SPEECHES & WRITINGS FILE Drafts, A Colored Woman in a White World (8) 156 A Few Cases of Friction. Although I have been more or less intimately associated with white people all my life, have entertained views on the race problem which have been considered quite radical by some and have alwyas expressed my opinion, I have have no open break with them as a group and I have had friction with individuals a very few times. As a member of the Board of Education I might easily have fallen out with a man whose friendship I prized highly, because he insisted upon dismissing a supervising principal who was an excellent officer and one of the finest teachers in the corps, but who in the kindness of his heart had given here salary to a teacher in dure need and distress in a manner not prescribed by the rules. My good friend, Captain James F. Oyster was a prosperous business man who believed so thoroughly in business methods he insisted any school officer who failed to observe them should be dismissed, no matter how fine an instructor of officer he might be. I valued Captain Oyster's friendship, because he was one of nature's noble men, was always willing to assit me in my efforts to put through measures which I believed would improve the school system and I could rely absolutely upon any promise he made, because he was courageous and outspoken almost to a fault and because he had as little race prejudice as it is possible for a white man to have. When it looked as though our friendship could not weather this storm, after I had tried to convert him to my point of view and had failed I resigned myself to my fate, but held firmly and desperately to my efforts to save the supervising principal from dismissal. I finally succeeded in saving the school officer and also in retaining the friendship of Captain Oyster as well, because he was a broad-minded man and when he finally yielded a point, he let the dead past bury its dead. During the eleven years I was a member of the Board of Education I often differed materially with the others, both colored and white. I never had bitter words or an open break with anybody. Perhaps I came as near having friction with a few members of the Executive Committee of the International League of Peace and Freedom as with any white people with whom I was ever associated. 157 I was asked to sign a petition requesting the removal of the black troops from occupied German territory. I was told that all the other members of the Executive Committee were willing to sign it and that it was especially desirable for me to affix my signature, because the Committee wished to make the request unanimous. One of the women who talked with me about it was Mrs. Lafollette, wife of the late Senator from Wisconsin. What she said in favor of the petition impressed me deeply. She seemed to have no race prejudice whatever and always had the courage of her convictions when she felt it was necessary to show where she stood on the Colored-American's right to a square deal. Both by word and by deed Mrs. Lafollette often placed herself on record as being in favor of any legislation or of any effort designed to give Colored people all the rights and privileges which other citizens enjoy. Because I held Mrs. Lafollette in such high esteem it would have afforded me great pleasure to, comply with her request. I knew she wanted the petition signed, because she believed it would pour oil on the troubled waters to have France remove the black troops from German soil. One afternoon Mrs. Lafollette invited me to her beautiful home and we had tea together. I tried to listen with an open mind to the arguments she presented in favor of it, but, try as hard as I might, I could not see my way clear to to sign that petition. [Disliked?], however, to be the only member of the Executive Committee to refuse to sign it and thus make it impossible for the others to say that their position on the matter was unanimous. After mature deliberation I decided that it was my duty to resign from the Committee and I wrote the following letter to Miss Jane Addams: Washington, D.C. March 18, 1921. My dear Miss Addams: It is plainly my duty to write you concerning a matter in which you are deeply interested, I know. I have been requested to sign a petition asking for the removal of the black troops from German territory. The most terrible crimes are said to be committed by these black troops against the German women. I belong to a race whose women have been the victims of assaults committed upon them by white men of all 158 races. As a rule, these men have ruined and wrecked the women of my race with impunity, For that reason I sympathize deeply with the German women, if they really are the victims of the passions of black men. I pith them in their present peril as I pitied the French women when the newspapers told us of the brutal treatment they received at the hands of the German soldiers who were quartered in France. Because the women of my race have suffered so terribly and so long from assaults committed with impunity by men of all races, I am all the more pained at the brutal treatment to which German women are now said to be subjected by black troops. However, I am certain that the black soldiers are committing no more assaults upon the German women than the German men committed upon French women or that any race of soldiers would probably commit upon women in occupied territory Our own American soldiers treated the Haitien women brutally. On good authority it is asserted that young Haitien girls were not only cruelly misused but were actually murdered by some of our soldiers. I can not vouch for the truth of that statement, but it is not at all difficult for me to believe that white Americans would treat colored women as brutally as our soldiers are said to have treated the Haitien women. I can not sign the petition asking for the removal of the black troops, because I believe it is a direct appeal to race prejudice. In all the statements concerning the matter great emphasis is laid upon the fact that these troops are worse than white soldiers. That is a reflection upon them which I am sure they do not deserve. Charges are usually preferred against soldiers of all races who are quartered in the land they have conquered. I can readily understand that if a German woman had to be outraged, she would prefer to suffer at the hands of a white man rather than at the hands of a black man. But, even though that be true, I cannot sign a petition asking for the removal of these troops, because they are black. On good authority I have been informed that the charges preferred against black troops are not founded in fact. Mrs. Carrie Chapman Catt investigated the charges against the black troops when she was in Geneva and found, according to the testimony of reputable people living in the region where the atrocities 159 were alleged to have been committed, that these black soldiers had conducted themselves with more courtesy and consideration than any white troops who had been stationed there. Two German delegates told Mrs. Catt that there was a movement in Germany to ask France to remove these Colored troops and that, so far as they knew, there was no complaint in Germany on that score. Mrs. Catt says that the three German women with whom she talked in Geneva promised to investigate the charges,against the Colored troops which were being circulated in this country and to let her know later. "I saw all three of them in London early in December," says Mrs. Catt, "and again they reiterated the same statement in Geneva, which was to the effect that atrocities such as are being described in the United States could not have been committed by the Army of Occupation without the masses of people of Germany knowing about it, and that they had heard nothing which warranted such charges being made." Moreover,some of the leading business men in the Rhineland have recently issued an indignant disclaimer of the propaganda campaign against the black troops. Director Reutten declared that investigation by the Rhineland Traffic Association had shown that stories of molestation of the population by the troops of occupation were untrue. I cannot sign the petition asking for the removal of the black troops with these facts staring me in the face. The propaganda against the black troops is simply another violent and plausible appeal to race prejudice. It is very painful to me not to do anything which you or the organization that I love would like to have me do. Knowing you as well as I do, however, I feel sure you do not want me to be untrue to myself or to the race with which I am identified simply to please my friends. I do not want to be stumbling block or a nuisance as a member of the Executive Committee. I am willing to resign. You have always been such a true friend to me, my esteem and affection for you are so great, I do not want to do anything which will embarrass you as the head of the International League for Peace and 160 Freedom. I am not at all sure I can be resent at the annual meeting next month. I shall try to be there. Please speak frankly to me. I am not narrow. I want to know the truth and do right. With gratitude to you for the many kindnesses to me in the past and with the highest esteem, I am sincerely yours, Mary Church Terrell. n a few days I received the following letter from Miss Addams written by her own dear hand March 29, 1921. My dear Mrs. Terrell: I was chariman of a Committee in the Chicago Branch on the colored troops on the Rhine and came to [?] exactly the same conclusion which you have reached- that we should protest against the occupation of enemy territory, not against any special troops. I am quite sure you will find the annual meeting absolutely fair on the subject and I hope very much that you will be able to attend the meeting on Monday, April 11th when the matter will probably come up. i have just come back from [?] and found your letter here. Please excuse this late reply. Faithfully yours, Jane Addams. This letter was a great relief to my mind. I was glad not to be forced to resign from the Executive Committee of the League, for I enjoyed working for peace and the contacts made with the fine women who were members were edica- tion to me. It also afforded me an excellent opportunity of getting out of the "Ghetto" in Washington and [?] dominant race as I had been accustomed to do during my childhood and youth. But two years later the question of removing the black troops again dis- turbed the public mind and this time France succumbed to the clamor which was raised. Feeling that it was my duty to let some of the French officials know how a colored woman in the United States felt about the matter I sent the fol- lowing letter to Premier Poincare: Washington,D.C. [?] [?] [?] Premier Poincare, Paris, France, Dear Sir: The colored people of the United States are shocked, dis- couraged couraged and pained beyond expression at the cable gram sent by you January 161 15th to give the American State Department the assurance that only white troops are being used or will be used in the [?] and that black troops rom Morocco and Algeria will be barred. Many colored people in this country love France devotedly, because they have experienced real liberty for the first time in their lives while trav elling on French soils and have there enjoyed privileges accorded only to white citizens in the United States. We love France also, because, as a rule, she has treated her dark citizens with justice and consideration. She has nev- er discriminated against people on account of the color of their skin and placed insurmountable obstacles in their path to progress, but has allowed them to reach any heights to which on account of their ability and their efforts they might attain. We are proud of the brilliant effort which the African soldiers fight- ing under the French flag made during the World War. For African blood flows through the veins of the colored people of the United States. We recall with pride that at the first battle of the [?] it was the black troops who helped to save France from utter destruction and preserved civilization to the world. The [?] ran red with the blood of those brave, black soldiers who fought so desperately and effectively to save their beloved France. And now, in spite of the valiant service rendered by these troops, the Premier of [?] French Republic which owes its salvation largely to their blood and sacrifice, takes the time and the pains to cable the world that they will be barred from the [?] in deference to the race prejudice which certain coun- tries practice in their treatment of colored people. Thus, for the first time in her history France publicly places a stigma upon her black citizens. Having preserved an unblemished record in this particular for centuries France has at last publicly prostrated herself before the monster, Race Preju- dice, and trailed her proud banner in the dust. For a long time some of us colored-Americans who have loved France so dearly have feared that she would eventually be inoculated with the deadly germ of Race Prejudice through intimate association with other nations in which men, women and children are burned at the stake, shot to dealth and flayed 162 alive with impunity in many instances solely because their complexion was dark. But Frenchmen, both white and black, have always ridiculed the idea that this could ever happen in their land of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, and have assured me that I need give myself no concern on this account. When I was in Paris immediately after the Wold War and expressed [?] this fear to one of the most distinguished and well-known authors in France, he replied:"France can no more learn race prejudice than the average white person in the United Stages can unlearn it." The colored people of the United States have no right to question the wisdom of France's decision to bar black troops from the [?]. We do not and can not understand all the reasons why she has decided to pursue this course. Nor is it necessary for us to understand them. But, we submit, that if for good and sufficient reasons it was deemed wise to draw the line between black and white soldiers, the interests of her brave, black soldiers to whom she owes so much, would have been better conserved, if that fact had not been cabled broadcast throughout the world. Since France has always stood for absolute equality between her white and black citizens, her attitude in deliberately barring black troops from the Ruhr will not only be interpreted by the world as a reflection upon them, but it will give aid and comfort to those already steeped in prejudice against their race. The cablegram sent by your Excellency assuring the American State Department that only white troops are being or will be used in the Ruhr and that the Colonial troops from Morocco and Algeria will be barred certainly panders to the race prejudice which rages so violently abd so ruthlessly in the United States. It is a great blow to many colored women in this country whose husbands and sons lost their lives in the World War to save France. We hope that France's decision to bar her black troops from the Ruhr does not portend any radical change in her attitude toward the dark races and we beseech the leaders of the great French Republic to do nothing more which will encourage the spread of race prejudice throughout the world, May the day never dawn when France will exchange her slogan of Liber th, Equality, Fraternity which colored people have always enjoyed on her beloved 163 soil for one of discrimination, injustice,prescription and persecution which handicap them so seriously and from which they suffer so terribly in the United States. Very sincerely yours, Mary Church Terrell. Although I received no reply to this letter, I was well aware that some of the Higher Ups in France learned from it how shocked colored citizens in the United States were that those brave, black troops, some of which saved civilization at the Marne, had been withdrawn from the Ruhr in deference to the wishes of people steeped in race prejudice and replaced by white troops. Having this [Having was shi-] information to the proper officials three was nothing more that I could do. The only time I have ever been attacked on the platform by a representative of the dominant race for something I have said in an address was in Baltimore, Maryland. I had been invited to deliver the Commencement address at the Baltimore High School for colored youth shortly after the United States entered the World War. There was a general understanding that the Government wished Commencement speakers to refer to the War so as to interest the public in this country's effort to aid the allies. In complying with this request I decided to take as my subject "The Race Problem and the War." In order to encourage the young men in the graduating class as well as the other men in the audience to do everything in their power to win the war I referred to the high stand this country has taken.in the conflict. Since the United States was fighting to "make the world safe for Democracy," I declared, if the allies were victorious the statu of the colored people in this country would be greatly improved. "Never since the first cargo of dark human beings was deposited on this shore has the future loomed so promising and so bright to men and women of African descent as it does to day," I said. "Colored youth who have their lives befor them are to be congratulated upon the opportunities which for many weary, dreary years have been denied the race with which they are identified but which in all human probability they will themselves enjoy. Out of a cataclysm which deluged practically the whole world in blood and broken the hearts of millions 164 millions, suddenly to a heavily-handicapped , cruelly- hindered group of human beings in the greatest Republic on earth, the dawn appears. " "For the first time in history the major portion of the civilized world is fighting for freedom. If actions apeal louder than words, "Give me liberty or give me death " is the cry that rings from one end of Christendom to the other. From their thrones of monarchy the Kings of England and Italy are vieing with Republican France and the United States in declaring war to the last ditch upon oppression and tyranny everywhere and pledging themselves unalterably and irrevocably to the cause of freedom for all mankind. The most spiritual and sanguine prophet that ever dreamed of the day when the iron heel of oppression would be lifted from the necks of men and women who groaned in bondage could never have imagined a movement so prodigious, so all-embracing and so irrestible as the onward, upward march to universal freedom in which millions of men of different races and complexions are engaged at the present time." Then I referred briefly to the gains which had recently been made by freedom. [?] strongly-entrenched despotism like Russia had been overthrown practically without bloodshed in the twinkling of an eye and a Republic had been set up in its place. England which had turned a deaf ear to Ireland's prayers and entreaties to be allowed to govern herself seemed at last willing to remove the note from her own eye that she might the more clearly see how to pick the beam from her Neighbor's. The East Indians had also been promised the recognition which they thought they had deserved for years but which they had hitherto been denied. In stating the reasons why she was unwilling to restore to Germany the African territory wrested from her during the war, England told the world that while she did not enter the war for the purpose of freeing the natives from German rule, nevertheless the outrages perpetrated by Germany upon the Africans were so savage and wicked, it would be a crime against civilization and humanity to permit them to bow again under such a cruel yoke, I referred also to the triumph won by women of England who had been fighting for suffrage so long. I emphasized the attitude assumed by newspapers which were full of editorials 165 editorials asserting that this "War of Democracy against autocracy had brought about the formation of a common brotherhood that knows neither race, religion nor people." I praised the white people of the South for the efforts they were making to set their house in order. Some terrible outrages had been perpetrated against colored people a short time before I delivered this Commencement address, so I said,"in spite of these barbarous outbreaks against colored people, such as the lynching near Memphis, Tenn., in which a man was burned to death, having been confined in a steel cage made expressly for the purpose, while a little colored boy only ten years old was forced to watch the flames consume this helpless victim of a savage mob; in spite of the recent race riots in St. Louis, where colored men working in munition factories were shot to death, beaten into insensibility, while the houses of colored people were set on fire and destroyed; in spite of other disheartening exhibitions of race prejudice a persecution, three is every reason to hope that this nation in the great crisis which confronts it will really endeavor to raise up the 12,000,000 of colored people to equal human dignity, as an English writer expresses it, and to wipe out the national stigma on the American commonwealth that every man, woman and child born with a dark skin is born to the shame of exclusion from rights guaranteed him by the Constitution and from privileges which he should be allowed to enjoy. Several times afterward I laid great emphasis upon my faith in the outcome of the war. I assured this audience of colored people that their condition would be greatly improved, because the people of this country were thinking about freedom and Democracy as they had never thought before, because their conscience had been aroused on the subject and because their hearts had been touched. The Comptroller of Baltimore had been requested to represent the Mayor at the Commencement exercise and when he arose to make some remarks,he was so enraged that he could scarcely control himself. He complimented those who had spoken, those who had sung- in fact he had words for everybody but myself, then he launched into a tirade against the speaker of the evening. He almost 166 jumped upon her with both feet. White with rage he paced up and down the stag criticising my speech. "The speaker of the evening has predicted that the condition of the colored people of this country will be improved," he declared with fierce indignation. He was too deeply stirred to proceed, so he paused a second. He shouted aloud and shook his fist at the audience as he warned" But I tell you people you will have no more rights after the war than you enjoy now. He shook his fist at the audience as he uttered this threat. Then something occurred which I had never heard before in an audience of colored people and which I have never heard since. They hissed the Comptroller of Baltimore with all their might. But he shook his fist at them again and told them sarcastically that he knew all about colored people, that he understood them perfectly and that he didn't care a fig(or words to that effect) how much they hissed. The newspaper account of this disgraceful occurrence which appeared in the Baltimore American was naturally very biassed and gave only the Comptroller's point of view, so I sent a letter to explain and correct it. Under the headline "Meant to be Optimistic", on June 28, 1917 the Baltimore-American published my letter as follows: "The report of the commencement exercises of the Colored High School which appeared in the Baltimore-American misinterprets the spirit and purpose of my address to the graduates and misinterprets the spirit, I am charged with having "aimed scathing and bitter remarks at the white race.", with having"referred to certain lynchings and hangings. " My address consumed 50 minutes, of which about one minute and a half, perhaps, certainly not more, was consumed in referring to to the recent riot in St. Louis. The Comptroller of Baltimore is reported to have said that it was"my unwise reference to lynchings and hangings " which caused him to rebuke me, and the American states that he"denounced me in no uncertain terms." If only three out of fifty minutes were devoted to one burning and one race riot, it is clear that one who reads the report of my address would get a decidedly inaccurate account of it. The part of the report which states the Comptroller of Baltimore denounced 167 denounced me, the guest of the occasion, in no uncertain terms is literally true. I doubt that any colored man in the country would treat a woman of any race under such circumstances with such discourtesy. The American account states that the white people who attended the exercises declared that my address should have been one of optimism, but it was just the opposite, and calculated to arouse anything but a feeling of good will." It is difficult to believe that any fair-minded person who listened to my entire address would have made such a comment. By insisting that the conditions would cause a better understanding between the two races, that efforts are already making in the South to ameliorate the condition of colored people, by reviewing the marvellous progress along all lines achieved bu the race since the Civil War, by emphasizing the irreproachable record made by the colored soldiers from the Revolutionary War to the martyrdom into which brave, colored troopers rushed last summer at Carrisal, I did everything in my power to create optimism and to inspire with hope the members of the graduating class, I have spoken in ever State of the South, and rarely have I addressed an audience in that section in which no white people were present. I have always pleaded for my heavily-handicapped race and expressed the hope that some day they would enjoy greater freedom and be given an equal chance. But, up to date, the Comptroller of Baltimore is the first man, white or any other color, who has ever publicly denounced me for anything I have said. It is possible to take a sentence or two from any address and distort it into meaning anything a hostile, illiberal,angry man wants it to mean. Moreover, some people can not bear the truth, no matter how tactfully it is told. No doubt the haughty,the tyrannical,the unmerciful, the impure and the [?] of discord take a fierce exception to the Sermon on the Mount." Mary Church Terrell. With one exception the most serious friction which has ever occurred between white and colored club women was caused by the segregation of the race in the Washington auditorium when the Quinquennial met here in May 1925. Mrs. Mary McLeod Bethune who was then president of the national Association of Colored Women had requested me to confer with the Chairman on Music appointed by the 168 American Council of Women, because she happened to be stopping at the Mayflower Hotel, while she was making out the program. Arrangements had been made by a former president of the National Association of Colored Women to have 200 colored singers from the Richmond, Va.Treble Clef Club, the Hampton Institute Choir, the Howard University Choral Society of Washington, D.C. and musicians