editorially; "The usual arguments on intermarriage is better than the relations which produce mulattoes in the South. This contention childishly ignores the fact that social sanction for intermarriage would induce what restraint there is". There can be but one interpretation placed upon these words. If anybody else in the North has ever believed that the white men of this country are justified under any circumstances in making Colored women their mistresses instead of marrying them, he has been ashamed to proclaim his contempt for morality and decency in the public prints so unblushingly and vulgarly as the writer of this editorial has done. So far as I know, no other magazine in the North has ever put itself on record as advocating the degradation of Colored women either for sake of perpetuating the restraint which will prevent intermarriage or for any other reason. Even the most violent opponent of the intermarriage of the races must be shocked at the immoral views expressed in the editorial to which reference has just been made. Surely there is some thing for the National Purity Association to do when a leading magazine in the United States openly declares that it is better for American men to degrade the women of any race by living with them as mistresses than to make them their wives. It is difficult to mention anything that would more surely and more quickly blunt the moral sensibilities of Americans than the general acceptance of such views as these.] [*Begin*] Even in the Courts Colored women are taught by the decisions rendered against them that no mercy will be shown those who have been forced to resort to violence to defend themselves or some loved one from the lust of men who seek their ruin. Under such circumstances the women of all other races in this country, at least, are shown great clemency in the courts, whereas, Colored women are not infrequently punished to the full extent of the law. [About two years ago in the Capital of this nation a Colored woman shot a man who tried to destroy her sister] 9 [who was only 17 years old and who was employed as a domestic in his family. The man referred to belonged to the dominant race and was a high salaried clerk in one of the government departments in Washington. Fearing longer to remain in the service of the family from the master of which she was constantly in danger, the young girl left and went home to her sister, who was several years her senior. So determined was her employer to accomplish her destruction,however, that he pursued her even unto her sisters home and tried to intimidate her under her sister's roof. In an effect to protect her younger sister the elder woman shot the man who dared to invade her home. Although the Colored woman's attorney emphasized the fact that this man had gone to his client's home to dishonor her young sister, his former servant, and although the Colored woman had inflicted but a slight flesh wound from which the government clerk shortly recovered, nevertheless this Colored woman was obliged to serve a long sentence in jail at the Capital of the United States. Is there anybody here who believes that a similar sentence would have been passed upon a woman of any other race under the circumstances for the same offence?] [*Begin*] And so, my friends, whenever you discuss Purity and the Negro, remember, I beseech of you, that both the press and the Courts of law are in many instances making it difficult for the Colored women to lead virtuous lives. Remember that unintentionally, perhaps, but very effectively, alas, the opinions expressed in the public prints and the decisions rendered by the Courts are educating the public to place Colored women in a class apart, so far as concerns the consideration, the charity, the sympathy and the assistance which the women of all other races, classes and kinds have a right to expect in the United States and which they usually receive. No one who has studied conditions as they exist in the South to day can doubt for a moment that if an effort were made in a southern court to mete out justice to the white destroyer of a Colored girl's honor, and this is rarely if ever done, such an effort would signally fail Although hundreds of Colored girls are being tempted in some instances and in other actually forced to lead lives of shame in one great section of this land, it is a well known fact that the authors of their destruction are not only exempt from the law but lose prestige neither in society nor in the Church. Indeed so notorious has this condition become that it seriously affects the Servant problem in the South. "I would rather 10 see my daughter dead, said the mother of a prepossessing Colored girl in a certain southern city not long ago, "than have her hire out in many of the families here. " And this woman voiced the sentiment of many a Colored mother's heart. When the Circuit Court convened in Jackson Miss. last December, the key note of Judge Anderson's charge to the grand jury was what he called the "Unlawful, Habitual Relations existing between Colored women and white men. Among other things he declared that the facts were too well known to try to conceal them. "The evil", he declared, "is not confined to any caste or standard of society, but the best men of the community, men with beautiful wives and children at their homes maintain illicit relations with Colored women, and the result has been " continued the Judge", that I believe to a great degree the servant problem has become more serious, resulting from this condition of affairs. In many instances said this very courageous and southern Judge the very stars of society, walk along the street and meet their unlawful children and see them going to school. The condition has become so extreme that it is to a great degree the great problem between the races, as many of the good Negroes now condemn and are fighting against it. The colored women should not be made more to blame," said the Judge", " able than the men. There is no use going down into the slums, where disreputable women live to correct this evil. The example should be made of the white men who brazenly indulge in this vice and are living double lives, while many of them have beautiful wives and daughters at home. I think" he concluded, "as I said before, "the servant problem is greatly chargeabl to this bad practice of the white men. In many instances instead of the servant being willing to give references, she herself wants reference, before she will go to work. When a southern white man publicly admits that Colored domestics stand in such dread of the men of the families for whom they work in the South that they themselves ask for references, gaurantees, so to speak, that they will be permitted to work in peace, unmolested by the men, can you wonder that colored mothers, who love their daughters and hold their honor dear are loath to see them work in service in communities where there downfall is almost certain and where, when dishonor and misfortune overtake them, they have absolutely no redress? But this side of the servant problem as it affects the Southern girl is rarely if ever told. Her enemies and traducers declaim eloquently about her laziness, her irresponsibility, her lack of skill and her inordinate vanity which [above] they claim causes her to shun do- [*continued on page 11*] 11 mestic [domestic] service, but the dangers which confront the Colored domestic in the South, who wishes to lead a decent life are rarely revealed to the public and seldom discussed[*Page 8*]. Some startling revelations on this subject have recently made by Miss Kellor, however, who is General Director of the Inter-Municipal Committee on Household research. After a thorough and careful investigation, this capable and energetic woman has discovered that there are employment agencies which resort to all kinds of schemes and offer all sorts of inducements to get Colored girls North, ostensibly to secure good paying places for them as servants in New York, Philadelphia and other cities of that section, but really to place them in houses of illfame. The contract with the ignorant Colored girl signs in the South places her for at least two months completely in the power and at the mercy of the unscrupulous agent, after she reaches what she believes in her innocence and hope will be a veritable Eldorado or the Promised Land. While some of these agencies may intend to place the Colored girls whom they lure from the South in good homes in the North, Miss Kellor says, the majority have no such intention at first. According to this high authority the employment agencies licensed by the Northern seaport cities are the chief medium through which disreputable houses get their supply of women. To the charge that Colored girls taken from the South by employment agencies to engage in domestic service in the North have already started on the road to immorality, before they leave home, Miss Kellor replies that in many cases it can be proved beyond a doubt that the Colored girl’s first wrong step was taken in the North, where she was friendless and subjected to dangers greater than those that beset any other woman except the most ignorant of immigrants. But why do Colored girls want to leave the South, you may ask. Although this step often leads to disgrace and shame, alas, the Colored girl’s desire to leave the South for the North is both legitimate and natural. The wages paid Colored women for general house work in some 12 parts of the South are ridiculously low. One need go no further South than Richmond Va. to find Colored women doing the cooking, washing, ironing and chambermaid work for families of 7,8, or 9 people for the small sum of $5 and perhaps, in some cases $7 a month. With the brillian promises of large wages and little work so deftly made by dishonest agents ringing in her ears, what wonder is it then that Colored girls are willing to exchange a life of drudgery and poor pay in the South for what they are assured will be a veritable Heaven by comparison in the North. And so it is clear, that so far as Colored women are concerned, the question of Purity and the Servant problem are indissolubly linked and intertwined. With the trades unions increasingly hostile to them the industrial outlook for Colored men is gloomy and threatening enough. But to Colored women who are forced to earn their own living, the cruel, unreasonable race prejudice in this country which excludes them from most of the gainful occupations and limits them to an unlucrative few means in many cases misery and despair. There is no doubt whatever that the inability to secure employment has caused more than one Colored girl to load a life of shame. For this reason it is difficult to discuss the subject of the Colored woman's purity without referring to the labor question as it affects them. With the exception of teaching, sewing, nursing and a few menial pursuits there is little that a Colored girl in this country can get to do, no matter how intelligent or good she may be and no matter how great her need. So overcrowded are the few occupations in which