of note like Nathaniel Dett, the well-known composer and Professor Roy Tibbs of Howard University to take part in the program. But the night on which the colored musicians were to appear, colored people who went to the auditorium discovered that they were not only segregated, but that they were seated for the most part in the most undesirable section of the building. When the singers learned this, they refused to appear. [This was a great disappointment to] The large audience, many of whom had gone expressly to hear the colored musicians, was greatly disappointed. This was especially true of the foreign women who had looked forward to this concert with great anticipations of pleasure. When they learned the cause of the trouble, they were thoroughly disgusted. Among both white and colored people who were genuinely interested in the welfare of the race opinions concerning the wisdom of the step taken by the singers differed. Some felt that they had missed a glorious opportunity on a notable occasion of showing what they had accomplished in music and what they could do. But without exception all the officers of the National Association as well as the great majority of colored people all over the United States were a unit in the conviction that this drastic action had been forced upon us by those who subjected us to the humiliation of segregation in the National Capital, adding insult to injury by doing so when a large number of foreign women was present to witness it. The Executive Committee of the National Association of Colored Women which was meeting in Washington at the time appointed a committee of which I was chairman to draft resolutions explaining our attitude [?] as follows: In order to maintain their self-respect the members of the National Association of Colored Women were forced to cancel their program, prepared at the request of the Music Department of the National Council of Women, for the Musicale given 169 May 5th by the International Council of Women during its Quinquennial Session in the national capital. Since the National Association of Colored Women represents a membership of one hundred thousand, the Executive Committee now assembled in Washington feel that it is their duty to their organization, to their country, and to the whole civilized world to explain why they so suddenly withdrew from a program in which they had made such extensive and expensive plans to participate. Having learned that there was a possibility that colored people would be segregated in the Washington auditorium, several officers of the National Association of Colored Women conferred with the President of the National Council of Women and with the Chairman of the Department of Music to protest against the contemplated discrimination. The National Association of Colored Women is now and has been for many years a member of the National Council of Women. Therefore, the officers of the Association feel that they had a right to expect the same courteous treatment for all members of their race that other groups received. For this reason they insisted that there should be no separation. From a written statement made by the President of the National Council of Women, the officers of the National Association of Colored Women were led to believe that their race would not be segregated. In order to make their position in this matter perfectly clear, the officers of the National Association of Colored Women explicitly stated that if there were any discrimination on account of color or race, they would cancel their part of the program. Therefore, the charge that the National Association of Colored Women withdrew from the program without warning is not founded in fact. Upholding their own purposes and ideals, as well as those of the International Council of Women, even though they deeply regretted it, the officers of the National Association of Colored Women were forced to withdraw from the program. Mary Church Terrell, Chairman of Committee on Resolutions. And when it was suggested to have the colored singers appear at a colored theatre the Evening Star quotes me as saying: "We consider the appearances 170 at the Howard Theatre as segregation just as much as a separate block of seats in the Auditorium. If these singers appear in any manner before the Quinquennial it will be expressly against our orders and in open rebellion." There was no difference of opinion among those responsible for the [?] of the colored singers. All agreed that is was a real tragedy they were denied the opportunity of entertaining the vast audience gathered to hear them, particularly the women from foreign lands who were eager to see them and listen to them,andeverybody friendly to us regretted also that the race thus lost such a fine chance of displaying its musical ability through its talented representatives and of proving to what a high standard of excellence it had attained. But, under the circumstances the rendition of the program was impossible. When the members of the choirs and the chorusses who were to appear on the program that night heard how those of their own race had come to the concert were to be treated, they said they were too depressed to sing. 171 Delegate to the International Peace Congress. The following letter which was received one morning about the middle of December, 1918 thrilled me with surprise and joy. "Dear Mrs. Terrell," it read,"It gives me real pleasure to inform you that at a meeting of the Executive Board the Women's Peace Party, which is the section for the U.S.A. of the International Committee of Women for Permanent Peace, held in New York City November 24, you were elected as one of thirty delegates and alternates to the International Congress of Women which it was arranged at the Hague in 1915 should meet at the time of the Peace Conference at the end of the War." The letter stated that it was likely the meeting would be held either at Paris or the Hague and the time might be either the first week in February or early in May. "We realize," the letter concluded,"that this is not an easy journey which we are inviting you to take under crowded conditions,in winter, to war- worn countries. But we sincerely hope that your love of human welfare will minimize the difficulties and that you will be able to go with us. Faithfully yours Alice Thacher Post, Secretary of Delegates from the U.S.A." Mrs. Post was the wife of Mr. Louis Post who was then Assistant Secretary of Labor under President Woodrow Wilson. I was working for the War Camp Community Service at the time and was in the South trying to induce some of the Committees of the large cities to sanction the establishment of centers for colored women and girls. After completing the summary of the conditions which obtained n these cities I sent it to headquarters and asked for a leave of absence to go as a delegate to the Peace Congress which would soon be held in Europe. This was granted in the following letter: "My dear Mrs. Terrell: Thank you for the summary; it is a fine piece of work and the classification workers are delighted with it. It will help us materially in understanding the problems of the cities you visited. We wish to express our appreciation of the devoted service you have given W.C.C.S. through the past months, and willingly grant you the leave of absence to enable you to make the important trip abroad. Wishing you success in your new undertaking, Very sincerely yours, (signed) Geo. E. Dickie, Director Field Department." 172 Miss Jane Addams, president of the International League for Peace and Freedom was eager to have me attend the Congress [and so was] and so was Mr. Moorefield Storey, president of the N.A.A.C.P., Miss Millen Mason and Mr. Joseph Loud of Boston, Mr. and Mrs. F.W. Hallowell Medford, Massachusetts; Mrs. Leach and the Misses Lewisohn of New York, Mr. Julius Rosenwald the philanthropist and several other prominent people were genuinely interested in having me go abroad and each one assisted in making the voyage possible. For three years [of years] I was [been] a member of the Executive Committee of the United States Section of the International League for Peace and Freedom and several times I attended meetings in the residence home of Mrs. Lucy Biddle Lewis the chairman who lived in a delightful old-fashioned home in the midst of spacious grounds a few miles from Philadelphia. Securing a passport to go abroad shortly after the armistice was signed was no easy matter. It was especially difficult to get one for France. The State Department refused to give passports to the 30 delegates and alternates to the Congress, as originally planned and reduced the number to 15. Under the circumstances it would have been very easy to leave the colored delegate out, since there was undoubtedly a goodly number of white women who had been deeply interested in the peace movement and who had contributed liberally to the cause and were financially able to go. For that reason I was felt a signal honor had been conferred upon me by the Peace Party, when my name was retained as a delegate. Since I had worked for the War Camp Community Service till the last minute, I had only a few days in which [to] prepare for the voyage after I reached home from New York. Having secured my passport In Washington, I had to have ample time for the visas in New York. This necessaitated trips to the consulates of all the countries named in the passport, to the office of the line in which passage had been booked as well as to the custom house of New York. One was also advised that some of the visa work had to be done at least 72 hours before sailing. But the fates were very kind to me and I went through the mill in two days. 173 I was fortunate also in securing a fine, large stateroom in which there was only one other passenger, a young woman born in Holland whose parents had grown rich in Java, one of the Dutch possessions. With a party consisting of Miss Jane Addams, the founder of Hull House and president of the International League for Peace and Freedom, Miss Jeannette Rankin, the first woman to be elected to the Congress of the United States, Mrs. Louis Post, Mrs. Florence Kelly, an official in the Consumer's League, Dr. Alice Hamilton, the first woman who was ever invited for the Peace Party and Mrs. John Jay White, a writer, we sailed from New York on the Hoordam, Holland-America line April 9th, 1918 almost five months to the day after the armistice was signed. On the steamer going over all of our party sat at the captain's table and received as much attention as was good for any of us. Every morning we worked hard in Miss Addams' room trying to decide on the resolutions which should be presented to the Congress and in what language they should be couched, The necessity of typewriting these resolutions became very apparent . But where was a typewriter to be found? That was indeed the questions and who would type them, if haply we could locate a machine. I guaranteed to get a typewriter and promised to type the resolutions. This was not hard to do, [It involved a no difficulty whatever] for the purser cheerfully consented to lend me the machine a short while each morning and edit. some of the resolutions so that everybody in the delegation approved of them was by no means easy and considerable gray matter was consumed in that operation. We reached Paris Easter Sunday morning and experienced some difficulty in securing suitable quarters, because all the hostelries were full. It was finally decided to go to the Hotel Continental. Miss Jannette Rankin invited me to [take] share a room having two beds with her and we selected one next to that occupied by Miss Addams and Dr. Alice Hamilton. These rooms were beautiful but they cost a pretty penny. We remained in Paris several weeks, before it could definitely decided just where the Congress should meet. Finally Zurich Switzerland was selected as the place and May 12-17 as the time. 174 Attending this Congress was as interesting,as illuminating and as gratifying an experience as it falls to the lot of the average woman to have. In the first place, we were a group of women meeting to advocate peace right after the war in which the major portion of the civilized world had engaged. I was about to say that women from all parts of the world were present. But, on sober, second thought it is more truthful to say that women from all over the white world were present. There was not a single delegate from Japan, China, India or from any other country whose inhabitants were not white. Since I was the only woman present who had even a drop of African blood in her veins, it was my duty and privilege for the second time in my life not only to represent the colored women of the United States but the whole continent of Africa as well. In fact, since I was the only delegate who gave any color to the occasion at all, it finally dawned upon me that I was representing the women of all the non-white countries in the world. I shall not attempt to mention in detail the subjects discussed or the measures proposed or the work actually done by the International Congress of Women which met in Zurich soon after that awful World War in which millions of men were killed, other millions maimed for life, not to mention the millions of women and children who were killed outright or who died as the result of the terrible conditions under which they were obliged to live and in consequence of the unspeakable torture to which thousands of women both young and old were subjected by soldiers without regard to country race. No group of human beings could have made more earnest or conscientious efforts to help solve the problems of reconstruction and readjustments incident to the great World War than did the women who took part in that Congress. A striking, never-to-be-forgotten feature was the good feeling existing between the French and the German women who were present. Owing to France France's hostile attitude toward the Peace Congress some of the French women who wished to attend as delegates were unable to secure passports. But the letters and sentiments exchanged between the women of those two hostile countries showed their breadth of view, their sincerity of purpose and their de- [??????????????????????????????????????] or doubt 175 On the third day of the Congress Miss Addams called me to her and toldme that the American delegation had voted unanimously to have me represent them the next night, Thursday. Although the notice for such an important effort was very short, I decided immediately to deliver my address in German, since Zurich is in German Switzerland and I wanted as many in the audience as possible to understand what I had to say. Everybody connected with the Congress was as busy as a bee. The resolutions and the other important papers which came before the delegates were all translated into three languages, French German and English, so that I knew [i] it would be difficult to get one of the official translators to help me. However, after diligent search I found a young woman who said she would assist me a little that afternoon(Wednesday) at three o'clock. She had to leave at six to take a new position, she said, so that what we did would have to be done quickly. Knowing that it would require more time to express myself in German than it would in English and that only fifteen minutes had been allotted me, it was very difficult to decide what to include and what to omit. By six o'clock, however, I had definitely made up my mind what to say and with with the assistance of the clever, obliging Swiss girl it had been translated into German. Wednesday night I did nothing but read and reread and study that German speech till nearly dawn. I was obliged to attend the meeting Thursday morning, for I had been notified that my resolution would be called for at that session. Nothing but serious illness or death would have kept me from that morning meeting, not even the desire to appear well that evening, so eager was I to be present when my precious resolution was presented to the delegates. I had written, rewritten and then had done it all over again many times on the steamer, before it was acceptable to the whole delegation. After the other delegates on the steamer had presented all the resolutions which they care to offer I told them I wanted to submit one in which I was very much interested. I then offered one protesting against the discriminations, humiliations and injustices perpetrated not only upon the 176 colored people of the United States, but upon the dark races all over the world. Several members of the delegation thought they could improve upon mine, but none of them exactly expressed the thought which I wished to convey. It was finally agreed to let me present the following resolution to the Congress: "We believe no human being should be deprived of an education, prevented from earning a living, debarred from any legitimate pursuit in which he wishes to engage or be subjected to humiliations of various kinds on account of race, color or creed." Anent [?] this resolution a rather amusing incident occurred. Just before it was to be read to the delegates Miss Emily Bal[?]h, formerly a teacher at Wellesley College and then an officer in the International League, came to me to to tell me my resolution had been changed a little. When I expressed surprise and regret that this had been done without notifying me, she told me it was too late then to discuss the matter, for the resolution which had been substituted for mine had already been translated into German and French and there was nothing left for me to do but go up stairs to the office of the translators, get it and read it. I did as I was directed, feeling very much depressed, not knowing what change had been made in the original. But, when I glanced at the German and French copies I could scarcely believe I was seeing aright, for there before before my very eyes was my own dear resolution in which no change had been made at all. The translator had misunderstood the instructions given her and instead of translating the substitute resolution she had translated mine. It was a proud and gratifying moment in my life when I presented that resolution in person in Zurich Switzerland to the International Congress of Peace and Freedom. It certainly was fitting that I should do this, since I was the only delegate present who represented the dark races of the world and had a chance to speak in their behalf. That same night I delivered my address. It was the first large meeting which had been held. The previous sessions at night had been held in the lecture rooms of the University of Zurich where comparitively few could be accommodated. But this Thursday night meeting was held in a magnigicent old cathedral in which women had never been allowed to speak before. We stood in a pulpit that was high over the heads of the audience and looked down upon the people 177 as we spoke. That wonderful old St. Peter's Cathedral was packed and jammed, for the citizens of Zurich were immensely interested in that Congress. There were six speakers on the program. Addresses had been delivered in French, German, Italian and English, when I was finally introduced to the audience as the last speaker, just after Mrs. Philip Snowden, the well-known English woman had spoken. When Miss Addams presented me she made a slight reference to the Race Problem in the United States, declared that the American delegation was glad to have a representative of the colored group with them and concluded by saying "Although Mrs. Terrell speaks English at home, she is going to speak German to night." That German audience gave unmistakable evidence of the fact that this bit of information was good news to it. When I finished, the audience thundered with applause. Miss Addams asked me to come forward and acknowledge it. There went up such an outburst of approbation as I had not heard since I addressed the International Congress of Women which had met in Berlin fifteen years previously almost to the month. Unstinted praise was bestowed upon this effort by scores. No matter where I went after that women and men, too, would grasp my hand cordially and compliment me upon [?] German" and upon my speech. When I entered the stores the clerks would refer to my speech and the customers would sometimes stop making purchases to shake my hand in commendation. But there was nothing remarkable about that speech. It was simply overestimated by the audience because I told the people a few facts which they did not know. It was something new to them presented by a kind of human mongrel such as they rarely see in that part of the moral vineyard. That was all [?] I began by thanking the bread-minded white women of the United States for me to the Congress and giving me the opportunity to speak. If people everywhere would follow their example I said, race problems along with some others would soon disappear from the world. I cheerfully admitted that there were many white people in the United States who assisted colored people in every way they could and who tried to be just. Then I proceeded to reveal to that foreign audience in German 178 which they could understand the fearful injustices of every description perpetrated upon the colored people in the United States. The colored men who went from their country to fight in France "to make the world safe for Democracy, I declared fought for a freedom for other people which they did not possess themselves. "My friends," I concluded, "you may talk about permanent peace till doomsday, but you will never have it, so long as the dark races of the world are the victims of injustice and prejudice." I also referred to the fact that at the Peace Conference in Paris two of the most highly civilized and"most Christian nations in the world had denied racial equality to Japan [at the Peace Conference in Paris] which she had a right to demand. I was greatly surprised that I was able to crowd so much in such a little time. For once in my life I was satisfied with my effort. I have always been a harsh critic of myself and have suffered many times after I have tried my level best to reach a certain standard, because I have felt that I did not attain unto it. As a result of that effort in Zurich I had many invitations to speak in various parts of Europe, but I did not feel it was right for me to remain away from home long enough to accept them. While I was in Swizterland I wanted very much to revisit Lausanne, where as a young woman I had spent so many happy,profitable days in school. I hoped strongly I would be able to find the family with whom I had stopped so many years ago. I went to the post office, therefore, and asked one of the officials it either Mlle. Sarah or Mlle. Marie Gowthorpe still lived in Lausanne. He told me they did, [and] gave me their address in a juffy and in a few minutes I was standing before the door of their apartment. Although we had not seen each other for thirty years, Sarah who answered the bell, recognized me immediately. "Mlle Church", she exclaimed. Then came dear Marie of whom I was especially fond and we had a soulful reunion for a whole afternoon and evening reviewing old times. [*180*] 160 Meeting Old and New Friends in Paris. A Dose of Race Prejudice Administered by My White Countrymen. In Paris where I spent five weeks on my way home from the International Peace Congress which had met in Zurich I renewed my acquaintance with Monsieur [Finot] Finot whom I had met fifteen years previously when I was returning from the International Congress of Women which had been held in Berlin. It was gratifying that this distinguished man who for years had been making an exhaustive study of the mental capacity of the white and dark races respectively had not changed his point of view at all. The only change that had been made was in the name of his magazine. He was now writing for the La Revue Mondiale instead of La Revue de la Revue. Nothing is more exhilerating and encouraging to a member of the under-estimated group than a talk with this great French writer who believes head, heart and soul in the fine mental and spiritual endowment of the dark races. Nobody has taken more pains to explore the theory of the natural superiority of the white race and the inevitable inferiority of the dark than Monsieur Finot. In His large book on Race Prejudice (Les Prejuges des Races) contains enough facts and arguments proving the fallacy of this position to convince any human being who thinks and is san. Nobody could take a more advanced stand on absolute equality between the white and black races than does Monsieur Finot. When I expressed the fear that the French might learn from the large number of Americans in their country how to discriminate against colored people he assured me that my fears were groundless. "The French can no more learn how to be prejudiced against human beings on account of their color than Americans can unlearn it," he said. After writing his large volume on race prejudice Monsieur Finot wrote a much shorter book entitled "L'Agenie et la Mort dest Races." which his friend, Mr. William T.Stead, then editor of the British Review of Rdviews in London translated into English under the title "The Death Agony of the 'Science' of Race." In this masterful presentation Monsieur Finot shows that "the good in man is constantly leading him onward through the endless confusion caused by [161] 181 international hatred and war towards the brotherhood of races and nations. The old dogmas, the effect of which was to estrange human beings," he says, "are crumbling to pieces and new ones are arising, whose whole burden is the equality of all mankind." Monsieur Finot presented me with both the French edition and the translation by Mr. Stead and gave me permission to have the English book reprinted in the United States. He told me had talked with several rich Americans who had offered to back him with money, if he would stop his"foolish prattle" about the equality of races. A woman who is at the head of one of the large organizations in the United States had taken the time and the pains to call on him to argue against the stand he had taken and to convert him to her point of view. Trying to teach Frenchmen to discriminate against colored people amounted to an obsession with some Americans since The World War. The proprieter of a hotel in Nancy told me that she had been advised against accommodating colored people and when she had allowed a colored officer to stop there she was warned that if she adopted that as her policy no self-respecting Americans would [patron there] patronize her. She simply shrugged her shoulders and replied, "So much the worse for the Americans," and refused to discriminate against colored officers. "But, Madame," she said proudly, "they came to my hotel just the same. If I lost any guests I did not know it and I certainly did not need them."It was an indescribable pleasure to hear the French people, old and young, men and women sing the praises of the colored soldiers who were sent to France. It was no use trying to explain the white American's prejudice against his colored countrymen to French people, for they simply could not understand it. Through the courtesy of the Honorable Blaise Diagne Commissioner and in charge of official affairs I had the plea pleasure of visiting the French Chamber of Deputies. Tall, very dark, straight as an arrow, self-possessed, dignified and full of reserve power this French-African was a living, breathing illustration of the possibilities of his people under favorable conditions, when given the opportunity of cultivating their brains, coupled with the chance of reaching any height which their ability enables them to attain. There 182 There were five or six Africans in the Chamber of Deputies and it was an object lesson in what may occur when black and white mingle on terms of absolute equality and neither group is thinking about the color of the others skin. The black and white deputies talked with each other, mingled together indiscriminately exchanged views, laughed and joked together and every now and then one would place his hand familiarly on the other's shoulder just as though there were no difference in race or color at all. Nobody who has a drop of African blood in his veins can fail to honor and love France on account of the way she treats her black subjects when they live on her soil and mingle with the other citizens of that great Republic. In order to get first hand information [about this subject for myself] I made up my mind that I would stop every black Frenchman I happened to meet in the street and talk with him myself. Each and every one of them assured me that they were treated just like the "other Frenchmen" no matter where they went or what they wanted to do. B I questioned them closely about their status in France and whether they were discriminated against in any way and how they were treated on general principles. But a conversation I held with one French-African cured me of this habit. I had asked him whether he could attend any school he chose, whether he could be served in any restaurant he entered or accommodated in any hotel at which he wished to stop. The more I questioned him, the more puzzled he became. Finally in a tone denoting that he was both puzzled and grieved, he replied, "Mais, Madame, les Francais nous aiment. " (But Madame, the French people love us." His attitude toward me and the tone of his voice were precisely what one would expect from a child who had been asked whether his mother and father gave him enough to eat, a clean bed to sleep in and decent clothes to wear. His faith in the affection of the French for his group and the testimony he so cheerfully bore to prove it convinced me that the French really treat their dark citizens from their African colonies like brothers and men. For several reasons my interview with Baron Makino, Japan's representative at the Peach Conference at the hotel Maurice, in Paris, was indelibly stamped upon my mind. Naturally we discussed the attitude of the proud, selfish white races toward 183 the dark. I was outspoken as usual, but the Japanese Baron was very reserved and conservative in his remarks, He was a diplomat to his finger rips. It was a great relief to my pen-up feelings to tell him personally how shocked and sorry I was that two of the most Christian and highly-civilized races in the world had denied racial equality to Japan which she had a right to demand. After that interview in the Hotel Maurice which lasted an hour and a half I felt that I had been in the presence of a real diplomat. A few years after that I had an interview with Baron Naibe Kanda at the Shoreham hotel in Washington when he was attending the Arms Limitation Conference here and I discussed with him the attitude which the Japanese usually assume [as a rule] toward colored people in this country. As a rule, I told him, the Japanese avoid colored people and seem unfriendly toward them on general principles. Personally, I explained, I felt I could understand the reason why Japanese in the United States held themselves aloof from colored people. They learn, as soon as they reach this country, that in many parts of the United States colored people are debarred from hotels and restaurants, are denied privileges accorded to other people and that nearly everywhere they are socially ostracised. Under the circumstances, I admitted, it is quite natural that the Japanese wh who have troubles of their own, when they reach the United States should not want want to be closely affiliated with a group which is generally regarded as inferior and considered undesirable in the social circles of the dominant race Baron Kanda immediately assured me that in their own country the Japanese have absolutely no prejudice against colored people. They know very little about them, of course, he said, but when colored people come among them they are received with with the same cordiality as that accorded other races. He himself had entertained the Jubilee singers, he said, when they filled some engagements in Japan He had invited them to dine with him and had them given them a reception after wards. I prize highly a card which Baron Kanda gave me when we parted on which he had written a sentiment in Japanese characters. But, to return to Paris, One day while I was looking with admiration and adoration at the statue of Joan of Arc a friend from New York greeted me and told me that William Monroe Trotter, the editor of the Boston Guardian, 184 was in Paris and was trying to tell the French people the truth about conditions under which colored people live in the United States. I resolved to see him as soon as I could and learned that a Frenchman who admired him and believed in him had given him a desk in his office. Sure enough, therehe was working away like a beaver. "Have you heard what a hard time I had getting to Europe?" Mr.Trotter inquired. I had heard nothing about it, but when he related his story I realized that he had not sailed to Paris on flowery beds of ease. For reasons best known to the officials who decided who should and who should not be granted passports right after the World War, Mr. Trotter had been unable to secure one. But, he was bound, bend and determined to go. Since he could not swim across the big pond, he was at his wits end. Finally a bright thought struck him. He would cross the ocean as a cook on a steamer. But, alas, he didn't know how to boil water even. He could learn, couldn't he? And that is exactly what he did. He altered his name a bit, got a job on a steamer as a cook and reached France in due course of time right side up with care. The rest was easy. The National Equal Rights League had elected him as a delegate to represent it and he was also made the Secretary of Race Petitioners to the Peace Conference.So, as soon as he landed in Paris and had been offered a desk in a sympathizer's office near the French Stock Exchange , he went to work in earnest. He gave me a copy of the following letter which he had just addressed to Mr. Wilson: Paris, May 31st, 1919. Headquarters of Delegate to Paris of National Equal Rights League, 10 Place de la Bourse, Chez M. Collet. The President of the U.S.A. Hon. Woodrow Wilson, Maison Blance, 11, Place des Etats Unis, Paris, Sir; Lawlessness and mob murder against citizens of color continue to take place in our common country, the U.S.A. This was so while the world peace agreement was being written. Day before yesterday, while the Entente Allies were waiting for the peace treaty to be signed by Germany, a man of color was taken by the mob from the Court House itself, in the State of Missouri, and lynched in the Court House yard, after the Court had decided that life imprisonment was the punishment due the victim for killing officers when arrested. Yesterday here in France in your Memorial Day address at the graves 185 of American soldiers you declared: "I stand consecrated to the lads sent here to die." Moany of them were lads of color, gallant and loyal, fighting for France, for civilisation and for world democract. Will you, therefore, for their sakes and that they should not have died in vain, grant to their king and race at home protection of rights and of life in the world peace agreement? And will you not at once send a special message to Congress recommending that lynching be made a crime against the Federal Government? This request is made in the name of the National Equal Rights League whose elected delegate to Paris I am. Yours for World Democracy, William Trotter, Delegate to Paris and Secretary of Race Petitioners to Peace Conference. Shortly after the armistice was signed there was a riot in the National Capital, started, it is claimed, by marines who didn't like to see colored men wearing the uniforms of soldiers so cockily about the streets and who wanted to teach them to keep their place. My life was in danger on that occasion as was that of the members of my family and all the other colored people in the city. The slightest pretext for shooting any colored person would have been considered sufficient excuse for any member of the negro-hating, negro baiting mob to commit murder. I shot was fired into the house of one of my friends, a widow which came from the second story of a house across the street. Mr. Arthur Spingarn, a member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, came from New York to secure some facts concerning this riot and asked me to go with him to his destination. As we walked along a street on which many colored people lived, one of my friends told me that the feeling against white people was running so high on account of the brutal manner in which they had beaten, shot and other wise maltreated assaulted colored people, it was not safe for us to be seen together and advised me to return home. But we continued on our wau till we reached the 9the precinct so that we might ask the captain whether it was true that [? heard from the lips of the captain that] colored men were being arrested by policemen and beaten badly after they the rumor of the beatings administered by policement to colored men in the were placed in the station house cells. Reluctantly he admitted thay such outrages had occurred. 187 In several cities of the South at least six colored soldiers were lynched by white people because they objected to having colored men wear the uniform of a United States soldier. These and other incidents show that William Monroe Trotter was justified in trying to do something which would ameliorate the condition of his race, while he had an opportunity to spread propaganda in their behalf in Paris. While I was in the French capital a big.allopathic dose of race prejudice was administered to me by Government officials stationed there. I wanted very much to take a trip through the devastated sections of France which was offered citizens "in good standing" by the Government and arranged by the Visitors Bureau. Nearly all of the delegates to the Peace Congress with whom I had crossed the ocean had taken the trip. I had not been invited to go with the party, not because any member of it would have objected to my presence, but because they probably took it for granted that the discrimination against colored people in the United States under similar circumstances would quite likely be displayed by its citizens in France. In other words a taboo on anything which might be twisted to mean "social equality" for colored Americans would undoubtedly "follow the flag". [?] I observed that very broad-minded white people who have no prejudice against colored people [should? ?] cause trouble unwittingly by raising the issue themselves by asking questions about colored people whom they have invited to accompany them somewhere. If they want a colored person to take a meal with them at a restaurant or at a hotel for instance they feel in duty bound to go to the proprietor to inquire whether he will serve colored people or not. This very questions raised the ugly issues which the proprietor may never have had to meet before and which promptly [?] him out of a year's growth. In a sort of paroxysm of fear he quickly states that he can not serve colored people in his place. In ninety nine cases out of one hundred the probability is that if the white individual had asked no questions about the policy pursued by the proprietor with reference to colored people and had gone calmly into the dining room with his colored friend, his [?] guest 188 would have been served. It seldom happens that a colored person accompanied by a white friend is excluded from a dining room in the North, East or West. I do not know whether or not the other delegates to the Peace Congress asked the officials in the Visitors Bureau in Paris whether there would be any objection to having a colored woman accompany them on the trip and were told there would be. I simply know I was not invited to go with them when they went. Although I wanted very much to avail myself of the opportunity of seeing the devastated sections of France, I did not so express myself to the party. I carefully concealed my feelings [disappointment] from my companions. The evening they were scheduled to return I had a nice little lunch waiting for them, because I thought they would be too tired to order a meal for themselves, and I listened to the report of what they saw without showing how disappointed I was that I had not gone. I made up my mind, however, that I would do my level best to get a chance to go. Suiting the action to the thought about the last of April I went to the Visitor's Bureau Bureau to prefer my request. A friend employed there told me he felt certain I could go at the Government's expense just as the others had gone. I presented my credentials to a red-headed young man who asked for them and who seemed very favourably impressed with me indeed. [He asked for credentials and] I gave him the original letter written to me by Mr. George Dickie, Field Director for the War Camp Community Service in which he complimented my summary of conditions in some southern cities I had been sent to visit. The young man took it, and made two copies of it, giving me one and retaining one himself. Captain Platt, one of the Higher Ups in the Visitor's Bureau, came in person to the Hotel Continental and not finding me there wrote me a note telling me to be ready to take the trip to the devastated section the following Thursday, May 1st. But late Thursday afternoon, when I had packed a few things together and was already to start, I received a telephone message saying that the trip had been given up and that I would hear from the Visitor's Bureau later. But nary a word from the Visitor's Bureau did I hear. This was a great disappointment to me. I had remained at the Hotel Continental a whole week- rather an expensive procedure at that time- so as to be in Paris long enough to gon 189 on that trip. Soon afterward I was obliged to leave Paris to go to Zurich Switzerland to attend the Peace Congress. When I returned to Paris after the Congress had adjourned, I resolved to try once more to get to the devastated section, feeling reasonably sure I would be granted that privilege, since Captain Platt had [?] [?] promise with me that I might take the trip later on. It is barely possible, however, that the Captain might have thought that after I lef Paris I would not return, so there would be no "later on" pledge to come back to tease him. Presenting myself at the Visitor's Bureau again I saw the same red-headed young man who had received me so cordially when I made my first appearance before him. I would not refer to the color of the young man's hair, if I knew his name or was certain what position he held. I might add that I like red hair very much. How this young man's attitude toward me had changed. O, what a fall, my countrymen., or words to that effect. The moment I began to talk with him I knew the awful secret had leaked out. Either he had used his own eyes more effectively than he had at first or he had been informed from others the damning fact of my African descent. When I first appeared at the Bureau, and [He was positively rude to me and] my racial identity was not suspected [and] I was most cordially received by the young man with the lurid locks He was eager to have me take the trip and was very courteous indeed. Now, after the great light had dawned upon him he was positively rude. He told me very positively that they did not intend to arrange for any more trips. I replied that Captain Platt had definitely promised that I could take the trip, that I had remained a whole week at the Hotel Continental expecting every day that I would be notified I could go, but had been disappointed. "Well, we are not taking any more people," I tell you," he said angrily. "You are discriminating against me because I am a colored woman," I replied. "We dont stand for any such discriminations against this office," he snapped, glaring at me fiercely trying to intimidate me. "And I dont stand for any such treatment," I said. "You are discriminating against me, because I am a colored woman," I repeated. "I dont care what you think," he said, as he raised 190 his voice and grew so red in the race that his complexion matched his hair exactly. Then he strode angrily out of the room and entered what was evidently a private office. I did not see him any more. After waiting a very long time another young man entered the office and asked innocently "Are you being attended to?" I "I want to see Captain Platt," I replied. "Well, I don't know whether Captain Platt is here or not," he said doubtfully, but I'll try to find him. Pretty soon Captain Silsby, who acted and talked like a gentleman came into the room and asked me very courteously what I wanted. I related the conversation between the young man and myself. "Captain Platt will be here soon, I think," he said reassuringly. In a short while Captain Platt really arrived. He was very dignified and stern, when I told him he had definitely promised to let me take the trip which the Government had given others and that I had come to request him to do so. "We are not sending anybody else on those trips," he said icily. "Then you mean to say," I replied, "that although you promised to let me take the trip which many other Americans have taken, you now refuse to do so." You can not go." he said. "Well, so let it be," I said, scarcely above a whisper in a tone tense with indignation and feeling. Then I quickly left the room. Even if I tried I could not describe the emotions which surged within me. The following day I saw Captain Boutte, a colored officer stationed in the Visitor's Bureau who spoke French fluently and he told me I would hear definitely the next day whether I could take the trip or not. Since Captain Platt had stated positively that I could not go, I was very much surprised to learn that there was even a remote possibility that their decision would be reversed. The stern captain evidently relented, for the trip was arranged and Captain Boutte was designated as my guide. Thus it was that I saw the devastated sections of France, the terrible destruction of the villages and towns, the miles upon miles of the wicked barbed wire with which the fields had been interlaced and the beautiful, age-old structures which hed been shot to pieces it was pathetic but heartening to see the wonderful industry and the fixed, 191 grim determination of the French who had already started to repair the awful destruction which had been wrought. These who saw the [Arg?nn?] Forest right after the World War must have been impressed with the fact that the Germans felt absolutely certain that they would win it. They had converted it into a regular town with cemented houses, some of them prettily decorated. There was a grand stand in which the soldiers could listen to band concerts and a regular tiled bath room for a Royal Highness. The little spades and pewter spoons left by the Germans were still to be seen lying here and there on the ground where their owners had left them, and I took the trouble to bring several of them home with me. In the Argonne Forest I plucked a piece of ivy which grew near the grave of an American soldier and although I carried it about with me a long time for many miles from pillar to poet, several pieces of it survived, so that in two places I have living things to remind me constantly of France - a French ivy vine which climbs up the front wall of my residence in Washington and which clings to the front of my summer home. near Annapolis on Chesapeake Bay, where the Naval Academy is located. I was glad I had struggled against the exhibition of race prejudice exhibited by my white countrymen in France and finally had an opportunity to see for myself what it would have been a tragedy for me to miss and to gain invaluable information which I could have received in no other way. Incidentally it was an object lesson in the horrors of war which I can never forget. 192 A Week End Visit with Mr. and Mrs. H. G. Wells. Get Acquainted with Other Distinguished People in England. One morning while I was at the Hotel Continental in Paris, before I had started for the Peace Congress at [Eurich?], I received a letter from Mrs. H. G Wells extending me a cordial invitation to be their guest after I returned from Switzerland on my way to the United States. The newspapers had given the delegates a great deal of publicity, so that it was not difficult for anybody who wished to communicate with them get our address, If there had been the slightest suspicion in my mind that the invitation to visit her was merely perfunctory or that it had been extended just for the sake of politeness, it would have been dispelled when I reached Zurich. For there I found another letter from Mrs. Wells who had sent me the second one addressed to the American Express Company in Paris which she knew would forward it to the [???????????????????????????], for fear that the first one might not reach me while I was in Paris. She intrusted me to notify her as soon as I reached London after the Congress adjourned for she wanted very much to have me come out to see her. Consequently the first thing I did after reaching London was to write Mrs. Wells requesting her to command me when she wanted me to come. By return mail I received a reply stating that Mrs. Wells wished me to be at a certain station between London and [Dunm?w] on a certain Saturday afternoon in June. To an American unaccustomed to travelling in England conditions are bewildering in a huge station like the Liverpool, when she tries to buy a ticket for a small place at which trains stop only by request. After finding the right train one has to keep a sharp look out to avoid going several stations beyond the one at which she wishes to detrain, for [??????lls] out small stations in England. But the fates were with me and when I left the train I found Mrs. Wells waiting for me. Lithe and willowy of form, gracious, vivacious, smiling and charming in manner Mrs. Wells looked younger than she did in a photo she had sent me of herself and her two little sons fifteen years previously. 193 No one could have received a more cordial greeting than was given me by Mrs. Wells. "We will wait a few minutes," she said, "for I am expecting two other guests on this train." Just as she had finished saying this a young man on crutches with a young woman by his side approached us. I was then introduced to Mrs. and Mr. St. John Ervine, a well-known, promising, young English playwright and novelist whose plays have enjoyed a merited success both in England and in the United States. He had lost his leg in the World War, but apparently it had not affected his spirit in the least. After her guests had seated themselves in the automobile Mrs. Wells proved herself to be a first class chauffeur and she whisked us to her home in the twinkling of an eye. When Mrs. Wells opened the gate through which the auto passed I saw we were entering a typical English estate covering I dont know how many acres of land, which I learned later had been leased from [???????] the [??????????] I shall not attempt to give an extended or an accurate description of the house in which Mr. and Mrs. Wells were then living, except to say that it contained everything which comfort and good taste could suggest. But I do want to refer to the library. I could gush like a school about that. It was literally a dream - a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It was an unusually large room extending half way across the house, having at least three doors and I don't know how many windows through which the light streamed in floods. As soon as one stepped into the hall and entered Mr. Well Wells' home, one saw this most inviting, and alluring room with tufted divans, big and little chairs artistically upholstered plus books and magazines galore. But a great disappointment awaited a guest who expected to find any of Mr. Wells' books [????] handy. They were conspicuous by their absence. After casting about with the determination to find one at least, I finally discovered a small one in which [??????] heat-author described a trip to Mars. Mr. Wells did not arrive from London until, fifteen minutes before dinner. It was hard to believe I was actually looking at a man who had won such fame as a writer and about when I had been hearing for such a long time. Dont ask me how the English people keep looking so young. But they seem to find 194 the fountain of youth somehow and never grow old. There was H. G. Wells in the flesh, beaming upon his guests, extending them a most cordial welcome to his home, grasping their hands warmly, as ruddy, as lively and as approachable as a man could possibly be. Mr. Wells is without doubt the most unaffected, the most human and the most unassuming man in the whole world. We had had tea on the lawn where Mr. Wells arrived with Mrs. Lamont, wife of Mr. Thomas Lamont, who had just bought the New York Evening Post from Oswald Garrison Villard, the grandson of William Lloyd Garrison, who was also the European representative of J. Pierpont Morgan's firm and was also a valued member of President Woodrow Wilson's party in the Paris Conference on the League of Nations. Mr. Lamont had to take a long automobile ride to reach Mr. Wells' estate. I shall never cease to regret that I had not learned stenography before I became a member of that house party, so that for my own sake I might have recorded some of the clever remarks and bons mots of those interesting, well- informed and delightful people gathered for three days and nights under one roof, at one table and then after dinner in a circle for the whole evening. Not that I might publish them broadcast to the world, but it might refresh my memory in the sear and yellow leaf and live over those delightful hours again. Mr. Wells was as fine an example of perpetual motion as one could met meet in a day's march. He will never grow old. He seemed never to tire and was never happier than when he was engaged in some kind of physical exercise. I saw him play the game of ball described in "Mr. Brittling Sees It Through" an entire morning then later on he played tennis on the Countess of Warwick's estate the whole afternoon without showing the slightest signs of fatigue. In playing the game of ball Mr. Wells would take one guest as his partner till he tired him out and then he would go for another until he was exhausted too. Strolling through his spacious grounds was another kind of recreation which Mr. Wells thoroughly enjoyed, He took pleasure in showing