Colored women may engage and so poor is the pay in consequence that only the barest livelihood can be eked out by the rank and file. Those who are interested in the moral welfare of Colored girls, therefore, cannot consistently ignore the industrial boycott by which they are so seriously handicapped in the struggle for existence and which not infrequently leads to their ruin. It is of the highest importance, thereforem that those who are interested in the moral welfare of 13 this nation should do everything in their power to create a humane public sentiment in the Colored girl's behalf, so that she may have the same chance as others to earn a decent living by honest toil. The picture which paints the heredity of the Colored woman of the present day based on the unspeakable degradation to which her grandmothers were subjected for nearly 300 years, which depicts the environment from which it is impossible for thousands to escape, which outlines the customs and laws which seem to be designed for the express purpose of debasing Colored women in at least one section of our land- such a picture is hideous and depressing indeed. But there is another side to the canvas, I am glad to say. One of the most convincing and encouraging signs of the Colored- American's development is the high moral standard in which those who have been blessed with education and high moral training training believe and to which in their daily lives they rigidly adhere. Among what is called the best class of Colored people, comparitively speaking, a scandal rarely occurs. In a social circle of such people, if a girl or a woman transgressed the moral law, it would be practically impossible for her to retrieve her lost reputation or ever again to occupy the position in society which she formerly held. If a Colored wofe became enamored of her husband's best friend, or he with her, and a convenient divorce made it possible for the guilty twain to wed, I doubt very much that such a couple would be received in what is called good society among Colored people in any city of the United States. We are an imitative people, however, and are prone to imitate the example of our superiors, so there is no telling what we may do, when we are further advanced. But in spite of the fateful heritage of slavery, in spite of the numerous pitfalls and traps to ensnare Colored girls, and though safe guards usually thrown around maidenly youth and innocence are in some sections entirely withheld from them, statistics compiled by men not inclined to falsify in favor of my race show that immorality among the Colored women. 14 of the United States is not so great as among women similarly situated in at least five foreign lands. And when figures showing the number of children born to the unmarried Colored women of the United States are considered and compared with statistics on illiegitmacy among women of the dominant race, it should be remembered that in one section prejudice and in all sections the poverty of erring or unfortunate Colored girls make it impossible for them to enter sanitariums and other institutions to which their more favored sisters may go and in which they may bury their misfortune and hide their shame from the eyes of the world. No discussion of the Colored Americans purity would be complete without some reference to the men. Wherever I go in the United State, if lynching is discussed, no matter how broad, and just and well-informed on the race problem may be the individual who expresses his views, I have invariably discovered that his misapprehension on this subject was as prodigious [??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????] awful atrocities perpetrated upon him, distinguished Southern gentlemen, whose words, unfortunately carry great weight in the North, are constantly declaring in the halls of Congress, in the pulpit, on the lecture platform and in the press that assaults upon white women by Colored men are responsible for most of the lynchings in the South. And that, too, in spite of statistics compiled by white men themselves and available to all which show that out of every hundred Colored men who are lynched, from 75 to 85 are not even accused by the South of what is so falsely and maliciously called the usual crime. And among the 12 or 15 in the hundred who have been accused of it, it is safe to assert that many have been absolutely innocent of charge. More than once white men in the South bent upon the commission of some foul crime have blackened their faces, so as to fasten their guilt upon Colored men and escape detection themselves. 15 But a few weeks ago (Sept. Oct. 1905) in Alexandria Va., just across the river from the National Capital two women were attacked by a highwayman who was described by the victims as being a Negro. But a close inspection of some marks left on a package of money which the Highwayman had tried to snatch proved beyond a doubt that however black the face and hands of the highwayman were at the time he committed the crime, they were not black when he was born. Among the police who investigated the matter there was no doubt the the highwayman's swarthy complexion which lead the women, who were waylaid to describe their assailant as a Negro was acquired for the purpose of concealing his identity by an allopathic application of lamp black. [*Begin*] Again it is easy to understand why there is so much misapprehension in the North about the brutality and immorality of Colored men. When ever a lynching occurs in the South, accounts of it are sent North by the