his guests his rose garden which happened to be in bloom the beautiful Sunday morning in June 195 June he showed it to me and we went to his vegetable garden while we walking through the grounds. It was during this stroll that I condided to Mr. Wells I was thinking about writing the story of my life and calling it "The Confessions of a Colored Woman." "I like the title," he said immediately. It will be be widely read in England. But write it dispassionately. "I have tried to follow the advice of this distinguished author, my good friend, as best I could. While I was the guest of Mr. and Mrs. H. G. Wells, the Countess of Warwick whom I had met in London fifteen years previously when I was returning home from from the International Congress of Women in Berlin and whom I had met again while she was lecturing in the United States invited us all to tea. Sunday afternoon. The baby who was only three months old when I first met the Countess had grown to be a beautiful, young woman and one of the pleasant experiences of my visit was playing a rather excited game of ball with this little Lady Mercy Grevills in Mr. H. G. Wells gymnasium one morning. The Contess asked me to sit beside her while the delicious refreshments were being served and without doing anything which smacked of patronizing her guest she showed she was genuinely interested in me. On the Countess of Warwick's estate was a cage of monkeys of which their mistress was very fond. She sometimes went into their cage, she said, and they they knew her very well. The Countess was also very fond of dogs and carried a favorite pekinese in her arms wherever she went. Being fond of dogs myself I felt that this made the bond between us still stronger. On several occasions I met personally Sir Harry Johnston, the noted explorer, author, painter and pioneer in British colonization in Africa. I heard him speak when he presided at a dinner given by the African Society of which he was president. I prize very highly a pamphlet entitled "The Africa of the Immediate Future. which Sir Harry wrote and presented to me with the following note on the cover: Mrs Mary Church Terrell from the Author. When you get back to the States you should read my novel, The Gay Dombeys, published by McMillan and Co., New York. several years Mr. John H. Harris, the parliamentary secretary 77 to my entire satisfaction that both because of excellence of record and length of service the promotion rightfully belonged to her. I was at the breakfast table, when I received this information and I had already sent my recommendation to the Superintendent to promote the teacher recommended by the Supervising Principal, but who I was convinced did not deserve it. It was just a few minutes before nine. School was about to begin and I had no phone. Few private individuals had phones then and there was no time for me to reach the Superintendent in person to instruct him to change the recommendation I had already sent in. But it occurred to me that there was a phone at Freedmen's Hospital which was about four blocks from our residence. Grabbing my coat and hat I ran nearly every step of the way to the hospital, rushed to the phone and reached the Superintendent just as he was sending a messenger to notify the teacher who did not deserve it that she had been promoted. It is unnecessary to state that the teacher whose excellence of record and longevity entitled her to the promotion received it. At that time it was a violation of the rules for a woman-teacher to marry and retain her position in the schools. Marriage automatically severed a woman- teacher from the service. One day an acquaintance who had taught in a white school in a Western city came to tell me that a certain teacher in my Division was married. She presented facts which convinced me she was telling the truth. I urged her not to make the matter public, until I had had a chance to talk to the teacher. At first this teacher denied it vehemently. But when I convinced her that I had the facts in my possession, and that I knew she had been married in Baltimore five months previously, she confessed the truth. I promised the teacher that I would not divulge her secret, if she would resign at the end of the month, and that thus no sensation would be created in the schools. She took my advice and to throw the public off the scent, she had a wedding at her home, after she resigned, so that no one would suspect that she had violated the rule by marrying and continuing to teach. As I look back upon my record on the School Board, I am happy in the belief that I did everything in my power to promote the welfare of the pupils, The Secretary of [?] Suspends Order Dismissing Colored Soldiers at My Request. Just as I left the Fall River Boat from New York one morning to take the train from Boston I read the glaring headlines of a newspaper which stated that President Roosevelt had dismissed without honor three companies of colored soldiers who had been accused of shooting up Brownsville, Texas, where they were stationed. I could scarcely believe my eyes. Although rumors had been floating around Washington for several days before I left home that the President might take such drastic action, few believed he would do so. If my heart had been weak, I should have had an attack of heart failure right then and there. When I reached Boston I got in touch with Colonel Thomas Wentworth Higginson immediately and went to see him. He had commanded the colored soldiers of the First South Carolina Volunteers in[?] war and was a well known champion of their race. Colonel Higginson regretted that such terrible punishment had ben inflicted upon the soldiers, but he was quite irritated with me, because I did not see in this incident indisputable evidence of the marvellous progress the race had made. The fact that the colored soldiers refused to tattle on each other, even if they know who the culprits were, convinced Colonel Higginson that they had greatly improved since the Civil War. When I commanded them in the South, he said, I feared that colored men would never learn to stick together and be loyal to each other, because they were so treacherous to to representatives of their own race. But, if the colored soldiers really shot up Brownsville and they can be neither forced nor bribed to reveal who did it, they have taken a long step forward. I am so glad to see the progress they have made in this respect, I do not worry very much about the drastic order the President has issued. "The Conspiracy of Silence" for which the colored soldiers at Brownsville were so severely condemned by many was not charged against them as a crime by [?] inel Higginson at all. Shortly after I reached home from a lecture tour in New England the telephone rang one morning about ten o'clock. It had just been installed, after we had urged the Telephone Company for several months to give us service. It st tled me, for I did not know that workmen had finished the job. In my Freshman year In my Freshman year I attended the Bible Class regularly and believe it benefitted me greatly. I really looked forward to it with enthusiasm and pleasure, because I was allowed to ask questions about passages in the Scriptures which troubled me. And no [?] came near shaking my faith in the justice of God than tha one which states, "I [?] God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of fathers upon thee children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate and shewing mercy unto thousands of them who love me and keep my commandments." I could not understand why a just and loving father should [could] make innocent children suffer for the sins of committed by their foreparents, The injustice of the law of heredity stunned me. It seemed terrible to me that the children of drunkards should inherit a tendency to drink immoderately/and that the children of thieves [?] have a hard time to be honest and so on through the category of vices. The teacher was patient with me and did his best to show me why such a dispensation was just, but I was never able to see it in that light. However, I decided not to try to understand it any longer. I am finite, I see it in that light. However, I decided not to try to understand it any longer. I finally brought a semblance of peace to my mind by saying I am finite and if I understood all the plans of the Infinite I should be equal to Him in Wisdom and which would be unthinkable and absurd, of course. Even so my poor, little brain often whirled and my poor little heart was often sad, as I wrestled with the problem of heredity. 197 Mrs. Celeridge-Taylor and her two children after a separation of fifteen years. Each of the children has inherited the talent and taste for music from both of their parents. Here was an illustration of what unusual heridity does in some cases, at least. The father was a genius and the mother an accomplished musician also. Both before and after marriage Mrs. Celeridge-Taylor who had a voice of great sweetness and power sang in recitals often accompanied on the violin or piano by her famous composer-husband. 77 to my entire satisfaction that both because of excellence of record and length of service the promotion rightfully belonged to her. I was at the breakfast table, when I received this information and I had already sent my recommendation to the Superintendent to promote the teacher recommended by the Supervising Principal, but who I was convinced did not deserve it. It was just a few minutes before nine. School was about to begin and I had no phone. Few private individuals had phones then and there was no time for me to reach the Superintendent in person to instruct him to change the recommendation I had already sent in. But it Occurred to me that there was a phone at Freedmen's Hospital which was about four blocks from our residence. Grabbing my coat and hat I ran nearly every step of the way to the hospital, rushed to the phone and reached the Superintendent just as he was sending a messenger to notify the teacher who did not deserve it that she had been promoted. It is unnecessary to state that the teacher whose excellence of record and longevity entitled her to the promotion received it. At that time it was a violation of the rules for a woman-teacher to marry and retain her position in the schools. Marriage automatically severed a woman- teacher from the service. One day an acquaintance who had taught in a white school in a Western city came to tell me that a certain teacher in my Division was married. She presented facts which convinced me she was telling the truth. I urged her not to make the matter public, until she had had a chance to talk to the teacher. At first this teacher denied it vehemently. But when I convinced her that I had the facts in my possession, and that I knew she had been married in Baltimore five months previously, she confessed the truth. I promised the teacher that I would not divulge her secret, if she would resign at the end of the month, and that thus no sensation would be created in the schools. She took my advice and to throw the public off the scent, she had a wedding at her home, after she resigned, so that no one would suspect that she had violated the rule by marrying and continuing to teach. As I look back upon my record on the School Board, I am happy in the belief that I did everything in my power to promote the welfare of the pupils, 2 Queen of all Puddings, the recipe for which was found in a little paperback book given away by the Crisco Company which was just beginning to distribute this product. By the time I had corraled all the ingredients for the turkey and the pudding I am sure I had walked ten miles. I have always regretted that I did not have a speedometer that day, so as to prove that I walked that distance, at least. In the afternoon, my husband attended a foot ball game and returned about six expecting to find dinner ready, but he was disappointed. The oven did not seem to want to bake the things. He went off and returned later, but still the Queen of All puddings was not yet done. I tried to keep up appearances and look uncerned, but my morale was completely destroyed. Finally, about nine o'clock one of our friends- a husband and wife called to see us, and although it was very humiliating to me, I related my tale of woe. The good woman said she would look at the stove to see what was the matter. And when she did so, she discovered that the portion under the oven was just as full of ashes as it could possibly be. Nothing in the world could cook in such an oven, she declared. And if that were not bad enough, I had turned the damper the wrong way. About ten o'clock Thanksgiving night we sat down to our dinner, a more wretched, tired and disgusted woman than I was could not have been found in the United States. I managed to restrain the tears and that was all. I certainly was not cheerful at the meal. My husband [enjoyed teasing me and he never tired talking about that] was a great tease and he enjoyed nothing more than talking about that wonderful Thanksgiving dinner which it took me twelve hours to cook and he [Queen of all Puddings which never got done. He frequently referred to me as] frequently referred to me as "The Queen of All Puddings" for many years. Both my mother and my father were very hospitable and I inherited that trait from them. But I dreaded having company for dinner like a tooth ache, because something was always sure to go wrong, when I did, no matter how hard I tried to having everything right. Once I invited four young men to dinner a few years after we had gone to housekeeping. [*of them*] They were the sons of fine caterers and one of them was the son of a man who had kept one of the best hotels in Boston, so they all knew what a good dinner was. I tried to make that meal absolutely perfect and I thought I had succeeded. I had made some delicious ice cream myself. In that I excelled the father said I had 3 But I observed that the young men simply tasted it and let it go at that. I did not care for ice cream, so I had instructed the girl who was serving not to bring me any. Chagrined that my guests did not touch their dessert I went into the kitchen after dinner to discover the reason. It did not take me long to do this, for the minute I tasted it I rralized that it was full of coal oil. The young girl who had frozen the cream confessed that she had poured coal oil into the holes placed in the freezer to lubricate it- had poured a good deal of it into the holes, she said, because she thought the job would be easier for her. When I invited Samuel Coleridge Taylor the great composer to dinner another tragedy occurred He said he liked oysters, and was especially fond of oyster soup, so I decided to have some. In those halcyon days it was possible for me to have a real sure enough cook, for they did not receive fifty and sixty dollars a month for their services then. I am glad they can get a living wage now, even if I can not afford to have such a luxury. This particular cook was an expert at making oyster soup, so it was unnecessary I thought to give her any directions or hold any conference on the subject. But, when the soup [it] reached the table it was so badly curdled, it looked for all the world like dish water- dirty dish water at that. The cook was never able to explain what happened. She had never failed before and she never failed afterwards, but she certainly did embarrass me when she placed that curdled oyster soup before the distinguished composer. The second time Mr. Coleridge-Taylor came to the United States I invited him to dine with me again. This time some evil jinx put it into my head to have lamb chops. The butcher from whom we were accustomed to get them had always sent us good ones, so my husband simply ordered them as he had been accustomed to do. That afternoon I went out with my guest and returned just in time for dinner. When the chops were brought into the dining room, they were as tough as whet leather and we could scarcely eat them. Just one other incident to show why I dreaded to invite guests to a meal. Mrs. Mary McCleod Bethune who was then President of the National Association of Colored Women and is now president of Bethune -Cookman College in Daytona Beach Florida came to Washington once and I invited her to stop [*4*] with me. Assisting me in my home at that time was a young woman from South Carolina whom I had sent through the High School and who was about to complete her course in the Normal School. She was absolutely dependable in every way and quite a good cook. I explained to her that I was especially anxious to have every thing pass off well, while Mrs. Bethune was my guest, because she had treated me so handsomely while I was with her in Florida. My dearly-beloved [??ula?] promised me that she would do her level best. I bought a chicken frm from a dealer who assured me that it was as tender as a broiler. It did not exactly look the part and I had my doubts, but the man assured me that it was all right. However, I wrote a note for Eula, just before I left home to attend a meeting, in which I advised her to parboil the chicken, if she had the slightest suspicion that it was not tender enough to roast as it was. I also suggested that she should get some ice cream for dessert, so that she would not be bothered with making it herself. When Mrs. Bethune and I sat down to dinner, the chicken was so tough we could hardly eat any part of it. Eula had not parboiled it, as I had advised her to do. Naturally I expected to have ice cream for dessert, but instead of the ice cream Eula brought us something, the like of which I had never seen before and have never beheld since. She had decided to make a tapioca pudding in which she was an expert, because she added some demi-semi-quayer to it, which made it particularly good. But the concoction which she set before us looked like a piece of brown parchment and it tasted like it too. We could not eat that either. Eula explained this sad failure to me by saying that she had tried to make the pudding particularly good and had injected into it more of something than she usually did and had ruined it completely. When I first went to housekeeping I enjoyed it. I studied all the new notions, attended Mrs. Rorer's lectures on cooking and made a business of keeping up with the times. But, when I began my public work I realized that I was seriously handicapped because I had to teach myself to cook and had never been in the kitchen with a woman who was efficient and willing to show me just how many things were done I followed the cook book slavishly and did not dare to add or subtract [*5*] anything from a recipe, as some of my friends who had enjoyed such training wither in their own home or in somebody else's kitchen were able to do. I balked at nothing which had to be done in the home. With the little assistance which I received occasionally from the children and my helper I gave each of four rooms originally finished in oak four coats of ivory paint. When anything needed a coat varnish, or the floors had to be stained, I did that. The parlor furniture which we bought when we went to housekeeping began finally to look worn and needed repairing. But when I got an estimate for the job it was more than I felt I could afford. so I decided to do it myself. With the assistance of a young seamstress I upholstered those five pieces of furniture, so that my father who was by no means easy to please declared that it looked as though it had been done by an expert. I learned to tie up the springs in sofas or chairs when they sagged and could do odd jobs in carpentering fairly well. My mother was very proud of my [????] and was boasting of of my skill in canning, reserving and doing other stunts to Mr. Lewie Douglass, son of Frederick Douglass, whom she met in the car one day. But the manner in which Mr. Douglass received this information took Mother back considerably. Instead of enthusing over the fact that I spent so much time and strength in doing such work, Mr. Douglass who was one of my best friends, stated in no uncertain terms that he thought I was making a great mistake. He thought it was a pity, he said, that I could not devote more of my time and strength upon the work for which I had been trained and which I seemed to enjoy doing. Public work of various kinds was my forte, he believed. There were comparitively few colored women at that time who could discharge these duties, he said, and if the few who could were going to use themselves up in doing drudgery, the race would be the loser and the sufferer in the end. Try to persuade your daughter to use her head he said and let others whose brains have not been trained use their hands. Mother was very much impressed with Mr. Douglass's advice, for she had often expressed an opinion similar to his herself. But the duties which pressed had to be done, and often there was no one to do them but myself. Even though [*6*] though I had a helper for the kitchen for many years, there were numerous things about the home which like other women I had to attend to myself. After my dear mother came to live with me I was relieved of much responsibility and I was able to leave home to fill lecture engagements, occasionally which I could never have done but for her presence in my home. But Mother was not well and it was difficult for her to walk, so that I would not allow her to do any manual labor if I could prevent it. After having enjoyed housekeeping for many years it finally began to pall on my taste. I regretted that in meeting its insistent, continuous demands I had been unable to direct more of my energy into channels toward which my inclination and my aptitude beckoned. and in which I believe I would have been able to render greater service to my race. While I can not help wishing that much of the time spent in cooking, dishwashing, sweeping, dusting, painting and sewing had been consumed in doing the work which I believe would have advanced the interests of my race and which I longed to do. Still I am thankful that a kind Providence made it possible for me to render even the small service which I have been able to give in behalf of my group. 5 He was frequently requested to recite at meetings held for various purposes. And it was always interesting to hear him relate his experiences I used to tell him that he had missed his calling and that he should have after he returned home. He was a great mimic. He had a keen sense of the gone on the stage, "you think I should have been an end man,"I presume, ludicrous, and he could enjoy a joke on himself as much as one on anybody else. Once he recited at a meeting in New York City where the higher education for the Negro was to be discussed. Naturally Paul Dunbar believed most enthusiastically in the higher education of the Negro. A man who had gone to that meeting intending to oppose it, but after he heard Paul recite he subscribed $1000 to the fund. "Little did that man known," said Paul relating the incident that I had never been beyond the High School of Dayton. [Tha?a?a?] sore disappointment to Paul Dunbar that he could not go to college. He tried several times to make arrangements to take a course in college and once he thought he had succeeded, but he failed. He has discussed his inability to go to college with me many times and he always expressed deep regret that his plan to do so had been upset. More than once I have heard him tell how surprised were some of the help at the hotels at which arrangements had been made for him to stop, by those who when they had engaged him to read his poems. saw him appear with his dark face in the flesh. He would mimic to perfection the consternation written on the face of when they saw him a colored porter or a waiter who saw him, a black man, walk up to the desk of a fine hotel, register, and a brazen image would have laughed at Paul when he imitated the depicted the expression on the faces of the colored help, when they saw him assigned to the best room in the house. "How did you get these rooms a colored waiter once asked him at a fine hotel. Miss Helen Gould occupied these rooms last week. Guess somebody must have seen the proprietor about it" When relating such an incident of course Paul used the broken English in which the conversation was carried on by the colored man who couldn't understand how a black man could see ours accommodations in a fine hotel. In acting the park he would make the gestures, strike the poses and shake his head exactly until one felt one could see man whose was representing and the scene part he was acting standing before him. As a rule Paul told these experiences to amuse those to whom they were related, but sometimes I sued to observe that they got under his skin, so to speak, "My position is a most un- A Visit to the World's Fair. [*??? Douglass Paul Dunbar at the World's Fair*] My father invited me to visit the World's Fair, while he and his family were tehre, and paid [*generously8] the expenses of my trip. The Midway Plaisance with all its oriental denizens and dancers was something decidedly new under the sun and many [*perfect ladies*] there were who went to see them perform only to come away [*very much*] shocked. Compared with what one commonly sees on the stage in this country to day,, however, those exotic ladies knew nothing but the A.B.C. of sending thrills down the spinal column [*by ???? ???? ?????