associated press, whose representatives are usually Southern men. In their zeal to shield their section from the censure it so justly deserves, they do not distort the facts, they present only to the South's side of the story to the world. And of nothing is it truer than that there are always two sides of a lynching story in the South; and so it happens that the Northern newspapers announce in sensation headlines that the Colored man who was put to death by a mob composed of the best citizens of the place confessed the crime of which he was accused, before he was shot to death or burned at the stake. But these so called confessions of Colored victims of mob violence in the South should be taken with a grain of salt by those who want to know the truth as well as that other statement so frequently made that the black criminal was positively identified by his white victims before he was perforated with bullets or consumed by flames. On the 27 of last July, 1905 a Colored boy who was charged with robbing three white women and attempting a criminal assault upon one was released from jail in Roanoke in spite of the fact that he had been positively identified by all three of the women as 16 their assailant. His alibi, however, which was testified to by reputable white people including the man and his wife by whom he was employed accounted for every hour, yes every minute of his time when the alleged assault and robbery took place. It was just one of the innumerable cases of mistaken identity which has put the halter around the neck of more than one innocent Colored man in the South, applied the torch to his quivering frame. Just a few days before I took the train for La Crosse, on the 23 of Sept. a Colored man was lynched by a mob composed of the best citizens of Conway Ark. although the sheriff and others in a position to know the facts declared that there is not the slightest doubt that he was perfectly innocent of the crime of the assault which he was charged. Just a short while before another Colored man accused of what is called the usual crime was to be hanged in Fayetville, N.C. last April, the Governor of that State received a letter from the white woman on whose testimony he was convicted and sentenced to death, stating that she had sworn falsely on the witness and acknowledging that she had perjured herself, because, she had been paid $10 to swear away an innocent man's life. But this is the side of the big, black burly brute's story which rarely appears in glaring headlines in the daily press. Does it not seem strange that there should be such a sudden sharp revolution in the Colored American's moral nature in the short space of forty years as to metamorphose him into such a brute and monster as his enemies represent him to be? But forty years ago the mothers, wives, sisters and daughters of the men who lynch and burn Colored men to day were left the plantation all over the South, in charge of slaves, while the masters were off fighting to keep forever their slaves and their children in the most cruel bondage the world has ever seen. And yet the records of history show that not a single white woman was harmed by a slave through out the entire Civil War. Far easier would it be for the leopard to change its spots and the African his skin than that the moral Nature of a whole race of men should be so radically revolutioned in the short space of forty years as their 17 enemies would have the world believe. In connection with the Colored American's unblemished record both before and during the War of the Rebellion it is well to remember also that in the West Indies assaults upon the white women by Colored men are practically unknown. Not long ago in the International Quarterly over his signature an English official, familiar with the judicial statistics of the West Indies paid the Colored men of that Island a glowing tribute. After stating that he was head of a household of women and girls who have frequented the suburbs of Kingston and lived for weeks and months in remote country districts with neither himself nor any other white man within call, this Englishman emphasized the fact that assaults committed by the natives upon women almost never accur. And the only terror said he "in highways and byways of Jamaica are the white sailors, wastel runaways from European vessels." In discussing Purity and the Negro at least four facts must be well kept in mind, in order thoroughly to understand the subject and justly to decide upon the merits of the case. In his native land the conduct of the untutored African savage toward women is irreproachable and his ideals of virtue are high, measured by his standard, of course and judged from his point of view. In Africa the penalty for the violation of woman is death and if a woman deliberately transgress the moral law she is punished in the same way. In the second place through out the War of the Rebellion the attitude of slave men toward their white mistresses who were entrusted to their care, were completely at their mercy and absolutly in their power on hundreds of southern plantations all over the south, bears eloquent testimony to their honor, their high regard for woman and their self control. Thirdly, the unblemished record of the Colored men in the West Indies is but another proof of the same fact. In the fourth place, the crime of rape as committed by the natives of Liberia is practically unknown. Let me hasten to assure you that there is no desire of intention on my part to represent the men of my race as perfect or the women as entirely above reproach, for like 18 the rest of mankind of whatever race or color they are human and are prone to err. From the very nature of the case the Colored American needs constantly to be instructed concerning the righteousness of correct living as well as encouraged to adopt and to adhere to high moral ideals. From the very nature of the case he needs as many precepts and particularly as many examples of virtue and morality as can be presented to his views. The pity of it is if actions speak louder than words, that those in power in that section where the majority of Colored people live, those who make the laws, those who administer them, and those who would public sentiment, are doing everything in their power to make it difficult for the race in general for the women in particular to lead virtuous lives. Laws against intermarriage have been enacted in almost every State in the South. How rigidly these laws against intermarriage are enforced, may be seen from a case which has recently occurred. On the 28th of Sept. 1905, a white woman in Magnolia Miss. was sentenced to the penetentiary for ten years for marrying a Negro and that too, in spite of the fact that the woman stoutly maintained she did not know he had a drop of African blood in his veins. In passing sentence upon her the Judge regretted that he could make the punishment no heavier. On the other hand illicit relations between Colored women and white men are openly maintained without receiving the condemnation from the dominant race as a whole which one would naturally expect. Particularly from men and women who call High Heaven to witness that they would rather die the death than have their superior blood painted by that of an inferior race. As has already been stated, southern white men representing the culture, the wealth and the aristocracy of the communities in which they live openly, flagrantly violate the moral law, and while they are neither banished from good society nor disciplined in the Church. Strangely enough it seems never to occur to the white mothers and wives in the South that the debauchery [in the South] 19 of Colored women cannot be winked at and condoned without blunting the moral sensibilities of their respective communities and currupting the lives of their own husbands and sons from which their fair daughters must inevitably suffer. And I sometimes wonder if the White North realizes how closely the two sections are interwoven and intertwined and how inevitable the moral taint of one is felt by the other. Let me emphasize the point that in describing conditions as they exist in the South today, in referring to temptations to which Colored women and girls are constantly subjected, in enumerating the snares and pitfalls laid to trap their unwary feet, in showing how perilous and thorny is the Colored girl's path to virtue, I have neither intended nor desired to shield by erring sisters from whatever reproach they deserve nor do I wish to exonerate them from their complicity in guilt. I have tried to present the truth and nothing but the truth, tho to an audience like this the whole truth could not possible be told. I have tried to present the Colored woman's side of the story, and leave you to pass the judgement upon yourselves. There is no doubt that in many instances Colored women and girls are responsible for their own downfall and have nobody to blame but themselves. Like weak and tempted women of other races they lack the decency and the courage to turn a deaf ear to the tempter's voice. If there are extenuating circumstances in the shame of many Colored girls reared in the South, however, it is that the tempter frequently belongs to the race which she has been taught is superior to her own, so that she feels greatly flattered by his attention he condescends to bestow. It is that the tempter is in many cases wealthy or at least in comfortable circumstances and the Colored girl is as poor in prospects as she is in pocket at the time the temptation presents itself owing to the prejudice against her race and is thus down irresistibly drawn to her ruin by the alluring promises of a future free from the want she has always known and full of the comforts which she has always desired but which she is persuaded can 15 who were entrusted to their care, were completely at their mercy and absolutly in their power on hundreds of southern plantations all over the South, bears eloquent testimony to their honor, their high regard for women and their self control. Thirdly, the unblemished record of the Colored men in the West Indies is but another proof of the same fact. In the fourth place, the crime of rape as committed by the natives of Liberia is practically unknown. Let me hasten to assure you that there is no desire or intention on my part to represent the men of my race as perfect or the women as entirely above reproach, for like the rest of mankind of whatever race or color they are human and are prone to err. From the very nature of the case the Colored American needs constantly to be instructed concerning the righteousness of correct living as well as encouraged to adopt and to adhere to high moral ideals. From the very nature of the case he needs as many precepts and particularly as many examples of virtue and morality as can be presented to his views. The pity of it is if actions speak louder than words, that those in power in that section where the majority of colored people live, those who make the laws, those who administer them, and those who would public sentiment, are doing everything