*] of American sight-seeers. Chicago was only an overgrown village when the World's Fair was held there to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the discovery of America by Columbus [*a year later than it should have been*] and [*it*] was not the mammoth, sitrring metropolis of the West that it now is. The exhibits sent from practically every civilized country in the world instructed and fascinated me beyond expression and I never tired looking at them. But there are two recollections which have left the delightful flavor in my memory was the honor paid to the great Frederick Douglass by the people of the dominant race as well as by own his group. The other was meeting Paul- Laurence Dunbar, just as he was starting on his career as a poet. Mr. Douglass was the Commissioner in charge of the exhibit from Hayti at the World's Fair and he employed Paul Dunbar to assist him. Mr. Douglass had the habit of entertaining his friends at the Fair by giving them a few hours of his valuable time taking them to see the exhibits which he especially liked. Pursuant to this custom he invited me to go with him one afternoon to take in some of the sights. As we walked along either through the grounds or in the buildings Mr. Douglass was continually halted by admiring people who begged the privilege of shaking hands with him. A mother would stop him and say, "You are Frederick Douglass, aren't you Please shake hands with my little son, because when he grows up I want him to say that he has met and shaken hands with the great Frederick Douglass." Let's get on the scenic railway," suggested Mr. Douglass so that we may have a chance to talk a little. Nobody can get us there." But he reckoned without his host, for we had no sooner taken seats on that little railroad than a man reached over two seats to touch him on Up To Date Mary Church Terrell. July 14, 1928. In Eddyville, Kentucky, not long ago seven men died in the chair, all of them murderers. Four were white and three were not. It is not to tell the story of the murders that this paragraph is written, but to call attention to the manner in which the white men went to their doom. The new papers tell me that the negroes recovered their spirits to a greater degree than the white men before the time came for them to pass down the corridor of steel and stone that connects the death house with the chair room. The account also states that the "condemned men" (referring to the white men) "were reduced by fear to a condition bordering on collaps[e] as midnight approached. [w]ith heads supperted in cupped hands, they sat s[i]lent, their bodies shaken by chills despite the intense heat." One of the condemned, not [w]hite, said nothing, another entered the chamber singing, and the last of the three h[um]med a song as he paid clos[e] attention to the manner in which the straps were adjusted." What a fine illustration of the difference between the courage displayed by white an[d] that displayed by men who are not white this would have been, if the tabl[?] had been turned. If the white men had gone to the chair humming and singing or in a dignified silence and the men who were not white had collapse[?] and shivered, the newspaper reporters would have played up the courage of the white men magnificently and contract [?] in strong language with the fear and the collapse of Negroes. Over and over again the non-white men of this country have proved that they are not weaklings either physically or [???]ally. During the Spanish- American war with superhuman courage they saved the day at [?] and San Juan Hill by rushing over the prostrate forms of white soldiers who had fallen in abject fear. Then they were allowed to fight in the Civil War, [?] of their race were still held body and soul in the chains of slavery, one of their white officers said, "So far from being inferior to the white soldiers, the colored solders are in some respect [??festly] superior. They have an inherent fire and dash about them which white troops of more sluggish Northern blood do not emulate and their hearty enthusiasm shows itself in the shoulder and greet him. "Well. we'll go up on the Eifel Tower, chuckled Mr. Douglass, "I know nobody can interrupt us, when we are in that cage. But just as we started to ascend, a man in another cage shouted, "Hell Mr. Douglass, the last time I saw you was in Rochester." It was certainly gratifying to see the homage and reverence exhibited by people of the dominant race to Frederick Douglass at the World's Fair. HeThe great man had become very deeply interested in Paul Dunbar, because the young poet Mr Douglass had struggle for existence and recognition had been so desperate. It is a recollection that I cherish the fact that the first time I ever heard mention of Paul Dunbars name is a recollection which I cherish. By appointment I had gone to see "the Sage of Anacostia" at his home across the Potomac from Washington. After we had finished with the business I had come to transact he said inquired "Have you ever heard of Paul Dunbar?" I told him I had not. Then Mr. Douglass gave me the facts in the young man's life. "He is very young, but there is no doubt that he is a poet. He is working under the most discouraging circumstances in his home, Dayton. He is running an elevator Fate decreed that I should be with both of these renowned men shortly before they passed into the great beyond. I was with Mr. Douglass just a few hours the day on which Mr. Douglass suddenly died, while he was at the table describing [*X his wife*] the homage paid him bythe National Council of Women Susan B. Anthony, Anna Howard Shaw and other officers of the N.C. of Women. When Mr. Douglass entered the meeting of the Council a little before noon one of the women spied him and announced from the platform that Frederick Douglass was in the house. Immediately a Committee was appointed to escort him to the platform, and when he appeared before the women they gave him a royal Chautauqua salute. When the meeting adjourned and the white women had ceased paying their homage to Mr. Douglass which I had enjoyed so much from afar a distance, I cam forward and greeted him. He and I left the building to what is now the Columbia theatre together and walked to the corner. There he asked me to have lunch with him But I had been indisposed for several days and declined the in[for]vitation. After insisting lifting his large light sombrero in which he looked so handsome he bade me good bye. And that evening a fri about seven o'clock a friend came by our house to tell me that Fredericj Douglass had just died suddenly while he was dexcribing 119 1/2 caused me [to reflect seriously]. while I could not agree with it entirely, it caused me much serious thought [to reflect seriously] . I was forced to acknowledge to myself that it had often been hard for me to hold fast to my faith, when crimes were committed with immunity against my race. After reflecting upon the injustices of various kinds of which they had been victim so long, my mind would revert involuntarily to to the horrors and cruelty of slavery for 300 years. In moments like these I feared that if I did not hold fast to my belief in the religion of Jesus Christ, my grip on my faith might slip. The more I realized that I was often depressed and that my mind was frequently disturbed by thoughts like these, while I was carrying my baby under my heart, the more I became reconciled to what had once seemed such a cruel and bitter fate. to his wife the ovation tendered to him in the forenoon by the members and officers of the National Council of Women. How deeply I regretted then that I had not spent [*another hour*] a few more in the company of that great man. When Paul Dunbar married he brought his wife and his mother to live in my father's house which was next door to ours. Precious memories rush over me like a flood whenever I pass that house. I can see Paul Dunbar as he used to beckon me as when I walked by when he wanted to read me a poem which he had just written or when he wished to discuss a word or a subject on which he had not yet fully decided. Paul often came to see me to read his poems or his articles in prose before he sent them to the magazines. Sometimes he would tauntingly wave back and forth a check which he had just received and say "Wouldn't you like to have that? Then, after he thought he had aroused my curiosity sufficiently he would show it to me and say "Look at it quick Dont keep it long. Give it back to me right away. The Ohio State Federation of Colored Women's Clubs invited me to deliver an address when it met in Dayton Ohio. When Paul heard I was coming, he wrote me a letter inviting me to stop with him. Knowing that his mother had the burden of the house resting upon her in addition to nursing her son who had been ill quite a while and has confined to the house, I declined. But he wrote again urging me to stay with his mother and himself and saying that it would be such a great pleasure to talk over the good old times that he would be bitterly disappointed, if I did not do so. I did not have the heart to decline again and I accepted the invitation. When I saw him he was shut in, wasted and worn by disease and coughing his young and precious life away, yet full of cheer, when not actually racked with pain and perfectly resigned to his fate. On one occasion 119 1/2 [later on] a few months after my babys death a thought [which] occurred to me one day while I was in a paroxysm of grief which helped t reconcile me to the loss of my first born. While I was looking forward to his coming one of my friends, a man whom I had known from boyhood was brutally lynched in Memphis, not because he had committed a crime, but because he was prospering too well. He and several other colored men were running a store at which colored people who came from the country had begun to trade, They had formerly spent their money at th store kept by some white man, and these white men became so angry at the increasing trade of their colored competitors that they started a row one night which caused the latter's arrest. several nights after they had been place in jail a mob took them out and lynched them. It is one thing to read that quite another to learn that your friend who has committed no crime has suffered a [costly] cruel fate. Tom Moss had attended the parties which my parents gave me as a child. He had [given me half a dozen solid silver oyster forks when we married] One of the most beautiful wedding presents we received was the gift of Tom Moss The lynching of this friend affected me deeply. I could think of little else but this awful crime for days. I resented the barbarous treatment of colored men by white mobs with all the intensity of my soul. And so, as I was grieving over the loss of my baby boy one day, it occurred to me that it might be well for him and for his parents that his precious life was not spared. The horror and resentment felt by the mother coupled with the bitterness which filled her soul might have seriously and injuriously affected the unborn child. Who can tell how many desperadoes have been born to colored mothers who were carrying them under their hearts when some relative or friend was shot or burned alive or beaten to death by a mob. Thoughts like these did much to reconcile me to the loss of my baby boy. I was also impressed with a statement made by one of my white friends who happened to meet me on the street one day shortly after I was bereaved. "I do not see how she said any colored woman can make up her mind to become a mother under the existing conditions in the United States. I should think a colored woman would feel she was perpetrating a great injustice upon a helpless infant she would bring into the world. I had never heard that point of view expressed before and it The engagement at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition was indellibly impressed upon my mind, not only because those who invited me to speak had to expend a larger sum for my services than anybody or any organization had ever done before, but because of an incident which preceded and one which followed it. In the winter a physician told me that I would have to undergo an operation to prevent me from becoming an invalid for the rest of my life. As soon as I could I arranged to go to a Western Clinic over which one of the greatest surgeons in the world presided. When I reached the hospital and requested thiat this far-famed physician should perform the operation I was told that as he advanced in years he was doing as little work as possible and preferred to have younger men who were as skillful as himself operate in his stead. The was bad-very bad news for me. I had set my heart on having the famous surgeon about whom I had been reading so long take my case and this message was conveyed to him. Immediately he sent me word that if a woman had come alone 1000 miles to have an operation performed and wanted him to do it, he would certainly comply with that request. And he did. I remained at this hospital nearly two months and [when] I think of it to day as I would probably would if I had been permitted to remain that long in Heaven. I feel also that I could never pay in dollars and cents for the attention I received there. When I returned home I learned that during my absence we had sustained a terrible loss by fire. [?] up housekeeping, when I took our two daughters to Oberlin, where they remained one year. Placed our household effects in a storage house. A fire broke out on the floor on which our things were stored and destroyed almost everything we had. Not only were the three volumes on the History of Woman Suffrage and other books given me by Susan B. Anthony licked up by the flames but many other literary treasures suffered this same fate. Among them were autographed copies books given me by Frances Willard, the great temperance advocate, W.T. Stead for many years, the editor of the English Review of Reviews, Mrs. Van Rensselaer Cruger and several other well-known authors and publishers der to get first hand information about this matter I made up my mind that I would question every black Frenchman I happened to meet in the street about their status is France, so as to ascertain whether they were discriminated against in anyway and how they were treated on general principles. Each and everyone of them assured me that they were treated just like "other Frenchmen," wherever [where] they went or whatever they wanted to do. But a conversation with one French-African cured me of this habit of propounding questions, I had asked whether he could attend any school he chose, whether he could be really white to all intents and purposes with blue eyes and golden hair have refused to accompany him to the railroad station in the South, because, they said, if I wanted to buy a Pullman ticket, they "would give me away." Nobody who had any sense of humor at all could fail to enjoy a situation like that- seeing a white person fear to go to the station with one decidedly swarthy because the agent would know that the individual who wanted the ticket was classified as colored, and, would therefore, not be allowed to get it. The white-colored friend in each case was well known in his community as a "Negro." Nothing is more ridiculous than the Race Problem in the United States. A short time ago Mr. Max Barber, formerly editor the Voice of the Negro, recalled an incident which once happened in Atlanta, Georgia. He walked into an elevator first and I entered behind him alone. As soon as the gallantly southern gentlemen saw me they removed their hats. When I turned around to talk to Mr. Barber, a more disgusted set of men than they were had never been seen. One of them suddenly discovered a speck of dust on his hat rubbed it off, [and placed it firmly on his head] as though he had removed it for that purpose, and then placed it firmly on his head. The others follow suit. It is safe to assert that not one of those southern white gentlemen could have been forced to previously to admit that he could possibly mistake a colored man for a white lady." For, in many parts of the South a colored woman is never referred to as a "lady". All "ladies" are white. Whenever I have needed [to buy] a berth on a Pullman in the South, or when I have wanted to see a play or hear an opera, I have bought my ticket office just as a white woman would. To me this is a very discouraging sign of the times. It proves that even though I am far from being fair, the fact t that I ask for a ticket is all the proof the ticket seller needs to convince him that I am not a colored woman, even though circumstantial evidence is against me. "If she really belonged to the jim-crowed group." they seem to argue, "she would not dare to ask for privileges granted only to the whites had to offer. The story of my stopping at a white hotel in Washington will amuse some people immensely. By some in my own group the idea that I could deceive anybody concerning my racial identity, especially in the South, will be considered a huge joke. "Nobody who has a pair of eyes and who uses them could possibly make a mistake about your race,"they will say. With a cocksureness that defies doubt or contradiction white people in the South declare emphatically that they can always detect a person of African descent, however fair he or she may be. And yet, thousands of authentic cases might be cited to prove this contention is false. Every day in the South Colored people who are far from being fair every day in the South are enjoying advantages to which they are entitled,but which they would be denied,if white people had not been deceived about their race. A man who is dark brown in complexion, having hair which is not dead straight,worked as a "white man", in Birmingham,Alabama for several years. He called himself an"Indian", and that made him white there. Few people who see him here can believe that is true, but it happened, nevertheless. Colored people who pass over the line can be dedected much more easily by their own group than they can by white people.For that reason I have frequently been able to avail myself of privileges and take advantages of opportunities in the South which the advocates of segregation would never have allowed me to enjoy, if they had been positive that I belonged to the prescribed race. It is not considered diplomatic for colored people to admit this, because they thereby incur the displeasure of both white and black There are very few colored people, however, who will refuse to avail themselves of necessaries and comforts which they desire, if by any hook or crook they can arrange to secure them. If they refused to do so, they would be playing into the hand of their foes. Mistakes have been made with reference to my racial identity over and over again, not because I am so fair, but because I have gone ahead and availed myself of whatever it was my right to have without acting as though I feared I could not get it. On several occasions colored people who were Ill Health and Fire. Nearly all of the furniture, rugs, pictures and china were destroyed including many of our wedding presents. Most of the silver was saved,as were also some pieces of a limoges china breakfast set which my mother had given me and which I was able to match, The beautiful seal skin ulster which Mother had made in England from selected skins and the one which she gave me were so badly damaged by chemicals that they were completely ruined. This is a splendid illustration of my husband's optimism. He believed in looking upon the bright side of everything. It seemed never to occur to him that any bad luck could overtake him. Ten days before the fire broke out in the storage rooms, the agent of the company with which he insured the our belongings notified Judge Terrell that the storage [room] house was unsafe and refused to renew the policy., until they were removed. But the unconquerable optimism of my husband led him to believe that nothing would happen, if he took his time in moving them, so he let them remain where they were. When, therefore, nearly everything we possessed in the world was destroyed by fire, it was a total loss to us, for the insurance had lapsed ten days. pestiferous little article was. Although I urged him to send it to Chicago to me, he refused to comply with that request. He would put it where he knew it couldn't get lost for a while anyhow, he said. My precious little thimble became a great nuisance to my family, I fear, because I was so wretched when it was misplaced, which happened every now and then, when I was called away suddenly while sewing with it, laid it down hurriedly and forgot where I had left it. Under such circumstances I never stopped hunting for it till I found it. Nothing inanimate that I have ever possessed was (?) and nothing inanimate that I have ever owned has caused me to passes any unhappy moments it did. Even as a young girl the thought of being separated from my thimble made me very wretched. . When I was about 14 years old I suddenly discovered at the beginning of the school year in September that it was gone. The lady with whom I boarded declared she had not seen it. Her little daughter about ten and her husband well advanced in years (?). That settle it. My beloved thimble was lost at last - irretrievably, irrecoverably lost. All throu through the fall and winter I grieved about it. Scarcely a day passed that I did not talk about it. Finally a short time before school closed for the summer vacation my landlady brought my thimble to me, saying she had found it in the back yard, when I had probably dropped it and where it had lain all the winter, till the snow melted in the Spring. On another occasion I was separated from my thimble throughout the Fall and winter. A friend who lived with us shortly after we went to house keeping and I were sewing together one afternoon. Although I did not enjoy sewing, nevertheless I learned to do it quite well, because it saved money. For many years I made all of my mother's housedresses, and nearly all the summer dresses which the two girls and myself wore. Sometimes I had help and sometimes I did not. But, to return to the thimble. I remembered distinctly that I had set it on the sideboard in the dining room, when I stopp stopped. But when I went to look for it, it was gone. My husband, my friend Visit to the World's Fair. My father invited me to visit the World's Fair,while he and his family were there,and paid all the expenses of my trip. The Midway Plaisance with all its oriental denizens and dancers was something [perform] decidedly new under the sun and many there were to see them only in this country to come away quite sho ed. Compared with what one sees on the stage commonly today [?] exotic ladies knew nothing but the A.B.C. of sending thrills [?] spinal column of American sight-seeers. Chicago was only an overgrown village when the World's Fair was held there to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus a year later than it should have been and was now not the mammoth, stirring metropolis of the West that it now is. Although the exhibits sent from practically every civilized country in the worked instructed and fascinated me beyond expression and I never tired of looking at them. But the recollections which have left [a more] the most delightful flavor in my memory was the honor paid to the great Frederick Douglass by the people of the dominant race as well as by own his group. [?] [?] [?]bar, just as he was starting on his career as a poet, Mr, Douglass [had] was the Commissioner in charge of the exhibit in Hayti at theWorld's Fair and he employed Paul Dunbar to assist him. Mr. Douglass had the it of entertaining his friends at the Fair by giving them a few hours his valuable time taking them to see the exhibits which he especial ed. Pursuant to this custom he invited me to go with him one aftern take in some of the sights. As we walked along either in through the gro in thee buildings Mr. Douglass was continually halted by admiring indivi who begged the privilege of shaking hands with him. A mother w him and say, "[This is] You are Frederick Douglass, [isn't it] aren't you Please with my little daughter or my little son, because when he want him to say that he has met and shaken hands with the Douglass. "Let's get on the scenic railway," suggested Mr. that we may have a chance to talk a little. Nobody can But he reckoned without his host, for we no sooner hat little railroad than a man reached over two seats the shoulder and greet him. "Well. we'll go up on the Eifel Tower,chuckled Mr. Douglass, "I know nobody can interrupt us, when we are in that cage." But just as we started to ascend, a man in another cage shouted, " Hello Mr. Douglass, the last time I saw you was in Rochester." It was certainly gratifying to see the homage and reverence exhibited by people for the dominant race to Frederick Douglass at the World's Fair. The great man had become very deeply interested in Paul Dunbar,because [*Mr. Douglass*] the young poets's struggle for existence and recognition had been so desperate. The fact that the first time I ever heard mention Paul Dunbars name is a recollection which I cherish. It is a recollection [that I cherish] By appointment I had gone to see "the Sage of Anacostia" at his home across the Potomac from Washington. After we had finished with the business I had come to transact he said [inquired] "Have you ever heard of Paul Dunbar?" I told him I had not. Then Mr. Douglass gave me the facts in the young man's life."He is very young, but there is no doubt that he is a great poet. He is working under the most discouraging circumstances in his home, Dayton. He is running an elevator Fate decreed that I should be with both of these renowned men shortly before they passed into the great beyond. I was with Mr. Douglass just a few hours before he The day on which Mr. Douglass suddenly died at his home, [while he was at the table describing the homage paid him bythe] Susan B. Anthony, Anna Howard Shaw [National Council of Women and other officers of the N.C. of Women.] [When Mr. Douglass entered] He had attended the meeting of thee Council a little before noon when one of the women spied him as he entered the door [and] she announced from the platform that Frederick Douglass was in the house. Immediately a Committee was appointed to es[?]t him to the platform, and when he appeared before the women they gave him a royal Chautauque salute. When the meeting adjourned and the white women had ceased paying their homage to Mr. Douglass which I had enjoyed [so much from afar] at a distance, a distance, I came forward and greeted him. He and I left [the building to] what is now the Columbia theatre together and walked to the corner. There he asked me to have lunch with him But I had been indisposed for several days and declined the invitation[for]. [After insisting] Lifting his large, light sombrero in which he looked so handsome he bade me\good bye. And that evening a fri about seven o'clock a friend came by our house to tell me that Fredericj Douglass had jus died suddenly while he was dexcribing 119 1/2 [caused me to reflect seriously.] while I could not agree with it entirely, it caused me much serious thought. I was forced to acknowledge to myself that it had often been hard for me to hold fast to my faith, when crimes were committed with impunity against my race. After reflecting upon the injustices of various kinds of which its representatives had been victims so long, my mind would revert involuntarily to the horrors and cruelty of slavery perpetrated upon a defenceless people for 300 years. In moments like these I feared that if I seriously did not hold fast to my belief in the religion of Jesus Christ, my grip on my faith might slip. The more I realized how [my depression of my mind) might have affected my unborn child that I was often depressed and that my mind was frequently disturbed by thoughts like these,while I was carrying my baby under my heart, the more I became reconciled to what had once seemed such a cruel and bitter fate. which was caused by the lynching of a friend (and horror of this crime) 2 own personal observation, but none was more striking than the one which might have been done in my own home. ???? and I have weathered the storms of fifty years together. Sometimes we have been very happy and then again we have been very sad. When I shuffle off this mortal coil I shall request my loved ones whom I leave behind to put my little thimble in the casket with me, so that we may be together till the end of time. 11912 A few months after my baby's death a though occurred to me one day while I was in a paroxyam of grief which helped to reconcile me to the loss. While I was looking forward to his coming, the lynching of Tom Moss to which have already whom I had known from my girlhood was brutally lunched in Memphis, not because he had committed a crime, as I have already explain but because he was prospering too well. Tom Moss and several other colored men were running a store at which colored people who came from the country had begun to trade. They had And so, as I was greiving over the loss of my baby boy one