in their power to make it difficult for the race in general and for the women in particular to lead virtuous lives. Laws against intermariage have been enacted in almost every State in the South. How rigidly these laws against intermarriage are enforced, may be seen from a case which has recently occurred. On the 28th of Sept. 1905, a white women in Magnolia Miss. was sentenced to the penetentiary for ten years for marrying a Negro and that too, in spite of the fact that the woman stoutly maintained she did not know that he had a drop of African blood in his veins. In passing sentence upon her the Judge regretted that he could make the punishment no heavier. On the other hand illicit relations between Colored women and white men are openly 16 maintained without receiving the condemnation from the dominant race as whole which one would naturally expect. Particularly from men and women who call High Heaven to witness that they would rather die the death than have their superior blood painted by that of an inferior race. As has already been stated, southern white men representing the culture, the wealth and the aristocracy of the communities in which they live openly, flagrantly violate the moral law, and while they are neither banished from good society nor disciplined in the Church. Strangely enough it seems never to occur to white mothers and wives in the South that the debauchery 17 of Colored women cannot be winked at and condoned without blunting the moral sensibilities of their respective communities and corrupting the lives of their own husbands and sons from which their fair daughters must inevitably suffer. And I sometimes wonder if the white North realizes how closely the two sections are interwoven and intertwined and how inevitable the moral taint of one is felt by the other. Let me emphasize the pont that [that] in describing conditions as they exist in the South [in the] to-day, in referring to temptations th which Colored women and girls are constantly subjected, in enumerating the snares and pitfalls laid to trap their unwary feet, in showing how perilous and thorny is the Colored girl's path to virtue, I have neither intended nor desired to shield my erring sisters from whatever reproach they deserve nor do I wish to exonerate them from their complicity in guilt. I have tried to present the truth and nothing but the truth tho to an audience like this the whole truth could not possible be told. I have tried to present the Colored woman's side of the story, and leave you to pass the judgement upon yourselves. There is no doubt that in many instances Colored women and girls are responsible for their own downfall and have nobody to blame but themselves. Like weak and tempted women of other races they lack the decency and the courage to turn a deaf ear to the tempter's voice. If there are extenuating circumstances in the shame of many Colored girls reared in the South, however, it is that the tempter frequently belongs to the race which she has been taught is superior to her own, so that she feels greatly flattered by his attention he condescends to bestow. It is that the tempter is in many cases wealthy or at least in comfortable 18 circumstances and the temptation presents itself owing to the prejudice against her race and is thus down irresistibly drawn to her ruin by the alluring promises of a future free from the wany she has always known and full of the comforts which she has always desired but which she is persuaded can come to her in this way alone. Again in many instances the Colored girl's ignorance is pitted against the intelligence, the craftiness and above all against his ability to present just those specious reasons and the plausible arguments which would appeal to his victim most. And so among intelligent thoughtful Colored women, all of his country the conviction is growing more and that they themselves must put forth Herculean efforts to save their girls. All through the South, all over the country, in fact, Colored women who are as pure and gold as the women of any other race can possibly be, both by precept and by example, are pointing the path of virtue to their girls. As a race we are eager to work out our own salvation along invidual, mental, moral, spiritual and other lines and we are doing so with might and main. But we need the help of the race which is stronger in numbers, in intelligence, in opportunity and in wealth and blessed with as heredity and environment superior to our own. There is much that the broad of mind and generous of heart among the more favored race can do to solve the vexed race problem in the United States. By work and deed they can teach the people of this country to treat a struggling and oppressed race with common humanity by giving its representatives a fair chance and a square deal in every field of labor or human endeavor in which they are fitted and trained to work. By pursuing such a magnanimous course not only would the citizens of this Republic demonstrate to the world that is Christian in fact as 19 It is in name, not only would they atone in partat least to a race, many of whose vices and defects are attributable to the cruel bondage in which it was held for 250 years, and help lift it to higher planes, but they would use one of the swiftest, surest and most effective means of purifying the morals of the nation as a whole which can possibly be employed. Mary Church Terrell, 326 T St., N.W. Washington, D.C. Transcribed and reviewed by contributors participating in the By The People project at crowd.loc.gov.