day, it occurred to me that under the circumstances it might be well for him and for his parents that his precious life was not spared. The horror and resentment felt by the mother coupled with the bitterness which filled her soul might have seriously and injuriously affected the unborn child. Who can tell how many desperadoes have been born to colored mothers who before the birth of their babies had been shocked and distracted, when some relative or friend was shot or burned alive or beaten to death by a mob. I was also impressed with a statement made by one of my white friends who happened to meet me on the street one day shortly after I was bereaved. "I do not see", she said "how any colored woman can make up her mind to become a mother under the existing conditions in the United States. I should think that under the circumstances a colored woman could feel she was peroetating a great injustice upon any helpless infant she would bring into the world." I had never head that point of view expressed before and to his wife the ovation tendered to him in the forenoon by the members and officers of the National Council of Women. How deeply I regretted then that' another hour I had not spent a few more in the company of that great man. When Paul Dunbar married he brought his wife and his mother to live in my father's house which was next door to ours. Precious memories rush over me like a flood whenever I pass that house. I can see Paul Dunbar as he used to beckon me when I walked by when he wanted to read me a poem which he had just written or when he wished to discuss a word or a subject on which he had not yet fully decided. Paul often came to see me to read his poems or his articles in prose before he sent them to the magazines. Sometimes he would tauntingly wave back and forth a check which he had just received and say "Wouldn't you like to have that? Then, after he thought he had used my curiosity sufficiently he would show it to me and say "Look at it quick Dont keep it long. Give it back to me right away. The Ohio State Federation of Colored Women's Clubs invited me to deliver an address when it met in Dayton Ohio. When Paul heard I was coming, he wrote me a letter inviting me to stop with him. Knowing that his mother had the burden of the house resting upon her in addition to nursing her son who had been ill quite a while and was confined to the house, I declined. But he wrote again urging me to stay with his mother and himself and saying that it would be such a great pleasure to talk over the good old times that he would be bitterly disappointed, if I did not do so. I did not have the heart to decline again and I accepted the invitation. When I saw him he was shut in, wasted and worn by disease and coughing his young and precious life away, yet full of sheer, when not actually racked with pain and perfectly resigned to his fate. On one occasion 116 During the time when colored people engaged in such heated discussions about industrial training and the higher education, I was known as a disciple of the latter school. Dr. W.E.B. Dubois was its leader and I agreed with him perfectly. At the same time I realized that no race could ever hope to stand on a firm financial basis without a well-trained laboring class. But I felt that Mr. Washington emphasized industrial training to the exclusion of everything else, when he first started his crusade in its behalf. Moreover, it seemed to me that he sometimes tried to make colored people who had acquired the higher education [*appear*] as ridiculous as he could, which I thought was both unwise and unfair. I visited Tuskegee for the first time when I accepted an invitation which Dr. Washington extended to me by wire. Dr. Dubois who was then teaching at Atlanta University had invited me to speak on "The Negro Woman and the Church" at one of the conferences which he held at that institution. After I delivered the Atlanta address, Dr. Washington wired me that if I would come to Tuskegee to attend his Commencement, he would defray my expenses both ways. I accepted and I was very glad I did. It was the first time I had ever seen students actually performing on the stage the work they had learned to do in school as a part of the Commencement exercises. It interested me greatly to hear young men tell how to build a house, how to paint it and how to compute the cost of everything they did. After I had seen Tuskegee with my own eyes, I had a higher regard and a greater admiration for its founder than I had ever entertained before. I realized what a splendid work he was doing to promote the welfare of his race - that he was actually filling "a long-felt want." Then and there I decided that henceforth when any one criticized Booker T. Washington's school in my presence or I happened to be a party to a discussion concerning him I would simply say "I will talk about Tuskegee and its founder with you if you have actually been there and have seen with your own eyes the fine work being done. But if you have not been there, I'll not try to discuss the subject with you." I felt it was a waste of time to enter into a debate with any one who had not been to the school but had formed his opinion from hearsay. 41 In fact it was always a pleasure to address any group of colored women, no matter whether it functioned in a small village, in a city, county or State. When Dr. W.E.B. Dubois was a teacher in Atlanta. Georgia and held annual conferences on some phase of race work, he invited me to address the 8th Conference on the Negro Woman and the Church. This talk required a great deal of research. While I was getting the necessary information I discovered that this is one of the many subjects pertaining to the work well done by a single group in the race about which practically nothing has been written and about which the public will continue to remain in ignorance until the interesting facts are published. I felt well repaid for my research. I was amazed at the prodigious amount of work which colored women did for the church in the early days of this country's history, long, long before the emancipation of slavery. While I was in Atlanta filling this engagement for Dr. Dubois I received a telegram from Dr. Booker T. Washington saying that he wanted me to come to the Tuskegee Commencement, and remain two days and that he would defray my railroad expenses from Atlanta and return. At that time the most acrimonious discussions were engaged in by two divisions of colored people - one favoring the higher education of the race and the other laying special stress upon the need of industrial training. Dr. Dubois was the High Priest of Higher Education and Dr. Booker T. Washington was the champion and recognized spokesman for industrial training. While I appreciated the efforts exerted by Dr. Washington to train the masses of the race efficiently to earn their living, I also believed in the higher education for as many of the race as could possibly secure it just as ardently as did Dr. Dubois. The invitation to visit Tuskegee about which I had heard so much - good, bad and indifferent seemed almost providential to me and I accepted it with the keenest anticipation of pleasure. At last I would see for myself what this much-discussed school was like. I had never seen a Commencement like the one at Tuskegee before. Students actually did their stunts before the assembled multitude. They showed us how to 42 build houses, how to paint them, how to estimate the cost and so on down the line. I was taken completely off my feet. I was a convert with all my heart, soul, mind and strength. Here was a school giving just the kind of instruction that the majority of the pupils attending it needed. Owing to the lessons inculcated in slavery neither the white nor the colored people of the South knew any more about injecting system into their work or making accurate calculations than they should. I was sure these students at Tuskegee would get a good start in the right direction and might be expected to be the little leaven which would eventually leaven the whole lump. After this - my first visit to Tuskegee - I made up my mind I would never discuss the school or its founder with anybody who had not seen it for himself. From that day forth whenever those friends tried to engage me in conversation about Tuskegee who knew that way down deep in my heart I was a stickler for the higher education and that if it came to a show down in the controversy I would vote on that side, I would simply say "Have you seen Tuskegee? If you haven't seen it for yourself I will not discuss it with you till you do." Mr. Scott Bone, who was then managing editor of the Washington Post but who later became Governor of Alaska asked me to write an article about the Tuskegee Commencement when I returned home. I told him that I had attended the Commencement of Atlanta University a college for colored youth which had a scientific and an academic course and awarded the A.B. degree to those who completed it and that I should like to write an article about that also. He refused to commission me to write this article for the Post on the ground that there was nothing new or distinctive about such a Commencement, that it was like all the other commencements and for that reason the readers of his paper would not be interested in it at all. I was greatly embarrassed and disturbed by this decision. I disliked to write an article for the Post describing the Tuskegee Commencement and ignores completely the one which represented the higher education of colored youth. I learned from a reliable source that I was criticized by some friends of Atlanta University for so doing. But an obdurate editor's blunt refusal to publish an article and his blue pencil (which invariably eliminates one's [*most*] precious thoughts as well as his pet paragraphs) have caused many another poor, helpless writer to be pilloried and misunderstood. Nobody in the house had seen it and there was nobody whom I could possibly suspect. I searched everywhere for it. I [?????????????] and looked behind every piece of furniture in the house. I went through every box and drawer from the first floor to the third drawers and boxes which had not been opened for months. But the thimble could not be found. After having succeeded in keeping it for twenty years I knew it was gone. I tried to give it up philosophically and forget it. I ridiculed myself for setting so much stock and store by a bauble like a thimble, even if my mother had given it to me when I was a little girl and I had preserved it so long but, like Banque's ghost it wouldn't be downed. One day after the Winter had passed and the warm days of Spring had come I heard my friend utter a loud exclamation, as she was coming down stairs. She had felt a small, cold object in the pocket of her negligee, and when she had investigated she discovered it was my thimble. It had been quietly reposing there for six months. My friend thought that [w???] she [????????] by the sideboard the afternoon we sewed together, she must have have been fingering the thimble, while she was talking and had put it into her pocket when she left the room without being conscious of doing so. It turned quite cold shortly after that and she discarded the light negligee for a heavier garment for the rest of the season. That was a valuable lesson for me on circumstantial evidence. Some of my acquaintances to whom I related my tale of woe suspected that the girl who was in my home working her way through school. had taken the thimble and advised me to her questioned by the police, I had no idea of doing such a thing and I would never have forgiven myself, if I had done so. I shuddered when I thought what might have been the fate of that friendless girl, if she had working for people of the dominant group who believe that all colored people steal. Many a colored man - many a colored woman, no more guilty than that girl in my house when my gold thimble mysteriously disappeared, has been convicted and sentenced to the penetentiary for years. Several forceful illustrations of the wrong which may be done innocent people depending solely upon circumstantial evidence have come under my own personal observation, but none more striking than the one which might The Vicissitudes of My Precious Gold Thimble. Although I was glad to get a chance to see the World's Fair I was quite unhappy for several weeks after I [????] Chicago because of an incident which some people might consider quite trivial. For the first time in my life the gold thimble which my mother gave me when I was twelve years old was left at home by mistake. There is no doubt whatever that it is possible to have a genuine affection for an inanimate object, for I dearly love my little gold thimble. It had been my inseparable companion so long. I had carried it with me thrugh the High School and college and I had taken it abroad. Whenever I traveled in the United States or in Europe I put it in my purse with my railroad ticket, so determined was I never to lose it. And now having carefully preserved it through all those years there I was in Chicago without it. I wrote my husband immediately and implored him to search carefully through our two rooms till he found my thimble. When he did not reply the day after he received my letter, I wired him begging him to telegraph me whether he had succeeded in finding it. "Sorry to say I have not found it yet," came back the answer." In order to pacify and comfort me he wrote he was sure the thimble was in the rooms somewhere, but he had not had time to search for it thoroughly. I wired my husband nearly every day, begging him to find it and assuring him that I could never become reconciled to losing it. Having waited two weeks without hearing that my thimble had been found I thought seriously of returning home. But just as I had about decided to do so I received a telegram from Mr. Terrell saying that it had come to light. One day as he was walking up the street, he met a friend who had come to help me get ready to go to Chicago. I had lent her my thimble so that she might [?????] something for me and when she went home she took the little timble with her by mistake. It never occurred to her that I worried about it, so she did not take the trouble to tell my husband she had it. Mr. Terrell used to say that he fell upon my friend's neck and embraced her right there in the street, his mind was greatly relieved to learn where that The Ohio State Federation of Colored Women's Clubs invited me to deliver an address when it met in Dayton, Ohio. Paul heard I was coming and wrote me a letter inviting me to stop with him. Knowing that his mother had the burden of the home resting upon her shoulders in addition to the strain mental and physical, of nursing her son who [??????????] despaired of even then, I declined. Almost by return mail Paul wrote again urging me to stop with his mother and himself, saying it would do him so much good to talk over the good old times. I could not resist that and I went to his home. When I saw him then he was wasted and worn by disease and he was coughing his precious, young life away.. He was cheerful, however,, when not actually racked with pain and perfectly resigned to his fate. On one occasion when some beautiful girls who had called to pay their respects to Mr. Dunbar had gone, in a nervous effort to relieve the tension of my own feelings, I turned to him and said: "Sometimes I am tempted to believe you are not half so ill as you pretend to be. I believe you are just playing the role of interesting invalid, so as to receive the sympathy and homage of these beautiful girls." "Sometimes I think I am just loafing myself," he laughingly replied. just a [??????] before he passed away How well he remembered this was shown a short while after I returned home. He sent me a copy of his "Lyrics of Sunshine and Shadow," which at that time was his latest book. On the fly leaf he had written with his own hand, a fea feat which during the last year of his illness he was often unable to perform the following lines. "Look hyeah, Molly, Aint it jolly, Jes a loafin' roun'? Tell the Jedge Not to hedge For I am still in town. With Fredereik Douglass and Paul Dunbar at the World's Fair. [??????] following critical illness during which I lost my first baby and came very near losing my life, my father invited me to visit the World's Fair, while he and his family were there, and generously paid the expenses of the trip. The Midway Plaisance [?????? ????? ??????] denizens and dancers was something new under the sun and many perfect ladies who went there to see them perform came away very much shocked. Compared with what one commonly sees on the stage in this country to day, however, those exotic ladies knew nothing but the A.B.C. of sending thrills down the spinal columns of American sight seers by their terpsichorean stunts. Chicago was only an overgrown village when the World's Fair was held there to celebrate a year later than it should have been the 400th anniversary of the discovery of America by Columbus and it was not the stirring, milling, mammoth metropolis of the West that it now is. The exhibits sent from nearly every civilized country in the world instructed and fascinated me beyond expression and I never tired looking at them. When my companions - men as well as women - sometimes [??????] completely exhausted from walking up an down the endless aisles of the long buildings and from inspecting what they contained, I would leave them to rest while I continued joyfully on my way. My friend [?????????] marveled at my power of endurance and I sometimes wonder at it myself. [???????] very tired, I can still work on an incredibly long time. There are few young women who can walk further, stick to a job or dance longer than I can even unto this day. further, stick to a [j?????????????????] World's Fair which have left a more delightful flavor in my memory than anything else. One was the great honor paid to Frederick Douglass by people of the dominant race as well as by those in his own group. The other was meeting Paul Laurence Dunbar, just as he was starting on his career as a poet. Mr. Douglass was the Commissioner in charge of the exhibit from Hayti at the Fair and he employed Paul Dunbar to assist him. Mr. Douglass was accustomed to entertain his friends there by taking them to see some of the exhibits which he especially liked. Persuant to this custom he invited me to go with him one afternoon to take in some of the sights. As we walked along with through the grounds or in the buildings, Mr. Douglass was continually halted by admiring people who begged the privilege of shaking hands with him. A mother would stop him and say, "You are Frederick Douglass, aren't you? Please shake hands with my little son (or may be it was a little daughter) , because when he grows up I want him to say he has shaken hands with the great Frederick Douglass." "Let's get on the scenic railway," suggested Mr. Douglass, so that we may have a chance to talk a little. Nobody can get us there." But he had reckoned without his host, for we had no sooner taken seats on that little railroad than a man reached over two seats to touch him on the shoulder and greet him. "Well, we'll go up on the Eifel Tower," chuckled, Mr. Douglass "I know nobody can interrupt us, when we are in one of those cages." But, just as we started to ascend, a man in another cage shouted. "Hello Mr. Douglass, the last time I saw you was in Rochester." It was certainly gratifying to see the homage and reverence exhibited by people of the dominant race to Frederick Douglass at the World's Fair. The great man had become very deeply interested in Paul Dunbar, because his struggle for existence and recognition had been so desperate. The fact that Mr. Douglass was the first person I ever heard mention Paul Dunbar's name in a recollection that I cherish. By appointment I had gone to see him in his home in Anacostia across the Potomac River from Washington. After finishing the business I had come to transact the "Sage of Anacostia" inquired "Have you ever heard of Paul Dunbar?" I told him I had not. Then Mr. Douglass rehearsed the facts in the young man's life. "He is very young, but there is no doubt that he is a poet," he said. He is working under the most discouraging circumstances in his home, Dayton, Ohio. He is an elevator boy and on his meager wage of $4 a week he is trying to support his mother and himself. Let me read you one of his poems" said Mr. Douglass and then he arose to get it. I can see his fine face and his majestic form now, as he left the room. He soon returned with a newspaper clipping and began to read the drowsy day. When Mr. Douglass had read several stanzas his voice 43 a period of nearly thirty years or which addresses delivered for organizations formed for widely different purposes by people of different races enabled me to deal the most effective blows in behalf of the cause to which I had dedicated my life and consecrated my powers. Every time I spoke in public, no matter how small was the audience which greeted me, I tried to say the right thing in the most effective way. Because I practically never used a manuscript when I delivered an address many thought I spoke extemporaneously. This was not the case and I tried to disabuse the people's minds of this impression every time I had a chance. When I had time, as a rule, I not only decided very carefully what arguments I would make and what facts I would present, but I spent considerable time choosing the language in whcih my thoughts should be couched. I took myself very seriously as a public speaker. It always amazed me to hear an individual who had been specially invited to address an audience say nonchalantly as he arose, "I don't know what I shall talk about to night. I haven't decided what my subject shall be. Perhaps I had better talk about this (naming the theme he had chosen.) I always felt that either the speaker had prepared [?????? ??????] the audience to believe he was such a genius that he could make a fine speech without doing so or that he had done the people who came to hear him a great injustice, if he had not. [*page 47*] Sometimes I am asked what was the largest sum I ever received for an address. I usually reply by saying that the largest sum I ever received for rendering such a service was $500. It is interesting to watch the look of incredulity on the inquirer's face. After allowing that statement to sink into his consciousness I explain by stating that the Woman's Congress of Missions invited me to represent colored women at a meeting which they held in San Francisco during the Panama-Pacific International Exposition and it cost them that much to transport me from the Atlantic to the Pacific and return, and pay all the expenses incident to such a long jaunt across the continent twice. The lady who introduced me to the audience referred to me as an alien. It was the first time I had every thought anybody regarded me as an "alien" and I was both shocked and pained. As I arose I said that even if I were technically an alien in the United States, I certainly did not feel like one. It afterward occurred to me that everybody in this country is an alien except the Indians. It is impossible for me to decide which was the most notable engagements I filled during the time I was on the lecture platform which covered a period of thirty years. Nor can I tell which addresses delivered for organizations formed for widely different purposes by people of different races enabled me to [*???? ???? ??????? ??????*] Club Work. Shortly after my marriage I became very much interested in club work among our women. For many years colored women had been banding themselves together in the interest of the church and had done very effective work in various ways. But secular organizations among them were comparatively rare. As soon as the idea of uniting their forces outside the church dawned upon them, it took definite, tangible form quickly and women of all classes and conditions seized upon it with enthusiasm. In Washington, D.C. where there were probably more colored women who had enjoyed educational advantages than in any other city in the country, this was especially true. A goodly number of these women decided to band together to raise the standard of their group and the Colored Women's League was formed in 1893?. They resolved "That the colored women of the United States associate ourselves together to collect all facts obtainable showing the moral intellectual, industrial and social growth and attainments of our people; to foster unity of purpose; to consider and determine methods which will promote the best interests of the colored people in any direction that suggets itself." Among other things the League established a sort of Night School on a small scale. Classes in various subjects were offered. As Chairman of the Educational Committee I gave my services gratuitously to teach a class in English Literature and one in German several nights a week. A goodly number availed themselves of this opportunity and the students were asked to pay ten cents a lesson, so as to help defray the expense of heating and lighting the building of the Young Men's Christian Association where we met. There were classes in sewing also and in other industrial arts. Meantime in Boston a club of progressive colored women was formed whose purposes and aims were similar to those the League. Each one of these organizations grew space and enlarged its sphere of usefulness more and more. In the summer of 1895 women from various States met in Boston at the call of Mrs. Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin and the Federation of Afro-American Women 2 was formed. There were then two national organizations of Colored women, for clubs outside of Washington had already become affiliated with the League. A dispute soon arose as to which was the first to become actually national in scope and later on the question was raised as to which one had more clubs affiliated with it than the other The Colored Woman's League declared it was the first to suggest that there should be a national organization. An article which I myself wrote and which appeared in Ringwoods Afro-American of Fashion in 1893 in May and June issue of Ringwood's Afro-American Journal of Fashion proves beyond a doubt that this contention is correct. The title of the article is "What the Colored Woman's League will do" and reads as follows: "Anational organization of colored women could accomplish so much in such a variety of ways that thoughtful, provident women are strenuously urging their sisters all over the country to co-operate with them in this important matter. In union there is strength, and in unity of purpose there is inspiration. The Colored Woman's League, recently organized in Washington, has cordially invited women in all parts of the country to unite with it, so that we may have a national organization similar to the Federation of Clubs of the Women of the other race. The local societies are subject in no way whatsoever to the League. The local societies may devote themselves to any special work, in any manner they choose. There is every reason for all who have the interests of the race at heart to associate themselves with the League, so that there may be a vast chain or organizations extending the length and breadth of the land devising ways and means to advance our cause. We have always been equal to the highest emergencies in the past and it remains for us now to prove to the world that we are a unit in all matters pertaining to the education and elevation of our race." So far as I know this is the first article which appeared in any magazine announcing that a national organization of colored women had been formed. 3 But the Federation of Afro-American Women, whose president was Mrs. Booker T. Washington, declared that even if the League were first to say there should be a national organization, the Federation was the first to actually become national in scope. Among some of the close friends of the officers and members of the these two bodies this dispute created no little bitterness of feeling. In some respect it resembles the controversy between the Wright Brothers and the Smithsonian Institute which caused the former to decide to send to England the first plane in which they flew. To quote Will Rogers, the humorist, "The trustees of the Smithsonian Institute decided Langley's machine could have flown first but didn't. I could have flown to France ahead of Lindbergh but I just neglected doing it. I had a lot of other things on my mind at the the time." When the National Federation of Afro-American Women met in Washington D.C. July 20, 21, 22, 1896, Mrs. Josephine Bruce, wife of Ex-Senator B.K. Bruce, who later became Register of the Treasury, stated that in July 1895 there had been a national gathering of women in Boston and that in December of the same year there had been a national gathering of women at Atlanta Georgia where an exposition was held. Representation to this Congress of Women was by States each State being allowed five delegates. Twenty five States were represented. In the address which Mrs. Bruce delivered in Washington before this convention of the Afro-American Federation of Women she made the following statement. "There had been but one national gathering of colored women previous to this Congress which was held in Atlanta, Georgia, viz the convention held in Boston in July 1895." Mrs. Bruce's statement of this fact has never been successfully challenged so far as I know. Moreover, the program of the convention held by the National League of Colored Women July 14th, 15th and 16th, 1896, a week before the Afro-American Federation met, reads "First Annual Convention of the National League of Colored Women," which proves that Mrs. Bruce's statement was correct. It would appear, therefore, that while the Colored Woman's League of 4 Washington was the first to resolve "that colored women of the United States associate themselves together," the group which assembled in Boston in July 1895 at the call of Mrs. Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin was the first, secular, national gathering of colored women in the United States which met with the intention of becoming permanent organization. It was at that Boston meeting that Mrs. Booker T. Washington was elected President of the newly-formed association which was named the National Federation of Afro-American Women and which held its second convention in Washington in July 1896, the following year a few days after the League held its first. At the convention of the Afro-American Federation which marked a milestone in the progress of the race, a remarkable thing was done. It was apparent to the thoughtful women of our group that there would be very little likelihood of two national organizations achieving success at that stage of their development. Among these women, therefore, it was the consensus of opinion that only one national organization was needed. After a sufficient number [*had been converted*] to this point of view it was decided to merge the two organizations into one. To effect this union a Committee of Seven was appointed from the League and seven from the Federation of which I was one on July 20, the first day the Afro-American Federation's second Convention met. This joint Committee elected me Chairman and proceeded to discuss the terms on which we could unite with justice to each organization. Considering the difficulties encountered this was accomplished with comparatively little friction. What should the child of this union be called? What was indeed the question. It was decided to use the name of neither of the former organizations which were merging. Therefore, it could be called neither a League nor a Federation. After a prolonged discussion it was decided to call the new organization "The National Association of Colored Women," the name under which it was incorporated in St., Louis, Mo. in 1904 and which it will continue to bear till the end of time, I hope. Then the most difficult task of all confronted us: Who should be the first president of the new Association [??? ????] That was indeed the question. It is safe 5 to assert that while we were in the throes of electing the president, the name of no colored woman who had achieved prominence anywhere in the United States failed to be presented for consideration. The name of practically every woman in the room at the time, as a member of the Joint Committee, was also mentioned for the office, not once but several times. When a member of this Committee as nominated, the result of the poll usually showed that every woman on her half of the Joint Committee voted for her, while every woman on the other half voted for somebody else. Over and over again the tellers would report that Miss A had 7 votes and Miss B had 7. And this went on indefinitely, until most of us had little hope that anybody in the United States or out of it could ever be elected. Several times during the Committee meeting prayers were offered by the members who sought divine guidance in accomplishing the task they were trying so hard to perform. Like the other members of the Committee I had been nominated early in the day and had met the same fate as the others. Finally I was nominated the second time, the dead lock was broken, I received the majority of the votes cast and was elected the first president of the National Association of Colored Women. It was nearly six o'clock when this occurred. The Joint Committee had been in session all day long and had to return to the church for the evening session at eight o'clock, although each and every one of its members was worn to a frazzle. At the time I was expecting a little stranger who would arrive, I thought and hoped, the last of September. He came, but did not tarry with me long. It was a bitter, a greivous disappointment to Mr. Terrell and myself, but like other mothers who have passed thru this Gethsemane, I pulled myself together as best I could and went on with my work. In fact I had to go on with it, for the teachers, parents of children and others who wanted to talk with the only colored woman who was a member of the Board of Education insisted on seeing me and presenting their respective cases, anything my nurse might say to the contrary, notwithstanding. And they rendered me a great service for which I am grateful 6 to day. Obliged to be interested in the troubles and trial of others I had little time to think of my own aching heart, disappointment, and woe. Naturally, I felt it was a great honor to be elected president of the National Association of Colored Women and I was especially gratified, because the members of the Committee who finally broke the deadlock declared that they had done so, because my fairness as Chairman of the Joint Committee convinced them I was the right woman for the place. It was a great undertaking for a young woman with little experience and it required prodigious effort, not to mention patience, to establish the organization on a firm foundation, so that the superstructure would be secure, I decided that whatever else I tried to do, the ideals should be high. In assisting with the constitution I suggested that no woman should serve as president longer than two terms. I feared that some of the women whom I wanted very much to hold in the new Association would lose interest in it, if they felt it would be impossible for them to become its president, because the same woman might be elected over and over again. It was decided to hold the first convention of the National Association of Colored Women in Nashville, Tennessee in the summer of 1897, because an exposition was to be held there at that time, and we were sure that rates would be reduced. Another reason which actuated the Association to make this decision was a desire to interest southern women in the new organization and to make it easy for them to attend the first convention. This meeting in Nashville was a success from every point of view. It was well attended, the subjects discussed covered those phases of our life in the home, in the school and along other lines in which our women are especially interested and on which the papers which were read gave them much useful information. While social courtesies were extended by many leading colored citizens, no one took more genuine pleasure in doing so that did Mr. and Mrs. J.C. Napier. The latter is the daughter of the Hon. John M. Langston, one of the most distinguished men the race has ever produced. In going to his office Mr. Langston usued often to pass by our home and wave a pleasant greeting to 7 me and when returning to his home occasionally he would stop in to talk a few minutes. It was always a pleasure to see him, for he not only had something to say worth hearing, but he was full of good cheer and of enthusiasm for any cause he espoused. The second convention of the National Association of Colored Women was held in Chicago, August 15, 16, 17, 1899. In the opinion of many who attended all the conventions in the early years of the organization's existence, it was the most successful we have ever held. There were 145 delegates - a large number for that time. In addition to an unusually interesting program, fine speakers, the active participation of the most distinguished colored women in the United States and crowded houses both day and night, the biggest and best newspapers of Chicago gave the Association more publicity than it has ever received from the press of any other city in which we have since met. Column after column giving detailed account of the proceedings appeared in all the big dailies, while the editorials in several leading newspapers bestowed upon the meetings, the officers and the delegates unstinted praise. "Of all the conventions that have met in this country this summer," said the Daily News, "there is none that has taken hold of the business in hand with more good sense and judgment than the National Association of Colored Women, now assembled in this city. The subjects brought up, the manner of their treatment and the decisions reached exhibit wide and appreciative knowledge of conditions confronting colored people." In commenting upon the delegates the Time Herald frankly admits "These women were a continual revelation, not only as to personal appearance, but as to intelligence and culture. If by a bit of magic the color of their skin could be changed to white, one would have witnessed a convention of wide-awake women, which in almost every particular would compare favorably with a Convention of white-skinned women." Nothing could have spoken more eloquently and more forcibly for the success of our meetings than the crowded houses they drew. Long before it was time to call the meetings to order, there was hardly standing room in Quinn Chapel 8 which was one of the largest churches in Chicago. The first afternoon of the Convention we talked about establishing schools of Domestic Science and insisted that our wage-earners should not only be skilled and proficient in the trades but that they should establish the reputation of being [?pendable] and reliable as well. Why the National Association Should Devise Ways and Means for Establishing Kindergartens was the subject for discussion the second afternoon. The hope of the race lies in the children was the burden of our song and I expressed the opinion that the more unfavorable the environment of children the more necessary it is that steps be taken to counteract baleful influences on innocent victims. For that reason I felt that the National Association could do nothing better than assist in establishing as many kindergartens as possible, and I started a fund for that purpose. In order to do this I had printed in pamphlet form the address on The Progress of Colored Women which I had delivered before the [*Thirtieth Annual Convention of the*] National American Woman Suffrage Association [*in Washington*] and sold it to the delegates and visitors to the Convention. In this way the money was raised with which to help establish kindergarten. And this is also how I happened to be the first president of the Association to inaugurate the custom of raising funds for some specific purpose. Although the price charged for the pamphlets was only twenty five cents, several enthusiastic friends paid a dollar for it and even more, so as to help a good cause. Quite a neat little sum was thus raised and during the next two years it was a great privilege to use it to assist in establishing and maintaining the kindergartens which appealed to the Association for aid. It is very gratifying to know that I inaugurated the plan of raising funds for a special object which has been followed with varying degrees of success by several presidents who succeeded me. I am glad also that the effort I made was exerted in behalf and for the sake of the children of the race. I tried to impress the delegates to the convention with the thought that if the Association did nothing but try to save the children during their early 9 impressionable period of their lives, its mission would be more than nobly fulfilled. The Labor question, the Convict Lease System, Temperance, the Necessity for an Equal Moral Standard for Men and Women and the Jim Crow Car Laws were ably treated by women who had made a special study of these important subjects. Miss Jane Addams of Hull House invited several of the officers to lunch with her. In commenting upon this the Times-Herald says: "The color line was given another good rub yesterday by Miss Jane Addams of Hull House, who entertained at luncheon a party of colored women. The guests included in this social departure were for the most part prominent out of town delegates to the Convention of the National Association of Colored Women which has just closed in this city. After luncheon, at which Hull House residents were present, another party of twenty five women came to inspect this social settlement. They were shown all about by the residents, evincing great interest in every department. "We were impressed," said one of the residents later in the afternoon, "with the intelligence of these colored women. They inspected the settlement understandingly and poured in on us as many interested questions as we could answer. "This is the first time," says the Herald, "that colored women have been given decided recognition in a social way by a woman of lighter skin." "When Miss Jane Addams invited the delegates of the National Association of Colored women to lunch with her," said one of the papers, "it was the whitest thing she ever did." After complimenting the women of the Association upon the intelligent efforts they were making in behalf of their race, the Chicago Tribune said editorially: "That within a single generation since the war which gave freedom to the race such a gathering as this should be possible means a great deal. Could Abraham Lincoln have looked in upon the nearly two thousand people crowded into Quinn Chapel the other evening and have seen the representatives of the race he emancipated and listened to the addresses said to have been so admirably spoken by the president of the Convention, Mrs. Terrell and others and [?] and others and observed their essential dignity, evident refinement of manner and noted the breadth of their outlook for their race and country, it is not difficult to imagine some of the emotions which would have stirred him, especially in view of their so clear apprehension of the real conditions of the problem before them." "After watching these capable colored women three days," said one distinguished white woman, "Inever want to hear another word about there being no hope for the Negro. Another thing, if the Lord helps him who helps himself, three colored club women will have a good, long pull with Providence." At the Chicago Biennial I was re-elected President by an overwhelming majority. Since I had served one year before the Convention was held in Nashville, Tennessee, at which the constitution was adopted and which at my suggestion provided that the president should serve only two terms, women who wanted very much to elect me again feared that this clause would prevent them from doing so. They insisted that while the Association was still in its infancy self-preservation demanded that a woman should be retained at the helm in whose ability to guide it wisely they had perfect confidence at the crucial time. There were so few colored women who at that time knew enough about parliamentary law to preside successfully over a large Convention, many of the delegates argued, that it would be stupid and dangerous deliberately to dispense with the services of one who had proved that she was an adept at it and elect another who might know little or nothing whatever becaome about it. But several women who were eager to become president of the National Association themselves, missed no opportunity of assuring the delegates that they would violate the constitution, if they elected me again. Finally, however, a lawyer declared that since I had been elected but once after the constitution had been adopted at Nashville, I was eligible for re-election in Chicago, and that if I were re-elected at the Chicago convention, I would then begin to serve my second term. The women were also informed by this same authority that to rule I was not eligible for re-election in Chicago, because I had been president a year before the adoption of the constitution limiting As the Chicago Biennial I was re-elected President by an overwhelming majority. I had declared repeatedly that I did not desire to be re-elected. So anxious was I to impress upon the delegates my reluctance to assume the presidency again that I went so far as to say that I would not accept a re-election, unless it were unanimous (which from the nature of the case I knew could never happen.) And even if it were, I stated, I greatly preferred not to serve again. Before leaving home my father who had come from Memphis to see me urged me not to accept the presidency again under any circumstance and my husband's opposition to it was as strong as my father's. Most of the delegates supposed that the constitution prohibited the re- election of the officers who had served the past two years. Indeed it had been stated positively as a fact.. Especially did the women who wished to become President themselves insist upon this interpretation of the law. On the morning of the election of officers after the name of five or six candidates for the presidency had been mentioned, one of the delegates announced to the convention that there was no reason why all the officers could not be re-elected, if the women wanted to retain them. "The constitution," she explained,"forbids an officer from serving more than two consecutive terms. As is was adopted just two years ago at Nashville, and as our present officers have served only one term since it was adopted, they are all eligible for re-election."I still stoutly maintained that I did not want to serve again. But some of the officers on the platform persuaded me to go before the women and promise to accept the presidency, if I received a two-thirds vote of the convention. This was the last straw 11 which broke the camel's back, so to speak. So many of the delegates had impressed me with the fact that it was my duty to remain at the helm till the Association was well established on a solid foundation, that being human I finally succumbed. When I announced this decision to the convention the delegates applauded it vigorously. One of the candidates for the presidency then moved that the name of each delegate should be called,she should come forward and deposit her ballot in a box on a table in front of the pulpit in the presence of the whole convention. This was done exactly as prescribed and the vote showed that Mary Church Terrell had received 106 ballots out of a possible 145. In other words there were thirty-nine votes distributed among the other five candidates whose names were before the convention. Nobody who witnessed the demonstration when the result of the poll was announced could have doubted who was the choice of the delegates. Some of the women wept and rushed upon the platform to embrace me. Such a spontaneous outburst of confidence in me thus displayed by the delegates more than repaid me for all the strenuous efforts I had exerted to make the Association [?] and the Convention in particular a success. The third convention of the Association which was the one over which I presided was held in Buffalo, New York, in the summer of 1901. Here also the press of the city bestowed unstinted praise upon the officers, the delegates the earnest efforts we were making as an organization and upon the work which we had actually done. Some of the delegates urged me to allow them to present my name for re-election to the presidency at this convention also, but it did not offer the slightest temptation to me to do so. When the constitution was being written as I have already said, I myself had suggested that a president should serve only two terms and nobody could have persuaded me to violate it. I wanted very much, however, to have a woman well-fitted intellectually and spiritually to be chosen president of the Association. In looking over the possible candidates I was fully persuaded that nobody possessed the necessary qualifications to a higher degree than did Mrs. Josephine Silone Yates who 12 was a teacher in Kansas City, Mo., and who had already served the Association as Treasurer. She knew she was my candidate and was perfectly willing to accept the office, if it were offered to her. But the morning on which the election was to take place, she came to me with tears in her eyes and begged me neither to present her name myself nor allow anybody else to do so. Her friends told had told her, she said, that she could not possibly poll enough votes to elect her and she did not to be slaughtered by the delegates to the convention, as she had been assured by the aforesaid friends that she would be Try as hard as I might I could not argue her out of the notion to withdraw her name. But I would not promise that I would prevent her name from being presented to the convention, if anybody else chose to do so. After the names of several women who had sought the election themselves had been presented, Mrs. Mosselle of Philadelphia nominated Mrs. Yates for the presidency in a most eloquent speech and our candidate was elected on the very first ballot by an overwhelming majority. This afforded another proof of the fact that, as a rule, the women of the Convention know those who seek the office of president mainly to gratify their ambition and refuse to vote for them, while they recognize and reward women who they know will serve the organization faithfully and is not seeking it just for the honor her election to it will bring. Before the Buffalo convention closed, the delegates unanimously voted to make me Honorary President for life and presented me with a silver loving cup on an ebony stand. During the term I served as president both before the adoption of the constitution and throughout the two I served afterward I strove with all my heart, sould, mind and strength to place the National Association of Colored Women on a solid foundation and to make its ideals high. In the first years of its existence there were comparitively few colored women who had had any experience in club work and upon whom I could call for assistance but the cooperation I received from those who were able to assist was hearty, genuine, and valuable to the highest degree. Without the help given me by these able and loyal co-workers I could never have succeeded in bring the National Association of Colored Women up to the hight standard during the first five years of its existence to which it undoubtedly attained. 13 On the Lecture Platform. My appearance on the lecture platform happened more by accident than by design. I really didn't mean to do it. If I had been questioned about it a month before I was swept into it by an unexpected and unforeseen event, I should probably have expressed a very strong opinion against doing any such thing. I was invited to speak to the Congregational Association of Maryland and the District of Columbia which was holding a meeting in the First Congregational Church of Washington, the same church which President and Mrs. Coolidge attended while they lived in the White House. Contrary to the custom I have observed all my life when speaking in public, I used a manuscript and spoke on the Progress of Colored Women. After the meeting Mr. Robert Nourse,a well known lecturer who lived in Falls Church, Virginia, told me he would like to talk with me about something very important, and as soon as we were free to have a private conference, he unburdened his mind. He told me he had had years of experience on the lecture platform, that he knew the material out of which a good lecturer was built when he saw and heard one and that he was certain I possessed all the qualities which would insure success. Dr. Nourse left nothing unsaid to me which one human being could say to another so as to encourage him to undertake an enterprise or engage in a pursuit in which he had previously had no experience. The suggestion was literally a thunderclap out of a clear sky to me., for it had never occurred to me to go on the lecture platform. When I enumerated the obstacles which would prevent me from attempting it, [?] [?] them all aside and assured me that when I talked with my husband and mother about it, they would do the same thing. And this they certainly did. Judge Terrell agreed with Dr. Nourse that I would be a success on the lecture platform and reminded me that through the medium of the lecture bureau I would have a better opportunity of doing the work I had always wanted to do than by any other method. For years I had been wishing that the opportunity [way would open] creating sentiment in favor of our group would be presented to me in some way 14 and it seemed to me that going on the lecture platform would give me the chance for which I longed. An offer was made by the Slayton Lyceum Bureau which I accepted with the understanding that I would never be obliged to remain away from home longer than three weeks at a time. Mother declared that she could easily look after affairs in the home during that length of time and urged me to embrace the opportunity which had presented to me so miraculously. I did not have the confidence in my ability which Dr. Nourse and Judge Terrell possessed. With fear and trembling I made the decision to appear before the public as a lecturer. "But, Dr. Nourse," I remarked one day while we were all discussing the subject in our family, "I may not be able to say anything which will either interest or enlighten the public." "oh, never mind about that", he replied seriously. "Maybe you wont. But people never go to hear what a woman says anyhow. They simply go to see how she looks." Mr. Charles Wagner, one of the agents of the Slayton Lyceum Bureau, was the first to book me. From the press notices of the addresses which I had previously delivered on various occasions he got up a very good circular for me Neither Mr. Wagner nor any other official of the Slayton Bureau had ever seen me or heard me speak, when they consented to offer me as one of the attractions for the Chautauqua that summer. So great was their confidence in Dr. Nourse's ability to "pick em" that they took me on his representation alone. It was said that up to that time the Bureau had never promised to back a speaker whom none of the officials had heard till Dr. Nourse persuaded them to try me out on his recommendation alone. Mr. Charles Wagner who has since then so successfully managed John McCormack, the famous tenor,and other celebrities secured for me some very fine engagements at the leading Chautauquas in the West. At that time he was booking Maud Ballington Booth, William Jennings Bryan and other well known lecturers, so that my name often appeared on the same program with theirs. On several occasions I spoke to the same audiences which Tom Dixon addressed. That Tom Dixon who wrote the Clansman, which as a novel did a great deal of 15 harm. Then when it was filmed as "The Birth of the Nation", it was an instrument of evil, appealing as it did to race prejudice, inciting to riot and arousing the murderous passions of the mob. The following were the four subjects which I offered the Chautauquas: The Progress of Colored Women, The Bright Side of A Dark Subject, Uncle Sam and the Sons of Ham and Harriet Beecher Stowe. In my address on our women I referred to the marvellous progress which they had made and I usually introduced it by saying: "When that small but noble band of women began an agitation in Seneca Falls, New York in 1848 by which colleges were opened to women and the numerous reforms inaugurated for the amelioration of their condition along all lines, their sisters who groaned in bindage had little reason to hope that these blessings would ever brighten their crushed and blighted lives. For, in those days of oppression and despair colored women were not only refused admittance to institutions of learning, but the Law of the States in which the majority lived made it a crime to teach them to read. Not only could they possess no property, but they did not even own themselves. So gloomy were their prospects, so pernicious the customs, so less than fifty years ago. But from the day their fetters were broken and their minds released from the darkness of ignorance in which they had been held for nearly three hundred years; from the day they could stand erect in the dignity of womanhood, no longer bond but free, till to day, colored women have forged steadily shed in the acquisition of knowledge and in the cultivation of those graces of character which make for good. To use a thought of the illustrious Frederick Douglass, if judged by the depths from which they have come, rather than by the heights to which those blessed with centuries of advantages and opportunities have attained, colored women need not hang their heads in shame. Consider, if you will, the almost insurmountable obstacles which have confronted colored women in their efforts to educate and elevate themselves since their emancipation and I dare assert, not boastfully, at all, but with pardonable pride, I hope, that the work they accomplished and the progress they have made will bear favorable comparison at least, with their more favored sisters from whom the opportunity of acquiring 16 acquiring knowledge and the means of self culture have never been entirely withheld. For, not only are colored women with aspirations handicapped on account of their sex, but they are everywhere baffled and mocked on account of their race. Desperately and continuously they are forced to fight an opposition born of a cruel, unreasonable prejudice which neither their necessity nor their merit seems able to subdue. Not only because they are women, but because they are colored women are discouragement and disappointment meeting them at every turn. But, in spite of the opposition encountered and the obstacles opposed to their acquisition of knowledge and their accumulation of wealth, the progress made by the colored women of their country has never been surpassed by that of any group of women since the world began." And then I gave specific instances of the marvellous success achieved by colored women, as teachers, founders of schools and charitable institutions of various kinds, such as old folks homes and orpand asylums. I referred to the public work done by colored women through the medium of the National Association of Colored Women and through the clubs in the church as well as in their numerous beneficial organizations. I emphasized their intellectual and cultural advancement by citing the splendid records which colored women have made in some of the best institutions of the land. I discovered that very few white people had ever heard of Phyllis Wheatley, the African poetess, so I related a few facts about this remarkable women whose careers reads more like fiction than fact. At nine years of age she was brought to the United States packed like a sardine in a slave ship. She was bought by Mrs. John Wheatley who saw her wrapped only in a piece of carpet shivering on a street one cold, bleak day in Boston. The Wheatley family discovered that the little slave girl whom they named Phyllis had a fine mind, allowed her to cultivate it and nine years after she had been dragged from a slave ship more dead than alive, she had so mastered the English language that she had written a volume of poems which were published by her friends in 1773 and which compare favorably with any poems written by women at that time in the United States. 17 Ever since this little volume appeared titled "Poems on Various Subjects Religious and Moral by Phyllis Wheatley, Negro Servant of Mr. John Wheatley of Boston" colored women have shown decided literary ability from time to time. Naturally I referred to the huge obstacles which block the colored woman's path to success in many pursuits in which she would like to engage. And I always ended with an appeal to the white man's sense of justice, especially in behalf of the children and the youth of the race. I have every reason to believe that this address on the Progress and the Problems of Colored Women did a great deal of good, because it opened the eyes of many to the difficulties which confront colored women about which they had neither heard nor thought before. It was a revelation to many who heard for the first time about the success which colored women had achieved in varied lines of human endeavor as well as [????] desperate struggles which they were making to forge ahead. Over and over again people who had been in the audience would wait to talk with me after the lecture about the facts which had been presented. Desiring to compliment me they would say "If there were any more colored women like you there would be no race problem at all. And even if there were one, it could be quickly solved." When I told them there were many well-educated, highly cultivated colored women in the United States, they always expressed the greatest surprise and even though I would give them the names and addresses of some to whom I referred, they seemed unable to believe that colored women had accomplished so much. Thus it was that I learned how little the majority of white people really know about what colored have done and are doing [???] their own interest and for their own advancement. The Bright Side of A Dark Subject was an appeal to consider the creditable things which colored people have done and to talk about that phase of the subject [????????] dwelling continually upon their backwardness, their defects and their crimes. "The tendency of the present is such," I said, "as to make it imperative for those who are really interested in the colored man's welfare to emphasize his virtues, recount his achievements in the past and to disclose his chances of future success, rather than exaggerate his vices, recall his 18 ignominy and discredit his ability to keep abreast of the times. The eyesight of many white people is all right," I said, "until they begin to look at colored people. But they no sooner fasten their optics upon their brother in black than they are straightway afflicted with astigmatism, with myopsis, while they are far-sighted, near-sighted, short-sighted and cross-eyed all combined. I related the story of the medical student who decided to experiment upon one of their own number to see what effect imagining one's self to be ill would have upon the health of an individual who was well. Accordingly several groups stationed themselves at regular intervals along the route which they knew the object of their experiment was accustomed to take. As he passed, the first group simply asked him, if he were ill, to which he replied in the negative. "Are you not ill?" inquired the second group with evident concern, "You look so," they added. The third group pretended to be alarmed, when they saw him and assured him that the pallor of his countenance indicated that he was far from being well. All the other groups seemed just as shocked at his appearance and warned him that he had better be looking after his health. By the time the young men reached the last group, it is said, he was actually ill and he admitted to his comrades that he was not feeling well. According to this story which went the rounds of the medical journals a few years ago this student who was perfectly well, when he started from home to take a walk was seriously affected physically by the repeated assurances of his classmates that he was ill. His mind was no deeply impressed and his nerves were so wrought upon that he took to his bed and died in spite of every effort to save him. Whether this story is true or not, I told my audience, its application to the colored man's case is perfectly clear. His intellectual faculties may be never so strong, his spiritual endowment never so fine and his courage never so indomitable, still in marching to the goal of his ambition, if the first group composed of Anglo Saxons halts him with the warning that he is too sick mentally or morally to reach it; if the second group composed of Doubting Thomases of his own race (of whom there so many, but I hope no more will grow) corroborates the first and if all the other groups composed of friends and 19 foes alike join in this same chorus of despair, the whole race may finally be so inoculated with the poison of doubt, fear and discouragement that all efforts to save it from ultimate ruin may be in vain. But thanks to the happy disposition of the Colored-American, it will be a long time before the masses of us can be seriously affected by this pernicious pessimism which many latter- day philosophers of both races are trying to dispense. The Lord God of Hosts knew exactly what he was doing, when he put a smile upon the colored man's lips and a song in his heart. In spite, therefore, of the hardships and the humiliations to which some of the best and worthiest of the race are subjected almost every day, the majority of us still find good and sufficient reasons for looking upon the bright side of the problem and we will continue to hope. In this address I referred to the brilliant success achieved by colored students at Harvard University, Yale and in other institutions of the North, East and West. I gave a bried resume of the marvellous military record of colored soldiers who have fought in all the wars which this country has waged. The first blood spilled for this country was shed by a colored man. It was Crispus Attucks, a colored man who first led the American soldiers against the British troops and who fought desperately for this country till the enemy laid him low. In Boston there stands to day a monument erected by the citizens of that commonwealth to commemorate the patriotism and the heroism of that colored man. I rejoiced in the financial progress of the Colored-American, and that while he had been storing his mind with useful knowledge, he had been filling his pockets as well - filling them honestly, too. I referred especially to the the charge against the Colored-American that he is innately dishonest and declared that it is not founded in fact. When I was a student at Oberlin College I heard several missionaries state that in Africa theft is practically unknown and that the natives do not learn to steal until they come into close contact with other races. There is no doubt, therefore, I declared, that from our African forefathers we have inherited the stricted honesty and that if we had developed a penchant 20 for laying heavy hands on their neighbor's property, this was an acquired rather than an inherited taste. Among the reasons I cited for believing that as a group we would ultimately be able to work out our own salvation and triumph over the obstacles against which we were then and still are contending to day was the fact that we are more and more learning the advantage of uniting our forces and helping ourselves. The lesson of unity is being slowly but surely learned, I said, and nothing impresses its utility and its necessity upon us more than that very prejudice of which we as a race so justly complain. From the many evils born of prejudice and proscription, however, we are learning lessons which could be taught us, perhaps in no other way, and we are gaining a kind of strength which could to us from no other source. After a brief reference to the race's progress from every point of view I concluded this address on The Bright Side of A Dark Subject as follows: Then we'll forward with brave hearts and true, As we climb, let us lift from below, Let no soul be left in the dark, As onward and upward we go. Success we've achieved in the past, To day we are hopeful and strong, For blossoms and buds of desire Will burst into fruitage ere long. In the address entitled "Uncle Sam and the Sons of Ham" I dwelt upon the government's relations to the race. I presented some shocking facts concerning the Convict Lease System, the Contract Labor System and the wholesale of disfranchisement of colored people in that section where the majority live. But I took occasion even in this address to refer briefly to the progress which the race had made. No matter what my subject was I never allowed an opportunity ot presenting facts creditable to us as a group to pass. I believe it is the duty of every speaker who makes a specialty of discussing the race problem, no matter what the color of the audience may be to emphasize the fact that we have taken long strides ahead. As soon as I was fairly launched on the lecture bureau I decided never to crack a joke at the colored man's expense. Nothing displeases and disgists me more 21 than to hear a colored speaker relate stories or crack jokes at the colored which make his race appear ridiculous, cowardly or light-fingered. Nobody could be more fed up on the chicken and watermelon-stealing jokes than I am. The address on Harriet Beecher Stowe was truly a labor of love. I enjoyed nothing more than to deliver it to audiences who wanted to hear it. And it is a great satisfaction to me to recall how genuine and cordial were the expressions of appreciation which those who heard it bestowed upon it. I poured my very heart's blood into it when I wrote it I poured out my soul when I relivered it. The press comments which appeared in the leading papers in the places where I spoke were always complimentary in the extreme. Usually there were great headlines announcing my appearance and my subject before I spoke and still bigger ones after I delivered the address, I do not see how greater praise could have been bestowed upon a speaker than was given me. I marveled at the space devoted to a resume of my talks, even when I had to compete with that incomparable orator and that most beautiful women, Maud Ballington Booth. In announcing my appearance with big headlines the Winona Indiana Assembly Review called me "Queen of the Race, the Leading Colored Woman of the World" and printed enconiums from the press on my training, the work I had done and the success I had achieved on the lecture platform. The Clarinda Iowa Herald's opening comment after I had delivered an address was as follows: "Mrs. Mary Church Terrell has come and spoken and conquered. She came on Tuesday afternoon. She delivered her address on the work of colored women a short time after she arrived, and last evening she was the lionness of the hour. She won all by her beautiful unassuming manner, her sweet face and her stirring, inspiring words. Her appeal for justice to her brethren and sisters was powerful and pathetic. It is in the first time a [?lrinda] audience has heard Mrs. Terrell and now that we have heard her on our own platform we feel highly honored. By her words she has given the people of Clrinda and vicinity a higher regard for the colored race, and inspired them to feel that justice and equality must be granted to the weaker people. Mrs. Terrell's subject this evening will be 22 Harriet Beecher Stowe. At least 2,500 people listened to her lecture Tuesday afternoon, in spite of the great heat. Mrs. Terrell is a handsome woman - a wonderful woman. Her race has cause to be very proud that they have such a woman. among them." "She Won All Hearts" was another headline in the press report of my talk at a Chautauqua in the West. "The colored race need no better proof of its bright side than the existence of a woman like Mrs. Church Terrell," was the opening sentence. "Graceful, magnetic, bearing the unmistakeable stamp of [b???] culture, education and refinement, a woman whose vast knowledge of her own and other races left her far above the average woman of whatever color, she stood upon the platform yesterday and captured the hearts of her audience." The Danville Illionois Daily News declared "Mrs. Terrell well deserves the title "The Female Booker T Washington," tho she needs not the title to aid her to the intellectual and oratorical world. Her addresses are the pure gold with less dross of nonsense than any lecturer that has come upon the stage of this Chautauqua. From the first to the last she has something to say, and says it as a cultured ladu, in the best of English, which has no tinge of the hifalutin or the sensational. Such speakers are rare. She should be paid to travel as a model of good English and good manners." I considered that high praise indeed to be bestowed upon any woman, particularly upon a woman of African descent, for some of the most famous lecturers of the country had appeared at that particular Chautauqua. I doubt that it would be possible for me or any other colored woman to receive such complimentary notices in the press of this country at the present time. Although I was warned by some of my friends not to present certain facts showing the injustice and brutality to which colored people are sometimes subjected, for fear it might do more harm than good, I felt that I could be true neither to myself nor to my race, if I did not touch upon this phase of the subject. I never failed, therefore, to tell the truth about the barbarities perpetrated upon representatives of the race, when I discussed the problem. For that reason the following comment upon my address pleased me greatly: 23 Saturday's Asembly closed with an address by the colored orator, Mary Church Terrell of Washington on "The Bright Side of a Dark Subject." She fired no pyrotechnics. She touched lightly on southern bonfire lit with living, human flesh. She only incidentally hinted at the flaying of live negroes and other holiday sports whereby the "superior race" whiles away the festive hour, The whole discourse was lacking in all efforts at blood-curdling and blood-boiling effects:" I was glad to see that it is possible to present the facts concerning the injustice and brutality of which colored people are often the victims without being misrepresented and denounced by the press for exaggerating and tearing passion to tatters for effect. Never, from the minute I first stepped upon the lecture platform till to day have I made any effort whatsoever to induce newspaper men to give me write ups of any kind. The favorable, complimentary notices which I received at their hands were given me gratuitously. I doubt very much that I or any other colored woman could exert enough influence or bring enough pressure to bear upon newspaper reporters to induce them unduly to bestow praise where it did not belong. 24 Notable Lecture Engagements During my career on the lecture platform I have spoken for individuals of all classes, ages and kinds and for organizations founded for almost every purpose imaginable. I have spoken literally from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Canada to the Gulf. For instance, I once spoke in New York City for Marcus Garvey, when he was just beginning to preach his doctrine of Africa for the Africans, before he became so amitious as to try to buy a steamer on which adventurous colored people could sail from the United States to the homes of their ancestors in Africa. In the New England States especially I have been invited to deliver addresses for the Young Men's Cristian Association. I seized these opportunities eagerly, It was a fine chance to present certain facts to the wide-awake responsive men who at that time usually attended the Sunday afternoon meetings and who always seemed to me to be open to conviction, no matter what subject was discussed nor what opinion the speaker expressed. Addressing the Forum meetings in some of the New England States also gave me an excellent opportunity of imparting information to those who were really interested in the Race Problem and who knew unbelievably little about it. But my experience at the Ford Hall meeting in Boston stands out conspicuously in my mind. I had been invited by Mr. George Coleman who was then president of the organization to address a Sunday evening meeting and I cheerfully accepted the invitation. I had met Mr. and Mrs. Coleman in Atlanta, Georgia, when I delivered an address at the celebration of the 25th anniversary of Spellman Seminary in which they were both deeply interested, and which was then the largest school for colored girls, not only in the United States, but in the whole world. John D. Rockefeller was one of the principal patrons of the school, because an aunt or some other member of his family had been one of the founders. Mrs. Coleman entertained me in her home, when I came to fill this Ford Hall engagement and invited some of her friends to dine with us Sunday after noon. During the conversation at the table one of the guests asked me if I 25 felt equal to answering all the questions the audience would ask me that night. Although I had often heard about the Sunday evening meetings which were held in Ford Hall, for some reason or other I did not know that people in the audience were accustomed to ask the speaker to answer any questions which they wished. When I learned that was the custom at that dinner table, if I had been given to fainting, I should certainly have fallen out in a fit. No human being could have possibly dreaded an ordeal more than I did that to which I knew I should be subjected within a few hours, unless it be one condemned to be electrocuted or hanged at the expiration of that time. If I could have run away somewhere and broken the engagement without being disgraced myself and disgracing the race in the bargain, I should have done so. But a colored woman who loves her race and wants to help give it a good reputation is always careful to do nothing which will bring it into disrepute, no matter how great the sacrifice to avoid doing so may be. But, like most ordeals in this world it was not nearly so terrible as I anticipated it would be. To tell the truth I enjoyed it immensely. It was easy to answer the questions, because most of them were so simple that any colored person who had thought seriously about the problem at all could have answered them with ease. I had not realized till then how little even intelligent white people know about conditions which confront our colored group. The experience at Ford Hall in this respect was duplicated every time I addressed a Forum audience, when the speaker was requested to answer questions which the audience propounded. It mattered not whether I spoke in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island or New York the questions asked were practically the same and the evidence that those intelligent people possessed comparatively little knowledge about the race problem was equally convincing. At every meeting invariably somebody asked me what I thought about the intermarriage of the races. That seemed to agitate the minds of my auditors - particularly the men - more than anything else. "Do you think it is right or wise for white people to marry colored people," was asked me every time I spoke and was expected to reply to questions put to me by those who 155 But once it was impossible for me to respond to this call, and as the fates would have it on that very day several women were arrested for picketing and sent to Occoquan, when I was absent from my post. The following letter dated January 20, 1921 notified me that a pin was to be presented to me along with others for the service I had rendered the cause. "Dear Fellow Picket", it read, "The National Woman's Party wishes to present to each woman who has ever picketed, whether she was imprisoned or not, a picket pin in memory of our picket days together. We will present these pins on the evening of February 18th during our national convention which meets in Washington February 15th and late through February 18th. We hope to make the ceremony of giving the pins a dignified and impressive one and want, by this ceremony, to show appreciation of the militant workers in our campaign of whom we are all proud. We ask each picket to wear upon this evening a white dress, and, if possible, white shoes and stockings. A room will be provided adjoining the hall in which wraps may be left during the ceremony." And so it happened that on February 18th, 1921, both my daughter, Phyllis, and myself were each presented a pin at the Washington Hotel by the National Women's Party, because we helped picket the White House as a protest against the disenfranchisement of women. There is no doubt that this gesture on the part of group of determined women called attention to the injustice perpetrated upon them by denying them the suffrage and hastened the passage of the 19th amendment. Transcribed and reviewed by contributors participating in the By The People project at crowd.loc.gov.